Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer



Similar documents
Lake Oswego, Oregon; Water/Sewer

Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado; General Obligation

Tri-Township Consolidated School Building Corp., Indiana Tri-Township Consolidate School Corp.; School State Program

Spotsylvania County, Virginia; Water/Sewer

South Padre Island, Texas; General Obligation

Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Stable

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Toll Roads Bridges

Interactive Brokers LLC

Electricity Transmission System Operator TenneT's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To Intermediate; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

A Financial Analysis of Energies and Gas Pipelines

Residential Real Estate Company Deutsche Wohnen 'BBB+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Conwert Takeover Offer

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To "Intermediate"; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC-' On Heightened Risk Of Missing An Interest Payment; Outlook Negative

Pohjola Non-Life Insurance Downgraded To 'A+' After Government Support Review Of Pohjola Bank; Outlook Remains Negative

Swedbank Outlook Revised To Stable From Negative On Improved Business Position; Ratings Affirmed At 'A+/A-1'

Dogus Holding 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Sustained Investments And Expected Completion Of Garanti Sale; Outlook Negative

New York Life Insurance Co. 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Criteria Review; Outlook Stable

Four Ratings Raised From GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables Funding L.L.C.; 10 Ratings Affirmed

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC+' On Weak Earnings And Delays In Customer Payments; Outlook Negative

Codelco Rating Outlook Revised To Negative On Lower Copper Prices, 'AA-' Rating Affirmed

Research Update: Banco Monex S.A. Rated Global Scale 'BB+/B', National Scale 'mxa+/mxa-1' Rating Affirmed. Table Of Contents

Six Russian Real Estate Companies On CreditWatch Amid Higher Interest Rates, Weakening Demand, Sharp Ruble Depreciation

Ten Japanese Insurers Downgraded; Outlooks On Two Other Insurers Revised Down To Stable Following Downgrade Of Japan

Spain-Based IT Service Provider Amadeus IT Holding Rating Raised To 'BBB/A-2' On Strong Financials, Outlook Stable

RBS Citizens Financial Group Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative; Stand-Alone Credit Profile Lowered To 'a-'

Sirius International Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Plans To Retain Its Strategy Post Acquisition; Ratings Affirmed

Volkswagen Bank Ratings Lowered To 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Negative

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch; Outlook Stable

Turkey-Based Appliance Manufacturer Vestel Outlook Revised To Positive; 'B-' Rating Affirmed

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

Gemini Securitization Corp., LLC (As Of May 2014)

Healthcare Support (North Staffs) Finance Outlook Revised To Stable On Operating Risk; 'BBB-' Issue Ratings Affirmed

Danish Bank DLR Kredit Affirmed At 'BBB+/A-2'; Junior Subordinated Debt Downgraded To 'BB'; Outlook Remains Stable

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. And Subsidiaries 'BBB' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; The Outlook Is Stable

UBI Banca Ratings Lowered To 'BBB-/A-3' On Heightened Economic And Industry Risks In Italy; Outlook Negative

Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais Upgraded To 'BB+' From 'BB' On Stronger Business Risk Profile, Outlook Stable

Guardian Life Insurance, Core Operating Subsidiaries 'AA+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Review, Outlook Negative

Italian Veneto Banca 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch Negative Following Review; Outlook Negative

Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe

Millenniumbcp Ageas Core Non-Life Insurance Entity 'BB' Ratings On CreditWatch Positive On Announced Ownership Change

Covea Group Core And Guaranteed Companies Outlooks Revised To Positive; 'A' Ratings Affirmed

German Utility RWE Downgraded To 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Danish Mortgage Bank DLR Kredit A/S Assigned 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings. Table Of Contents

SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative

Duke Energy International Geracao Paranapanema 'BBB-' Global And 'braaa' National Scale Ratings Affirmed

Spanish Multi-Cedulas Rating Actions As Of Aug. 2, 2012

FWD Life Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. Assigned 'A-' And 'cnaa' Ratings; Outlook Stable

International Finance Corp. 'AAA/A-1+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Islamic Development Bank 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Revision; Outlook Stable

Lear Corp.'s Recovery Rating Profile

S&P Takes Rating Actions On Section 15 Bonds Issued By Various Danish Mortgage Banks

Research Update: Ratings Lowered On Netherlands-Based SNS REAAL N.V. Group And Core Subs On Slower Recovery Prospects; Outlook Stable

Sul America Upgraded To 'BBB-' And Sul America Companhia Nacional de Seguros To 'BBB+' Under New Criteria Review

Energinet.dk SOV. Primary Credit Analyst: Alf Stenqvist, Stockholm (46) ;

Transcription:

Summary: Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer Primary Credit Analyst: Scott D Garrigan, Chicago (1) 312-233-7014; scott.garrigan@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Tim Tung, San Francisco (415) 371-5041; tim.tung@standardandpoors.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 1, 2015 1

Summary: Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer Credit Profile Centennial Wtr & San Dist wtr & swr (AGM) Unenhanced Rating AA+(SPUR)/Positive Affirmed Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has affirmed is 'AA+' rating on Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colo.'s water and sewer revenue bonds. The outlook is positive. The positive outlook reflects our view that the rating could improve over the next one to two years depending on whether debt service and fixed-charge coverage do not drop below historical trends, and that unrestricted cash remains consistent with the rating level, in our view. The rating reflects our view of the district's: Affluent, primarily residential, underlying customer base with incomes we consider strong; Competitive customer rates, given the strong wealth levels; Strong financial risk profile, including historical debt service coverage (DSC) and liquidity; and System leverage that we consider low, and would expect to remain low to moderate when incorporating additional loans to fund water acquisitions. Net revenues of the district's water and wastewater system, including one-time connection fees, secure the bonds. Other bond provisions include the following: A rate covenant to set rates such that recurring revenues, which exclude one-time connection fees, cover the next year's annual debt service (ADS) by at least 1.00x, and that revenues including connection fees as well as any funds in a rate-stabilization account exceed ADS by 1.25x; A restriction on issuing additional bonds only if recurring revenues for the previous fiscal year are at least 1.00x pro forma maximum ADS (MADS), and that revenues (including connection fees and funds in a rate-stabilization account) are at least 1.25x MADS; A debt service reserve funded at the lesser of 10% of principal, MADS, and 125% of average ADS (which may be in the form of a surety); and A rate-stabilization account that can be funded by restricting for 11 months' available funds if net revenue and capacity fees are less than 125% of ADS. (This money is not pledged to bonds.) Centennial provides water and sewer services to two local governments -- Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District and Northern Douglas County Water and Sanitation District -- under service agreements. Pursuant to these agreements, retail customers of Highlands Ranch (which constitute about 95% of Centennial's customers) are billed directly by the WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 1, 2015 2

Summary: Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer district while Northern Douglas is billed on a master meter basis (the costs of which, according to management, are then passed directly to its retail customers from Northern Douglas). Centennial also charges a one-time capacity fee for new hookups to the two districts and acts as a "right to serve" charge. For any new retail customers, management has indicated that Highlands Ranch and Northern Douglas pass these fees along as tap fees. The district serves a total population of about 95,000, with a customer base of about 40,000. Residential customers account for approximately 90% consumption, resulting in what we view as a very diverse customer base. Income and wealth indicators for Highlands Ranch and Douglas County are very strong, in our view. Highlands Ranch's 2013 median household effective buying income (EBI) and per capita income levels were at 187% and 159% of the national average, respectively, while Douglas County's median household EBI and per capita income levels were at 179% and 161% of the national average, respectively. Given these income characteristics, we consider rates affordable. Management raised the rates about 10% in 2014, leading to combined monthly water and sewer bills of $65.60 for 8,000 gallons of use. Management indicates that it will continue to raise rates in the near future to fund additional water rights acquisitions. Centennial holds water rights for 29,500 acre-feet (AF) per year: 17,000 AF from groundwater and 12,500 AF from surface water. District facilities include a water treatment plant with a capacity of 40.0 million gallons per day (mgd) and an 8.5 mgd wastewater treatment facility. Management has indicated that the current water rights as well as water and wastewater's treatment facilities are sufficient to meet demand. We believe the district's financial performance has been generally strong in the past three completed fiscal years. Based on the three most recent audited financial statements, DSC has remained what we view as strong, at 2x during the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2014. Adjusting net revenues to exclude fixed take-or-pay payments on several of the district's water supply agreements and treating those payments as debt, fixed-charge coverage has also remained strong, and was equal to 1.8x in 2014. The district has retained $42.5 million in unrestricted cash and investments, equivalent to 689 days' operating expenditures, which we consider very strong. Management has a policy of maintaining at least six months' cash on hand for working capital purposes and also sets aside a full year of debt service in its restricted cash balance. For fiscal 2015, budgeted net revenues continue to provide what we view as strong DSC of 2x and an unrestricted cash balance of $33 million or 510 days' cash in hand; the projected cash balance excludes restricted capital projects and debt service fund balances. The drawdown in cash is primarily due to water acquisition expenses. Most of the district's projected capital spending also relates to a mix of projects, including water acquisition, system expansion, and regulatory compliance. Apart from an expected $34 million loan for an acquisition project, Centennial does not have any additional debt plans. In 2012, the district issued about $50 million of bonds that Bank of America N.A. purchased. We understand that the district issued these direct-purchase bonds to refund its 2004 bonds and provide for $6 million of funds for treatment plant improvements. We do not view that issue as a negative credit factor because we understand that the bond covenants related to payment priority, rate covenants, and additional bond covenants are the same as Centennial's debt outstanding. The system's debt-to-plant ratio in 2014 was, in our view, low at 30%. We do not expect this ratio to increase substantially after the additional $30 million loan is closed. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 1, 2015 3

Summary: Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer Outlook The positive outlook reflects our view that within the next two years, there is a one-in-three chance of an upgrade. We base this view on the recent improvement in DSC, and that this improvement could be sustainable given the stable customer base and management's ability to raise rates as needed. An upgrade would also be contingent on our view of the unrestricted liquidity and leverage not changing, and no significant additional debt plans being developed. However, given the stability of the customer base and our view that the district should be able to generate financial performance at least consistent with, or better than, historical results, we believe the most probable action, absent an improvement in financial metrics, would be to affirm the rating and revise the outlook to stable. Related Criteria And Research Related Criteria USPF Criteria: Key Water And Sewer Utility Credit Ratio Ranges, Sept. 15, 2008 USPF Criteria: Standard & Poor s Revises Criteria For Rating Water, Sewer, And Drainage Utility Revenue Bonds, Sept. 15, 2008 USPF Criteria: Assigning Issue Credit Ratings Of Operating Entities, May 20, 2015 Ratings Above The Sovereign: Corporate And Government Ratings Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013 Criteria: Use of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009 Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 1, 2015 4

Copyright 2015 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 1, 2015 5