Central Office and Non-Teacher Appraisal System



Similar documents
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610

Performance Appraisal Policy. Purpose

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS

James Rumsey Technical Institute Employee Performance and Effectiveness Evaluation Procedure

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. Teacher Performance Appraisal

Ph.D. in School Psychology Academic Assessment Plan

Performance Appraisal Process

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

Participant Guidebook

A L D I N E I N D E P E N D E N T S C H O O L D I S T R I C T Aldine-Westfield Road Houston, Texas (281)

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL

Job Description Lemon Grove School District DIRECTOR, SPECIAL EDUCATION

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals

The Behavior Specialist shall report to the Executive Director of Special Education.

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Human Resources REORGANIZATION 1

to DTU/DCPS Non Economic Teacher. Tentative Agreement #1

Long Beach Community College District Date Adopted: January 30, CLASS SPECIFICATION Director, Classified Human Resources

CPSY 585 School Psychology Practicum, 2

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

ALLAN HANCOCK JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PART-TIME FACULTY ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE (Credit)

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT for COOK ISLANDS PRINCIPALS

*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM

VOLUSIA FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING School Psychologist 2 BASIC/DEVELOPING/ NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

Texas Principal Evaluation and Support System FAQ

Annual Performance Evaluation Form

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

Teacher Appraisal. Houston Independent School District

preparatory courses design pre-master s

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan

Job Description of the School Psychologist Reports To: Supervises: Purpose:

Careers in Education. Pre-school, daycare Education

Understanding District-Determined Measures

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.

Teacher Performance Evaluation System

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

School: 1. For each of the performance standards, rate the counselor using the following scale: Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised I. Introduction

GRADING SYSTEMS

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

Edmonton Catholic Schools is now accepting applications for the position of

DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators. DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists

DESERT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TUTORING AND ACADEMIC SKILLS CENTER (TASC) AND SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION (SI) BASIC FUNCTION

COURSE SYLLABUS COVER SHEET Lewis & Clark College Graduate School of Education and Counseling

MUNIS certification reference rev. Rev. Aug. 2012

NCLB and the Highly Qualified Teacher

Respiratory Therapy Career Ladder Model

one year courses digital image creation for luxury brands

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x

Fayetteville Technical Community College PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL

University of California, Berkeley

SBBC: JJ-002 FL: 28 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB DESCRIPTION. Approved School-based Administrators Salary Schedule

Professional Education Competence Program

Appendix D: Faculty Evaluation Form Second/Third Year Appointments

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF BILINGUAL/ESL ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

one year courses cosmetic and fragrance marketing & management

Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3

The Organization: Leadership, Resources, Faculty and Staff Worksheet

Director of Human Resources

School Psychologist Performance Appraisal Instrument

Assuring flexibility to educational platforms Case study: UniBuc Virtual Campus

PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION - STRUCTURED LEARNING CLASS PROGRAM

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Transcription:

Houston Independent School District Office of Accountability and Rewards Central Office and Non-Teacher Appraisal System Appraisal Training Last Revised October 2011

Purpose of the Appraisal System It is the intent of the District to provide an appraisal system that will allow central office managers and principals to focus on core competencies and measurements needed to ensure success and to optimize individual and department performance that align strategically with district goals. The eperformance Appraisal System for non-instructional will serve as a conduit for ongoing feedback on goal attainment, employee performance, and alignment to district goals for central office employees and for those employees who are assigned to campus-based non-teacher positions. 2

What s New Timelines and procedures around the appraisal process for non-teachers will generally remain the same as previously What s new? New appraisal instrument and Performance Goals Worksheet New Professional Development Plan (PDP) form New Prescriptive Plan for Assistance (PPA) form Progress Conference (mid-year checkpoint of progress towards goals) These changes will allow the district to: Transition to a more integrated technology platform (from OASyS to eperformance in PeopleSoft) that can be better supported by IT Update the non-teacher appraisals to reflect more robust set of performance criteria and drive consistent expectations for performance Ensure alignment of goals across the district, departments/campuses, and individual employees Positions affected: Any campus employee whose job code is other than teacher, including: Full and part-time employees, i.e. academic tutors, hourly lecturers Itinerant teachers from Special Education and Community Services Campus appraisers will not appraise the following: Special Ed (speech therapists, evaluation specialists, psychologists, social workers), custodial, food services, police 3

General Information The eperformance appraisal instrument in the PeopleSoft application will be used to evaluate the job performance of all HISD central office employees and campus-based employees whose job code is other than classroom teacher. All HISD central office and campus-based personnel shall be appraised annually in accordance with the appropriate appraisal calendar. This includes full and part time employees, tutors, hourly, etc... (Board Policy - DN(LOCAL)) 4

Appraisal Process Goal Setting August - October Progress Conference December - March (completion dates vary by duty schedule) For the 2011-2012 transitional year, this deadline is extended to December 16, 2011. End-of-Year Conference March - July (completion dates vary by duty schedule) Continuous observation, documentation of performance concerns, feedback to employees through: Memorandums Conferences, followed with Conference Summary Memorandums 5

Appraisers Each employee shall be assigned one appraiser during the appraisal year. The department head or campus principal makes appraiser assignments and can change the assignments when necessary. 6

Conferences Each appraiser will meet individually with each assigned employee at least three times during an appraisal year: Goal Setting, Progress, and End of Year conferences. Additional conferences may be requested by the appraiser or employee at any time. Every effort shall be made to honor the request by both parties. Employees are allowed representation at a Conference for the Record, which is a conference with the employee to address disciplinary action. Regular conferences related to the appraisal process do not require representation. 7

Performance Goals Department heads/principals will determine specific department or campus goals that align with the goals of the district. Additionally, every employee will be appraised by six district-wide individual goals that align with department and district goals: o Leadership o People and Team Development o Judgment and Decision-Making o Planning/Organization o Customer Focus o Interpersonal Effectiveness Appraisers can add additional individual goals that are more job specific. 8

Performance Ratings There are five levels of performance defined for the individual employee appraisal: E = Exemplary EE = Exceeds Expectations SP = Solid Performance D = Developing U = Unsatisfactory Using this scale, at the end of the year appraisers will rate an employee s performance against the goals for the year. 9

Evidence Appraisers are required to collect sufficient documentation to support appraisal ratings. Evidence that will inform the appraisal ratings shall be shared in writing with the employee: within 10 working days of receipt or knowledge of occurrence for central office employee and campus-based employees appraised through their departments; within10 instructional days for campus-based employees who are appraised by campus administrators. Appraisers shall establish and maintain an appraisal file for each employee he or she appraises. An employee may ask for and receive a copy of his/her file. All appraisal files and documentation within are confidential. 10

Third Party Evidence The assigned appraiser may use Third Party evidence to inform the appraisal ratings. District policy, DN(LOCAL), must be followed regarding Third Party evidence. All documentation is confidential. 11

Professional Development Plan Each employee will complete a Professional Development Plan (PDP) and submit it to his or her appraiser by October 31. The deadline can be extended for the 2011-2012 transitional year. The PDP identifies 1-2 professional development opportunities for the year, based on the goals and expectations for the job. Late hires will create a PDP: within 15 working days from the hire date (central office employees and campusbased employees appraised by their department supervisor); within 15 instructional days (campus-based employees who are appraised by a campus appraiser). The PDP is a living document and can be changed collaboratively by the employee and appraiser throughout the year. 12

Professional Development Plan (SAMPLE) Develop technology skills to increase workflow efficiency Increase knowledge and understanding of appraisal processes etrain course Microsoft Access- Advanced Users etrain course Microsoft Excel- Advanced Users On-line Moodle courses: TADs and eperformance Appraisal Systems Fall Semester/S. Smith Spring Semester/S. Smith Fall Semester/S. Smith Increase leadership skills and knowledge base to be considered for leadership position Sr. Manager of the Department 13

Prescriptive Plan for Assistance An appraiser shall create a Prescriptive Plan for Assistance (PPA) for any employee whose job performance becomes a concern or whose ratings at the Progress or End of Year conferences indicate a need for improvement. Please note that a Developing rating on any criterion may not require a PPA; however, if performance is regressing, or not improving, a PPA would be required. 14

Prescriptive Plan for Assistance (SAMPLE FORM) 15

Grievance/Dispute Resolution An employee may submit a written response or rebuttal at the following times: after receiving any written documentation associated with the employee s performance/appraisal; after receiving a written annual appraisal report. Any written response or rebuttal must be submitted: within ten working days from central office employees and campus-based employees appraised through their departments; within ten instructional days from campus-based employees who are appraised by campus administrators. An employee may initiate the grievance process regarding content or process at any time during the appraisal year. DGBA(LOCAL) 16

Appraisal Manuals and Forms You can locate your appraisal manual on the Employee Appraisal Systems web site (login to the Employee Portal; go to Appraisals > Employee Appraisal Systems). Forms pertinent to the appraisal process are also located on this site. 17

Questions Questions regarding the appraisal process can be directed to the Performance Management Team. perfmgt@houstonisd.org 18