SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative

Transcription

1 Research Update: SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative Primary Credit Analyst: Mark D Nicholson, London (44) ; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Oliver Herbert, London (44) ; [email protected] Table Of Contents Overview Rating Action Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research Ratings List MAY 7,

2 Research Update: SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative Overview The insurance operations of the SNS REAAL group (collectively, SRIO) were placed on CreditWatch positive on Feb. 5, 2013, after the Dutch government nationalized the whole SNS REAAL group. We have resolved the CreditWatch placement and raised the ratings to 'A-' from 'BBB'. The negative outlook reflects our view that SRIO's competitive position may have been damaged, as well as uncertainty over the long-term capital position, the possibility that the European Commission's restructuring plan may place the group under impositions, and strategic execution risk. Rating Action On May 7, 2013, Standard & Poor's Rating Services raised to 'A-' from 'BBB' its insurer financial strength and counterparty credit ratings on the insurance operating companies of the SNS REAAL group--srlev N.V. and REAAL Schadeverzekeringen N.V. (collectively known as SNS REAAL Insurance operations or SRIO). We also raised to 'BBB+' from 'BBB-' our counterparty credit rating on the group's insurance holding company, REAAL Verzekeringen N.V. At the same time, we removed these ratings from CreditWatch with positive implications, where they had been placed on Feb. 5, The outlook is negative. In addition, we maintained the issue credit ratings on the 30-year and perpetual subordinated debt issues issued by SRLEV N.V. on SRLEV's two subdebt issues at 'C' and 'CC', respectively. The latter remains on CreditWatch negative. Rationale The upgrade reflects the inherent strengths of the insurance operations, which have been largely undimmed by the travails of its company and sister bank. We resolved the CreditWatch placement because we consider that the near-term strategic position of SRIO is now settled and we are able to fully recognize the group's strengths. The negative outlook reflects our view that the remaining risk factors are likely to play out over a longer timescale. Thus, the ongoing uncertainty around SRIO is best expressed in the form of an outlook. We do not expect to see any material change to the ownership or makeup of the SNS REAAL group for the next months. Should this change, we may reconsider the ratings and outlook. MAY 7,

3 Research Update: SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative We first placed the ratings on SRIO on CreditWatch developing in July 2012, when the group announced a strategic review that could have seen the insurance operations broken up or sold off. In the immediate aftermath of the nationalization in February 2013, we changed the CreditWatch implications to positive to reflect our view that the separation of SRIO from SNS Bank could strengthen SRIO's creditworthiness. While a range of strategic options remain under consideration, our base-case scenario reflects the expectation that SRIO will remain intact, associated with SNS Bank under the current group structure and owned by the Dutch state for at least the next 18 months and probably beyond. Should alternative scenarios emerge, we may reconsider the ratings. In the longer term, SRIO could be detached from SNS Bank and returned to the private sector, but we do not expect this to happen in the next months. We assess SRIO on a stand-alone basis, having in March 2013 decoupled its ratings from those on SNS Bank, which previously constrained it. We do not impute any support to the ratings based on SRIO's governmental ownership because the relationship is likely to be relatively short. We regard SRIO's competitive position as strong. We consider that there is potential for reputational damage arising from the nationalization. However, we consider that the group's open architecture and multibrand strategy will limit reputational damage. The European Commission may also impose operational and pricing restrictions on SRIO, as a state-owned insurer. Based on precedents within the Dutch market, we expect the impact of the Commission's restrictions to be significant in the near term. Operating performance has held up well through the group's travails in recent years and we regard it as strong. We also continue to regard SRIO's capitalization as strong. Capital adequacy, as measured using Standard & Poor's capital model is extremely strong; however, we do not expect the group to maintain this high level of capitalization in the medium or long term. Conversely, following the deferral of the coupons on SRLEV's subdebt, we regard financial flexibility as marginal. We do not expect the delayed 2012 financial statements to show a material impairment to SRIO's capital base. We have made a cautious estimate of 2013 performance, forecasting lower non-life premium and a post-tax profit of 150 million. We expect, however, that SRIO will return to growth and stronger profitability thereafter. As we stated on March 29, 2013, SRLEV's 30-year and perpetual subordinated issues will be rated 'C' and 'CC', respectively, while they are required by the European Commission to defer their coupon payments. These ratings are unchanged by the rating action on their issuer. MAY 7,

4 Research Update: SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative Outlook The negative outlook reflects our view that despite its inherent strengths, SRIO may find it difficult to maintain its performance over the next months. The insurance group's franchise may be impaired by the nationalization, and the European Commission may impose restrictions on the state-owned insurer's ability to compete on price within the Dutch market. It is possible that the Commission may also impose wider restrictions. The group restructuring plan has yet to be submitted; the outcome will not be known until toward the end of this year at the earliest. Therefore, its implications cannot be predicted. Separating SRIO from SNS Bank carries inherent execution risk, which could be enhanced if continuing problems within the bank demand group management's focus. Should any of these factors materially impair the group's performance, we could take a negative rating action. Capitalization is expected to remain very strong according to our model throughout the forecast period. Should significant capitalization be upstreamed out of SRIO, this too could trigger a negative rating action. We could revise the outlook to stable if we consider that SRIO's competitive position has not been impaired by the above named factors and if we gain comfort over the development and execution of the group's strategy for SRIO. Related Criteria And Research Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011 Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009 Group Methodology, April 22, 2009 Ratings List Upgraded; CreditWatch/Outlook Action To From SRLEV N.V. REAAL Schadeverzekeringen N.V. Counterparty Credit Rating A-/Negative/-- BBB/Watch Pos/-- Financial Strength Rating A-/Negative/-- BBB/Watch Pos/-- REAAL Verzekeringen N.V. Counterparty Credit Rating BBB+/Negative/-- BBB-/Watch Pos/-- Ratings Affirmed SRLEV N.V. MAY 7,

5 Research Update: SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative Subordinated Junior Subordinated C CC/Watch Neg Additional Contact: Insurance Ratings Europe; [email protected] Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at and at spcapitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. Alternatively, call one of the following Standard & Poor's numbers: Client Support Europe (44) ; London Press Office (44) ; Paris (33) ; Frankfurt (49) ; Stockholm (46) ; or Moscow 7 (495) MAY 7,

6 Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription) and (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at MAY 7,