Quality Improvement Project (QIP) Reporting Tool



Similar documents
Medicare Advantage Quality Improvement Project Reporting Template

Medicare Managed Care Manual Chapter 5 - Quality Assessment

EQR PROTOCOLS INTRODUCTION

EQR PROTOCOL 6 CALCULATION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES

EQR PROTOCOL 1: ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGULATIONS

MEDICARE PARTICIPATING PHYSICIAN OR SUPPLIER AGREEMENT

2012 EXTERNAL QUALITY REVIEW (EQR) PROTOCOLS

Special Needs Plan Model of Care 101

Key Points about Star Ratings from the CMS 2016 Final Call Letter

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Summit Health Plan of Florida

EQR PROTOCOL 1 ASSESSING MCO COMPLIANCE WITH MEDICAID AND CHIP MANAGED CARE REGULATIONS

STAR RATINGS FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PLANS

Medicare Advantage 101. Michael Taylor, PhD Medicare Advantage Branch Manager Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Atlanta Regional Office

EQR PROTOCOL 2 VALIDATION OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORTED BY THE MCO

2014 Model of Care Training SHP_ A

8/14/2012 California Dual Demonstration DRAFT Quality Metrics

A. IEHP Quality Management Program Description

Performance Evaluation Report Kaiser Prepaid Health Plan (KP Cal, LLC) Marin and Sonoma Counties July 1, 2009 June 30, 2010

EQR PROTOCOL 4 VALIDATION OF ENCOUNTER DATA REPORTED BY THE MCO

[Document Identifier: CMS-10003, CMS-10467, CMS-1450(UB-04), CMS-1500(08-05)]

Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call

Quality Improvement Program

Medicare: 2015 Model of Care Training 04/2015

SYNOPSIS OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

SERVICES OFFERED: Yearly Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) Quarterly Targeted Medication Review (TMR)

Arrah Tabe-Bedward Director, Medicare Enrollment & Appeals Group

2014 Quality Improvement and Utilization Management Evaluation Summary

State Medicaid HIT Plan (SMHP) Overview

This form is used to advise Medicare of the person or persons you have chosen to have access to your personal health information.

Special Needs Plans Structure & Process Measures. Policy Clarifications and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Solicitation for Applications for Medicare Prescription Drug Plan 2017 Contracts

empireblue.com Empire Dual Advantage (HMO SNP) Dental-Yes Identification Number: Group: Issuer (80840): Rx Group: RX Bin: RxPCN:

HEALTH ALLIANCE MEDICAL PLANS 2015 QUALITY and MEDICAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STRUCTURE

2015 HEDIS/CAHPS Effectiveness of Care Report for 2014 Service Measures Oregon, Idaho and Montana Commercial Business

Medicare Basics and Medicare Advantage

Welcome! Medicare Advantage. Elderplan Advantage Institutional Special Needs Plan

Medication Therapy Management (MTM) Program

The Virtual TeleConsult Clinic:

Independent diagnostic testing FacIlItIes site InvestIgatIon 42 cfr

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health and Life Insurance Company Commercial Lines of Business

DSOEA NEW HIRE BENEFIT GUIDE. Dearborn Schools Employee Healthcare Program

SNP Model of Care Provider Training

Contra Cost Health Plan Quality Program Summary November, 2013

An Update on Medicare Parts C & D Performance Measures

HEDIS, STAR Performance Metrics. Sheila Linehan, RN,MPH, CPHQ Director of QM, Horizon BCBSNJ July 16, 2014

Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes DRAFT

Introduction to Medication Management Systems, Inc. Comprehensive Medication Therapy Management Solutions

NetworkCares (PPO SNP) 2016 Model of Care Training. H5215_360r1_ NHIC 12/2015 m-cnm-ncprovpres-1215

NCQA Health Plan Accreditation. Rigorous. Flexible. Superior.

PSYCHIATRIC UNIT CRITERIA WORK SHEET

Introductory Guide to Medicare Part C and D

The Role of Oversight and Monitoring and the Use of Analytics to Increase Effectiveness of your Compliance Program

Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) strives to make information available to all. Nevertheless, portions of our files including

2015 Quality Improvement Program Description

CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System

7/31/2014. Medicare Advantage: Time to Re-examine Your Engagement Strategy. Avalere Health. Eric Hammelman, CFA. Overview

Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes

Gale P. Arden, Director ~ Disabled and Elderly Healt~Programs Group. Medicaid Obligations for Cost-Sharing in Medicare Part C Plans

PBM s: Helping to Improve MA-PD Star Scores. James Brehany PharmD, PA-C, JD Associate Vice President, Pharmacy Services PerformRx

Safeguard Your Medicare by Understanding Medicare Advantage Plans. The Medicare Fraud Program. with the Colorado Division of Insurance

Medicare Advantage Stars: Are the Grades Fair?

Medicare Advantage Star Ratings The Compliance View

Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes

POLICY AND PROCEDURE RELATING TO HEALTH UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Medicare Advantage special needs plans

Medicare Health & Drug Plan Quality and Performance Ratings 2013 Part C & Part D Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT

July 27 th, Dear Acting Director Slavitt,

Center for Medicaid and State Operations/Survey and Certification Group

Health Care Reform Update January 2012 MG LILLY USA, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

VNS CHOICE: Managing Complex Care Needs for the Frail Elderly of New York City. Roberta Brill Vice President, VNS Health Plans

Shoot For The Stars. Medicare Advantage Plans. Quality Scores Drive Participation 1

Aetna Better Health Aetna Better Health Kids. Quality Management Utilization Management Program Evaluation

GUILDNET HEALTH ADVANTAGE MODEL OF CARE

CSBG Model State Plan: Major Revisions

Transcription:

Quality Improvement Project (QIP) Reporting Tool A. Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO) Information MAO Name Contract # Identification # MAO Location Contact Person Name Title Telephone Email MAO Plan Type: HMO PPO PFFS SNP: Other Chronic (type) Dual Eligible Institutional Project Cycle: (drop down) Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Other B. Background Quality Improvement Project (QIP) Topic: Clinical Non-clinical Domain: (if applicable) Clinical An organizational improvement project focused on the structure and processes that will enhance care and services to Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO) plan enrollees in order to improve health outcomes. These include but are not limited to: prevention and wellness programs; care management; utilization management criteria and guidelines; peer review; medical technology review; pharmaceutical management procedures; medical record criteria; and processes to enhance communication and continuity of care between practitioners and providers. Non-clinical An organizational project focused on improving and enhancing health plan policies and procedures, benefit and coverage information and service standards (customer service, appeals and grievances) in order to ensure timely access and delivery of services to the MAO enrollees. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0938-1023. The time required to complete this information is estimated to average 5 hours per response. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: CMS 7500 Security Boulevard, Attn: PRA Reports Clearance Officer, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1580.

PLAN C. Data Sources Used for Problem Identification (Check all that apply) Medical Records Claims (Medical, Pharmacy, Laboratory) Appointment Data Plan Data (complaints, appeals, customer service) Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Tools Surveys (enrollee, beneficiary satisfaction, other) Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Institutional SNP MAO Part C Reporting Requirements Encounter Data Audit Findings Health Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS ) Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS ) Registries Other Sources D. Based on Model of Care (Check all that apply) Not Applicable Description of SNP Population Measurable Goals Staff Structure & Care Management Roles Interdisciplinary Care Team (ICT) Provider Network Having Special Expertise & Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines MOC Training HRA Individualized Care Plans Communication Network Care Management for the Most Vulnerable Populations Performance & Health Outcome Measurement 2

E. Basis of Selection Please provide an overall description of the QIP for the year: E1. Description of the QIP E2. Impact on Member E3. Anticipated Outcome E4. Rationale for Selection Health Outcomes Member Satisfaction Other F. Prior Focus Describe any previous attempts to address the problem. Previous Cycle Other (Previously studied but not presented as a QIP) F1.Cycle/ Year F2. Intervention (actions taken to achieve goal) F3. Outcome Achieved F4. Priority Assessed G. Project Goal and Benchmark G1. Target Goal and Benchmark: G1a. Target Goal: G1b. Benchmark: G1c. Rationale: Baseline Internal External G1d. Planned Intervention G1e. Inclusion Criteria G1f. Methodology G1g. Timeframe 3

G2. Risk Assessment: G2a. Intervention Auto Populate G2b.Target Audience G2c. Anticipated Barrier G2d. Mitigation Plan H. Plan Project Approval: (Medical Director) This section to be completed by the responsible person. Name of Individual Title E-mail Address Phone Date of Approval I. CMS Regional Office Approval Yes No Reason: Name of Individual Title Date of Approval The above information will remain in the system for reporting in subsequent years. 4

DO J. Project Implementation Review and Revisions J1. Goal and Benchmark: J1a. Goal: Auto populate J1b. Benchmark: Auto populate J1c. Intervention Actions taken to achieve the goal (Auto Populate from Plan Section) J1d. Target Audience (Auto Populate from Plan Section) J1e. Timeframe (Auto Populate from Plan Section) J1f. Barriers Encountered J2. Mitigation Plan for Risk Assessment: J2b. Intervention J2a. Mitigation Plan Complete all applicable sections. J2c. Timeframe J2d. Target Audience J2e. Measurement Methodology J2f. Rationale J2g. Anticipated Impact on Goal 5

Study K. Results K1. Intervention: Auto Populate from Plan Section K2. Project Cycle/Year K3. Time Frame (Auto populate from Plan section) K4. Sample Size or Total Populatio n (Number) K5. Numerato r (skip if not applicable) K6. Denominator (skip if not applicable) K7. Results and/or Percentage K8. Other Data or Results K9. Target Goal (Auto populate from Plan section) K10. Benchmar k (Auto populate from Plan section) Baseline Remeasurement Period #1 Remeasurement Period #2 Remeasurement Period #3 6

ACT L. Summary of Findings or Study Conclusions L1. Study Findings/ Conclusions L2. State if any Best Practices resulted from the findings. L3. Describe any Lessons Learned (Narrative) (Narrative) (Narrative) M. Root Cause Analysis Description Goal/Progress Not Achieved: M1. Intervention (Auto Populate from Plan Section) M2. Root Cause Analysis M3. Action Plan (Drop down boxes) Revise intervention Revise methodology Change goal Other N. Action Plan Description N1. Next Steps N2. Action Plan (Description of how next steps will be implemented) O. Next Steps Goal Met/Progress Demonstrated (Check all that apply): Adopt change Revise process Apply lessons learned to other areas Implement policy change Issue resolved, no need for further study Other (describe) 7