QATAR UNIVERSITY Non-Academic Unit Review (NUR)



Similar documents
Strategic Plan 2010/2013 Office of the Vice President for Institutional Planning and Development June 2010

Guidelines for Strategic Planning

Policy Abstract. for the. Handbook for Program Review: Cleveland State University s Self-Study Process for Growth and Change Spring 2005

The University of North Texas at Dallas Policy Manual

BYLAWS OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY ARTICLE I. Name

Senate Policy on the Review of Undergraduate Programs at Saint Mary's University Policy Number: University Senate Approved: March 12, 2010

College of Business Faculty Charter. Code of Operating Standards for Academic Policy and Administrative Structure

ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW PROCEDURES (Form 1) THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA rev. June 2014

Organizational Report for Post-Baccalaureate Non-Degree Educator Preparation Programs. (Institution, Organization, or LEA name)

QUALITY ASSURANCE HANDBOOK. Policies, procedures and resources to guide undergraduate and graduate program development and improvement at UOIT

Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process

Nipissing University Institutional Quality Assurance Process: Policy and Procedures (IQAP)

University of Minnesota Medical School Periodic External Reviews

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI I AT MĀNOA

International Agreements

CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE. Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process

STATUS OF EMPLOYMENT:

Scientific Cores/Service Centers Administrative Manual. Responsible Office: Associate Provost for Research. Introduction

Non-Academic (Departmental) Assessment

AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING GRADUATE SCHOOL POLICIES

Professional Education Unit

Faculty of Health Sciences Master of Nursing Graduate Supervision Manual A guide for faculty and students

Sociology Department Faculty Expectations Handbook For Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

Policies and Procedures for Graduate Assistantships (GAs) at QU

School of Social Work Stephen F. Austin State University

Program Review - The University of Graduate Programs

Strategic Planning Procedure Manual

Academic Program Review Manual

A New Approach to Needs Assessment and Communication to Connect and Collaborate with Faculty

A. An estimation of the soundness of the applicant s proposal, such as:

ORDINANCE 22 UNIVERSITY OF LONDON RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

CENG Strategic Planning

ABET SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE: TEMPLATE FOR A SELF-STUDY REPORT Review Cycle

PROCEDURES FOR ACADEMIC FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL STAFF SALARIES

GRADUATE SCHOOL SPRING 2012 PHD PROGRAM REVIEW SUMMARY REPORT

College Entrance - The Importance of a Performance Evaluation

University Of Alaska Anchorage College Of Health Department Of Human Services. Criteria and Guidelines For Faculty Evaluation

The Belk College of Business Policy Statement on Academic and Professional Qualifications

Bylaws of the Department of Agricultural Education and Communication University of Florida Approved October 7, 2009

Computer Science Department College of Arts & Sciences State University of West Georgia

Guidelines for the Annual Assessment and Fifth Year Review of Centers and Institutes

Proposed UNTHSC School of Public Health. Faculty Bylaws. May 4, 2012

GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 GRADUATE PROGRAMS

Guidelines for the Development of Certificate Programs University of Nebraska at Kearney

PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR FACULTY AND DEPARTMENTS The Graduate School of NMSU Revised on March 19, 2013

Policies for Evaluating Faculty: Recommendations for Incorporating Student and Peer Reviews in the Faculty Evaluation Process DRAFT

The Constitution of The Informatics Research. Group At. Indiana University Kokomo

OIPD Customer Satisfaction Survey: Spring 2011

Community College of Philadelphia Administrative Function and Support Service Audit Learning Lab Executive Summary

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Process

The University of Central Arkansas. Strategic Planning

PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) Bylaws for Program Structure

Founded Standards and Indicators for the Accreditation of Online Academies

Standards for Faculty Sufficiency & Faculty Qualifications

Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013

Academic Program Review

Community-Based Program Review at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Trudy W. Banta

Weber State University Information Technology

ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW GUIDELINES

DOC Actions pertaining to degree programs and academic departments

Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

Link to University's Strategic Plan (Strategy #) Goal 1.1 Strategy 1.1.1

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 3

GUIDELINES FOR ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW For self-studies due to the Office of the Provost on October 1, 2015 CENTERS

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY. The Graduate School. Graduate Degree Program Review. Revised Format for the Self-Study Report

University of Georgia Bylaws of the College of Public Health

Graduate School Policies and Procedures

Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements

2011 Outcomes Assessment Accreditation Handbook

Graduate Students Employed as Teaching Assistants and Graduate Part-time Instructors

Getting Started. PRINTABLE COPIES: Access to a printable version of this document and the forms and samples referenced are available at:

Student and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet

Institutional Quality Assurance Process. University of Ottawa

Supporting Academic Staff Guidelines

Instructions for Preparing the Self-Study Report, Doctoral Programs

Iona College. Comprehensive Academic Program Review

School of Nursing (B.ScN, MN, PhD)

Tenure Consideration. Department of Foreign Language Studies Criteria and Procedures for Tenure and Promotion

EVALUATION OF TEACHING AND COURSES POLICY

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

CAMPUS GUIDE TO THE NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM APPROVAL PROCESS

GUIDELINES FOR MN THESES

Unit Plan for Assessing and Improving Student Learning in Degree Programs

SFCC PERSONAL LEARNING AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF STAFF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTAPPRAISAL POLICY 4-38

Program Review Guidelines Undergraduate Programs

The CSUCM Program

Program Review. Social Work: BSW Follow-Up Report. College of Health Professions. October 2010 MARSHALL UNIVERSITY

Rules of Organization and Bylaws Gladys A. Kelce College of Business

New Degree Program Proposals INTERNAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL

Governance Of Teacher Education Programs

Board Policy 7215 Faculty, Counselor and Librarian Responsibilities

UNO College of Business Administration (CBA) Requirements regarding Academically Qualified (AQ) and Professionally Qualified (PQ) Faculty

Guidelines on Employment of Graduate Assistants Third Edition. The Graduate School, New Mexico State University Revised August 1, 2008

media relations 2.10 Media relations serves as a portal through which accurate and consistent information passes.

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATE COUNCIL

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY

Department of Criminal Justice BYLAWS. CHAPTER I Department Organization and Bylaws

College of Natural and Social Sciences Guidelines on Promotion and Tenure

Proposed: USF System Policy Number: Subject: Faculty Credentials for Teaching Undergraduate and Graduate Courses

Transcription:

QATAR UNIVERSITY Non-Academic Unit Review (NUR) 0

GENERAL_ Non-Academic Unit Review (NUR)_0XX Contents: Purpose Who Should Know This Policy Policy Description Definitions Responsibility Policy Statements Procedure Version Number: 5 Effective Date: Reviewed by EMC on: 15 Sep 2015 Approved by President/Board of Regents on: 15 Sep 2015 Purpose The purpose of this policy is to govern the Non-Academic Unit Review process and provide the necessary guidelines and timeframe to be followed. The Office of the Vice President for Institutional Planning and Development (VPIPD) is responsible for overseeing and monitoring the implementation of this policy and accompanying procedures. Who Should Know This Policy President Vice President Legal Advisor Dean Director / Departmental Head Faculty Accounting/ Finance Personnel Student All Employees NUR 1

Policy Description To ensure a systematic and consistent review process of all non-academic units at QU. 1. Definitions 1. Endorsed Recommendations Report: The final recommendations report endorsed by the EMC. 2. Peer External Reviewer: A person from outside the University selected by the committee. 3. Follow-up Report: A report prepared by NURC that includes the status and actions taken for each endorsed recommendations. 4. Master Calendar: A five-year calendar that shows the NUR review schedule. 5. Peer External Reviewer Report: A report prepared by the external peer reviewer based on the study of SSR and interaction with the unit head, to evaluate and provide feedback on the unit being reviewed. 6. QU Community: Any person hired by QU such as Faculty, Administrator and Researcher. 7. Review and Recommendations Report: A report prepared by NURC that highlights the most important findings and committee recommendations based on the SSR, interactions with the Unit head and the peer external reviewer report. 8. Self-Study Report (SSR): A report compiled by the reviewed unit to collect documents, data, information, and any other material necessary to provide a comprehensive description of the unit, and how it supports the mission and strategic plan of the university. 9. Non-Academic Units (NU): All non-degree granting programs. 10. Non-Academic Unit Review (NUR): A systematic process to ensure the quality and relevance of student support services, faculty and staff related administrative services, and the efficient use of resources. 11. Non-Academic Unit Review Committee (NURC): A committee formed by the VPIPD, which includes one representative from OIPD, a maximum of four representatives from the QU community, and one peer external reviewer per service unit being reviewed. 12. VPIPD: Vice President of Institutional Planning and Development. 2. Responsibility Executive Management Committee (EMC) Review the Review and Recommendations Report submitted by NURC for the endorsement of any necessary recommendations. Review the Follow-up Report. Peer External Reviewer Review SSR submitted by the unit and prepare the Peer External Reviewer Report. Amend the Peer External Reviewer Report submitted to reflect any agreed changes based on discussions between the committee and the Unit head. NUR 2

Non-Academic Unit Prepare a self-study report provided by the NURC and provide all data required to justify the contents in SSR. Meet with NURC to discuss the contents of SSR and any other missing points that need to be highlighted for the performance of the Unit. Meet with EMC and NURC to discuss the suggested recommendations. Prepare action plans to start the implementation of the endorsed recommendations. Submit feedback on status of actions taken to implement each of the recommendations. Meet with NURC to discuss the implementation of their action plan. Non-Academic Unit Review Committee (NURC) Assist units in preparing their Self-Study Reports by providing directions, recommendations and answering questions. Review Self-Study Reports submitted by units under review. Meet with the unit s head and evaluate reports for any necessary concerns or recommendations. Submit a report with recommendations to the VP, Planning and Development based on the results of reviewing the Self-Study Report and meetings with unit heads and staff. Prepare the Endorsed Recommendations Report based on the feedback of the EMC and send it to the units. Prepare a Follow-up Report to highlight the actions implemented to address the endorsed recommendations, and submit it to the EMC. 3. Policy Statements 1. All non-academic units at Qatar University shall undergo the Non-Academic Unit Review once every five years. (Research units will not be reviewed by NURC) 2. NURC members are appointed by VPIPD for the five-year cycle. The peer external reviewers are selected by the committee according to the unit being reviewed, whose role is considered completed once the review is finalized. 3. The Non-Academic Unit Review process should provide sufficient evidence to decide whether to enhance, reduce, maintain, eliminate, outsource, reorganize, or conduct further assessment of the unit. 4. A master review calendar to evaluate all units reviews shall be developed, reviewed by (VPIPD) and approved by the Executive Management Committee (EMC). 5. Units may request to postpone their review by one academic course in advance from the VPIPD. NUR 3

6. Units should develop action plans and should be accountable for implementing them. 7. Based on available data and initial reviews, the EMC may recommend additional and/or more frequent reviews of a particular unit if determined necessary. 4. Procedure 4.1 UNIT SELF-REVIEW 1. VPIPD sends an official communication to the persons in charge of units selected for review informing them about the Support Service Review policy, related process, timelines, and the Self-Study Report template. Simultaneously, the committee selects external reviewers to be part of the NURC according to the characteristics of the unit under review. 2. The unit completes the SSR by collecting data, information, and any other material necessary to provide a comprehensive description of the unit, and how it supports the mission and strategic plan of the university. 3. The unit submits the SSR to the NURC within one academic semester from the official communication in step 1. 4.2 COMMITTEE REVIEW 1. At the beginning of each NUR cycle, VPIPD sends the NUR Master Calendar through an official communication to the persons in charge of units selected for NUR. 2. Once the report is received by the NURC, it reviews the report to understand the services provided by the unit, and its strengths and weaknesses. 3. The Peer External Reviewer completes the Peer External Reviewer Report within two weeks to reflect his/her feedback on the SSR, and submits it to the committee. The NURC will provide the External Reviewer with any other information needed 4. The NURC meets with the unit head to discuss the content of the SSR and ask the peer reviewer to make amendments to the Peer External Reviewer Report, if needed. 5. Once the report is finalized, it is sent to the VPIPD and the EMC. Thereafter, a meeting with the EMC will be arranged. 6. The EMC discusses the recommendations of the committee and may amend as needed. 7. The NURC meets with the EMC in the presence of the unit head to discuss the review and recommendations report. 8. The NURC prepares the Endorsed Recommendations Report to include the recommendations approved by the EMC. The report is then sent to all NURC members for documentation purposes and to the unit head. 9. The unit prepares action plans within three months to implement these recommendations, and updates their strategic plan accordingly. 10. The OIPD representative reviews the strategic plan of the unit to make sure actions related to the implementation of the endorsed recommendations are included. NUR 4

4.3 FOLLOW-UP 1. NURC contacts the units that were reviewed a year earlier to report on the status of their recommendations. 2. NURC prepares a Follow-Up Report based on the discussions with the units, including the status and actions taken for each endorsed recommendation. 3. NURC sends the Follow-Up report to the EMC for their review. The EMC may request further meetings to discuss any major challenges or issues. NUR 5