Credit Ratings from S&P



Similar documents
Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Workshop B: Credit Spread Trends In The Energy Sector

Russia-Based EvrazHolding Finance And Sibmetinvest Rated 'B+', Unsecured Notes Rated 'B+'; Outlook Stable

Interactive Brokers LLC

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC-' On Heightened Risk Of Missing An Interest Payment; Outlook Negative

Four Ratings Raised From GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables Funding L.L.C.; 10 Ratings Affirmed

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. And Subsidiaries 'BBB' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; The Outlook Is Stable

Pohjola Non-Life Insurance Downgraded To 'A+' After Government Support Review Of Pohjola Bank; Outlook Remains Negative

Standard & Poor's Base-Case Scenario. Related Criteria And Research

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

Sirius International Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Plans To Retain Its Strategy Post Acquisition; Ratings Affirmed

Guardian Life Insurance, Core Operating Subsidiaries 'AA+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Review, Outlook Negative

Electricity Transmission System Operator TenneT's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To Intermediate; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To "Intermediate"; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC+' On Weak Earnings And Delays In Customer Payments; Outlook Negative

Lear Corp.'s Recovery Rating Profile

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch; Outlook Stable

Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Stable

New York Life Insurance Co. 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Criteria Review; Outlook Stable

Tri-Township Consolidated School Building Corp., Indiana Tri-Township Consolidate School Corp.; School State Program

Ten Japanese Insurers Downgraded; Outlooks On Two Other Insurers Revised Down To Stable Following Downgrade Of Japan

Gemini Securitization Corp., LLC (As Of May 2014)

Primary Credit Analyst: Eric Tanguy, Paris (33) ;

Evaluating Insurers Enterprise Risk Management Practice

Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais Upgraded To 'BB+' From 'BB' On Stronger Business Risk Profile, Outlook Stable

SNS REAAL Insurance Operations Ratings Raised To 'A-'; Outlook Negative

Largest South African Non-Life Insurer, Santam Ltd., Assigned 'A-' Long-Term And 'zaaa' National Scale Ratings

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Toll Roads Bridges

A Financial Analysis of Energies and Gas Pipelines

Duke Energy International Geracao Paranapanema 'BBB-' Global And 'braaa' National Scale Ratings Affirmed

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

German Utility RWE Downgraded To 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Ratings Lowered On Netherlands-Based SNS REAAL N.V. Group And Core Subs On Slower Recovery Prospects; Outlook Stable

Spain-Based IT Service Provider Amadeus IT Holding Rating Raised To 'BBB/A-2' On Strong Financials, Outlook Stable

RBS Citizens Financial Group Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative; Stand-Alone Credit Profile Lowered To 'a-'

Energinet.dk SOV. Primary Credit Analyst: Alf Stenqvist, Stockholm (46) ;

Healthcare Support (North Staffs) Finance Outlook Revised To Stable On Operating Risk; 'BBB-' Issue Ratings Affirmed

Sul America Upgraded To 'BBB-' And Sul America Companhia Nacional de Seguros To 'BBB+' Under New Criteria Review

Swedbank Outlook Revised To Stable From Negative On Improved Business Position; Ratings Affirmed At 'A+/A-1'

Millenniumbcp Ageas Core Non-Life Insurance Entity 'BB' Ratings On CreditWatch Positive On Announced Ownership Change

Dogus Holding 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Sustained Investments And Expected Completion Of Garanti Sale; Outlook Negative

Research Update: Banco Monex S.A. Rated Global Scale 'BB+/B', National Scale 'mxa+/mxa-1' Rating Affirmed. Table Of Contents

U.K. Broadcaster ITV Upgraded To 'BBB-/A-3' On Expected Solid Credit Metrics, Moderate Financial Policy; Outlook Stable

Standard & Poor's Puts Ratings On Eurozone Sovereigns On CreditWatch With Negative Implications

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Stand-Alone Credit Profiles: One Component Of A Rating

Codelco Rating Outlook Revised To Negative On Lower Copper Prices, 'AA-' Rating Affirmed

Residential Real Estate Company Deutsche Wohnen 'BBB+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Conwert Takeover Offer

Six Russian Real Estate Companies On CreditWatch Amid Higher Interest Rates, Weakening Demand, Sharp Ruble Depreciation

Revised Criteria for Rating Nonbank Financial Institutions And Financial Services Companies

Vienna Insurance Group AG Wiener Versicherung Gruppe

Lake Oswego, Oregon; Water/Sewer

Volkswagen Bank Ratings Lowered To 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Negative

South Padre Island, Texas; General Obligation

Overview of Takaful Insurance from a credit perspective

Research Update: Iceland-Based Utility Landsvirkjun Rating Raised To 'BB+' On Improved Stand-Alone Credit Profile; Outlook Negative.

Spanish Multi-Cedulas Rating Actions As Of Aug. 2, 2012

Transcription:

Credit Ratings from S&P 2010 Marine Money Conference Philip Baggaley Managing Director Standard & Poor s Funmi Afonja Director Standard & Poor s November 9, 2010 Copyright 2010 Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Agenda The Rating Process Determining a Corporate Credit Rating Recovery Analytics Rated Shipping companies 2.

S&P s Analyst-Driven Rating Process Ratings request from issuer Initial evaluation Meeting with issuer management Appeal Notification to issuer Ratings committee review and vote Analysis Publication and dissemination of public rating opinions Surveillance of rated issuers and issues 3.

S&P s Risk Factors for Corporate Ratings Country risk Industry characteristics Company position Profitability, peer comparison Business risk Rating Accounting Governance, risk tolerance Financial policy Cash flow adequacy Capital structure Liquidity/short term factors Financial risk 4.

Business Risk / Financial Risk Matrix Financial Risk Business Risk Minimal Modest Intermediate Significant Aggressive Highly Leveraged Excellent AAA AA A A- BBB -- Strong AAA A A- BBB BB BB- Satisfactory A- BBB+ BBB BB+ BB- B+ Fair -- BBB- BB+ BB BB- B Weak -- -- BB BB- B+ B- Vulnerable -- -- -- B+ B CCC+ 5.

The Opinions Reflected by Standard & Poor s Ratings 'AAA' Extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments Highest rating Investment Grade Speculative Grade 'AA' 'A' 'BBB' 'BBB-' 'BB+' 'BB' 'B' 'CCC' 'CC' 'C' 'D' Very strong capacity to meet financial commitments Strong capacity to meet financial commitments, but somewhat susceptible to adverse economic conditions and changes in circumstances Adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but more subject to adverse economic conditions Considered lowest investment grade by market participants Considered highest speculative grade by market participants Less vulnerable in the near-term but faces major ongoing uncertainties to adverse business, financial and economic conditions More vulnerable to adverse business, financial and economic conditions but currently has the capacity to meet financial commitments Currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable business, financial and economic conditions to meet financial commitments Currently highly vulnerable A bankruptcy petition has been filed or similar action taken, but payments of financial commitments are continued Payment default on financial commitments Ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories. 6.

Recovery Analytics S&P recovery analytics has three basic components Determining the most likely path to default Valuing the company following default Distributing value to claimants that we identify, based on upon the relative priority of each claimant 7.

Discrete Asset Valuation We focus on discrete asset valuation methodology because: Earnings volatility renders discounted cash flow and enterprise value methodologies less reliable Debt is secured with identifiable assets There are reliable means of judging expected asset values (e.g. appraisals, market data) 8.

Recovery Ratings Scale Recovery rating Recovery description Recovery expectations (%) * Issue rating relative to issuer credit rating** Notching 1+ + Highest expectation, full recovery 100 +3 1 Very high recovery 90-100 +2 Notch Up 2 Substantial recovery 70-90 +1 3 Meaningful recovery 50-70 0 4 Average recovery 30-50 0 No Notching 5 Modest recovery 10-30 -1 6 Negligible recovery 0-10 -2 Notch Down For issuers with a non-investment-grade corporate credit rating * Recovery of principal plus accrued but unpaid interest at the time of default ** Number of notches the issue rating may be adjusted relative to the credit rating of the issuer (i.e. +3 could mean the issuer rating could be BBB+ if the issuer rating was BB+) 9.

Rated Shipping Companies Misc Bhd. A-/Negative/-- Tanker Matson Navigation Co. Inc. BBB+/Negative/-- Container Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. Stena AB BBB-/Negative/-- BB+/Stable/-- Drybulk Car Carrier Tanker Ferry Wan Hai Lines Ltd. BB+/Stable/-- Container BW Group Ltd. BB+/Negative Tanker Teekay Corp. BB/Stable/-- Tanker Ship Finance International BB/Stable/-- Lessor Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. BB-/Stable/-- Dry Bulk Overseas Shipholding Group Inc. BB-/Stable/-- Tanker First Ship Lease Trust Ltd. BB-/Stable/-- Lessor Ratings as of Nov. 5, 2010 10.

Rated Shipping Companies, Continued Navios Maritime Acquisition Corp. B/Stable/-- Tanker Marquette Transportation Company Holdings, LLC B/Stable/-- Towboats Barge United Maritime Group, LLC B/Stable/-- Barge American Commercial Lines Inc. B/CreditWatchDev./-- Barge American Petroleum Tankers B-/Stable/-- Tanker Ultrapetrol B-/Stable/-- Tanker/Barge Horizon Lines Inc. B/Negative/-- Container General Maritime Corp. B/Negative/-- Tanker Trailer Bridge Inc. B-/Stable/-- Container PT Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk B-/CreditWatch/Neg-- Chemical Tanker PT Arpeni Pratama Ocean Link Tbk SD Barge/Bulk Carrier Ratings as of Nov. 5, 2010 11.

www.standardandpoors.com Copyright 2010 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an as is basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. 12. STANDARD & POOR S and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC.