VCH PHCTF EVALUATION CORE INDICATORS, DATA COLLECTION PROCESSES, TOOLS & TARGETS



Similar documents
Manitoba EMR Data Extract Specifications

Performance Measurement for the Medicare and Medicaid Eligible (MME) Population in Connecticut Survey Analysis

2013 ACO Quality Measures

Primary Care Quality Care Indicators - Accuro EMR Prevention

Patient Activation and Engagement for ACOs

ACO Name and Location Allina Health Minneapolis, Minnesota

Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Specialists. NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Demonstrating Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements for Eligible Providers Using Certified EMR Technology

Improving Evidence-Based Primary Care for Chronic Kidney Disease. Walter L. Calmbach MD MPH South Texas Ambulatory Research Network (STARNet)

Medicare Health Risk Assessment Questionnaire

Continuity of Care Guide for Ambulatory Medical Practices

MISSING DATA ANALYSIS AMONG PATIENTS IN THE PINNACLE REGISTRY

Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year

Data, Outcomes and Population Health Management. CPPEG January 2016

Psychiatrists and Reporting on Meaningful Use Stage 1. August 6, 2012

Understanding Diseases and Treatments with Canadian Real-world Evidence

Platforms for Performance: Clinical Dashboards to Improve Quality and Safety 2011 Midyear Clinical Meeting

HealthCare Partners of Nevada. Heart Failure

Mercy Hospital Columbus Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP)

Radiology Business Management Association Technology Task Force. Sample Request for Proposal

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

ASaP Chart Review Instructions - for EMR Based Charts

Clinician Guide: Bridges to Excellence Diabetes Care Recognition Program

"2015 ACO quality measures- What's new? How can we be successful?"

Healthy Living with Diabetes. Diabetes Disease Management Program

ACO Project Overview and Key Elements. Presented to FSSA September 3, Franciscan Alliance, Inc.

Congestive Heart Failure Management Program

Diabetic nephropathy is detected clinically by the presence of persistent microalbuminuria or proteinuria.

Trends in Part C & D Star Rating Measure Cut Points

Hypertension Best Practices Symposium

Medical management of CHF: A New Class of Medication. Al Timothy, M.D. Cardiovascular Institute of the South

EMR Adoption Survey. Instructions. This survey contains a series of multiple-choice questions corresponding to the 5-stage EMR Adoption Model.

Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations

ACO Program: Quality Reporting Requirements. Jennifer Faerberg Mary Wheatley April 28, 2011

A Detailed Data Set From the Year 2011

Health Maintenance Guidelines for Women

ADVANCE: a factorial randomised trial of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes

Accountable Care Organizations: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Direct Pay + FFS Visit Revenue. Joseph E. Scherger, MD, MPH Vice President, Primary Care Eisenhower Medical Center Rancho Mirage, CA

2010 QARR QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Adults

Tip Sheet for Wolf Users

Primary Care in the U.S. Measuring and Improving Primary Care in the United States ISQua Indicators Summit CMS Measures. Primary Care Measures

ATLANTIC and OPTIMUS ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONs CMS QUALITY MEASURES

TELUS PS Suite Tip Sheet

Chronic Kidney Disease and the Electronic Health Record. Duaine Murphree, MD Sarah M. Thelen, MD

Baskets of Care Diabetes Subcommittee

8/14/2012 California Dual Demonstration DRAFT Quality Metrics

OBJECTIVES AGING POPULATION AGING POPULATION AGING IMPACT ON MEDICARE AGING POPULATION

Continuous Quality Improvement using Centricity EMR

Practice Readiness Assessment

An Interprofessional Approach to Diabetes Management

Population Health Management Program

DRUG UTILIZATION EVALUATION OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH CKD

Tips for Success. Documenting Practice Workflows and Envisioning the Future. 1. Involve All Areas of Practice

Chapter Three Accountable Care Organizations

Using Wolf EMR for Panel Identification and Screening

Tip Sheet for QHR-Accuro Users

The State of U.S. Hospitals Relative to Achieving Meaningful Use Measurements. By Michael W. Davis Executive Vice President HIMSS Analytics

Quality Improvement Case Study: Improving Blood Pressure Control in a 3- Provider Primary Care Practice

EMR Outcomes Self-Assessment Contents

University Hospital Community Health Needs Assessment FY 2014

Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) Assessment

Patient Centered Medical Home

InteGreat EHR Meaningful Use 2 Features and Reports Jenni Walters, Sr. Business Analyst, McKesson Beth Crews, Business Analyst, McKesson

ABELMed EHR-EMR/PM version 12, an ONC HIT 2014 Edition Complete EHR, has been certified for the following 42 clinical quality measures (CQMs).

JNC-8 Blood Pressure and ACC/AHA Cholesterol Guideline Updates. January 30, 2014

Provider Manual. Section Case Management and Disease Management

Steven E. Ramsland, Ed.D., Senior Associate, OPEN MINDS The 2015 OPEN MINDS Performance Management Institute February 13, :15am 11:30am

Clinical Quality Measure Crosswalk: HEDIS, Meaningful Use, PQRS, PCMH, Beacon, 10 SOW

Delta s Healthy Rewards Program. Administration Services

Preventive Health Services

Preventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Low Risk Adults Age 18 through 64

Price Transparency Attestation emr4md version /03/2014

Improving Care Transitions using PDSA Methodology

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Physician and Clinical Pharmacist Patient Education and Disease Management in Diabetes Mellitus

CARDIO/PULMONARY MEDICINE FOR PRIMARY CARE. Las Vegas, Nevada Bellagio March 4 6, Participating Faculty

Transcription:

OVERVIEW In alignment with VCH PHCTF deliverables, there is general agreement that our teams use the following core evaluation indicators and evaluation processes to move closer to the proposed targets or stretch goals. We will be working in partnership with your team and the UBC Family Practice Informatics, Clinical Decision Support System development team, (BC-CDSS). The BC-CDSS together with our VCH evaluation, IT and CDM experts will provide support for your professional practice to integrate and utilize these tools in your daily practice. Our objective is to ensure that over time, they are built into practice to support improvements that ultimately benefit all of your patients. The overall aim and purpose of the evaluation effort is to use this information for positive change and effective office practice redesign. The Model for Improvement developed by the IHI* is the framework being adopted as current best practice for change management. Key questions your project teams are asked to address include: 1. What are we trying to accomplish? 2. How will we know that a change is an improvement? 3. What changes can we make that will result in improvement? * Refer to the Institute for Health Improvement at www.ihi.org for more information on the Model for Improvement. Chronic Disease Management indicators, processes and targets parallel those used in B.C. CDM Collaboratives Type of Indicators & Definitions Information o Third available appointment. Date of Birth Sex First 3 digits of postal code The third occurrence in a schedule when a certain type of appointment is available. PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS Entered from chart into PATIENT ACCESS Weekly, MOA counts & records the days until the next routine appointment for each physician / nurse in the practice. Chart / new patient questionnaire for schedule Excel spreadsheet to record weekly counts Spreadsheet (template to be provided by VCH) All patients registered in Appointment for a routine physical within 6 days All others same day access March 2004 Evaluation Core Indicators and Guidelines for Vancouver Coastal Health PHCTF project teams 1

CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT Type of Indicators & Definitions CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT DIABETES Population o Glycemic Control o Hypertension o Lipids o Eyes o Renal For Diabetes and CHF Patient Registered Patients with diabetes will be retrospectively and prospectively identified HbA1C Results and % of patients with lab test done every 3 months BP % of patients with BP <=130/80 determined by clinical asst. every 3-6 months LDL % of patients with lab test done at least annually (or as indicated) Dilated eye exam % of patients with referral made to Ophthalmologist/Optometrist at least annually (or as indicated) ACR % of patients with lab test ordered at least annually (or as indicated) For CDM, the data is recorded on the flow sheet on the Establish registry from billing code info, MOH secure website info, chart audit and clinical reassessment The Billing system, MOH secure website, registry stored on and transferred from the Registry developed on the and data sent to CDM to CDM Record on to CDM Record on when referral made to CDM to CDM to CDM Taken from CHF and DM Collaboratives based upon Best Practice Guidelines 95% <7.0 % in >90% <=130/80 in >40% <2.5 in Referral made at least annually in Result <2.0 M, <2.8 F In >50% March 2004 Evaluation Core Indicators and Guidelines for Vancouver Coastal Health PHCTF project teams 2

Type of Indicators & Definitions DIABETES continued o Neuropathy Lower extremity exam % of patients, at least annually (or as indicated) o Selfmanagement Set and/or review self-management goals with patient annually Record on Record on to CDM to CDM Tested at least annually in >90% CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE Patient Registered: Population Patients with CHF will be retrospectively and prospectively identified; % of patients LV Ejection Fraction Drug Use in Patients with Systolic HF Drug Use in Patients with Systolic HF o Selfmanagement LV Ejection Fraction as determined by ECHO or RNV will be done; % of patients ACE Inhibitors (or ARB if ACE-I Intolerant); % of patients with documented systolic HF who are on ACE-I (or ARB) B-Blockers; % of patients with documented systolic HF who are on B-Blockers Set and/or review self-management goals with patient annually Establish registry from billing code info, MOH secure website info, chart audit and clinical reassessment Record method used, % Ejection Fraction and whether systolic or diastolic HF on Record drug use on Record drug use on Record on Billing system, MOH secure website, registry stored on and transferred from the to CDM to CDM to CDM to CDM 95% recorded in >85% >85% with systolic CHF will be on ACE- I or ARB >85% with systolic CHF will be on B- Blockers March 2004 Evaluation Core Indicators and Guidelines for Vancouver Coastal Health PHCTF project teams 3

Type of Indicators & Definitions PRACTICE SIZE Fee for service sites Quarterly count of current patients listed in Rostered sites - Roster size - Outflows INFLUENZA Dated records of occurrence of tests &/or results Occurrence of vaccination PRACTICE SIZE Query of >1500 active patient records for patients/physician totals over the last >7100 services/physician 18 months Report from MOH >1500 active patients/physician >4000 service/nurse? PREVENTION review & post run charts >80% of these patients will meet patient goals in each category >90% of patients over 65 years of age >90% of diabetics and CHF patients any age SMOKING o Baseline Status Smoking Status Record All patients over 8 years o Self-management This indicator to be reviewed for use next year, not used in Fall 04 report Assess & discuss self-management challenges Offer smoking/risk management Record if ready to quit and when Record date(s) of smoking cessation See www.bcdssp.com for smoking status data collection tool >90% smoking status recorded & documented selfmanagement goals each visit. > X% patients quit 2 weeks to 1 year. X% > 1 year. MAMMOGRAPHY PAP TESTS reduction education Occurrence of mammogram and result Occurrence of Pap test and result within the past 2 years of discussion held for those 50+ if female 18-69 years and no hysterectomy >90% of women 50-69 are screened in the last year 1st 3 normal Pap smears at one-year intervals, >90% compliance >90% every year if abnormal >90% every 2 nd year if normal March 2004 Evaluation Core Indicators and Guidelines for Vancouver Coastal Health PHCTF project teams 4

Type of o Internal Survey (under review to shorten, review otheralternative tools and send for plain language review) o Internal Survey ( to be discussed at site visits) o PHCTF Project Group Survey (Suggest to be used with physicians only) Indicators & Definitions SATISFACTION SURVEYS PATIENT SATISFACTION SCORES On one randomly Patient selected day each questionnaire month, MOAs distribute a questionnaire to all patients as they check in and collect them in a drop box as patients leave. STAFF SATISFACTION SCORES All staff in the Staff practice will be questionnaire(s) given an anonymous questionnaire every 6 months or more frequently at the discretion of the practice All physicians in the practice will be given an anonymous questionnaire in March 2004, 2005, and March 2006 and a stamped envelope return to VCH evaluation staff. Satisfaction questionnaire MS Access or EXCEL database (to be provided by VCH) MS Access or EXCEL database (to be provided by VCH) VCH staff will send a summary report back to each practice Run Charts posted in clinic and reviewed by team for action Run Charts posted in clinic and reviewed by team for action. March 2004 Evaluation Core Indicators and Guidelines for Vancouver Coastal Health PHCTF project teams 5