TRADE TRAINING CENTRES IN SCHOOLS PROGRAM INDEPENDENT REVIEW 2014

TRADE TRAINING CENTRES IN SCHOOLS PROGRAM INDEPENDENT REVIEW 2014

The Hon Sussan Ley MP Assistant Minister for Education Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister Independent Review of the Trade Training Centres in Schools Program I am pleased to provide to you the report of the Independent Review of the Trade Training Centres in Schools Program. While the project description for this review suggested it would principally be a desk-top review, concerns about the paucity of data and the need to engage with employer and industry groups, principals, head teachers and students led me to follow a different approach. This 30 day review examined the utilisation and performance of TTCs, including whether they have met expectations. It focuses on the outcomes of the 217 centres operational in 2012 and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the program. It reports on best practices and makes suggestions about how to maximise the value of the program over the stipulated reporting period of the next 10 years (noting that the scope for change is limited given the stage the program has reached and that funding agreements have already been signed or are in the process of being finalised). I have been impressed by the willingness of a wide range of stakeholders to engage on this review and to provide their frank assessment of the issues, including: - 126 schools that participated in the Review survey - employer and industry groups who willingly gave their time to provide their assessment of the performance of trade training centres - education authorities, principals and head teachers who were unfailingly patient in the interviews on outcomes and areas for improvement. Departmental staff answered over 100 detailed information requests and provided secretariat support for the school visits and other consultations. Helen McLaren, Deb Barton and Louise Dooley bore the weight of my requests for evidence. The conclusions reached in this report are mine. I am pleased to submit my report for your consideration. Yours sincerely Patricia Scott Independent Reviewer 17 October 2014

Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Background on Trade Training Centres in Schools Program... 1 Scope of Review... 2 Early key changes to the TTC Initiative... 2 Clusters... 2 An early shift away from Certificate III qualifications... 3 Performance against the program s objectives... 3 Inconclusive material on the extent of the impact... 4 Academic Studies... 4 Table: Selected recent Australian research on the impact of VET in Schools on Year 12 completion and engagement in post school study and employment... 4 Indigenous students... 5 Clusters are both real and faux... 5 Utilisation... 5 Have TTCs met local skill shortages?... 6 Very diverse approaches by both jurisdictions and schools... 6 Multiple objectives... 7 Employer and industry groups call for a further shift in TTCs focus... 7 TTCs operate in a fast moving and complex environment... 8 Branding is about the school rather than a TTC or a particular course... 8 Taster courses... 9 Red tape and school performance... 9 Continuity... 9 Key points arising from the Review... 9 Opportunities for improvement... 10 1 Trade Training Centres Snapshot... 12 Figure 1: Enrolments in TTCs by Fields of Study by Jurisdiction (2012)... 12 TTC course selection by gender... 12 Figure 2: Female Enrolments by Field of Study... 12 Figure 3: Male Enrolments by Field of Study... 12 TTCs are attracting Indigenous enrolments... 12 Figure 4: Proportion of Indigenous Enrolments in TTCs (2012)... 12

TTC information by qualification level... 13 Figure 5: 2012 Enrolments by Qualification Level... 13 Figure 6: 2012 Qualifications Completed by Level... 13 Figure 7: Australian School based Apprenticeships in TTCs (2012) by Qualification Level... 13 Type of Construction 2012... 13 Figure 8: Allocation of Funding by Project Type 2012... 13 Figure 9: Allocation of Refurbishment Funding by Sector 2012... 13 TTC Review survey information... 13 Figure 10: TTC Impact on Enrolments... 13 Figure 11: TTC Impact on Retention... 13 Figure 12: TTC Impact on Completions... 13 2 Scope and Conduct of the Review... 14 Scope of Review... 14 Conduct of the Independent Review... 14 3 Performance Indicators... 16 Performance against the program s objectives... 16 1. What is the direct contribution of TTCs to the COAG Year 12 or equivalent target?... 17 1.1. Completion of Certificate II or above qualifications... 17 Figure 13: Number of completions at Certificate II level or above, 2010-2012... 17 Figure 14: Number of completions at Certificate II level or above by Indigenous students, 2010-2012... 18 2. What is the possible future contribution of the TTCs to the COAG Year 12 or equivalent target?... 19 2.1. Completion of Certificate I qualifications... 19 Figure 15: Number of completions at Certificate I level at TTCs, 2010-2012... 19 2.2. Completion of units of competency as part of Certificate II or above qualification... 19 Figure 16: Number of students completing one or more units of competency at a TTC, 2010-2012... 20 2.3. Australian School-based Apprenticeships... 20 Figure 17: Number of ASbAs at TTCs by Certificate level, 2010-2012... 21 3. Are completion levels at TTCs better than completion levels in VET in Schools more broadly?... 21 3.1. Comparison of TTC s share of Vet in Schools students with TTC s share of Vet in Schools qualification completions... 21

Figure 18: Proportion of total VET in School enrolments that are at a TTC compared with the proportion of total VET in School completions at a TTC... 22 3.2. Comparison of TTC s share of Vet in Schools enrolments with TTC s share of Vet in Schools module completions at Certificate II or above... 22 Figure 19: Proportion of total Vet in Schools students at Certificate II or above that are at a TTC compared with the proportion of total Vet in Schools students who have completed at least one unit of competency/module at a TTC... 23 Education Authorities... 23 Employer and industry group attitudes about the performance of TTCs and the responses of employers... 23 Survey results... 24 Academic studies... 24 Rates of return on the TTC program: insufficient time and inadequate data to tell at this stage. 25 4 Utilisation... 26 Background... 26 Data on TTC utilisation... 27 Table 1: Teaching Space Utilisation for Timetabled Classes Non TTC School... 27 TTC workshop utilisation information... 27 Table 2: Funded Teaching Space Utilisation by Activity Type TTCs 2012... 27 Cluster schools... 28 Examples of wider use of the TTCs... 30 Non-school use... 31 Employer and industry groups considered schools could do more... 32 White elephants?... 32 Not a white elephant but suboptimal use... 33 Remedies... 33 Conclusion... 33 5 Expectations, Employer Views and Shifting Goal Posts... 35 Shifting school expectations and altered contractual obligations: the initial changes... 35 Employer and Industry Groups Expectations... 36 Employer and industry groups are concerned about the value proposition for employers while schools report that employers value their students... 37 Competency-based Wages... 38 Changing Goal Posts... 38 Changes in industry s views regarding engineering qualifications... 39

Actions by Manufacturing Skills Queensland... 42 Conclusion... 42 6 Best Practice... 43 Southern Cross Catholic Vocational College, Burwood NSW... 43 A concentrated effort on trades training... 43 VET Enrolments 2010 2014 Southern Cross Catholic Vocational College... 44 School-based Apprenticeships and Traineeships 2014 by Industry Group... 44 Outcomes... 45 Recognition for TTC s strong performance... 45 Challenges... 46 Success Factors... 46 Sunshine Coast Technical Trade Training Centre Queensland... 47 Strong engagement with local employers and industry... 47 Their success in engaging with employers and industry... 47 Outcomes... 48 Loyola Senior High School, Mt Druitt, NSW... 48 The school offers a concentrated trades offering... 48 Catholic Regional College (CRC) Trade Training Centre, Sydenham, Victoria... 49 An international showcase: The College uses five school businesses to give students practical experience... 49 Industry and employer engagement... 51 Outcomes... 52 A cluster arrangement... 52 Ensuring access to schools within the cluster... 53 Aviation High School Queensland... 53 Offering a highly specialist course... 53 Success factors: a Review perspective... 54 Some common lessons... 54 7 Views of Education Stakeholders and the Issue of Recurrent Funding... 57 The views of principals and head teachers... 57 Funding of VET in schools... 61 Recurrent funding... 61 Education authorities... 62 Is there a case for Commonwealth recurrent funding now?... 63

Staff continuity... 63 Appendix A... 65 HISTORY OF THE TRADES TRAINING CENTRES IN SCHOOLS PROGRAM... 65 Appendix B... 66 Consultations by the Independent Reviewer for the Trade Training Centres in Schools Program... 66 Summary of Independent Review on-site visits... 67 Executive Summary... 67 Bibliography... 69

Executive Summary Introduction Background on Trade Training Centres in Schools Program Commonwealth expenditure on the Trade Training Centres in Schools Program (TTCs Program) is expected to be $1.4b (2008-2017). This will fund 511 TTCs. The program has closed for new applications. Successful applicants for Round 5 Phase 1 (the last Round) have been announced; the Department has settled 128 funding agreements and is settling a further eight funding agreements. The Department will disperse the funds in accordance with the terms and conditions of the relevant funding agreements. The TTC initiative operates as a partnership program. The partnership is between the Commonwealth Government and state and territory education departments or state based education authorities representing the Catholic and independent schools sectors. The Commonwealth has signed overarching funding agreements with state and territory governments, and Block Grant Authorities (which are the conduits for both the Catholic and independent sectors managing the TTC funding.) Essentially, the Commonwealth Government provided funding for: 1. new or refurbished buildings 2. trades equipment for the centres 3. a small amount for administration costs for the school authorities to assist with their administration of the TTC Program. Capital funding from the Commonwealth is sometimes supplemented by capital funding from the school or the owning school authority or in some cases a third party (e.g. TAFE). The Commonwealth Government funding for the TTCs explicitly did not cover recurrent funding requirements. There are precedents for this. Recurrent costs under the program (teachers salaries, utility costs, consumables, transport costs, insurance and so on) are to be met by the school or the school authority (state or territory government, or Catholic Education Office). Of the approximately 391,000 VET in Schools enrolments, 5.5 per cent are through a TTC. Just over 1200 indoor workshops and classrooms have been built or refurbished to date. Thirty nine per cent of the funding by project in value terms went to new buildings only; approximately 50 per cent a mix of new buildings and refurbishments; and 12 per cent to refurbishments only. Refurbishments were principally in the state sector; 81 per cent of all refurbishments were in the Government sector with NSW accounting for about two-thirds of the share. Chapter 1 provides a Snapshot of TTCs and Appendix 1 a short history of the program. 1

Scope of Review This 30 day independent Review examined the utilisation and performance of TTCs, including whether they have met expectations. It focuses on the 217 centres operational in 2012 and identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the program 1. This report identifies best practices and makes suggestions about how to maximise the value of the program over the stipulated reporting period of the next 10 years (noting that the scope for change is limited given the stage the program has reached and that funding agreements have already been signed or are in the process of being finalised). Chapter 2 details the scope of Review. Early key changes to the TTC Initiative The terms of reference for the review include an examination of performance against expectations. There were two early changes to the TTC initiative that involved shifting expectations. 1. Not every school would get a TTC. Some schools would get a TTC in their own right, but others could form a cluster for a TTC. Additional funding to the original budget allocation of $2.5b would have been required for all eligible schools to have a TTC based on the cost of establishing the required training infrastructure over the early years of the program. 2. The early focus of the government on Certificate III qualifications was not appropriate for most TTCs. Clusters It was quickly recognised by the incoming Labor Government that while its election commitment was to have a TTC in all schools, this was not sensible some schools are too small, others were not interested and there are economies of scale in concentrating capital funds in larger schools. As a result, the former government rolled out the program allowing both individual schools and school clusters to apply for funding. Of the total 511 TTCs funded, 263 (51.5 per cent) go to individual schools in their own right (standalone TTCs) and 248 (48.5 per cent) are in clusters. Of the 217 TTCs operational in 2012, 86 (39.6 per cent) are stand alone and 131 (60.4 per cent) are in clusters. It is worth noting that some standalone TTCs do enrol students from other schools in courses even though they are not a cluster school (and some cluster schools extend their enrolments in the TTC to students beyond the cluster schools). 1 There are an additional two schools that are non-conforming TTCs and are under investigation. 2

An early shift away from Certificate III qualifications The initial expectation of the program under the former government was that students would undertake courses up to and including Certificate III. However, the general consensus of principals, head teachers, education authorities and employer groups is that the completion of Certificate III courses outside an Australian School-based Apprenticeship (ASbA) is impractical for most schools because of the substantial requirements for structured workplace learning and need for students to make up for missed school classes in their own time. The great bulk of students undertaking approved courses in TTCs are studying for Certificate I and II (93 per cent based on 2012 enrolments). Funding agreements were varied to support this change to the training delivery. However, there are some schools that offer units in Certificate III competencies outside ASbAs. Performance against the program s objectives The objectives of the program are to help: support the achievement of a national Year 12 or equivalent attainment rate of 90 per cent by 2015 address skills shortages in traditional trades and other eligible occupations by: - improving student access to trade training facilities that meet industry standards - improving the quality of schooling offered to secondary students undertaking trade related pathways - assisting young people to make a successful transition from school to work or to further education and training, and - supporting COAG s goal to halve the gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other students in Year 12 or equivalent attainment rates by 2020. The Commonwealth Department of Education has encountered difficulties in converting these broad objectives into meaningful Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). There is a substantial mismatch between the stated program objectives and the availability of data to assess performance against those objectives. The KPI problem was compounded by the overwhelming initial focus of the Department on speedy and effective delivery of program funding reflecting the focus of the previous government. This has resulted in the Department treating this program largely as an infrastructure rather than a training initiative. There is some objective data on enrolments, school and course retention rates, and completion rates, but less data on the destination of students following school, and the data on post-school outcomes is only available with a considerable lag (see Chapter 3). Directly attributing any improvement or deterioration in these variables to the establishment of a TTC (or TTCs more broadly) through the use of aggregate econometric analysis is impractical as there are simply too few observation points to filter out all the other factors at play (changes in minimum school leaving age, improving or deteriorating labour markets, etc.). The absence of a unique student identifier for school students means that the data that might reveal the effects of the program are not available. 3

While an econometric analysis is not feasible, the state and territory education departments, the Catholic Education Commissions, the Independent Schools Association, the principals interviewed, the Annual Activity Reports of TTCs and respondents to the school surveys conducted as part of this review, all reported improvements against one or more of the available indicators: enrolments, retentions, completions, post-school training and employment pathways. In summary, the survey of schools shows around two-thirds of TTCs operational in 2012 reported that the TTCs had a positive impact on enrolments, retentions, completions, post-school training and employment pathways. Inconclusive material on the extent of the impact Schools surveyed were usually only able to provide anecdotal material on the extent of the impact because many factors are at play. The body of the report (Chapter 3) provides some broad measures of performance but again it is not possible to attribute specific results to TTCs with any confidence. Academic Studies Australian academic studies and consultant reports have examined the impact of VET in Schools rather than TTCs specifically. The table below provides a brief summary of what a selection of recent reports find in relation to the impact of VET in Schools on Year 12 completion and engagement in post school study and employment. For more information, see Chapter 3. Table: Selected recent Australian research on the impact of VET in Schools on Year 12 completion and engagement in post school study and employment School completion Transition to further study and employment Polidano and Tabasso 2013 Gemici and Curtis 2012 Deloitte Access Economics 2012 Clarke &Volkoff 2012 VET in School has a large positive impact, particularly if it includes workplace learning VET in Schools with workplace learning has a positive impact N/A Notes some studies have shown a positive impact of VET in Schools on school retention VET in School has a significant positive impact on transitions to further study in VET and employment but a significant negative impact on further study in higher education VET in Schools with workplace learning has positive initial impact on post school engagement in study and employment Early school leavers who study VET in School are more likely to experience good transitions into further study and work than early school leavers who did not study VET in School Presents a wide variety of stakeholder views to the question: Why is VET in Schools not providing strong employment and further study outcomes for student? 4

In very broad terms, the impression I have gained from a range of international studies suggests some VET in schools is better than none at all, simulated work settings have a small positive impact and real life work placements have the largest positive effect (see Kuczera 2011, Kang and Bishop 1989, Bishop and Maine 2004, Meer 2006, Meer 2007 and OECD Learning for Jobs 2010 for commentary on country case studies). For example, Bishop and Maine s analysis of 12 years of longitudinal data found that those who devoted one-sixth of their time in high school to occupation specific vocational courses earned at least 12 per cent extra one year after graduating and 8 per cent extra seven years later (holding attitude, ability, family background and college attendance constant). Indigenous students The level of Indigenous enrolments suggests that TTCs have been successful in attracting the participation of Indigenous students. Clusters are both real and faux Clusters provide opportunities and challenges, and are certainly not for the feint-hearted. They have: lowered average costs per student, as costs are shared over a larger number of students; there are economies of scale with wider course offerings; and greater opportunity to innovate. But clusters make the TTC exercise more complex (e.g. problems in timetabling, alignment of school approaches, differing expectations, need for agreement about shared costs, concerns about poaching students, and difficulty of travel to and from cluster schools). There are varied configurations and outcomes with clusters some are successful and others operate in name only. The survey results of TTCs operational in 2012 suggest that access within a TTC cluster is an issue for most schools in clusters. Given the large geographic area that some TTCs are meant to cover, it is not surprising that access is an issue. Cluster schools from Gascoyne Trade Training Centre in WA, for example, are at distances of 365 km, 329 km and 400 km from their lead school in Carnarvon. Video conferencing in remote settings makes a difference, but given the hands-on nature of so many courses, distance is a serious challenge. The survey comments included schools considering boarding school arrangements, while others have given up, or see the only realistic option being relocating their students to the school with the TTC facilities. Cluster issues are discussed in Chapter 4. Utilisation The figures reported by schools suggest there is not a major problem with schools meeting their school utilisation requirements. Utilisation rates do not look high but are broadly comparable with other specialist facilities in schools. The breadth of student curriculum choices, the size of the school population and whether schools are in clusters are three factors identified as affecting measured utilisation. There is a real risk that facilities will be used less over time (with a change in school leadership, shifting educational focus, etc.). Certainly, this risk is increased if there is a switch towards taster 5

programs and less technically demanding VET courses as less use would be made of the advanced equipment in TTCs. This is explored further in Chapter 4. If utilisation emerges as a serious issue, compliance and remedial actions are available. Schools have adopted very different approaches to opening up TTCs to wider use including by other registered training organisations (RTOs) and community groups. Some employer groups and RTOs interviewed suggested that many schools are missing opportunities for greater utilisation of their TTCs. Departmental data shows that on average relatively little use is made of facilities by community groups and industry. Have TTCs met local skill shortages? Data on meeting local skill shortages is not available. The Department s analysis finds that the fields of study undertaken by students through TTCs in Schools broadly align with the occupations listed on the National Skills Shortage list for 2013-14. In particular, these include: food, personal and health services; construction trades; and a range of automotive, engineering and electro-technology trades. There are very significant numbers of students undertaking hospitality courses (see the Snapshot) and it is unclear if this will meet or exceed labour market demand. Queensland expects hospitality demand to be strong over the next five years particularly for bakers, chefs, cooks and middle and senior management. Hospitality has been on the skills shortage list for over a decade. Schools as part of this review reported that students undertake hospitality for many reasons including the ability to access part-time employment while studying and other non-vocational interests. Very diverse approaches by both jurisdictions and schools Not only is there considerable variation in the ways individual schools approach the purpose and focus of their TTCs, the states and territories have very different approaches to VET in Schools, which influences the focus of TTCs. For example: Queensland and South Australia strongly focus their VET funding for school students in areas of skills need NSW mandates structured workplace learning while other jurisdictions provide structured workplace learning when required by the training package Victoria has a specific Senior Secondary School Certificate option for VET in Schools students the Victorian Certificate of Applied Learning the Northern Territory has determined it is important for its VET in Schools courses to commence earlier and target Year 9 students in particular to access VET, including those students in remote areas recently announced reforms in Western Australia include a Qualifications Register which provides parents, students and schools with industry guidance about the suitability of qualifications for delivery in a VET in Schools context. Furthermore, TTCs have followed diverse approaches reflecting: their leadership and teacher capabilities, parental expectations and student attitudes, and 6

to varying degrees, their surrounding labour market. Some TTCs operate with particular entrepreneurial flair and some TTCs have become promising and innovative examples of VET in Schools (see Chapter 6). Multiple objectives Generally speaking, TTCs and VET in Schools courses are being directed at multiple objectives: trades education for those committed to a trades career a trade certificate or certificates as part of a Year 12 or equivalent qualification completion of units of competency-based training taster education exposing students to a variety of trade pathways 2nd chance education life and work skills in a simulated workplace learning environment engaging students now required to stay to school to 17 years. The multiple objectives and variation in expectations makes achieving success very challenging ( they are all things to all people ). It is very difficult to achieve many objectives with one instrument. It also makes the assessment of overall performance problematic. Employer and industry groups call for a further shift in TTCs focus More recently, reflecting concerns from employer groups that schools have over-reached in their course offerings, and that students with some Certificate II qualifications may in fact be at a disadvantage in the labour market because of competency-based pay, there has been a push from a number of employer groups for schools to only offer certain courses up to either the Certificate I or II level. A number of states are likely to go in this direction. Some employer and industry groups have concerns about the value proposition for employers, while schools report that employers value their students. For TTCs to be effective as employment pathways, employers and industry must see value. Some industry groups have questioned the value proposition of students completing Certificate II and units of Certificate III without effective real workplace learning. They went further and stated that some schools and school systems are disadvantaging students in this regard. - This is especially the case given the industrial relations system requires employers to pay students on the basis of their qualifications (competencies) rather than the employer s perception of their value. Some employer groups questioned the employment value of students with Certificate II qualifications who have had limited practice with accredited competencies, and who did not have real life work experience. 7

The Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) was more nuanced in its response, considering that this was an issue for particular industries and highlighting the need for a very carefully and well-informed approach to course selection by schools. Employer groups reiterated the importance they place on real life work experience; something that a TTC, even with industry-standard equipment, cannot provide. One industry group interviewed noted that employers would value a second year apprentice who spends four days on the job and one day with their RTO more than a student from the TTC who spends four days at school (and with only part of that time in the TTC) and one day at work. That said, successful TTCs do produce students valued by employers (including some TTCs that offer units of Certificate III for capable students). Many TTCs in their annual activity reports and survey responses reported successful transitions of their trade students to work, being approached by employers to identify students for employment and willingly losing students to full-time employment after work placements. These messages were reinforced in my meetings with principals, head teachers and some employers. At the same time some schools and education authorities are expressing concerns that the pendulum may swing from over reach to under reach. Some pre-vocational courses are unlikely to provide sufficient challenges for Year 11 and Year 12 students (see Chapter 5). TTCs operate in a fast moving and complex environment TTCs are operating in complex settings with frequent changes in government policies and course content. Employers, head teachers and principals remarked on the rapidity of change. Some employer groups expressed concern that schools are disadvantaging their students by not keeping up with new course content and training packages. Branding is about the school rather than a TTC or a particular course The many objectives schools are attempting to meet means that the purposes of a TTC and the TTC brand are far from clear. Government descriptions of TTCs as state of the art, industry standard, trades education with a strong component of structured workplace learning, simulated workplace learning, and life skills education means that even interested stakeholders get a mixed message as to their key purpose. Inconsistent quality and frequent course changes mean that many employers rely on the reputation of the school and the trades teacher as a proxy for the quality of a particular course. Some employers clearly use work placements as a means to identify promising workers. Some TTCs have specialised focussing on trades education with strong components of work placements (see the case study on Loyola College at Mt Druitt). The top performing TTCs have an unambiguous focus on competencies within national accredited courses, the completion of certificates to a high standard, and real work placements. They have also engaged very experienced and well-regarded tradespeople with strong industry connections. Other TTCs provide a broader offering to students who have very diverse levels of long-term interest in trade training. In some schools, classes are streamed by whether students are studying for academic results (HSC, VCE, ACT Year 12 Certificate, SACE, WACE, QTE, TCE) or are 8

following a VET focused pathway. In smaller schools such as Boorowa Central School training is very individualised with a strong component of structured work placement. Two employer groups interviewed suggested that some schools have structured course offerings to the skill sets of the existing teacher workforce, and that a home economics teacher, even after undertaking a short course, is unlikely to have the same credibility as a chef from industry with extensive industry contacts. That disadvantage is compounded if the students do not experience quality structured workplace learning. Taster courses Taster courses are offered by many TTCs. These short courses are designed to give students some knowledge and experience of vocational areas to help inform any decision to undertake a full-time vocational program. Taster courses may be useful but they should not constitute the main use of a TTC. Red tape and school performance Information on TTCs outcomes are presently inadequate (KPIs have not been put in place despite earlier audit recommendations). The Annual Activity Report does glean some useful information. While it will be tempting for the Commonwealth Government to abolish the Annual Activity Report process in the quest to cut red tape, consideration needs to be given to how parents, students and taxpayers can be assured about the performance of TTCs. One option is to leave it to the market; information will filter back to parents if students with TTC qualifications from particular schools don t get jobs. The alternative is to provide some assurance to parents that there is effective monitoring of outcomes. The eventual introduction of a unique student identifier for school students at some time in the future would provide an opportunity to better track the destination of school students into further training or employment (but this is not imminent). The Commonwealth Department of Education is presently exploring alternative data sources. It would be sensible if the Commonwealth had a means to know the successes or failure of TTCs before abolishing one of the few points of information it has. Information available about TTCs should be published regularly including the individual performance of schools. Continuity While the Education Authorities were very complimentary of Commonwealth departmental staff, a concern for a number of agencies dealing with the Department on a regular basis was the frequency of staff movements. This reduced efficiency. Frequent staff movements also reduce substantially the opportunities for policy and program managers to learn the successes and failures of program design and implementation. The frequent movement of staff reduces individual but not departmental accountability. Key points arising from the Review The two critical success factors of TTCs are strong school leadership (the principal and the head teacher) and local employer engagement. Strong leadership and employer engagement are required to make the capital provided by the Commonwealth Government work effectively for students, parents, prospective employers and taxpayers. 9

Opportunities for improvement It is important that governments clarify the role of VET in Schools. This process is underway. At present, TTCs suffer from trying to be all things to all people. The overwhelming focus should be on trade training and ensuring the employability of students. Urgent consideration needs to be given to the standards of approved courses. Work placements are critical to achieving strong outcomes (ideally, states and territories would mandate these although there are implications for funding). As part of the industrial relations inquiry or another inquiry, the issue of training wages should be examined to see if they are acting as an unreasonable impediment to training and employment.it would be a retrograde step to reduce students ability to undertake Certificate II courses because of inflexibilities in the industrial relations system. Schools want to learn from each other, and at present there are few opportunities to do so. The Commonwealth should provide clear information on best practice to schools on its websites and highlight the availability of this information to all TTCs. This information would include: - the unambiguous focus of successful TTCs on relevant work experience - how principals successfully recruited trades teachers with strong industry experience - schools demanding high standards of students - work placements as an effective means to not only provide practical hands-on experience for students but also as a means to build a strong reputation with local employers - how schools have successfully worked with local employers, suppliers and sponsors to build up the TTC - the innovative use of TTCs by other registered training organisations, community groups and clubs. There would be benefit in governments highlighting for schools the practical options available to increase community and industry usage and how schools have successfully addressed concerns about non-school use. The Commonwealth should encourage the states and employer groups to hold regional meetings of TTCs to share experiences. The Commonwealth should highlight employer, industry and school TTC champions. The Commonwealth over the coming years should, as part of its contractual oversight, allow appropriate rationalisation and specialisation of courses by TTCs within a region. The Commonwealth Government could encourage the Education Authorities in each state to have regional cross-sectoral consultations between TTCs and interested local RTOs and providers of adult education regarding the use of TTC facilities. It would be worthwhile for the Department to finalise its deliberations of KPIs and its search for alternative data sources to assess TTC performance, even if this means accepting that some of the program objectives cannot be meaningfully assessed at this time. In the event that the Commonwealth was ever to roll out a similar program again it would benefit from a few salutary lessons from this program: 10

- the expectations gap between public statements and reality - the unnecessary haste associated with the first stage of programs involving buildings and complex ongoing agreements often comes at a cost in terms of effective consultation, policy design and program delivery - the overwhelming focus by program managers looking after this program to see it as an infrastructure project rather than a training program. If governments want to have programs with training and employment objectives they need to ensure a focus and KPIs to match. - better buildings result when each school has a genuine say in the building design process (see Chapters 6 and 7) - the need to have some continuity in program management say for the first 5 years of a program. 11

1 Trade Training Centres Snapshot Figure 1: Enrolments in TTCs by Fields of Study by Jurisdiction (2012) Source: 2012 TTC Activity Report. 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 Food and Hospitality Graphic and Design Studies Health Agriculture Building & Construction Engineering Science 1000 0 NSW QLD VIC SA WA TAS NT Note: Science enrolments relate to the broad field of natural and physical sciences and include courses in Carbon Management and Laboratory Technician. TTC course selection by gender Source: 2012 TTC Activity Report. Figure 2: Female Enrolments by Field of Study 80% 10% Science Engineering Building & Construction Agriculture Health Graphic & Design Studies Food & Hospitality TTCs are attracting Indigenous enrolments Source: 2012 TTC Activity Report. Figure 4: Proportion of Indigenous Enrolments in TTCs (2012) 8% Indigenous Non-Indigenous Figure 3: Male Enrolments by Field of Study Science Engineering 32% 12% 49% Building & Construction Agriculture Health Graphic & Design Studies Food & Hospitality 12

TTC information by qualification level Source: 2012 TTC Activity Report. Figure 5: 2012 Enrolments by Qualification Level 15000 10000 5000 Figure 6: 2012 Qualifications Completed by Level 4000 3000 2000 1000 Figure 7: Australian School based Apprenticeships in TTCs (2012) by Qualification Level 400 300 200 100 0 0 0 Certificate I Certificate II Certificate III Certificate I Certificate II Certificate III Certificate I Certificate II Certificate III Type of Construction 2012 Source: Departmental records. Figure 8: Allocation of Funding by Project Type 2012 TTC Review survey information Source: Independent Review survey of operational TTCs in 2012 (55 responses received, giving a 25 per cent response rate). Approximately two thirds of schools reported TTCs had positive impacts on school enrolment numbers, student retention rates and Year 12 completion rates. Figure 10: TTC Impact on Enrolments 24% Figure 11: TTC Impact on Retention 24% School Enrolments 65% Retention Rates 14% 62% positive impact no impact no comment positive impact no impact no comment Figure 12: TTC Impact on Completions Year 12 Completions 49% 39% New Build Refurbishment Combination 24% 16% 60% positive impact no impact no comment 12% Figure 9: Allocation of Refurbishment Funding by Sector 2012 13% 6% 81% Government Catholic Independent 13

2 Scope and Conduct of the Review Scope of Review This 30 day review was commissioned by the Assistant Minister for Education, the Hon Sussan Ley MP. The key elements of the terms of reference involve examining: 1. The current utilisation of training facilities to identify opportunities for increased or improved utilisation. 2. The training provided, particularly in terms of industry and employer engagement. This will involve an examination of the current role of industry and employers in training delivery models to identify: a. models of best practice b. options for strengthening industry and employer links c. opportunities for enhanced involvement leading to better training outcomes. 3. Training outcomes and whether they are meeting industry and employer needs. This will involve an assessment of the current training outcomes under the program against: a. program objectives b. original funding proposal expectations c. contractual obligations d. industry and employer expectations. Conduct of the Independent Review While the review brief suggested it would principally be a desk-top review, concerns about the quality of data and the need to engage with employer and industry groups, principals, head teachers and students resulted in the following approach: review of annual Activity Reports from schools extensive interviews with Commonwealth Department of Education managers of the program (present and past) interview with a former manager of the Australian Technical Schools program and internal audit staff review of key documents including the internal compliance report, the internal review of the Australian Technical College program, the performance audit of the TTC program by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), the draft internal review of the program s performance 2013-2014 review of key recent research papers, both domestic and international, on the outcomes of VET in schools review of other data sets review of a sample of student and employer feedback forms following work placements 14

discussions with education authorities from all states and territories i.e. the state education departments, the Catholic education office in each jurisdiction and the independent school association in each jurisdiction visits to 7 per cent of TTCs that were operational in 2012. Visits typically involved interviews with the principal and the head teacher but also other staff, discussions with the relevant education authority, agencies arranging the structured work placements, consultants to the schools on VET in Schools or their external RTO, and of course, discussions with students. The range of schools included a small central school in a rural area, regional and metropolitan high schools, stand-alone and cluster schools, a TTC attached to a TAFE, a community school seeking to serve second chance learners, small, medium and large schools and a school with a significant enrolment of indigenous students. Government, Catholic and independent schools were visited. Appendix B provides more detail video conferencing with three remote schools in a cluster a survey of TTCs: 126 schools responded with a particular focus on those TTCs operational in 2012 (the sample is 25% of TTCs operational in 2012) discussions with individual employers and industry and employer groups including ACCI, Ai Group, Victorian Automotive Chamber of Commerce, the Hospitality Training Network NSW and Construction Skills Queensland discussions with RTOs including the CEO of Industry Link and the Culinary School of Excellence Tasmania review of the summaries from the Minister s roundtable discussions on the Framework for VET in School discussions with Commonwealth Department of Industry on the broader VET reform agenda. 15

3 Performance Indicators Performance against the program s objectives The objectives of the program are to help: support the achievement of a national Year 12 or equivalent attainment rate of 90 per cent by 2015 address skills shortages in traditional trades and other eligible occupations by: - improving student access to trade training facilities that meet industry standards - improving the quality of schooling offered to secondary students undertaking trade related pathways - assisting young people to make a successful transition from school to work or to further education and training, and - supporting the Closing the Gap initiative to halve the gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other students in Year 12 or equivalent attainment rates by 2020. The Commonwealth Department of Education has encountered difficulties in converting these broad objectives into meaningful Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). In 2013-14, an internal performance audit of the TTC program was conducted. It noted that: In 2008/09, Internal Audit conducted a performance audit of the program and recommended the development of program key performance indicators (KPIs) that were able to be appropriately assessed, measured, monitored and reported in order to strengthen program management. Similarly, in 2010/11, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) conducted an audit of the Department s administration of the program and also recommended strengthening the program s performance information framework via the Portfolio Budget Statements and other publicly available reporting. The Department agreed with both the Internal Audit and ANAO recommendations regarding the program s performance framework. In 2012, the ANAO reviewed the implementation of the recommendations contained in the 2010/11 report and found that the implementation of the recommendations relating to the program s performance framework was only partially implemented. The Audit found additional performance indicators exist for the program; however, these indicators are not recorded in the Portfolio Budget Statements or the Department s Annual Reports. The additional indicators more closely correlate to the objectives of the program (paras 4.3.28 and 4.3.29 2013-14 Performance Audit Trade Training Centres in Schools Program draft report). Extensive discussions with the Commonwealth Department of Education show that limited progress has been made to finalise KPIs. In large part, this reflects the gap between the program s objectives and the data available (a disconnect that was also apparent in this Review). The quality of data available is poor and where good data exists there are a very limited number of observations (TTCs operations have been too recent to give sufficient information to allow analysis of trends). The Department did report publicly on things it could measure while continuing to explore alternative measures. 16

No. of completions In the Portfolio Budget Statements (PBS), the Department recorded the number of schools funded and the number of projects funded as program deliverables (later PBS recorded the total announced projects cumulative, new projects announced and the number of schools benefiting). Reflecting the focus on fast delivery under the previous Government, the Department primarily treated the program as an infrastructure project rather than a training program. The Department has provided the following information on the performance of the program, noting that it is difficult to demonstrate a direct correlation to the achievement of the broad program objectives. Commentary is provided on a range of these initiatives. 1. What is the direct contribution of TTCs to the COAG Year 12 or equivalent target? 1.1. Completion of Certificate II or above qualifications One of the key objectives for the TTC program is to support the achievement of a national Year 12 or equivalent attainment rate of 90 per cent by 2015. Since the TTC program began in 2010 until the end of 2012, a total of 6,031 students had completed an approved TTC qualification at the Certificate II level or above. As shown in Figure 13, the number of Certificate II or above completions has steadily increased from 113 in 2010, when 48 TTCs reported activity, to 3,785 in 2012, when 208 2 TTCs reported activity. Figure 13: Number of completions at Certificate II level or above, 2010-2012 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2010 2011 2012 Certificate II 112 1933 3256 Certificate III 1 200 529 Total 113 2133 3785 Source: TTC Activity Reports, 2010-2012 It is difficult to estimate the overall impact of TTCs on the 2015 target, as the target is measured by the attainment rates of 20-24 year olds in the total population 3 and the program has only been in operation since 2008. Furthermore, many factors would influence the attainment rate. However, the 2 By December 2012, 217 projects had commenced operations but completed activity reports were received from 208 of these. 3 The agreed measure for the COAG target is the proportion of 20-24 [year olds] that have attained a Year 12 or equivalent or a Certificate II or above qualification. 17

No. of completions 3,785 completions in 2012 represent about 1.2 per cent of all school leavers in 2012 4. When all 511 TTCs are operational, this proportion could be expected to more than double, assuming the completion rate remains constant. Another key objective of the TTC program is to support COAG s Closing the Gap initiative to halve the gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and other students in Year 12 or equivalent attainment rates by 2020. Since the first TTC became operational in 2010 until the end of 2012, a total of 415 Indigenous students have completed an approved TTC qualification at the Certificate II level or above. This represents 6.9 per cent of all qualification completions at a Certificate II or above at TTCs 5. As shown in the snapshot (Section 1), TTCs have a higher representation of Indigenous students than in the overall student population. Figure 14: Number of completions at Certificate II level or above by Indigenous students, 2010-2012 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2010 2011 2012 Certificate II 8 162 230 Certificate III 0 6 9 Total 8 168 239 Source: TTC Activity Reports, 2010-2012 4 According to the ABS 2013 Survey of Education and Work, there were approximately 319,800 school leavers in 2012. 5 By comparison, Indigenous students represent 4.1 per cent of all school enrolments in Years 9 to 12 (ABS Schools, Australia, 2012). 18

No. completions 2. What is the possible future contribution of the TTCs to the COAG Year 12 or equivalent target? 2.1. Completion of Certificate I qualifications Completion of lower level certificates can often be a pathway to enrolment in, and completion of, higher level certificates. Since the first TTC became operational in 2010 until the end of 2012, almost 4,000 students have completed an approved TTC qualification at the Certificate level I. Figure 15: Number of completions at Certificate I level at TTCs, 2010-2012 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2010 2011 2012 Certificate I 306 1625 2068 Source: TTC Activity Reports, 2010-2012 2.2. Completion of units of competency as part of Certificate II or above qualification Acknowledging that it can be difficult to complete a whole qualification while at school, the attainment of one or more units of competency at the Certificate II level or above is a recognised indicator for VET in Schools and can also often be a pathway to completion of higher level certificates 6. In 2012, 12,431 students successfully completed one or more units of competency at a TTC 7, of which 10,128 were part of a Certificate level II or above qualification. The Department is of the view that data from earlier years is significantly underreported by schools due to a misunderstanding about the definition of this item and should be treated with caution. 6 The report School-aged youth in vocational education and training published by the NCVER and the National Report on Schooling in Australia published by ACARA include data on the number of 15 19 year old students who have successfully completed at least one unit of competency/module as part of VET qualifications at AQF Certificate II or above as key program measures for VET. 7 Referred to as having received a Statement of Attainment in the TTC annual Activity Report 19

Module/units of competency completed Figure 16: Number of students completing one or more units of competency at a TTC, 2010-2012 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2010 2011 2012 Certificate I 102 222 2301 Certificate II 340 362 9259 Certificate III 222 157 869 Total 664 777 12431 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Source: TTC Activity Reports, 2010-2012 2.3. Australian School-based Apprenticeships Australian School-based Apprenticeships (ASbAs) are part of the national Australian Apprenticeships system. Australian Apprenticeships (including ASbAs) combine practical work on-the-job, with structured off-the-job training to achieve a nationally recognised qualification. ASbAs involve paid employment and training and also provide valuable experience to students, increasing their industry specific knowledge and employability skills. Students undertaking an ASbA are supported by their school/college to enrol in a range of courses that meet their individual needs and timetables, as well as to timetable their program to allow for work, training and regular schooling. ASbA is a term that covers both apprenticeships and traineeships that are school based. The program objectives and priorities for TTCs make no mention of ASbAs and no targets were set for projects or participating schools. Of the 24,753 students enrolled in ASbAs during 2012, around 23 per cent were studying at schools which accessed a TTC (My School data). A total of 758 students were enrolled in an ASbA for an approved course at a TTC facility during 2012. This figure represents around 14 per cent 8 of all ASbAs undertaken in traditional trades nationwide. Although the data is imperfect, it is possible that this proportion may be on the low side. This likely reflects the relative focus on the broader school curriculum vis a vis a focus on work settings. Certainly a number of schools in the Review survey reported the difficulty of students undertaking ASbAs given school timetables and the demands of work placements. 8 Source: VET in Schools students by major course characteristics, 2012 - For more information see: www.ncver.edu.au/publications/2698.html 20

No. of ASBAs Over time, if TTCs are successful in generating stronger interest, the TTCs share of ASbAs in these fields would be expected to increase. Figure 17: Number of ASbAs at TTCs by Certificate level, 2010-2012 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2010 2011 2012 Certificate I 11 177 245 Certificate II 27 110 286 Certificate III 44 113 227 Total 82 400 758 Source: TTC Activity Reports, 2010-2012 3. Are completion levels at TTCs better than completion levels in VET in Schools more broadly? 3.1. Comparison of TTC s share of Vet in Schools students with TTC s share of Vet in Schools qualification completions The following figure compares TTC s share of total VET in School enrolments with TTC s share of the total VET in School completions. To the extent that TTCs have a larger share of total Vet in Schools students completing a qualification in VET than they have as share of Vet in Schools students, it may indicate that TTCs are more effective in getting students to complete qualifications. The blue column in Figure 18 indicates that Vet in Schools students in TTCs represent 5.5 per cent of all enrolments in Vet in Schools at a Certificate I level or above and the red columns show that TTCs represent 6.2 per cent of all Vet in Schools qualification completions at Certificate I level or above. Comparing the blue and red columns, the data suggest that TTC students are completing Certificate I and III level qualifications at a higher rate than one would expect given their share of enrolments. However, it also suggests that TTC students are completing Certificate II level qualifications at a lower rate than one would expect given their share of enrolments at that level. A potential limitation of this analysis is that certificates are often not the same in terms of length or requirements. 21

Figure 18: Proportion of total VET in School enrolments that are at a TTC compared with the proportion of total VET in School completions at a TTC 7% 6% 5.5% 6.3% 6.1% 6.3% 5.8% 6.2% 5.5% 5% 4% 3% 2% 2.2% 1% 0% Certificate III or above Certificate II Certificate I Total % of VETiS enrolments % VETiS completions Source: TTC Activity Report, 2012; National VET in School Collection Note: Vet in Schools completion data is for 2011, which is the latest year of course completion data available; TTC data is for 2012, which is the most complete data set available. 3.2. Comparison of TTC s share of Vet in Schools enrolments with TTC s share of Vet in Schools module completions at Certificate II or above As noted above, it can be difficult to complete a whole qualification while at school, therefore the attainment of one or more units of competency at the Certificate II level or above is a recognised indicator for Vet in Schoolsand it can often be a pathway to completion of higher level certificates. The following chart compares TTC s share of total VET in School enrolments with TTC s share of Vet in Schools module completions at Certificate II or above. To the extent that TTCs have a larger share of students completing one or more units of competency at Certificate II level or above, it may indicate that they are more effective in getting students to complete units of competency. Figure 20 indicates, however, that students at TTCs only represent 5.5 per cent of module completions at Certificate II or above in Vet in Schools, which is lower than their share of students at Certificate II or above (7.2 per cent). Care should be taken in drawing any conclusions from this data given the concerns about data integrity raised in Section 2.2. 22

Figure 19: Proportion of total Vet in Schools students at Certificate II or above that are at a TTC compared with the proportion of total Vet in Schools students who have completed at least one unit of competency/module at a TTC 10% 8% 7.2% 6% 5.5% 4% 2% 0% % of VETiS students (Cert II and above) % of VETiS students who have successfully completed at least one unit of competency/module as part of VET qualifications at AQF certificate II or above Source: TTC Activity Report, 2012; NCVER School-aged youth in vocational education and training, 2012 Education Authorities Broadly speaking, all Education Authorities were supportive of the program and considered that it was making a positive impact. However, they noted that robust attribution is not possible given the paucity of the data and the stage of the program. For example, the recent Review of TTC conducted for the Victorian Government has concluded that: At this stage, we have not identified any change in outcomes attributable (emphasis added) to TTCs. Applying statistical testing and programming, we compared TTC lead schools, cluster schools and the Control Group but were unable to determine: Any change in enrolments, either at the schools level, for Vet in Schools or VET unit enrolments; Any difference in VCE or VCAL completions; and Any difference in post-school outcomes. It should be noted though that this Review has occurred mid-way through roll-out of the TTC program. Many TTCs were still under construction or had been operating for only a short period (12 months or less). If these tests were applied in future years, differences may become apparent. (Source: Phillips KPA Review of Trade Training Centres in Schools Program: Outcomes and Viability for the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, June 2014 p 5) Employer and industry group attitudes about the performance of TTCs and the responses of employers This is covered at length in Chapter 5. 23

Survey results As shown in the snapshot at Section 1 of this report, the survey responses from 55 TTCs operational in 2012 suggested that the school leadership consider their TTCs have had a positive impact on school enrolments, student retention rates and Year 12 completion rates. The same survey shows similar positive results for post-school training and employment outcomes. Schools surveyed were only able to provide anecdotal material on the extent of the impact because many factors (once again) are at play. Academic studies Australian academic studies or consultant reports available have examined the impact of VET in schools rather than TTCs specifically. While earlier research, particularly by Anlezark et al. (2006), suggests that VET in School has a slightly negative effect on Year 12 retention, more recent research suggests participation in VET in Schools can have significant positive impacts on school completion and engagement in post school work or study, particularly if the course involves workplace learning. A summary of selected recent research is presented below. Black D, Polidano C & Tabasso D (Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 2011, 2012 and 2013) using LSAY data, the authors found participation in VET in schools has a significant large positive impact on school completion (14 per cent) and that this result is consistent across different models of VET in schools and across different LSAY cohorts. In terms of post-school outcomes, participating in VET in schools is estimated to have positive labour market outcomes i.e. transiting to a full time career job and increased wages in the first and third year after school. Overall, VET in schools is estimated to improve the chances of finding employment, especially fulltime employment, increase weekly wages and improve the chances that youth will find a job they like as a career. The benefits are greater for those whose VET in schools course included a sizeable workplace learning component e.g. an average of more than 20 days per year. The most notable impact observed in the research is that school VET programs shifted the choice of post-school education in the first three years out of school away from higher education toward further VET study. Gemici S & Curtis D (2012) Like Black, Polidano and Tabasso, Gemici & Curtis conclude that structured workplace learning (as opposed to general work experience) undertaken as part of VET studies in Year 11 contributes to higher levels of Year 12 completion and greater post-school engagement. They found that participation in work placements during Year 11 is associated with a 5.2 per cent increase in Year 12 completion and a 3.8 per cent increase in full-time engagement in work or study one year after leaving school. Deloitte Access Economics (2012) using LSAY data, the report shows that having undertaken some part-time work while at school appears to help transitions for both early leavers and Year 12 completers, while VET in Schools shows a small positive association with good transition outcomes for early leavers. Year 12 completers who do not participate in VET while at school experience better transitions than those who do. This reflects the more academic inclination of the former group, many of whom go on to full-time tertiary study and a good post-school transition - they are less likely to participate in vocationally-oriented VET courses while at school. 24

Clarke, K & Volkoff, V (NCVER 2012) This is a working paper that draws on NCVER data and postschool destination surveys from Queensland and Victoria. The paper identifies that there are significant numbers of young people opting to leave school early and undertake VET outside senior secondary certificates. This raises questions about the effectiveness of current approaches to VET in Schools in retaining students within the structure of the senior secondary certificate, particularly in relation to pathways to work or further study. The paper notes a higher take-up of VET in School programs by low-socioeconomic status and low-achieving students, and consequently the need to develop strong, high quality occupational pathways to employment and further education. It also notes a move by jurisdictions to support higher level qualifications through VET in Schools programs and the different approaches taken to recognise VET within both senior secondary certificates and for university entrance. The paper observes that while VET in Schools has helped to increase retention and to engage disadvantaged and disengaged young people, it needs a delivery context and school culture that link tangibly with labour market, occupational and/or further study pathways as weak relationships with occupations will undermine its effectiveness. In very broad terms, the impression I have gained from a range of international studies suggests some VET in schools is better than none at all, simulated work settings have a small positive impact and real life work placements have the largest positive effect (see Kuczera 2011, Kang and Bishop 1989, Bishop and Maine 2004, Meer 2006, Meer 2007 and OECD Learning for Jobs 2010 for commentary on country case studies). For example, Bishop and Maine s analysis of 12 years of longitudinal data found that those who devoted one-sixth of their time in high school to occupation specific vocational courses earned at least 12 per cent extra one year after graduating and 8 per cent extra seven years later(holding attitude, ability, family background and college attendance constant). Rates of return on the TTC program: insufficient time and inadequate data to tell at this stage It was not practical to estimate the return on investment at this stage as we simply don t have sufficient data. We cannot separately identify individual students undertaking courses through TTCs (there isn t a unique student identifier), and as noted before, there are many factors at play. A number of schools that had TTCs operational in 2012 noted they were now only in their second year of operation and that they were still establishing their brand in the labour market. A number of principals made the comparison to a small business: it would take four or five years for the school to have a TTC operating optimally and that employers, parents and students need to see runs on the board before feeling convinced. It would be worthwhile for the Department to finalise its deliberations of KPIs and its search for alternative data sources to assess TTC performance, even if this means accepting that some of the program objectives cannot be meaningfully assessed at this time. 25

4 Utilisation Background The present and the previous governments have been concerned about the longer term utilisation of the TTCs. Through the five rounds of agreements, there have been various clauses about expected utilisation, with provisions for rectification and, where necessary, redress, and reporting requirements for the first ten years of the agreement. 9 Given the considerable time and effort school principals and head teachers put into developing successful applications for funding, and the responsibilities schools have taken on, it is reasonable to assume that school principals are highly motivated to ensure optimal use of the facilities. In effect, there should be a natural alignment between the desires of the Commonwealth Government, the education authorities and the school leadership to see optimal use of the TTC. This scenario is more challenging in a cluster situation where there needs to be continual alignment of the leadership of more than one school about the importance and use of the TTC. Principals and education authorities noted the impact that changing school leadership can have on the operations of the TTCs. One school visited reported that there had been three changes in school principal since the TTC application was originally made. As a result, the TTC was inherited by a new principal who did not necessarily share the same vision on the role and importance of the TTCs. Another principal remarked that, while he had inherited the TTC, he was very cognisant of the school s agreement with the Commonwealth and of the positive contribution the TCC was making, and could continue to make, to the school. Changing leadership within clusters was highlighted in discussions with education authorities as a risk for utilisation, as informal understandings between former principals became less certain over time. For cluster schools with small class sizes and considerable distances to travel, setting aside one day for common classes can mean that measured utilisation in hours per week for trade courses is relatively low (although the number of students using the facility as a result of students coming in from other schools may have increased). Some schools overcome the timetabling problems by altering the length of lessons and extending the school day for TTC students (e.g. start later and extend TTC time into the evening). Blocks of structured workplace learning will reduce TTC utilisation (unless it is made up by other temporary arrangements) but having students in real work places is to be encouraged. Schools appeared keen to use TTCs freed up by structured workplace learning as an opportunity to have Years 7 to 9 see and use the facilities (as a means to attract students to trade courses). 9 The ten year Training Obligation Period starts from the date the TTC commences operation and requires an annual report on the previous year s training activity. The Designated Use Period extends for 20 years from the date the TTC commences operation and requires the continued use of the facilities for TTC delivery. In Round 1 to 4, the requirement is for the school to use the TTC principally for the purposes approved by the Commonwealth. Round 5 stipulates hours and courses and, for year one, the student numbers. 26

For all schools, student interest and enrolment in TTC courses can fluctuate over time, heightening the challenges in managing the utilisation. Over time some rationalisation and specialisation can be expected and the Commonwealth s contractural oversight should reasonably facilitate this. Data on TTC utilisation Specialist facilities in schools will not necessarily be used every hour of the school day. TTCs are predominantly made up of specialist facilities with welding bays, car hoists, commercial kitchen facilities, etc as well as more standard classrooms (sometimes within the TTC shed or above the workshop floor). To ascertain what might be a reasonable benchmark for the use of TTCs, I asked the Department to look at the utilisation rate of non-ttcs, but still specialist school facilities. Table 1 contains data on the average hourly usage per week of various teaching spaces, compiled from a sample of 10 classrooms, 5 science laboratories and a design and technology complex consisting of 4 workshops, an art room and a computer/cad room. The workshop usage has been split between classes for students in Year 9 through to Year 12 (VET) and students below Year 9 (Other), as the comparative data from TTCs relates to approved usage for students in Year 9 through to Year 12 and other student usage (non-approved courses). Table 1: Teaching Space Utilisation for Timetabled Classes Non TTC School General Classroom Science Lab CAD/PC Room Art Room Metal / Wood Workshop VET Other 22.2 21.7 21.5 9.3 9.9 6.9 Figures are average hourly usage per week TTC workshop utilisation information According to the Department (2012) the program built or refurbished a total of 1232 indoor teaching spaces (not including covered outdoor work areas) at sites which reported activity during 2012. Table 2 is TTC specific and divides the hours of utilisation by the number of teaching spaces to arrive at an average hourly usage for a teaching space funded through the program. Of note, the data did not allow for differentiation between workshops, general teaching spaces (classrooms) or CAD/PC rooms. Table 2: Funded Teaching Space Utilisation by Activity Type TTCs 2012 Approved Courses Use Other Student Use Staff Use Community/Industry Use 8.5 4.9 0.8 0.7 Figures are average hourly usage per week 27

Based on the data available, generally: hourly student usage for TTC approved courses is in the vicinity of 8-9 hours a week compared to 9-10 hours a week for a non-ttc specialist workshop school facility TTC utilisation for approved courses is 57 per cent (8.5 of 14.9 hours per week) of the total utilisation of the teaching space which compares to 59 per cent (9.9 of 16.8 hours per week) for the non-ttc school total TTC utilisation for approved courses and other student use (e.g. taster courses for Year 7 and 9 students) is 60 per cent of available standard school time (assuming a 25 hour week) which compares to 67 per cent of available time for a non-ttc school relatively little use on average is made of TTC facilities by community groups and industry. While these figures suggest that, on average, student utilisation meets the utilisation requirement under Rounds 1 to 4, and usage is in the ball park for other specialist school facilities, intuitively, the total time on average a school is utilising its TTC facilities may still seem concerning. A constraint to lifting utilisation of TTCs is the time spent by students at school on non-ttc subjects. If, in the main, students are studying a broad curriculum where TTC courses are a minor element of their school timetable, then unless there are large student cohorts in each year (allowing for multiple classes in each year throughout the day), utilisation rates will never reach high figures. Some schools visited have a particularly strong focus on VET in school and are of sufficient size that utilisation rates are high. Facilities at St Edmunds College in Ipswich are in such demand that they reported a waiting list for students to enrol in TTC courses. The Principal suggested the TTC was utilised 75 per cent of a school week. The college s TTC centre is used by 784 students from a school population of 942. In years 9 and 10, there are 164 students in various classes studying woodwork, and 72 students in various classes in Year 11 and 12 studying construction. The auto workshop is used by 56 students studying Auto (AUR10112) in Years 11 and 12 and 95 students studying automotive in years 9 and 10. Cluster schools Clusters present both an opportunity and a challenge to optimising utilisation. Education authorities, principals and head teachers indicated there are many challenges associated with cluster arrangements. As one education authority noted: Common class timetabling between cluster schools and travel times to TTC sites are big issues for cluster projects. Some clusters choose to set aside a common day to get around these issues. The Department advised that there are a few cluster schools in rural areas where TTC facilities are effectively only used for approved courses one whole day a week. For example, the cluster members in one rural area reached agreement early on that there would be less disruption for students if training were held on a designated week day. This allows for coordinated travel and schools have ensured that timetabling is structured in a way that VET students do not miss out on core subjects when they attend trade training on the designated day. However, it means low measured utilisation rates. 28

The responses to the cluster question in the survey of TTCs that were operational in 2012 suggest access was not an issue for 18 per cent of respondents. The remainder said that access was an issue and a range of strategies were identified to address the problem. A few schools noted that they were unable, for a variety of reasons, to access the TTC. A sample of school survey comments on access to cluster schools Students at our school have never had access to the TTC that was built on another high school's site using our funding allocation. The school was initially involved in the building discussions but has not been able to secure access to the completed facility for student training. Travel to the site and the coordination of timetables between two schools makes this impractical. We are a cluster partner model Our students have access to the TTC on the same basis as other cluster students we have not yet experienced any difficulty in our own students missing out on accessing the program Two local high schools have come to the college to share in the use of the equipment especially for the design stages. Students and teachers from the local schools have received training alongside our staff from experts in industry and a link through the local council (almost 20 teachers training during the school holidays). In time I see the valley working well to support training through our TTC. We just need more time to develop a better image and safer environment for the inclusion of other students during the day. There are some barriers to cluster student participation which include transport, aligning timetables across schools, the need to multiple enrol a student and where the FTE [falls] between the 2 schools which has an impact on full school budgeting. Having said this, we have had 5 students from a school outside the cluster enrol in our D2C course and have hosted students from numerous schools for Try A Trade Days and Step Out Programs. An organised bus shuttle service enables students from [cluster] schools to access the TTC on training days. Our schools have been working together in an Alliance for around 15 years. Whilst the focus has evolved, a large part is around shared delivery of Vet in Schools for quality assurance and increased opportunity in as economically viable way as possible.consequently, we have agreements in place whereby the schools and RTOs under an MOU with us, deliver training on Tuesdays and Thursdays. This enables other core curriculum to be timetabled on the remaining days. It also allows flexibility for SWP day opportunities. All schools in the Alliance and TTC offer some form of training to each other. Places in the courses are agreed to by formula, ensuring equitable access. Processes such as interview are used if courses are oversubscribed and extra courses cannot be negotiated (though this latter occurrence is rare). My school has had limited access due to distance from the TTC. We are a 4 hour drive away from Umuwa. An accommodation facility has now been handed over to the TTC and that has facilitated access in 2014. We have had to increase site budget commitment to cover the additional costs of this access. Our school's access could be improved by greater alignment of courses to real employment in 29

the community and subsidising the cost of courses. We also need a fairer system of access between the 8 schools. [remote SA school] As the lead school in our cluster, we have just signed a lease on a house in town so that we can offer accommodation to staff and students from our partner schools, if needed. We intend to also provide a mobile service to other schools and kit them out with basic equipment. [school in remote SA] In 2012, Year 11 students came from over 50 different Year 10 feeder schools. Access to the TTC is open to all interested students. Our TTC has 7 schools involved and students have access to different VET options depending on what school they are at. We also now have some students moving from one school to another to access a particular VET program. This is only just starting to happen successfully and is difficult to negotiate due to school timetables. The students that are moving through report that it is working well and they are very pleased to have access to something that is not offered in their school. There appears to be a lack of willingness to block times for our students and at this stage it appears to be only on a Wednesday that block offerings are being made. It appears that the rest of the times available are timetabled classes and this does not suit [us] as we are not able to transport our students to the TTC for double periods, etc. Students feel that it is extremely difficult to access [the] TTC while remaining members of other secondary schools. It is an access and equity issue not only for SJC students but for all the schools in the cluster. We are in a cluster of three schools, but each has an identical building. It was anticipated early in the application that there would be difficulty transporting students between campuses. Examples of wider use of the TTCs Examples from the 2012 Annual Activity Reports showed TTCs being used for additional purposes beyond the delivery of approved qualifications: Trade Training Centre State/ Territory Additional Use Average hours per week Sapphire Community TTC NSW Special program for disengaged Aboriginal youth 30 Northern Adelaide Regional TTC SA Girls in Construction taster course 16 Kutjungka TTC WA Aboriginal Teaching Assistant Training 20 Fabric and Construction TTC NT Practical based construction and engineering projects 38 Cradle Coast TTC TAS Certificate II Hospitality - Kick Start Program for adult learners run by Polytechnic 25 Brisbane North West TTC QLD Get Set For Work (Disengaged students) 30 30

Non-school use Under the guidelines, schools are encouraged to make TTCs available for other uses. The clause in the Round 5 guidelines reads as follows, but similar clauses were in the guidelines for all earlier rounds. 5.2.2 Capacity for the school and broader community to benefit Schools are required to demonstrate in their application the benefit trade training will have on the school and the wider community. When demonstrating capacity to benefit in their application, schools should demonstrate or provide information on: the extent to which the facilities will be used by the broader community, for example through availability for adult training after school hours. During the school visits, I witnessed St George s School s TTC being utilised by an international cooking school with international students. Other schools visited reported the non-school use of their TTCs: by a local car club on Saturdays (with reciprocal support through the donation of equipment and learning opportunities for TTC automotive students) by school students from a school for children with special needs for industry seminars, trade displays and exhibitions by Mothers clubs on cultural days for community learning. The education authorities in interviews were able to give examples of the wider impact and use of TTCs. A clear message from the discussion with the NT education authorities was that the TTCs are providing invaluable infrastructure to remote communities where there are very few facilities, and the TTCs are being used extensively to build capacity through adult education. The Tasmanian authorities pointed to the use of TTCs for automotive trade days, master classes and hospitality trade days where ten of Australia s top chefs conducted cooking demonstrations at a TTC. Queensland education authorities noted that there had been an expectation at the beginning of the program that schools would generate income from third party use of the facilities outside of school hours and that industry would provide some level of investment. This had not occurred to the extent anticipated. WA authorities noted that the cost of delivering some training in schools, particularly at the higher certificate levels (III and IV), can be prohibitive. Developing agreements with partnering and other RTOs to share use of facilities is critical for sustainability. An emerging trend in WA is that VET providers and RTOs are approaching TTCs to develop partnerships and agreements to gain out-ofhours access to the TTC facilities in return for the provision of training or services. This will enable RTOs to access quality trade training facilities in smaller regional areas that may not have other 31

facilities. The WA Department of Education is looking at opportunities for the greater use of TTCs for training, workforce development and community access in school down-time. Employer and industry groups considered schools could do more Employer groups and RTOs interviewed suggested that many schools are missing opportunities for greater utilisation of their TTCs. White elephants? No one would embark on the onerous process of applying for a TTC grant to build a white elephant, but because of changes in personnel, or poor credibility of the teaching staff, or a significant deterioration in local industry or a suite of other changes, a TTC could seriously underperform, and either gradually or suddenly fall into disuse. The Department has identified three TTCs that were not functioning: two are under investigation and the third is expected to be operational this year after the matter was pursued by the Department. The latter involves Commonwealth expenditure of $0.2m on a refurbishment and fit out of an existing workshop. The school reported the TTC was not operating because of lack of student demand. Not surprisingly, no school surveyed self-reported that it had become a white elephant. Education authorities noted the real risk that TTCs could become white elephants. The annual activity review reports process reinforces the message from the Commonwealth about the need to adhere to agreed courses and use. A number of education authorities noted that due to changes in principals, the commitment to particular TTCs had waned and that remedial action by the relevant education authority had been taken. There appeared to be considerable awareness by the education authorities of their responsibilities and/or the schools responsibilities under the agreements, and a number of school principals in my school visits drew my attention to the requirements that they face associated with delivery. That said, a small number of principals raised or acknowledged the possibility that some TTCs could become white elephants (not at their school but elsewhere). None felt comfortable identifying a school with a white elephant TTC or at risk of having one. As this is not a full audit, it is not possible to identify and numerate poor performers and white elephants. The risk of non-usage and poor usage is real already there are examples. The risk factors include: change in school leadership with the new leaders unfamiliar or not in agreement with the original principal s rationale for committing to have a TTC poor quality teaching or lack of availability of teaching staff poor standing of the TTC with local employers a mismatch between courses delivered and the requirements of local industry 32

Not a white elephant but suboptimal use Schools can be utilising a TTC but in sub-optimal ways that are inconsistent with their contractual obligations. A drastic shift to using the facilities for non VET courses could see a TTC with its industry standard kitchen and equipment, in effect, become an over-capitalised home economics room. One school visited engaging second chance learners from disadvantaged backgrounds was providing training for three students in a facility with a capital cost of $1.08 m (GST inc). This TTC also offered junior secondary students the opportunity to visit the facility and is running taster courses for the year 8 and 9 students. One student had completed a Certificate III course and yet, until very recently, that student had experienced significant trouble finding an apprenticeship. The school Principal attributed this difficulty to the time it takes for the school to build a reputation in the marketplace. He considered it would take five years. The completion of a Certificate III is a significant achievement, especially so for a second chance learner with significant disadvantages. It is also the case that establishing brand credibility in the labour market takes time if strong industry contacts do not already exist. That said, there is a downside for the student completing a Certificate III, the TTC and taxpayers in having students complete courses with low prospects of employment. An expensive facility with very few ongoing students raises issues of sub-optimal use. This reinforces the importance of establishing industry engagement and credibility as soon as possible. Remedies Should the Commonwealth Government become concerned about the performance of a particular TTC, it could investigate the matter and engage with the relevant education authority to seek rectification if there is evidence of a problem (or with the school itself if that became necessary). Agreements in relation to the provision of capital funding for TTCs contain provisions that specify that the TTC must be used for the defined Designated Use in the Designated Use Period and there are also Designated Asset Use" provisions in relation to assets for the purposes of the agreements. These clauses generally contain a formula to assist in the calculation of the amount of funding that must be repaid to the Commonwealth in the event that the building and/or assets are not used for the Designated Use/Designated Asset Use within the Designated Use Period. An example of such provisions may be found at clauses 15.5 and 15.6 of the Trade Training in Schools Program Overarching Funding Agreement with state/territory governments. Round 5 agreements also contain clauses relating to the hours of usage and the number of students expected to use the facility. Of course, taking such a step would be a significant move on the part of a government and would need to be well-founded legally and taken after other remedies had been tried. Conclusion The figures reported by schools suggest there is a not major problem with meeting their school utilisation requirements. Utilisation rates do not look high but are broadly comparable with other specialist facilities in schools. The breadth of student curriculum choices, the size of the school population and whether schools are clusters are three factors affecting utilisation. 33

There is a real risk that facilities over time will be used less (with a change in school leadership, shifting educational focus etc.). Certainly this risk is increased if there is a switch towards taster programs and towards less technically demanding VET courses as less use would be made of the advanced equipment in TTCs. If utilisation emerges as a concern, compliance and remedial actions are available to governments. Schools have adopted very different approaches to opening up TTCs to wider use including by other registered training organisations (RTOs) and community groups. On the basis of the departmental data, community and industry use on average is very small (less than an hour a week). There would be benefit in governments highlighting for schools the practical options available to increase community and industry usage and how some schools have successfully addressed concerns about non-school use. The Commonwealth Government could encourage the education authorities in each state to have regional cross-sectoral consultations between TTCs and interested local RTOs and providers of adult education regarding the use of TTC facilities. 34

5 Expectations, Employer Views and Shifting Goal Posts While the initial expectation of the program under the former government was that students would undertake courses at the Certificate III level, this was later softened to up to and including Certificate III. This reflected the general consensus that the completion of Certificate III is impractical in a school environment. ASbAs are an exception and some TTCs offer competencies from Certificate III and Certificate IV courses rather than a full certificate. Only around 7 per cent of students in TTCs are undertaking Certificate III courses with the majority, around 66 per cent, studying Certificate IIs. The remainder, around 27 per cent, are undertaking Certificate I courses. More recently there has been a push from a number of employer groups that schools should offer courses up to Certificate II or only pre-vocational courses. This reflects concerns from employer groups that schools have over-reached in their course offerings, and that students with some Certificate IIs may in fact be at a disadvantage in the labour market because of competency-based pay and the value proposition they offer employers relative to others in the labour market. A number of states are likely to go in this direction. Structure of this chapter This chapter looks at the initial shift in contractural obligations as schools headed away from Certificate III. It also discusses employer and industry group views about the past performance of TTCs and where they should head now. It looks at two recent changes arising from deliberations of industry skills councils one from the perspective of the Catholic Education Commission of NSW. Some school principals and head teachers surveyed and interviewed pointed to the frequently changing goal posts in a complex system. While change in courses can be expected (for example as technology changes) some employers, principals and head teachers interviewed are concerned that the pendulum could swing too far in the direction of under reach and that Certificate II courses could be dumbed down. Shifting school expectations and altered contractual obligations: the initial changes As the program rolled out, schools were able to make a reasonably quick assessment about whether there needed to be a change to their course offerings and Commonwealth approved-ttc courses. The following presents two examples. 35

Our Lady of the Sacred Heart Thamarrur Mechanical, Technical and Hospitality Trade Training Centre (TTC) is located at a Catholic school in a remote Indigenous community in the Northern Territory. In 2008 the TTC was contracted to deliver a range of qualifications at Certificate I, II and III levels in construction, engineering, rural operations, hospitality and hairdressing. Due to a number of contributing factors, the TTC has withdrawn the majority of qualifications it was originally contracted to deliver. The TTC experienced low student demand for the qualifications offered and some students lacked basic skills to undertake Certificate III qualifications. The TTC has had difficulty attracting and keeping suitably qualified VET educators. The TTC is now offering Certificate I and II qualifications in automotive, hospitality, conservation and land management. These qualifications are in higher local demand and the TTC is able to utilise the program-funded infrastructure to deliver these courses. Seaton High School Electrotechnology Trade Training Centre (TTC) is located at a South Australian government school. The TTC was originally contracted to deliver Certificate II and III qualifications in manufacturing and engineering/electrotechnology. Consortium partners considered these qualifications achievable and suitable to local industry requirements. Due to low student enrolments, difficulties securing trained staff and a lack of community interest, the TTC no longer offers the Certificate II and Certificate III qualifications in manufacturing. The Certificate III qualifications in engineering and electrotechnology required students to undertake a school-based apprenticeship. The school was unable to secure apprenticeship opportunities for all students enrolled in these training courses. Consequently, these qualifications were withdrawn and replaced with an appropriate Certificate II pathway qualification which allows students to transition into a relevant Certificate III qualification following completion of their Year 12 studies. Employer and Industry Groups Expectations Employer groups interviewed had mixed views about TTCs - reflecting the divergent performance of schools and the different requirements of industry. Employer groups pointed, on the one hand, to individual success stories, while on the other, to the gap between employer expectations and what students can actually offer in terms of skills and relevant experience with a Certificate II. o A number of these groups have long held the view that school students would have insufficient work place experience to equip students with the necessary work ready skills (see Clarke, K (NCVER 2012) and the Australasian Curriculum, Assessment and Certification Authorities paper Vet in the Senior Secondary Certificate of Education Issues (April 2014)). There was a concern that some state education authorities and many TTCs were not sufficiently connected to employers and industry needs. A number noted that students and parents expectations were being raised unfairly because the courses were not always well-regarded by businesses. 36

ACCI strongly argued that TTCs, and schools more generally, were over reaching on their capability to deliver. Some employers want VET in school to be about VET and not a plethora of other objectives. The industry groups interviewed were keen to see students encouraged to follow VET as a valued pathway but concerned about how this is being implemented, and one group (Victorian Automotive Chamber of Commerce) were so concerned about quality, that if the issue cannot be resolved, they consider the focus of TTCs (and VET in schools more broadly) should be on pre-vocational courses. Other employer groups were very nuanced in their comments on TTCs suggesting that TTCs would perform well if they worked closely with local employers and were valued by them. Employer and industry groups are concerned about the value proposition for employers while schools report that employers value their students For TTCs to be effective as employment pathways, employers and industry must see value. Some industry groups have questioned the value proposition of students completing Certificate II and units of Certificate III without effective real workplace learning. They went further and stated that some schools and school systems are disadvantaging students in this regard. - This is especially the case given the industrial relations system requires employers to pay students on the basis of their qualifications (competencies) rather than the employers perception of their value. Some employer groups questioned the employment value of students with Certificate II qualifications who have had limited practice with accredited competencies, and who did not have any or sufficient real life work experience. - The Australian Industry Group (Ai Group) was more nuanced in its response, considering that this was an issue for particular industries and highlighting the need for a very carefully and well-informed approach to course selection by schools. - Employer groups reiterated the importance they place on real life work experience; something that a TTC, even with industry-standard equipment, cannot provide. One industry group interviewed noted that employers would value a second year apprentice who spends four days on the job and one day with their RTO more than a student from the TTC who spends four days at school (and with only part of that time in the TTC) and one day at work. - That said, successful TTCs do produce students valued by employers (including some TTCs that offer units of Certificate III for capable students). - Many TTCs in their annual activity reports and survey responses reported successful transitions of their trade students to work, being approached by employers to identify students for employment and willingly losing students to full-time employment after work placements. These messages were reinforced in my meetings with principals, head teachers and some employers. 37

Competency-based Wages The Construction and Property Services Industry Skills Council (CPSISC), among other employer and industry groups consulted, noted the adverse impact of competency-based wage progression on Vet in Schools students. The impact of competency-based wage progression has been highlighted as a potential and significant hindrance to a seamless pathway from a Vet in Schools program or School-based Apprenticeship into a construction trade qualification. Competency-based wage progression has existed in several states and territories for some years. Competencies achieved in a Vet in Schools program linked to nationally-accredited qualifications enable successful Vet in Schools graduates to obtain second stage (and even third stage) apprentice wages based on the retiring annual increment model of wage progression. This fast-tracking of apprenticeships through Vet in Schools is a clear sticking point in the construction industry, with questions raised over the quality of Vet in Schools training, the validity of work placements, and the industry qualifications of trainers and teachers. Recurring reports through CPSISC s stakeholder networks indicate that construction industry employers are overlooking Vet in Schools graduates, commenting that site-based productivity of school-leavers commencing as second year trade apprentices compared with second year trade apprentices who commenced full-time postschool is significantly lower. This is a pivotal issue for the construction industry as the construction industry is a popular VET choice for school students. False expectations about the success of a Vet in Schools program as an indicative pathway to employment are a primary concern. (Source: VET in Schools CPSISC Research August 2014) There was general although not universal support for the idea that this issue should be examined further. Ai Group noted that the Fair Work Commission had only relatively recently reviewed competency-based wages and that the heart of the problem lay with schools offering the wrong courses. Others saw fundamental problems with any comparability between largely institutional-based training in schools, and largely work-based training. Most employer groups placed particular emphasis on structured workplace learning. While the Victorian Automotive Chamber of Commerce was highly critical of the value of structured workplace learning as they see it operating at present (it has students observing rather than doing), this was not the consensus view. Changing Goal Posts VET arrangements within school systems and post-school are complex and frequently changing. The VET in school system within each jurisdiction is complex and industry groups need to invest considerable time and effort to be across the variations in the systems in eight different jurisdictions (for example, the Vet in Schools Construction and Property Services Industry Skills Council CPSISC Research August 2014). 38

A number of principals interviewed remarked on the complexity of the system and the frequent changes. Head teachers and teachers in TTCs deal with the complexity all the time often assisted by consultants or advisers from their respective education authorities. One teacher drew a diagram from her perspective to illustrate the system as she experiences it. The system is complex for those dealing with it on a daily and weekly basis. It is certainly a challenge for parents, prospective students and employers seeking up-to-date information in order to make well-informed decisions. Changes in industry s views regarding engineering qualifications During my school visits, head teachers at two different schools drew my attention to significant changes in industry skill council support for particular engineering courses. An employer interviewed as part of this review, who provides structured workplace learning to TTC students, also expressed concern. The Catholic Education Office has expressed deep reservations about this change and the initial lack of consultation. I was informed by a number of sources that these changes will necessitate amendment to the contractual obligations of schools affected. While contracutual changes are not a major issue, the concern being expressed is that the pendulum was swinging from over reach to under reach. If that is correct, and I am not in a position to judge this particular case, it would be an issue affecting the performance of TTCs. 39