THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE



Similar documents
Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Washington, DC November 4, 2015

City of Philadelphia

Saxe Middle School Auditorium Renovation February 4, 2015

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD DISCLOSURE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LEAD MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Disclosure Requirements Concerning Lead-Based Paint in Housing: Questions and Answers

CHAPTER 4 IDENTIFYING LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS

Summary of Georgia s Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rules For Contractors, Property Managers, and Maintenance Personnel

City of Chicago Department of Public Health Control and Mitigation of Lead Bearing Substances

Chapter 13: LEAD-BASED PAINT

IAC 12/12/12 Public Health[641] Ch 70, p.1 CHAPTER 70 LEAD-BASED PAINT ACTIVITIES

FDIC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OF. FDIC Asset Number Multi-Family Residence 2120 South Fairfield Avenue Chicago, Illinois

Former National Guard Armory Cherokee, Oklahoma Remediation Final Report

The Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Manual. Your key to working with Federal HUD/EPA Disclosure Regulations

ASBESTOS / LEAD PAINT MANAGEMENT PLAN

Guidance on the Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Rule: Part II

CERTIFIED LEAD-BASED PAINT RENOVATION CONTRACTOR. License Requirements & Work Practice Standards

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2014 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

Landlord Handbook. Portland Housing Authority

University of Tennessee Safety Program

- 1 - PART 35_LEAD-BASED PAINT POISONING PREVENTION IN CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

ANALYSIS OF BROWNFIELDS CLEANUP ALTERNATIVES FAIRFIELD HILLS CAMPUS HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REMOVAL DANBURY HALL AND EIGHT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES

Appendix 9: Lead-Based Paint Liability Insurance

The Rehab Inspector and LBP

Model Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule E-learning Course Component Implementation Requirements

THE NEW LEAD PAINT LAW OF NEW YORK. Rosevelie Márquez Morales Harris Beach PLLC 805 Third Avenue New York, New York (212)

NYU Safety Policy Manual

Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) Rule Frequent Questions

CDC Blood Lead Reference Value, Lead Exposure, and Primary Prevention. David E. Jacobs, PhD, CIH Research Director June 2012

Safety Policy Manual Policy No. 112

City of Fort Worth Lead-Safe Program

Management Instruction

Davis Community Housing Authority Down Payment Assistance Program Summary

Lead Exposure Management Plan

CHAPTER 5: RISK ASSESSMENT

ASBESTOS AWARENESS PLAN

DUST AND DEBRIS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES HPD HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAMS

LEAD PROGRAM MANUAL EHS LEAD-BASED PAINT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS NYU EHS LEAD MANAGEMENT MANUAL

Clearfield City s Down Payment Assistance Program Administered by Davis Community Housing Authority

Supplemental Investigation Summary Report

EPA and HUD Real Estate Notification and Disclosure Rule Questions and Answers The Rule

Guidance on the Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Rule

DRAFT Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives City of Olympia Isthmus Properties 505/529 4 th Avenue West

Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home

Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home

INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE ON HUD'S LEAD SAFE HOUSING RULE: THE HUD REGULATION ON CONTROLLING LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS

Lead Management Program

Iowa Department of Public Health

Inspection Item COMMENTS

Small Entity Compliance Guide to Renovate Right EPA s Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

Renovation, Repair, and Painting (RRP) Rule Frequent Questions

OGS LIMITED ASBESTOS & LEAD SURVEY REPORT

ADAM Environmental Information Management System

CHICAGO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS LEAD-BASED PAINT AND LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARDS DISCLOSURE (For Apartment Leases)

Northwood Lead-based Paint Management

SEE ATTACHED ED DOCUMENTS

Health and Technical Assistance for the World Trade Center (WTC) Dust Cleaning Program OSHA Activity Final Report

Contents Purpose... 1 Objectives... 1 Applicability... 1 Definitions... 2 Background... 2 Responsibilities

1804 W. Colorado Avenue Colorado Springs CO Fax AlpineConsultInc.com

NARRATIVE REPORT. The Asbestos Bulk Sample Results Table includes asbestos sampling data.

Understanding the Lead Based Paint Requirements: Guidance for HPRP Grantees

SECTION EXISTING HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONDITIONS

LEAD MANAGEMENT PLAN. Environmental Safety. Department of. Original February 2003 DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS. Revised November 2012

AHERA 3-Year Asbestos Re-Inspection

Essential Maintenance For a Lead-Safe Home

Draft ABCA : USEPA 2015 Brownfields Cleanup Grant Application for Former Hudepohl Brewery Site by Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority

Lead in Paint: U.S. Legal Framework Case Study

Re: Addendum to Preliminary Water Damage Report, Mendocino Public Health Branch, 1120 South Dora Street, Ukiah, CA

An Information Booklet Addressing PCB-Containing Materials in the Indoor Environment of Schools and Other Public Buildings

Appendix 1: Units of Measure Used in the Lead-Based Paint Field

ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

Lead Licensing and Certification Q & A s

SOIL TEST NOTES. NOTE 17: Managing Lead Contaminated Soils

DPH 77 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 845 SUBCHAPTER p

Environmental Protection Agency

Renovate Right. Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION PROGRAM CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS. March 2015

Environment, Health & Safety Services Policy

Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home

PA HEALTHY & GREEN MINI-GRANT APPLICATION TIPS

FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION RULES

LEAD-BASED PAINT HAZARD POLICY

ASTHMA REGIONAL COUNCIL

Restoration Specific Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey Report Logan Ave Colorado Springs, CO 80909

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN FAIRFIELD HILLS BROWNFIELD CLEANUP (EPA/DEP) TOWN OF NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUT

Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

6% Chrysotile NA White floor tile 2 nd Floor 10,000 sq ft Cat 1 2% Chrysotile Poor

105 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 105 CMR : LEAD POISONING PREVENTION AND CONTROL. Section

March Get The Mold Out: Mold Clean-Up Guidance for Residences. Introduction

Guidelines for Mold Remediation (Removal)

Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home

Small Entity Compliance Guide to Renovate Right EPA s Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL REPORT

Colorado Regulation No. 8, Part B, Asbestos 100 Questions

HUD Healthy Homes Grantee Program Sample Program Evaluation Plan

Lead Management Plan

Introduction: Analysis:

Mold Investigation Summary Report

October 30, Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Vick 101 Southwind Cove Benton, AR. Report of Findings, Structural Investigation, Benton, Arkansas, Dear Mr.

TECHNICAL REPORT TR-2254-ENV

Transcription:

THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Michael R. Bloomberg Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H. Mayor Commissioner nyc.gov/health Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 Report Date: April 15, 2008 1.0 Introduction and Background Recently, the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services (NJDHSS) reported findings of lead contamination in a synthetic turf playing field in Newark, NJ. In response to this report, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) and the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) assessed similar fields operated by DPR for potential lead hazards. The NJDHSS identified lead in the carpet fibers of a synthetic turf field manufactured several years ago. The synthetic turf in question is composed of a flat nylon carpet and does not contain crumb rubber infill. DPR only operates two synthetic turf fields similar in age and type, and purchased from the same manufacturer as the field in Newark. Both of these fields were assessed for lead hazards. In addition, two fields containing crumb rubber infill were also assessed for lead hazards. DPR hired an environmental consulting firm (Niche Analysis, Inc.) to collect bulk samples of synthetic turf carpet fibers, rubber infill and dust at the four fields. The NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene conducted lead hazard risk assessments at all four fields. Using exceedance of federal regulatory standards as indicative of a lead hazard, the results of the risk assessments indicate that lead hazards are not present in any of the four fields assessed. No regulatory limits for lead in any samples were exceeded. Synthetic turf fields at the following locations were assessed for lead hazards: Chelsea Park, West 27th Street and 10th Avenue (synthetic turf carpet) Riverside Park, West 103rd Street and Riverside Drive (synthetic turf carpet) Eugene McCabe Field, East 120th Street and Park Avenue (synthetic turf carpet with rubber infill) Riverside Park, West 107th Street and Riverside Drive (synthetic turf carpet with rubber infill) 2.0 DOHMH Lead Hazard Risk Assessment Lead hazard risk assessments were conducted at four DPR synthetic turf fields from 3/11/08 to 3/12/08 by the DOHMH. The risk assessments were conducted in accordance with The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (HUD Guidelines) by a DOHMH Associate Public Health Sanitarian and EPAcertified Lead Risk Assessor. The risk assessments included a visual inspection of each site and collection of environmental samples for lead in dust, bare soil and deteriorated paint. A total of sixteen (16) dust samples, four (4) soil samples and one (1) paint chip sample were taken during the assessments.

3.0 DPR Bulk and Dust Sampling The NYC Department of Parks and Recreation hired an environmental consulting firm (Niche Analysis, Inc.) to collect bulk samples of synthetic turf carpet fibers, rubber infill and dust at the selected synthetic turf fields. Niche Analysis conducted sampling on 3/4, 3/7 and 3/11/08. Niche Analysis, Inc. collected synthetic turf carpet fibers from all four fields and rubber infill from the two fields where it was present. Dust samples were collected from the two fields that are carpet fiber only. 3.0 Applicable Regulations and Guidelines The following regulations and guidelines were referenced for all sampling performed at the four fields. EPA 40 CFR-745.65(b) defines a dust-lead hazard as surface dust in a residential dwelling or childoccupied facility that contains a mass-per-area concentration of lead equal to or exceeding 40 µg/ft 2 on floors or 250 µg/ft 2 on interior window sills based on wipe samples. All dust wipe samples were compared with the EPA limit of 40 µg/ft 2 on floors. EPA 40 CFR-745.65(c) defines a soil lead-hazard as bare soil on residential real property or on the property of a child occupied facility that contains total lead equal to or exceeding 400 parts per million (ppm) in a play area or average of 1,200 parts per million of bare soil in the rest of the yard based on soil samples. All soil samples were compared with the EPA limit of 400 parts per million (ppm) in a play area. HUD 24 CFR-35 defines lead-based paint as paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or exceeding 1.0 milligram per square centimeter or 0.5 percent by weight or 5,000 parts per million (ppm) by weight. The paint chip sample was compared with the HUD limit of 5,000 ppm of lead in paint samples. The HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, Chapter 5: Risk Assessment indicates that during risk assessments of areas frequented by children, two floor dust samples should be collected from spaces up to 2,000 ft 2 and one additional sample should be collected for each increment of 2,000 ft 2. 4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on existing HUD Guidelines and EPA standards, lead hazard risk assessments at these four DPR synthetic turf fields did not identify lead hazards. Some sample results indicated the presence of lead in the synthetic turf carpet fibers in the fields at West 27 th Street and 10 th Avenue, West 103 rd Street and Riverside Drive, and East 120 th Street and Park Avenue. Lead was also found in the rubber infill at East 120 th Street and Park Avenue. Additionally, one micro vacuum sample of dust taken from the field at West 27 th Street and 10 th Avenue indicates that lead dust could be embedded in the field, however it is not known if the source of lead is from the carpet fibers or from other environmental sources. Micro vacuum dust samples can be used as an indicator of total dust available from a surface, but there are no applicable standards regarding lead levels in micro-vacuum dust samples. Although there are currently no lead hazards at these synthetic turf fields, the sites may be reassessed at a later date to ensure that they remain lead hazard free. As part of routine maintenance activities, the DPR may address the areas of bare soil present near the Riverside Park Fields and the peeling paint on the retaining wall. Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 2

5.0 Field Data Summary 5.1. Chelsea Park, West 27th Street and 10th Avenue The Chelsea Field located at West 27 th Street and 10 th Avenue consists of synthetic turf carpet only. Although lead was detected in some samples, no regulatory limits were exceeded indicating that lead hazards were not identified at this field. The NYC Parks Department environmental consultant collected bulk fiber samples, micro vacuum dust samples and a dust wipe sample from this field. The NYC DOHMH collected dust wipe samples from this field. Bulk carpet fiber sample results indicated the presence of lead. Four of five micro vacuum dust samples were below detection limits. One micro vacuum sample contained detectable levels of lead in dust. This may indicate that lead is present in sub-surface dust present at the field, however it is not known if the source of the lead is the carpet fibers or an environmental source. All dust wipe sample results for lead were below 40 µg/ft 2, the residential standard for lead in indoor dust. Visual inspection of this field did not identify deteriorated areas, excessive amounts of dust, or turf carpet particles. Lead Sample s: Chelsea Park, West 27th Street and 10th Avenue Bulk Carpet Fiber Micro Vacuum Dust Dust Wipe Sample Sample (µg/ft 2 ) Northeast NA Northeast <77.1 Northeast 10.0 Northwest 3,692.2 Northwest 214.7 Northwest 18.1 west 3,201.9 west <77.1 west 16.0 east NA Middle Area <77.1 North 14.2 Middle Area NA east <77.1 East 12.1 Northeast 4,780.6 Northwest 5,247.7 Middle Area 5,284.1 No regulatory standard exists for lead in synthetic turf fibers. Bulk sampling analysis establishes the presence of lead in synthetic turf fibers. There is no regulatory standard for lead in micro vacuum dust samples. All samples were analyzed by EPA method 3050B/7420 Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 3

5.2. Riverside Park, West 103rd Street and Riverside Drive The field in Riverside Park, at West 103 rd Street and Riverside Drive, consists of synthetic turf carpet only. Although lead was detected in some samples, no regulatory limits were exceeded indicating that lead hazards were not identified at this field. The DPR environmental consultant collected bulk carpet fiber samples and micro vacuum dust samples from this field. The DOHMH collected dust wipe samples from this field and samples from adjacent areas of bare soil. Two of five bulk sampling results indicate the presence of lead. One bulk sample result was below detection limits and two samples could not be analyzed because not enough material was present. All four micro vacuum dust samples were below detection limits. All three dust wipe sample results were below detection limits and below 40 µg/ft 2, the residential standard for lead in indoor dust. Samples taken from bare soil adjacent to the field were below 400 ppm, the residential standard for lead in soil in play areas. Visual inspection of this field did not identify deteriorated areas, excessive amounts of dust, or turf carpet particles. Approximately one third of the field was fenced-off for repairs and inaccessible at the time of inspection. Lead Sample s: Riverside Park, West 103rd Street and Riverside Drive Bulk Carpet Fiber Northeast 82.4 Micro Vacuum Dust Sample East Side/ North Part Dust Wipe Sample <77.1 Northwest <8.3 Soil Adjacent, northeast Baseball infield (ppm) North <16.2 West Side/ North Part <77.1 West <8.3 West NA Side/ Middle <77.1 East <8.3 west NA Middle area <77.1 Middle 159.7 No regulatory standard exists for lead in synthetic turf fibers. Bulk sampling establishes the presence of lead in synthetic turf fibers. There is no regulatory standard for lead in micro vacuum dust samples. All samples were analyzed by EPA method 3050B/7420 70.0 <15.2 Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 4

5.3. Eugene McCabe Field, East 120th Street and Park Avenue Eugene McCabe Field, at East 120 th Street and Park Avenue, consists of an synthetic turf carpet field with rubber infill. Although lead was detected in some samples, no regulatory limits were exceeded indicating that lead hazards were not identified at this field. The DPR environmental consultant collected bulk carpet fiber and rubber infill samples from this field. The NYCDOHMH collected dust wipe samples from this field. Bulk fiber and infill sample results indicated the presence of lead. All four dust wipe sample results were below detection limits and below 40 µg/ft 2, the residential standard for lead in indoor dust. Visual inspection of the field indicated that it was in generally good condition, but there was some surface water accumulated in a small depression in the southeast area of the field. Lead Sample s: Eugene McCabe Field, East 120th Street and Park Avenue Bulk Carpet Fiber Bulk Rubber Infill Dust Wipe Sample Northeast 194.2 Northeast 56.3 west <8.3 Northwest 139.7 Northwest 49.3 East <8.3 east 84.9 east 31.1 Center <8.3 west 293.7 west 45.8 Northwest <8.3 Middle 353.2 Middle 58.8 No regulatory standard exists for lead in synthetic turf fibers or rubber infill. Bulk sampling establishes the presence of lead in synthetic turf fibers and bulk rubber infill. All samples were analyzed by EPA method 3050B/7420 Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 5

5.4. Riverside Park, West 107th Street and Riverside Drive The field in Riverside Park, at West 107th Street and Riverside Drive, consists of synthetic turf carpet with rubber infill. Although lead was detected in some samples, no regulatory limits were exceeded indicating that lead hazards were not identified at this field. The DPR environmental consultant collected bulk carpet fiber and rubber infill samples from this field. The DOHMH collected dust wipe samples from this field, samples from adjacent areas of bare soil and paint from an adjoining retaining wall. None of the bulk sampling results for fiber or infill indicate the presence of lead. One bulk fiber sample result couldn t be analyzed because not enough material was present. Four of five dust wipe sample results were below detection limits. All five dust wipe samples were below 40 µg/ft 2, the residential standard for lead in indoor dust. Samples taken from bare soil adjacent to the field were below 400 ppm, the residential standard for lead in soil in play areas. The paint sample taken from the adjoining retaining wall is not considered to be lead-based paint. Visual inspection of the field indicated that it was in good condition, but the paint on the adjoining retaining wall was in poor condition. Lead Sample s: Riverside Park, West 107th Street and Riverside Drive Bulk Carpet Fiber Bulk Rubber Infill Dust Wipe Sample Soil Paint (µg/ft 2 ) West west East east East Northeast North Middle <16.4 NA <16.1 <15.3 <16.3 West west East east East Northeast North Middle <16.1 North 12.6 <16.1 Northwest <8.3 <15.7 Center <8.3 <15.4 east <8.3 <16.3 <8.3 Adjacent, northeast Adjacent, southeast 119.4 35.2 Retaining wall east No regulatory standard exists for lead in synthetic turf fibers or rubber infill. Bulk sampling establishes the presence of lead in synthetic turf fibers and bulk rubber infill. All samples were analyzed by EPA method 3050B/742 (ppm) 0.007 Report: Lead Hazard Risk Assessment of Synthetic Turf Playing Fields, March 2008 6