VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION



Similar documents
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

PERFORMANCE PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (PS-35LC)

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES

IC Performance Standards

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

Human Resources Training. Performance Management Training Module 2: Managing Employee Performance

Sample Performance Appraisal

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

Classified Performance Planning and Evaluation Form

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

How To Be A Team Member

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

How To Be A Successful Employee

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Human Resources Training

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

Performance Appraisal System

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EVALUATION - SUPPORT STAFF

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description. JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager

Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership

Learning Module On Effective. Communication. In Nursing Management

South Carolina Budget and Control EPMS Performance Characteristics

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Fayetteville Technical Community College PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

Performance Appraisal

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

CAMP LEJEUNE NONAPPROPRIATED FUND PERFORMANCE PLAN GUIDE

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

City of Sunset Valley Employee Performance Evaluation Form

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

County of Mono. Performance Evaluation System. Job Performance Expectations and Standards

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Performance Management Tool 5 Employee Self Evaluation

Utica College Performance Review Form

Department of Administrative Services

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

Agenda Cover Memorandum

Position Title: Management Info Chief. Working Title: Technical Project Management Section Chief

Interviews management and executive level candidates; serves as interviewer for position finalists.

Employee Development Plan

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Compliance Director

Interview Questions. Accountability. Adaptability

STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS:

Navajo Agricultural Product Industry Job Description

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Coaching and Feedback

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

North Dakota Human Resource Management Services Performance Evaluation

360-Degree Assessment: An Overview

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial

JOB POSTING FY 14/15 MARCH 26, 2015 REVENUE ACCOUNTANT #3315 FINANCE DEPARTMENT

GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Performance Appraisal Form for Doctor

TOWSON UNIVERSITY College of Business and Economics Department of Accounting. ACCT 497 Internship

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Employee Performance Review

EXAMPLE WORKPLACE COMPETENCIES

White Earth Tribal Council Annual Performance Appraisal

National Occupational Standards for the Financial Services Sector. Administration for Mortgage and/or Financial Planning Intermediaries

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & CORRECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

UC MERCED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Human Resources Manager, Temporary Full-Time Competition No

Position Title: Business Development Manager (BDM) Department: Business Development. Reports to: Vice President, Business Development

TROPICAL FRUIT & NUT COMPANY JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: OUTSIDE SALES REPRESENTATIVE SALES DEPARTMENT GENERAL STATEMENT OF JOB

Clinical Social Work Team Leader

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

The Appraisal Interview

Transcription:

VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The primary objectives of employee performance evaluations are: 1. An orderly effort designed to improve supervisor and staff communication; 2. To achieve a mutual understanding and appreciation of both business and individual objectives and to develop action plans for self-improvement. Employees want and deserve to know what is expected of them and how well they are performing their work. Performance appraisals serve this purpose, as well as demonstrating that the supervisor is interested in their accomplishments, is willing to give praise when it is deserved and cares enough about the organization to point out areas needing improvement and help them overcome obstacles to improving their performance. The performance appraisal process should improve communication between supervisor and staff. If good communication is not routine, the appraisal process should open communication channels that have been blocked by misunderstandings and personality conflicts. Appraisals can also provide a means of understanding how the employees view their work situation and what their concerns are. It is an opportunity to open a dialog. Performance appraisals help supervisors rate themselves. Often annual appraisals can be very trying for supervisors because they find out they haven t spent enough time coaching, discussing performance problems, and giving feedback throughout the year. If the general reaction is angry and defensive it may be an indication that employees resent this sudden interest in their performance and that the supervisor may need to provide feedback more regularly. For these reasons, we are instituting a process to supplement the annual performance evaluation process that currently exists. Performance Appraisals should be performed at least annually. However, as part of this process, employees may request a Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation (see pages 2-4) when they feel the need to receive more structured feedback from their supervisor regarding their performance or for the purpose of sitting down with their supervisor to discuss problems or training needs, etc. Employee Bargaining Units (BU) were consulted about this process. As a result, BU 12 opted out; therefore, ARB s Warehouse Workers will not participate in this process. All other employees desiring a Supplemental Performance Evaluation should submit a request to their supervisor in writing or via e-mail. Supervisors should make every effort to meet this request within two weeks. The Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation will not be placed in the employee s Official Personnel File. It is also important that supervisors receive input from employees on their effectiveness. During the Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation meeting, the supervisor should request this input. The Supervisor s Review by Employee section on pages 5-6 was developed for this purpose. It includes effectiveness factors, a rating scale and an area for additional comments and/or observations. The purpose of this form is to facilitate communication between supervisors and staff. The employee s comments will not be held against them; the comments will be used to initiate and encourage discussion about what s working or not working. Dispute Resolution Process: An employee may grieve the content of his/her Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation up to the department head level of the grievance procedure when he/she receives a substandard rating in either a majority of the performance factors or an overall substandard rating. An employee who believes he/she is the subject of reprisal as a result of his/her evaluation of the effectiveness of his/her supervisor/manager under the Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation Process may seek resolution as provided under the Reprisals or No Reprisals provision of the employees collective bargaining agreement. EO-24 (New 4/03) STATE OF CALIFORNIA Page 1 of 6

Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation Employee: Supervisor: Below is a Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation that employees may request at any time between annual appraisals. This Voluntary Supplemental Performance Evaluation may be used as a tool to provide more detailed feedback on an employee s performance. All requests should be sent directly to the supervisor in writing or via e-mail. Supervisors are asked to respond to this written request within two weeks. Performance Factors Improvement Needed Good Very Good Excellent 1. Quality of Work a. Employee produces work that is generally free of errors. b. Employee s work is accurate and thorough. c. Employee has the level of knowledge and expertise required to perform quality work. d. Employee produces documents that reflect good communication skills. e. Employee stays current with computer software training needs. f. Employee s oral communications are clear and concise. 2. Quantity of Work a. Generally, employee is able to keep up with workload. b. Employee informs supervisor when he/she is able to take on more work, and when workload is too heavy. Employee is effective in prioritizing work assignments. 3. Work Habits a. Employee follows time schedule as agreed upon. b. Employee uses time effectively. c. Employee is dependable. d. Employee has a good attitude. e. Employee demonstrates respect for State property and its appropriate uses. EO-24 (New 4/03) STATE OF CALIFORNIA Page 2 of 6

Performance Factors Improvement Needed Good Very Good Excellent 4. Relationships with People a. Employee shares information with other staff as needed. b. Employee shows respect for co-workers. c. Employee deals effectively with conflict. d. Employee cooperates with other staff. e. Employee is flexible when helping others. f. Employee has a pleasant attitude when visitors come to the work area. 5. Taking Action Independently a. Employee seeks clarification on assignments as needed. b. Employee keeps up-to-date on job-related technology. c. Employee works well without close supervision. d. Employee stays informed on issues confronting ARB. e. Employee performs independent research on his/her own initiative related to ARB business when workload permits. 6. Meeting Work Commitments a. Employee consistently meets deadlines. b. Employee keeps supervisor informed if deadlines cannot be met. c. Employee is aware of and follows established procedures. d. Unmet deadlines are adequately justified. 7. Analyzing Situations and Materials a. Employee develops effective solutions to problems and communicates them to supervisor. b. Employee utilizes appropriate resource materials. c. Employee shows creativity when approaching situations. d. Employee demonstrates awareness of and sensitivity to ARB policies in developing solutions to problems. e. Employee properly credits the work or ideas of others when applicable. EO-24 (New 4/03) State of California Page 3 of 6

Performance Factors Improvement Needed Good Very Good Excellent 8. Supervising the Work of Others a. Employee effectively establishes goals, objectives and strategies for completing the work in their area of responsibility. b. Employee utilizes good communications skills with subordinates. c. Employee coaches and encourages their subordinates. d. Employee provides workers with an appropriate amount of work. e. Employee regularly recognizes their staff for good work. f. Employee ensures their area of responsibility is free of harassment and/or discrimination. 9. Personnel Management Practices a. Employee displays a good understanding of management principles and state policies. b. Employee displays sensitivity to cultural differences as appropriate. c. Employee plays an active role in ensuring a discrimination- and harassment-free work environment. d. Employee stays current on administrative procedures. 10. Quality Service and Customer Satisfaction Commitments a. Employee returns phone calls and e-mails promptly. b. Employee leaves an alternate voice mail and e-mail message when away from the office for an extended period of time. c. Employee follows through on requests for information or service promptly. d. Employee provides clear and concise information when requested. e. Employee deals effectively with difficult people. The information above was discussed on : (Date) EO-24 (New 4/03) State of California Page 4 of 6

Supervisor s Review by Employee During a Supplemental Employee Evaluation, an employee may provide feedback on their supervisor s effectiveness in the areas listed below. Rating Scale 1=Does not meet employee s expectations. 5=Exceeds employee s expectations. Supervisor: Employee: Effectiveness Factors Rating (Circle one) Supervisor provides sufficient guidance and context when giving assignments. Supervisor provides employee with the appropriate amount of work. Supervisor provides enough time for assignment completion. Supervisor reviews employee s work in a timely manner. Supervisor provides on-going feedback to employee. EO-24 (New 4/03) State of California Page 5 of 6

Supervisor recognizes employee for good performance. Supervisor is sensitive to employee s need to balance home and work lives, (i.e. requesting vacation time, attending school functions, dental appointments, etc). Supervisor is reasonably available to discuss issues. Supervisor encourages and responds to questions in a timely manner. Additional comments: Please attach separate sheet if additional space is needed. The information above was discussed on : (Date) EO-24 (New 4/03) State of California Page 6 of 6