Title VI Service Monitoring Program



Similar documents
2014 SFMTA Transit Fleet Management Plan March 2014

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Title VI Program

Municipal Transportation Quality Review

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Analysis

GTFS: GENERAL TRANSIT FEED SPECIFICATION

Chapter 3: Third Street Light Rail

Service Guidelines Task Force. 5. Social Equity

TITLE VI PROGRAM 2014 UPDATE

Title VI Analysis of FY 2015 & FY 2016 Proposed Fare Changes

2010 SFMTA TRANSIT FLEET MANAGEMENT PLAN

San Francisco Transportation Initiatives and Workforce Support

BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORT

San Francisco Complete Streets Strategy

SERVICE, DESIGN, PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION GUIDELINES

2013 Annual Service Plan Five year Service Plan Updates

San Francisco s Network of Transportation Services in Response to Community Needs

Transportation Alternatives

5 Performance Measures

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW public transportation department municipality of anchorage

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2015)

Application of a Travel Demand Microsimulation Model for Equity Analysis

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Los Angeles Metro Rapid

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

Memo. Date: January 18, StarTran Advisory Board. From: Brian Praeuner. Review of Peer Transit Systems

Final Report. StarTran Financial, Marketing, Management, and Operational Analysis. February 2012

The mission of the Division of Transit Services is to provide an effective mix of public transportation services in Montgomery County.

Questions or comments regarding the LEP Plan may be submitted to Community Senior Services President/CEO:

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Budget Overview Fiscal Years 2017 & Investing in Transportation for Today and Tomorrow

Miami-Dade Transit Service Standards

Request for Approval: To seek Charter Service Rule Exception or Exemption approvals please fill out all information below completely.

STOP CONSOLIDATION TRANSIT STRATEGIES

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Asset Management and Incremental Progress. Robert L. Peskin, AECOM Arlington, VA

ATTACHMENT K 5310 ELIGIBLE COST

REPORT ON SAN FRANCISCO'S CABLE CARS

DRAFT. Martha's Vineyard Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan

d r a f t Division Street: 15.4 du/a Damen Avenue: 14.1 du/a Western Avenue: 12.8 du/a

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

March 2015 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Regional Peer Review PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Estimating Light-Rail Ridership from APC Data

Community and Systems Planning for Muni s Third Street Light Rail Project

Integrated Public Transport Service Planning Guidelines. Sydney Metropolitan Area

Financial Plan Status Report

Scheduling Review Technical Memorandum

Transit in the United States 3. Operating Costs and Performance Measures 13. Quality of Transit Service 19. ADA Compliance Bus 28

Federal Fiscal Year 2014 Funding For Utah s Large Urban Areas

Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE 2009 TRANSPORTATION GRANT APPLICATION PACKET

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

New York State Department of Transportation. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal for Federal Transit Administration (FTA) FFY

From the FTA 5310 Circular (C9070.1F): 1. ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES. Funds for the Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined

Houston-Galveston Regional Transit Services

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION AUDIT PROGRAM

Regulations for Working in San Francisco Streets

How to Supplement Traditional Paratransit Programs with Taxis: A Case Study. International Conference on Paratransit 10/31/14

Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

2010 METROBUS FLEET MANAGEMENT PLAN

SAN FRANCISCO BICYCLE COALITION

Performance Monitoring to Improve Service Quality and Efficiency Through Better Management of Bus Operators

Public Transport Planning and Regulation: An Introduction

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Terri Cutright Denny Poluga Clement Solomon

City Services Benchmarking: Public Transportation

5 Tips to Improve Biking in San Francisco

TITLE VI PROGRAM. Approved by the Tuolumne County Transit Agency October South Green St. Sonora CA 95370

SECTION 5310 CAPITAL ASSISTANCE VEHICLE APPLICATION

Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan

San Francisco Paratransit Taxi Debit Card System APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference Cleveland, Ohio

FAIRFAX CUE TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: FISCAL YEARS

CHAPTER 7 DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSIT

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. June 2013 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

A Comprehensive Process for Evaluating Existing and New Transit Services at the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board

KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT

Chapter 8 Funding Considerations

APPLICATION FORM MASS TRANSIT PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT NAME LEAD AGENCY PROJECT TYPE GENERAL PROJECT AREA

St. Cloud Metro Bus Charter Policy

Medical Transportation Study for the Needs of the Elderly BACKGROUND

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASURE TOOLBOX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Click to edit Master title style Transit Asset Management Coordination at the Regional Level

YUMA COUNTY S TRANSIT SYSTEM: AN IMPORTANT INVESTMENT

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Charter Service Final Rule

NHDOT Transit Grants Workshop: FTA Section 5310 Programs: Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities. January 12, 2015

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

ENHANCED MOBILITY OF SENIORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES 49 USC 5310 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN

California High Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecast Model Run Summary

Tam Valley Call n Ride Shuttle Option April 2008

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

August 15, 2008 (Approved by MTAB on June 17, 2008 & BOS on April 15, 2008)

SAFETY & SECURITY NEWSLETTER

BIKE TO WORK DAY. Dear San Francisco Employer,

Transit Service Assessment

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA TRANSLINK #98 AND #99, B LINES

Medical Transportation. What the hell is he talking about, And why is it important in my community

FREDericksburg Regional Transit (FRED) REAL-TIME SCHEDULING SOFTWARE, BUS STOP ANNUNCIATOR AND TRANSIT WEBSITE PROCUREMENT

Applying GIS and Survey Data to Transportation Demand Management. Richard Hsu, M.S. Carina Anttila-Suarez, Ph.D.

Memo to Supervisor Mar March 31, 2014

By Karla Karash March 18 18,

Road Repaving and Street Safety Bond Quarterly Status Report presented to the Citizens General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee As of March 2016

Transcription:

SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Historic Car number 1 and 162 on Embarcadero Title VI Service Monitoring Program 10 3 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Title VI Overview Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 addressed discrimination in most areas of public life in the U.S. Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Monitors transit providers for Title VI compliance; updated circular issued October 1, 2012 provides guidance for transit agencies receiving federal funds 2

General Program Requirements Title VI Notice to the Public Complaint Procedures Summary of any Lawsuits, Investigations, Complaints Public Participation Plan Language Assistance Plan Advisory groups with membership appointed by SFMTA and minority participation Subrecipient Monitoring 3

Transit Specific Requirements 4

Transit Specific Requirements Service Standards and Policies Demographic and Service Profile Maps and Charts, and Ridership Information Documentation of Public Engagement Process for Title VI Transit Policies: Disparate Impact, Disproportionate Burden, Major Service Change Fare Equity Analyses and Service Equity Analyses for Major Service Changes 5

Service Monitoring Program 6

Monitoring Program Required to monitor performance of minority routes compared to non-minority routes compared to service standards Required to perform service monitoring at least every three years SFMTA will perform annually as a best practice Required to monitor from a random sample: On-Time Performance Headways Passenger loads Coverage Amenities Fleet Assignment 7

How Does the SFMTA Define Minority Population Census block group with minority residents at or above the Citywide average of 58% On-board passenger survey underway to supplement geographic information (will not be available for 2013 Title VI program update) 8

Non-minority Block Group Minority Block Group 9

Sample of Route Randomly selected a sample of minority and non-minority lines by service type Based on census data Route Type Minority Route Non-Minority Route Radial 9 San Bruno 14 Mission 31 Balboa 108 Treasure Island T Third 1 California 2 Clement 10 Townsend 27 Bryant 30 Stockton Crosstown Feeder/ Community Express 18 46th Avenue 29 Sunset 44 O'Shaughnessy 52 Excelsior 54 Felton 56 Rutland 8BX Bayshore Express 16X Noriega Express NX N-Judah Express 22 Fillmore 33 Stanyan 49 Van Ness/Mission 17 Park Merced 37 Corbett 39 Coit 30X Marina Express 31BX Balboa Express 81X Caltrain Express 10

Monitoring Results Summary Standard On-Time Performance Vehicle Headway Vehicle Loads Service Availability Transit Amenities Vehicle Assignment Results No Minority or Non-Minority lines met the standard. Minority lines met or exceeded the standard across all route types except for Crosstown Minority and Non-Minority lines meet standard Meets standard. All residential areas within a quarter mile of a bus stop. Review underway Meets standard. Vehicles assigned randomly across system by division. Average age of fleet is approximately the same across divisions. 11

On-Time Performance Standard: Proposition E on-time performance standard is 85% Performance: No minority or non-minority lines met the standard Actions to improve: Focusing supervision resources on improving on-time performance Reassessing schedules and updating Transit Effectiveness Project will improve route efficiency and implement projects to improve performance like transit only lanes 12

Vehicle Headway Service standards for headways (route frequency): Route Type Weekday Weekend Peak Base Evening Owl Base Evening Owl Radial 10 15 20 30 15 20 30 Cross-town 15 15 20 30 20 30 30 Feeder/Community 20 30 30 -- 30 30 -- Express 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- Performance: Minority lines met the service standard more often than non-minority lines in all categories except for crosstown. Route Type Minority Non-Minority Radial 73% 50% Crosstown 78% 100% Feeder/Community 89% 72% Express 100% 100% 13

Vehicle Loads Standard: No more than 4% of peak period trips experiencing a load factor of 125% during the morning and evening peak Performance: All sampled routes below standard except for the T-Third line Route Type Minority Non-Minority Radial 0.7% 0.4% Crosstown 0.6% 0.2% Feeder/Community 0.3% 0.0% Express 0.1% 0.0% Actions to improve: T-Third crowding is due primarily to overall rail reliability issues and service gaps. Working to rehabilitate system and reduce delays. 14

Service Availability All residential areas are within a quarter mile of a bus stop Areas further than a quarter mile are located in the Presidio, Lake Merced, Hunter s Point Shipyard, and Candlestick Point 15

Standards: Transit Amenities All stops have a stop ID and are marked Stops with more than 125 daily boardings have a shelter within environmental constraints Powered and sheltered stops should get NextBus displays Performance: Reviewing stop database and will update for the final report 16

Vehicle Assignment Vehicles assigned to divisions based on maintenance capabilities Assigned to routes randomly based on division Policy is to distribute new vehicles across divisions to reduce the average fleet age of the divisions New articulated trolley buses will go to Potrero Division starting in 2014/15 New articulated diesel buses will go to Flynn Division starting in 2014/15 Motor Coach Average Age Woods 11 Kirkland 11 Flynn 12 Trolley Coach Average Age Potrero 14 Presidio 13 17

Next Steps Present to the Policy and Governance Committee (PAG) October 18 Present to the SFMTA Board of Directors November 5 Complete program update and monitoring report Due December 1 to FTA 18