The LSST Commissioning Plan

Similar documents
LSST Data Management plans: Pipeline outputs and Level 2 vs. Level 3

LSST Data Management System Applications Layer Simulated Data Needs Description: Simulation Needs for DC3

PMCS - WBS with Definition

V6 AIRS Spectral Calibra2on

Op#mal Es#ma#on of Starlight and Incoherent Light

LSST Data Management. Tim Axelrod Project Scientist - LSST Data Management. Thursday, 28 Oct 2010

San Jacinto College Banner & Enterprise Applica5on Review Task Force Report. November 01, 2011 FINAL

LSST Database Design Jacek Becla

Introduction to LSST Data Management. Jeffrey Kantor Data Management Project Manager

LSST Resources for Data Analysis

IT Change Management Process Training

One Degree Imager Pipeline Software and Archive Science Requirements Document

Software challenges in the implementation of large surveys: the case of J-PAS

How To Process Data From A Casu.Com Computer System

Data analysis of L2-L3 products

Summary of Data Management Principles Dark Energy Survey V2.1, 7/16/15

EXPERIENCE WITH SERVICE OBSERVING

Data Warehousing. Yeow Wei Choong Anne Laurent

Bank of America Security by Design. Derrick Barksdale Jason Gillam

Astronomy of Planets

LSST All Hands Meeting SLAC, December (MAP)

Queued Service Observations with MegaPrime Phase 1 Proposal Submission for Semester 2010A

Description of the Dark Energy Survey for Astronomers

Software Development and Deployment

The SST precursors of the CTA observatory: simula.ons for the ASTRI/CTA mini- array

ARTIST Methodology and Tooling. Jesus Gorroñogoitia - Atos SOC Crete, 1 st July 2015

CONTAM 02 Observa4ons in Rivers and Urban Streams: San Joaquin River Mixing Dynamics and Mass Balances

Legacy Archiving How many lights do you leave on? September 14 th, 2015

TOLOMEO. ORFEO Toolbox. Jordi Inglada - CNES. TOoLs for Open Mul/- risk assessment using Earth Observa/on data TOLOMEO

CMMI for High-Performance with TSP/PSP

LSST and the Cloud: Astro Collaboration in 2016 Tim Axelrod LSST Data Management Scientist

Protec'ng Informa'on Assets - Week 8 - Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning. MIS 5206 Protec/ng Informa/on Assets Greg Senko

CCAT: Overview & Status

SUMMIT. November 2010

ID Objective Requirements Description of Test Date & Examiner 15 Verify that the optics?? OMC

Introduction to CCDs and CCD Data Calibration

DEFINING COMPONENTS OF NATIONAL REDD+ FINANCIAL PLANNING

Business Analysis Standardization A Strategic Mandate. John E. Parker CVO, Enfocus Solu7ons Inc.

Help Framework. Ticket Management Ticket Resolu/on Communica/ons. Ticket Assignment Follow up Customer - communica/on System updates Delay management

Electric Field Conjuga2on implementa2on for ground based astronomy

Graduate Systems Engineering Programs: Report on Outcomes and Objec:ves

The LSST Data management and French computing activities. Dominique Fouchez on behalf of the IN2P3 Computing Team. LSST France April 8th,2015

Data Mining. Supervised Methods. Ciro Donalek Ay/Bi 199ab: Methods of Sciences hcp://esci101.blogspot.

Education and Public Outreach Summary. Suzanne Jacoby EPO Project Manager. October 23, 2013 December 2, 2013 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW

So#ware quality assurance - introduc4on. Dr Ana Magazinius

Chapter 3. Database Architectures and the Web Transparencies

Satellite Posi+oning. Lecture 5: Satellite Orbits. Jan Johansson Chalmers University of Technology, 2013

High Resolution Planetary Imaging Workflow

Explorations of the Outer Solar System. B. Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

DTCC Data Quality Survey Industry Report

UQ pipeline implementa,on and so0ware integra,on

Hall B So(ware Status. Veronique Ziegler

DEEP FILM ACCESS Project (Digital Transforma4ons in the Arts and Humani4es: Big Data) February 2014 April 2015

Pa8ern Recogni6on. and Machine Learning. Chapter 4: Linear Models for Classifica6on

Range of Organiza7onal Approaches

JDEM ISWG Report to NASA and DOE Headquarters May Executive Summary

Application Report. Propeller Blade Inspection Station

Office of Business and Financial Services. Department Budget Presenta0on

Business Analysis Center of Excellence The Cornerstone of Business Transformation

Copernicus Space Component Ground Segment and Opera4ons Concept

Merit Member Conference 2015 Does Migra+ng to a Virtualized Data Center Make Sense in Higher Educa+on?

BPO. Accerela*ng Revenue Enhancements Through Sales Support Services

MAXIMIZING THE SUCCESS OF YOUR E-PROCUREMENT TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT. How to Drive Adop.on, Efficiency, and ROI for the Long Term

Support from the CMS Innova2on Center for Rural ACOs

NERSC Archival Storage: Best Practices

Capitalize on your carbon management solu4on investment

Quality Label and Cer0fica0on Processes France- Suisse Summit on ehealth Interoperability 20 May 2014

Processing of Mix- Sensi0vity Video Surveillance Streams on Hybrid Clouds

Top Practices in Health IT Compliance. Data Breach & Leading Program Prac3ces

From the ASTRI/CTA ACTL prototype to CTA: a roadmap

DNS Traffic Monitoring. Dave Piscitello VP Security and ICT Coordina;on, ICANN

Fig.1. The DAWN spacecraft

CFITS Industry Partners

Update on the Cloud Demonstration Project

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: Status Update

Data archiving and reproducible research for ecology and evolu6on. March 23 rd 2010 Ian Dworkin

Gyrus: A Framework for User- Intent Monitoring of Text- Based Networked ApplicaAons

An Open Dynamic Big Data Driven Applica3on System Toolkit

The Future of Service Management: Addressing The Impact of Consumeriza<on

CS 5150 So(ware Engineering System Architecture: Introduc<on

Nodes, Ties and Influence

CiviCRM Implementa/on Case Study

Effec%ve AX 2012 Upgrade Project Planning and Microso< Sure Step. Arbela Technologies

Darrel L. Williams 1, Samuel N. Goward 2, and Ta9ana Loboda 2

Big Data. The Big Picture. Our flexible and efficient Big Data solu9ons open the door to new opportuni9es and new business areas

Financial Opera,ons Track: ROI vs. ROCE (Return on Customer Experience) Speaker: Robert Lane, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Premier Health Partners

Science Data Center Overview

Case Study. The SACM Journey at the Ontario Government

High speed 3D capture for Configuration Management DOE SBIR Phase II Paul Banks

How To Use The Wynn Odi

Possible use of the dedicated MARLY one meter telescope for intensive supernovæ studies

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

Project Management Introduc1on

Components of Technology Suppor4ng Data Intensive Research

Open-Source Based Solutions for Processing, Preserving, and Presenting Oral Histories

Selected Ac)vi)es Overseen by the WDAC

Coordina(ng Aircra- During NASA Airborne Science Field Campaigns AIST Michael Goodman Earth Science Technology Forum 21 June 2011

PROJECT PORTFOLIO SUITE

Exchange of experience from a SuccessFactors LMS Implementa9on

Fairpoint - Work at Home

Transcription:

The LSST Commissioning Plan Charles (Chuck) F. Claver LSST Systems Scien<st LSST SAC FACE-2-FACE April 7, 2014 Name of Mee)ng Loca)on Date - Change in Slide Master 1

The LSST Commissioning Plan Scope of Commissioning defined by 3 Func)onal Objec)ves An Overview of the LSST Commissioning Plan Engaging the Community LSST Commissioning Plan document is LSE- 79 2

Commissioning <es the individual elements together technically forming an opera<onal system Image Acquisition Camera LSST System Cmd/Cntl Rqt s ICDs Tel. & Site Image Formation & Infrastructure Calibrated Data Products Data Man. 3

In commissioning we will characterize and document the as- built system performance System Spa)al Response Sensor Features Op)cal PSF Size and Shape System Wavelength Response 4

Commissioning will conclude with data quality assessment of calibrated data products usable for science Data will be accessible through the LSST Science User Interface. Zero point fit and star/galaxy photometry SDQA tools currently in place. 5

Other requirements for Opera<on Readiness The project team shall demonstrate that the integrated LSST system can collect and process )me- domain Level 1 data products, including the genera)on and distribu)on of alerts; The project team shall demonstrate that the integrated LSST system can monitor and assess the quality of the data as it is being collected; The project team shall demonstrate that relevant metadata are being collected and archived; The project team shall deliver a complete set of documented opera)onal procedures and suppor)ng technical documents needed to operate the LSST as a scien)fic facility for the purpose of conduc)ng a 10- year survey; and The project team shall deliver all reports documen)ng the as- built hardware and soxware including: drawings, source code, modifica)ons, compliance excep)ons, and recommenda)ons for improvement. 6

Commissioning Management Structure Project Director and Manager maintains overall authority on all commissioning ac)vi)es, budget and schedule. LSST safety staff con)nues their role to ensure all ac)vi)es are conducted safely; par)cularly for the on- site ac)vi)es at the Summit Facility. Systems Engineering Manager and Systems Scien<st are responsible for the commissioning effort, including planning, priori)zing, coordina)ng the day- to- day commissioning ac)vi)es, and func)onal supervision of assigned staff. Subsystem Managers con)nue to provide administra)ve supervision to personnel assigned to the commissioning team and responsibility for remaining construc)on ac)vi)es not associated with commissioning. Chilean Site Manager supervises logis)c and administra)ve opera)ons of work carried out in Chile at the Summit and Base Facili)es. 7

The composi<on of the Project Commissioning Team The technical team is drawn from exis)ng personnel in each of the 3 subsystems and func)onally assigned to Systems Engineering and managed as a single group. DOE opera)ons is expected to support ~20 FTE (scien)fic & technical) assigned to Systems Engineering for Commissioning by MOU. The science team has both exis)ng personnel and new hires. New hires include: 3 scien)st + 3 postdocs 1 rota)ng scien)st posi)on Telescope operator (for 3 total) Project Office con)nues administra)ve support FY20 FY21 FY22 Com. Scien<sts 5.3 8.7 11.3 DM Scien<sts 3.5 4.5 3.9 TS Scien<sts 2.2 2.5 2.7 Science Team Total 10.8 14.7 16.0 Engineering 7.0 6.2 6.8 Technicians 5.2 6.0 7.6 SW Engineering 11.4 12.1 8.6 Technical Team Total 23.7 24.4 22.9 Commissioning Total 34.4 39.1 38.9 MREFC supported FTEs by fiscal year assigned to the Commissioning Phase 8

Commissioning plan is in 3+ Phases Staged subsystem acceptance tes)ng Telescope & site with ComCam Oct. 2019 Camera system at summit Aug. 2020 DMS Archive Center at NCSA Aug. 2020 Early System Integra)on & Test with ComCam 6 months planned tes)ng 4 addi)onal months available if needed Full System Integra)on & Tests Camera + Telescope + DMS 7 months to verify complete LSST system func)onality Science Verifica)on & Opera)ons Readiness Demonstra)on 5 months to characterize and demonstrate science performance and opera)ons readiness 9

Objec<ves in each of the 3 Commissioning phases guides detailed planning 6 month (min) early System I&T with ComCam Interface tes)ng Ini)al Telescope and Ac)ve Op)cs Control Tes)ng Calibra)on Opera)ons and Cal. Data Products Pipeline Processing Scheduler Driven Opera)ons Tes)ng DM Algorithm development Procedure defini)on 7 month Camera- Telescope- DM integra)on Final system interface verifica)on Telescope- Camera Integra)on and Test DM Pipeline tes)ng with Full FPA Data OSS requirements verifica)on 5 month Science Verifica)on Mini Surveys to characterize SRD performance LSR requirements verifica)on and characteriza)on Opera)ons Readiness and Verifica)on using ini)al survey cadence 10

Early System I&T ac<vi<es with ComCam A single rax camera opera)ng as a surrogate of the full science camera. U)lizes as many Camera system interfaces as possible: CCS- OCS SDS- DM WDS- TCS GDS- TCS Corrector for ~40 arcmin FOV 6 Filters - u- g- r- i- z- y planned Telescope interface includes Camera mass simulator Autonomous scheduler opera)ons safety tests Parallel telescope & system interface tes)ng 11

Early tes<ng of DMS release 8.0 w/live ComCam data Release R8.0/8.1 - Commissioning Camera ready Complete 8/31/18 Collect and compute metrics for algorithms below. Visualization and exploration of SDQA telemetry, catalog, and image data in support of nightly observing. (LSE-63 Level 1 DQA) L3 Toolkit Testable for science user usability of DM stack Calibration Products Master flat production from monochromatic flats. Estimation of telescope-camera Production bandpasses from monochromatic flats. Derivation of atmospheric models. Image Processing, Single Frame Measurement, Association of DIASources to DIAObjects, Association of DIAObjects with Objects, Image differencing with Alert Production images incorporating as-built sensor characteristics, Image differencing of crowded fields, DIAObject characterization from DIASources, NightMOPS, DayMops (not parallelized or running at scale) Set up and solve the least squares system for photometric self calibration (20% DR1 scale), PSF estimation at SRD specification level, Capability to build coadds in Data Release crowded fields, Multi-coadd deblending and association, Simultaneous generation Production of multiple coadds, Deep Detection, Model fitting of blended objects, Computational performance enhancements Science User Interface and Analysis Tools Science Data Archive and Application Services Data Management Control System SUI testable for science user usability of Data Products Construct Catalogs, Database Administration, Database User Management, Load Tables, SQL and non-sql Query, Scan Queries, Shared Scan Queries, Image and File Archive, Data Access Client Framework, Data Definition Client Framework, Application Services Configure, Catch-Up Archiver, OCS startintegration, Archive Image, OCS nextvisit, Manage Production Phase Execution, Resource Management 12

Data Management Pipeline Performance Verifica<on with ComCam Calibra<on (WBS 02C.01.02.04) Cross- talk matrix deriva1on (on- sky and off- sky data, Master bias construc1on, Master dark frame construc1on, Defect mask construc1on, Broadband flat field acquisi1on, Master flat produc1on from monochroma1c flats. Es1ma1on of telescope- camera bandpasses from monochroma1c flats, Reduc1on of calibra1on telescope spectra, Deriva1on of atmospheric models, Auxilliary telescope pipeline end- to- end test Alert Produc<on Pipelines (WBS 02C.03.*) Building difference imaging templates, Refinement of selec1on criteria and strategy for building templates, Differencing an image against a deeper template, Source detec1on on difference images, Verifica1on of false posi1ve rates, Measurement of PSF Flux and adap1ve moments on the diffim, Forced photometry on difference of exposures comprising a visit, FiRng dipole sources on diffims, Detec1on and masking of ar1facts, Detec1on and minimiza1on of ar1facts due to imperfect image registra1on, Trailed source model fit, Forced photometry on images and difference image, Image differencing of crowded fields, DIAObject characteriza1on from DIASources, variability characteriza1on, NightMOPS valida1on, Level 1 database par1al throughput valida1on, Data Management Control System par1al valida1on, End- to- end test of diffim pipeline, Alert Genera1on Pipeline valida1on Single Frame Processing (WBS 02C.03.01) ISR removal (defects, dark, flat, bias), Source detec1on and measurement of PSF flux, aperture flux, adap1ve moments. WCS determina1on, single- visit astrometry accuracy. Snap processing (CR detec1on and removal). Deblender performance. Measurement (flux, shape, astrometry) quality at chip edges and near bloom stop. Mul1- CCD sky background detemina1on. Cross- talk removal (intra- ran). Recogni1on and reten1on of trails (moving objects) in visit crea1on. Level 2 Pipelines (WBS 02C.03.*) Verify background- matched coadds, PSF, non- PSF matched, and chi^2. PSF Flux and Aperture photometry on coadds, Model firng using CoaddPSF (Stackfit, greedy PSF), Coadd source characteriza1on, Simultaneous genera1on of mul1ple coadds, Deblending and source associa1on given mul1ple coadds, Deblending in crowded fields (crowded field photometry), Capability to build coadds in crowded fields, Inser1on and recovery of simulated sources, Morphological star- galaxy separa1on A sample of Data Management func1onality testable with ComCam 13

Full System I&T: Camera- Telescope integra<on Vista Camera Camera- Telescope integra)on focus includes: Physical installa)on and basic func)onal checkout Final calibra)on and verifica)on of ac)ve op)cs system Integrated system requirements verifica)on (OSS) Func)onal interac)ons with scheduler driven observing 14

Ini<al Camera- Telescope characteriza<on is done prior to on- sky measurements Mechanical Tests Horizon to zenith displacements using laser tracker Update hexapod look- up tables Func)onal Tests Filter swap Maintenance procedures System Characteriza)on Photon transfer func)ons to verify amplifier noise and linearity Shuner )ming and repeatability System response by filter with narrow band flat images Broadband flats for each filter Shuner leakage tests All image data will be processed through the DM and many other tests pipelines. 15

Ini<al On- sky Camera- Telescope ac<vi<es will focus on ac<ve op<cs control Establish ini)al camera- telescope alignment and update control look- up tables Laser tracker maps camera hexapod / rotator deflec)on versus eleva)on angle Focus sequence images to determine best fit plane with respect to FPA; adjust hexapod control to minimize residuals as a func)on of telescope eleva)on. Build the ac)ve op)cs look- up tables for the full field of vied using Camera Science FPA as a wavefront sensor Intra and Extra focal images over the full FOV using hexapod to set defocus distance (~ ±5-10mm); Determine mean wavefront error for each of the 189 sensors; Determine Camera and M2 alignment and M1M3 and M2 surface correc)ons Determine eleva)on, azimuth, and other dependencies for look- up tables Focus sequence Intra/Extra focal images for wavefront sensing All image data will be processed through the DM pipelines. 16

Examples of early data sets that will test and characterize the DM Pipelines Further characteriza)on of the camera- telescope instrumental signature Illumina<on Correc<on Determina<on: dense (~ >50% overlap) image rastering over spans 3-4 FOV, fit photometry for fixed panern Super Flats : median filtered images stacks leaving only sky, verify illumina)on correc)on axer correc)on for tangent plane projec)on Ghost Image Valida<on: Raster bright star over field to measure ghost surface brightness versus field angle Scadered Light Performance: Measure changes in sky background from image sequences versus lunar angle to op)cal axis and azimuth orienta)on Astrometric WCS determina<on: Raster common field across each detector, also provides ini)al photometric color term determina)on. Addi)onal early data to DM pipelines Fixed Airmass Systema<cs: Repeated observa)ons of celes)al pole field, at different rota)ons; Performance Repeatability: High temporally sampled single fields to test image quality stability, and photometric / astrometric repeatability Moving Object Detec<on: Single field observa)on over extended )me period tracking moving objects over field of view to test visit linkage Transparency Correc<on: Observa)ons of celes)al pole field though different amounts and kinds of clouds, to verify how well we suppress transparency varia)ons 17

Full System I&T: Data Management processing full FPA images Calibra)on Products pipeline test & verifica)on Spa)al response from dome screen measurements System wavelength response from mono- chroma)c dome screen measurements Sensor characteris)cs from dome screen measurements Alert Produc)on test & verifica)on Instrumental signature removal Image differencing Transient detec)on and characteriza)on. Example transient detec)on 18

LSR/SRD verifica<on matrix will be filled in with compliance & characteriza<on data at ORR LSE- 79 20 15 10 5 0 Occurrences 25 19

Examples of early data sets that will test and characterize the system performace Further characteriza)on of the camera- telescope instrumental signature Illumina<on Correc<on Determina<on: dense (~ >50% overlap) image rastering over spans 3-4 FOV, fit photometry for fixed panern Super Flats : median filtered images stacks leaving only sky, verify illumina)on correc)on axer correc)on for tangent plane projec)on Ghost Image Valida<on: Raster bright star over field to measure ghost surface brightness versus field angle Scadered Light Performance: Measure changes in sky background from image sequences versus lunar angle to op)cal axis and azimuth orienta)on Astrometric WCS determina<on: Raster common field across each detector, also provides ini)al photometric color term determina)on. Addi)onal early data to DM pipelines Fixed Airmass Systema<cs: Repeated observa)ons of celes)al pole field, at different rota)ons; Performance Repeatability: High temporally sampled single fields to test image quality stability, and photometric / astrometric repeatability Moving Object Detec<on: Single field observa)on over extended )me period tracking moving objects over field of view to test visit linkage Transparency Correc<on: Observa)ons of celes)al pole field though different amounts and kinds of clouds, to verify how well we suppress transparency varia)ons 20

Commissioning concludes with an Opera<ons Readiness mini- survey Science verifica)on focuses on characterizing the system performance proper)es defined in the LSR/SRD. Verifica)on matrix filled in with compliance and characteriza)on data. Example sky coverage from an Opera)ons Readiness mini- Survey 21

30 day OpsSim example of a 2- color mini- Survey Following ORR the final mini- survey would be released to the general community to ini)ate science opera)ons. 22

An extended Commissioning Team will engage the community The Project will issue a call for proposals to par)cipate in the Joint Commissioning Team. Proposals are required to show: The proposed work will provide valuable feedback to the Commissioning team; Lead to higher data quality at the start of opera)ons; and The PI and team are capable and have the resources to carry out the proposed analysis in a )mely way. The par)cipants will work with the project to develop the observing plans by sugges)ng Specific areas on the sky Targeted observa)ons with special cadences Mini- survey designs 23

An extended Commissioning Team will engage the community Project team must stay focused on technical commissioning tasks and system characteriza)on Community team is expected to collaborate with the project to provide value added scien)fic analysis of commissioning data General release of the commissioning data will be subject to an internal vewng and review process (TBD). 24

Commissioning Planning and Review Over the next two years a detailed Commissioning plan will be assembled and will include: Specific verifica)on tests, procedures and acceptance criteria Ini)al observa)on sequences and mini- survey designs Simula)ons of key commissioning ac)vi)es using project tools. A review of the Commissioning Plan is expected some)me in 2016 25

End of Presenta<on Name of Mee)ng Loca)on Date - Change in Slide Master 26

Web forms for observa<on input 27