College Readiness in the US Service Area 2010 Baseline

Similar documents
Richardson ISD Fast Facts

February 2003 Report No

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Ennis ISD

2015 Texas Public School Rankings Methodology April 2015

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

COMPARISON OF SEO SCHOLARS AND

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

How NCTQ scores the Selection Criteria Standard

Chapter 3 The College- and Career-Readiness Component of the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) End-of-Course (EOC) Program

District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)

My College QuickStart My Online Score Report Reviewing Missed Questions worksheet (attached)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON ITED FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Greenville ISD. Danna Myers Chief Academic Officer January 2015

Race Matters. Household Asset Poverty by Race in North Carolina. Child Poverty by County

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness

The Greenville County Schools homepage provides five goals for the school system (

TEXAS STUDENT DATA SYSTEM

2. The AEC must be identified in AskTED (the Texas School Directory database) as an alternative campus.

DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGES GUIDELINES FOR DUAL CREDIT COURSES AND REMEDIAL COURSES OFFERED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH HIGH SCHOOLS

Comal ISD Bilingual & ESL Program Evaluation. Where Excellence is an Attitude!

Utah Comprehensive Counseling and Guidance Program Evaluation Report

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN NEW YORK CITY. credo.stanford.

62 EDUCATION NEXT / WINTER 2013 educationnext.org

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA. credo.stanford.edu.

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Roosevelt ISD

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ARIZONA. credo.stanford.edu.

TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS ABOUT COLLEGE

Bowen, Chingos & McPherson, Crossing the Finish Line

Special Report on the Transfer Admission Process National Association for College Admission Counseling April 2010

Wilder Research Statewide Census of Private Education (SCOPE) Summary of a study of private K-12 schools in Minnesota.

MCPS Graduates Earning College Degrees in STEM-Related Fields

Key Indicators on the Path to a Bachelor s Degree by Race and Ethnicity in Maryland

Center for Teacher Certification Austin Community College

Catalyzing District-wide College and Career Readiness in Clint ISD. Overview and Lessons Learned April 2015

How To Become A Teacher In Texas

Child Development Associate Training Program Checklist. Thank you for your interest in our Child Development Associate Training Program!

AEIS was published from to Archived AEIS reports may be found on the AEIS Archives page through TEA

Virginia s College and Career Readiness Initiative

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

State of New Jersey

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Allen Elementary School

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools

New York State Profile

John B. King, Jr. Kevin G. Smith SUMMARY

UNH Graduate Education Department

Texas Engineering Foundation

Developmental Education Plan Procedures Guide

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness. Parent & Student Information

Tenure and Retention of Newly Hired Principals in Texas

Chapter 5 English Language Learners (ELLs) and the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) Program

CURRICULUM. Texas Association of School Administrators

Applications must be received by: March 11, 2011 Incomplete or late applications will not be considered.

Transitioning English Language Learners in Massachusetts: An Exploratory Data Review. March 2012

Florida s Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to Excellent Educators. heralded Florida for being number two in the nation for AP participation, a dramatic

Stability of School Building Accountability Scores and Gains. CSE Technical Report 561. Robert L. Linn CRESST/University of Colorado at Boulder

A National Call to Action: School Counselors Ensuring College and Career Readiness. College Board National Office for School Counselor Advocacy

Transcription:

College Readiness in the United Way Service Area 2010 Baseline Report The Institute for Urban Policy Research At The University of Texas at Dallas

College Readiness in the United Way Service Area 2010 Baseline Report This report conveys the key findings of the Institute for Urban Policy Research analyses related to the United 2020 Education goal to increase the percent of students graduating college or career ready from to by 2020. In addition to college readiness, this report provides baseline numbers for overall graduation rates, as well as a more specific college readiness measure based on ACT and SAT scores. A brief overview of the methodology used to produce the estimates is included at the end. 9 8 7 5 3 2 1 54% College Ready Graduates Education Outcomes Indicators United Way Service Area, 2010 33% Percent Testing At or Above ACT/SAT Criterion 81% High School Graduation Rate College Readiness The Texas Education Agency (TEA) defines a high school graduate as college ready in math, English / language arts, or both if he or she scores at or above a criterion score on the ACT, SAT, or the Exit Level TAKS. For the State of Texas standardized test, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS), the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) established a scale score of 2,200 or higher in either the mathematics or English / language arts tests as evidence of college readiness. For English / language arts, students must also score a 3 or higher on the essay. Students who take the SAT are qualified as college ready in math or English / language arts by scoring at least a 500 on the critical reading or math section and a 1070 combined; students who meet the criteria in both subject areas are considered college ready in both subjects. Students who take the ACT are qualified as college ready in math or English / language arts by scoring a 19 or higher on the English or math sections and a 23 composite score. Again, students who meet both criteria are considered college ready in both subjects. A student is considered

college ready as long as he or she meets the aforementioned criteria for at least one of the three exams. Analysis of TEA s Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) data for campuses in the UWMD service area indicates that 54% of graduates in the class of 2010 graduated college ready by TEA standards, up from of graduates from the class of 2006. 8 7 5 3 2 1 Percent of Graduates Graduating College Ready by County, 2010 69% 46% 7 65% Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall Although college readiness rates are up across the service area, a substantial disparity exists between Dallas County and the suburban counties. In Collin, Denton 1, and Rockwall counties 65% to 7 of graduates in the class of 2010 graduated college ready; this compares to just 46% in Dallas County for the same year. Due to the fact that Dallas County accounts for greater than half of all graduates in the service area, its comparatively low college ready rate noticeably lowers the rate for the service area as a whole. 1 Numbers attributed to Denton County only account for the portion of southern Denton County that lies within the UWMD service area and do not represent Denton County as whole. P a g e 4

8 7 5 3 2 1 Percent of Graduates Graduating College Ready by Race / Ethnicity, 2010 72% 41% 34% 65% White Hispanic African-American Other Across the service area, substantial disparities exist among racial and ethnic groups, and while the suburban counties, overall, outperformed Dallas County, racial and ethnic disparities exist among graduates across all counties in a fairly uniform manner. In every county, graduates classified as white or other race had the highest college readiness rates, while African-American students exhibited the lowest rates with Hispanic graduates performing slightly better. So, while some counties perform better overall, all counties within the service area can benefit from programs that specifically address achievement disparities affecting racial and ethnic minorities. Percent of Graduates Graduating College Ready by County by Race and Ethnicity, 2010 9 8 7 5 3 2 75% 53% 46% 73% 68% 38% 32% 58% 76% 55% 48% 79% 71% 45% 42% 1 Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall White Hispanic African-American Other P a g e 5

ACT and SAT Scores The TEA reported college readiness indicator can be an unstable measure of student success due to the frequent changes that occur to both the state standardized test and the achievement requirements of that test. Consequently, one way to find a more stable measure is to exclude the TAKS test from the indicator and simply measure student achievement on the nationally normed ACT and SAT exams. TEA reports the percentage of students who meet a criterion score for the SAT and ACT exams, but uses a slightly different standard than that used in their reporting of overall college readiness. The criterion scores are at least 1110 for the SAT (critical reading and mathematics combined, 10 points higher than the criterion score used in the definition of college readiness) or a minimum 24 composite score on the ACT. IUPR analysis of TEA s AEIS data for campuses in the UWMD service area indicates that 33% of graduates in the class of 2010 who took the ACT, SAT, or both scored at or above criterion on at least one of the two tests, up from 29% of testtaking graduates in the classes of 2007, 2008, and 2009. The main drawback of using only these tests is that virtually every student in Texas takes the TAKS, while only about 65% of the class of 2010 high school graduates in the service area took either the ACT, SAT, or both. Although measuring the percentage of test takers who scored at or above criterion on these two tests provides a more stable measure of academic readiness, it leaves out the 35% of graduates who take neither of these tests. Percent of ACT / SAT Test-Taking Graduates Scoring At or Above Criterion by County, 2010 5 3 51% 49% 41% 2 1 21% Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall As with overall college readiness, noticeable disparities exist across the various counties with regards to test-taking graduates who score at or above criterion on the ACT, SAT, or both. Although Rockwall County trails Collin and Denton counties by about 1, the three suburban counties all perform considerably better than Dallas County and have shown improvement over the previous three years. Conversely, the percent of test-taking Dallas County graduates scoring at or above criterion has steadily decreased from 25% for the class of 2006 to 21% for the class of 2010. Moreover, when looking only at ACT and SAT scores, the percentage of graduates P a g e 6

scoring at or above criterion has remained far more stable over time than college readiness rates that include the TAKS. Percent of ACT / SAT Test-Taking Graduates Scoring At or Above Criterion by Race / Ethnicity, 2010 5 52% 49% 3 2 1 14% White Hispanic African-American Other 8% When evaluating ACT and SAT performance by race and ethnicity, extraordinary disparities are evident across the region as a whole; furthermore, racial and ethnic minorities experience the greatest county-level disparities. For example, the largest achievement gap among Caucasian students in different counties is 12 percentage points (between Collin and Rockwall counties), while the largest achievement gap among Hispanic students is 24 percentage points (between Denton and Dallas counties). Not only are there achievement differences across racial and ethnic groups, but the differences across counties are accentuated by racial and ethnic differences. P a g e 7

7 Percent of ACT / SAT Test-Taking Graduates Scoring At or Above Criterion by County and Race / Ethnicity, 2010 5 56% 63% 48% 54% 44% 5 3 2 1 36% 33% 34% 18% 1 6% 3 19% 19% Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall White Hispanic African-American Other Graduation Rate One of the more basic measures of academic performance remains the graduation rate. For the purpose of this report, the graduation rate is calculated based on the completion rate reported by TEA. TEA reports for each campus a graduates component of the completion rate that indicates the percentage of the members of a cohort who successfully graduated (completed the requisite number of credits, etc.) by August 31 of the preceding year. A cohort is defined as those students who first attended the ninth grade 4 years prior. For example, the Class of 2010 graduation rate is reported for the cohort of students who first attended the ninth grade in the 2006-2007 school year, and were reported to have graduated by August 31, 2010. IUPR analysis of TEA s AEIS data for campuses in the UWMD service area indicates that students graduating in 2010 represented an 81% graduation rate, up from 78% for the class of 2006. P a g e 8

10 Graduation Rate by County, 2010 8 94% 76% 93% 91% 2 Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall As with other indicators, the suburban counties again outperform Dallas County with regards to overall graduation rates. However, Dallas County has experienced a sizeable gain since 2007, when its graduation rate was just 69%. This is the largest three-year gain for any of the four counties. 10 Graduation Rate by Race / Ethnicity, 2010 8 88% 76% 74% 2 White Hispanic African-American Unlike the college ready indicators, there is considerably less racial and ethnic disparity among graduation rates. The gap among racial and ethnic groups is less than 10 percentage points in every county, and while Caucasian and students classified as other exhibit the greatest achievement levels in previous indicators, African-American students in Rockwall County graduate at a higher rate than any other student group in any county for 2010. Graduation rates from 2010 suggest that minority students graduate at reasonably comparable levels to Caucasian students across the service area. Still, the college ready indicators suggest that high school graduation is not sufficient for college readiness and parity among graduation rates belies considerable disparity on college ready indicators. Note that while, for the other P a g e 9

education indicators, rates are presented for White, Hispanic, African-American, and Other race / ethnicity categories, the Other category is omitted for the graduation rate reports. Because graduation rates are a cohort-based measure, they rely on data provided over 4 successive school years. During that timeframe, TEA introduced additional racial categories, complicating the direct comparison of AEIS data from prior years to the current year. Graduation Rate by County and Race / Ethnicity, 2010 10 8 96% 88% 92% 79% 74% 72% 95% 94% 9 87% 87% 96% 2 Collin Dallas Denton Rockwall White Hispanic African-American Brief Overview of Methodology To aggregate the percentages for each indicator reported for the campuses in the United Way service area, the number of graduates reported for the cohort year was used to derive an estimate of the initial cohort size. The aggregated numbers of graduates and cohort members are then used to produce aggregate estimates for the college ready graduation rate and overall graduation rate. While, following TEA s methodology, special education graduates are removed from the denominator when computing estimates for ACT / SAT test-takers scoring at or above criterion, this was not possible for the racial / ethnic breakdowns of the ACT / SAT criterion analysis. The impact of the omission should be within tolerance for each racial and ethnic group, rendering group comparisons reliable. Conclusion Initially, the baseline data for 2010 suggests that college readiness levels have nearly reached the 2020 goal; however, this belies some important underlying facts. Criterion scores on the SAT and ACT suggest that a significant portion of those graduates deemed college ready by TEA standards qualify by TAKS scores rather than SAT or ACT scores. This is important to note because of recent changes to standardized testing. With the state phasing out the TAKS and replacing it with the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR), TEA-computed college ready rates are sure to fluctuate in coming years. Achievement levels on standardized P a g e 10

tests dropped dramatically when the TAKS first replaced the TAAS in 2003, and a similar effect has already been documented in initial statewide reports of STAAR results. Moreover, the TEA has not yet set a college readiness criterion on the new test making the ultimate impact on college readiness unclear. So, the substantial gains shown in this baseline number may precede a looming decrease while students and teachers acclimate themselves with the new test and achievement standards, leaving more room for improvement than the baseline might indicate at first look. P a g e 11

800 West Campbell Road, GR20 Richardson, Texas 75080-3021 (972)883-5430 voice (972)883-5431 facsimile Visit us on the Web! http://iupr.utdallas.edu