WESTERN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc LLC

WESTERN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc LLC 20 S. 5 th Avenue, Brighton, CO 80601 2501 Mill St. Brush, CO 80723 Office: 720-685-9951 Cell: 303-913-7341, Fax: 720-294-1330 Email: firstname.lastname@westerneci.com August 1, 2014 Weld County Greeley, CO 80642 RE: SAUCEDO DRAINAGE LETTER To Whom It May Concern: Western Engineering Consultants inc LLC (WEC) appreciates the opportunity to provide this Drainage Compliance Letter with Weld County Criteria. Generally the areas of the existing site discussed in this letter currently drain predominately from south to northwest or south to northeast varying in slope from 1% to approximately just less than 2%. No apparent or knowledgeable drainage problems appear to exist or have been witnessed by the owners. Attached to this letter are the following supporting references and calculations: NRCS Soils Report UDFCD/Weld County based Rational Method runoff calculations Historic / Developed Drainage Plan WEC GENERAL CONCEPTS WEC s drainage design will adequately convey developed runoff from the proposed development to two proposed water quality ponds which will release along historic paths. Currently the grading and drainage design is intended to convey all runoff on site overland to the two proposed water quality detention ponds. No impervious areas will be undetained. The rational method for runoff quantities was performed. Each basin was analyzed for the maximum expected site buildout. The effective imperviousness based on this maximum buildable area is just less than 6%. The WEC drainage basins are denoted as A1, A2, and A3. Basin A1 (20.02 ac) is approximately the western portion of the property that will remain undisturbed. The minor (5yr) and major (100yr) releases are approximately 6.25 and 47.71 cfs respectively. Basin A2 (12.79 ac) is predominately the area that currently has existing gravel access and an existing building. The basin is also characterized to include the additional proposed parking and future building(s). The effective imperviousness of this built out basin is calculated at 10.1%. The minor (5yr) and major (100yr) releases are approximately 5.87 and 31.39 cfs respectively. Basin A3 (1.97 ac) is the eastern strip of land that ties the site to WCR 20. The majority of this rectangle strip will be made up of existing and improved access as well as a potential 80 * 120 future building. The minor (5yr) and major (100yr) releases are approximately 1.30 and 5.51 cfs respectively.

Saucedo USR Drainage Letter August 1, 2014 Western Engineering Consultants inc LLC Page 2 of 2 OFFSITE RUNOFF Currently there are tributary areas upstream of this 34.9 acre property however based on the existing conditions only localized runoff is expected to enter the site and said runoff is expected to be infiltrated by the current soils. The proposed Swale A2 and Swale A3 as located in Basins A2 and A3 respectively have been sized to accommodate offsite runoff. Swale A2 has been sized as 18 inches of flow depth and a 6 inch freeboard (24 inches total depth, 5 foot wide with 3:1 side slopes) to handle the calculated Off 2 basin runoff even though the majority of said flows are expected to be infiltrated and not enter the site. Total ditch width is 17 feet top of bank to top of bank. Swale A3 has been sized as 12 inches of flow depth and a 12 inch freeboard (24 inches total depth, 5 foot wide with 3:1 side slopes) to handle the calculated Off 3 basin runoff even though the majority of said flows are expected to be infiltrated and not enter the site. Total ditch width is 17 feet top of bank to top of bank. PROPOSED ATTENUTATED DRAINAGE SYSTEM As identified by County staff - this project is currently proposed to attenuate runoff on Basins A2 and A3 in accordance with UDFCD Volume 3 Water Quality Control Volume criteria. Attenuated flows will be released consistent with historic paths. Storms exceeding the WQCV storage will be released along historic routes as well. Pond A2 is proposed to have 3,759 cubic feet of capacity and Pond A3 is required to provide a minimum of 906 cubic feet. CLOSING The proposed Saucedo improvements will create additional imperviousness, however the attached drainage plan and supporting calculations enhance and significantly improve the current existing runoff conditions. The attached designs are intended to meet or exceed the minimum requirements of Weld County Storm Drainage Addendum and UDFCD criteria. WEC appreciates the opportunity to provide our preliminary designs for the Saucedo development for your consideration and review. Please contact me with any questions or comments you may have on this development project! Sincerely, Western Engineering Consultants inc., LLC Chadwin F. Cox, P.E. Senior Project Manager Encl. NRCS Soils Report UDFCD/Weld County based Rational Method runoff calculations USR & Historic and Developed Drainage Plan

SAUCEDO HISTORIC RUNOFF CALCS for B soils - C5 C10 C100 = from Table RO-5 Ti= (.395*(1.1-Cyr)*(L^.5)) / (S)^.333 5 10 100 1-Hour Point Rainfall 1.42 1.68 2.71 **for Ti calculations - only C5 is used BASIN H1 Historic - 5, 10, 100 yr 20.021 acres Use NCS Type A & B (50/50) Cyr - see frequency left Ti** Velocity Tt Tc check Use Tc I A CIA5 historic 5yr Length Slope 0.09 38.91 Tt= 0 0 38.91 12.78 12.78 1.90 20.02 3.43 cfs initial 500 0.024 travel 0 0.000 CIA10 historic 10yr 500 0.17 38.91 Tt= 0 0 38.91 12.78 12.78 2.25 20.02 7.48 cfs Overland flow condition only CIA100 historic 100yr Length is 934', use 500' 0.36 38.91 Tt= 0 0 38.91 12.78 12.78 3.63 20.02 26.17 cfs BASIN H2 Historic - 5, 10, 100 yr 14.890 acres Use NCS Type B Cyr - see frequency left Ti** Velocity Tt Tc check Use Tc I A CIA5 historic 5yr Length Slope 0.09 45.50 Tt= 0 0 45.50 12.78 12.78 1.72 14.89 2.31 cfs initial 500 0.015 travel 0 0.000 CIA10 historic 10yr 500 0.17 42.08 Tt= 0 0 42.08 12.78 12.78 2.14 14.89 5.30 cfs Overland flow condition only CIA100 historic 100yr Length is 1,071', use 500' 0.36 33.34 Tt= 0 0 33.34 12.78 12.78 3.99 14.89 21.40 cfs TOTAL AREA 20.021 acres BASIN H2 14.890 acres

SAUCEDO DEVELOPED RUNOFF CALCS See below for effective C values as calculated from Table RO-5 Ti= (.395*(1.1-Cyr)*(L^.5)) / (S)^.333 5 10 100 BASIN Point Rainfall 1.42 1.68 2.71 A1 Developed -5, 10, 100 yr 20.02 acres Use NCS Type A & B (50/50) C5 Ti Velocity Tt Tc check Use Tc Cyr - see above I A CIA5 developed 5yr Length Slope 0.09 40.05 0.00 0.00 40.05 12.78 12.78 0.09 3.47 20.02 6.25 cfs initial 500 0.011 travel 0 0.011 CIA10 developed 10yr 0.09 40.05 0.00 0.00 40.05 12.78 12.78 0.17 4.10 20.02 13.97 cfs Length is 700', use 500' CIA100 developed 100yr 0.09 40.05 0.00 0.00 40.05 12.78 12.78 0.36 6.62 20.02 47.71 cfs A2 Developed -5, 10, 100 yr 12.79 acres Use NCS Type B C5 Ti Velocity Tt Tc check Use Tc Cyr - see above I A CIA5 developed 5yr Length Slope 0.14 16.45 1.00 12.13 28.58 14.68 14.68 0.14 3.26 12.79 5.87 cfs initial 115 0.020 travel 728 0.010 CIA10 developed 10yr 0.14 16.45 1.00 12.13 28.58 14.68 14.68 0.22 3.85 12.79 10.65 cfs Cv= 10.00 CIA100 developed 100yr 0.14 16.45 1.00 12.13 28.58 14.68 14.68 0.40 6.21 12.79 31.39 cfs A3 Developed -5, 10, 100 yr 1.97 acres Use NCS Type B C5 Ti Velocity Tt Tc check Use Tc Cyr - see above I A CIA5 developed 5yr Length Slope 0.19 18.92 1.10 6.25 25.17 13.37 13.37 0.19 3.40 1.97 1.30 cfs initial 196 0.025 travel 411 0.012 CIA10 developed 10yr 0.19 18.92 1.10 6.25 25.17 13.37 13.37 0.26 4.02 1.97 2.09 cfs Cv= 10.00 CIA100 developed 100yr 0.19 18.92 1.10 6.25 25.17 13.37 13.37 0.43 6.49 1.97 5.51 cfs TOTAL AREA 20.021 acres TOTAL AREA 12.788 acres A1 Landscaping Gravel Building Concrete Asphalt A2 Landscaping Gravel Building Concrete Asphalt EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE I 2 40.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 2.00 I 2 40.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 10.08 C5 0.09 0.30 0.73 0.73 0.90 0.09 C5 0.09 0.30 0.73 0.73 0.90 0.14 C10 0.17 0.36 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.17 C10 0.17 0.36 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.22 C100 0.36 0.50 0.81 0.81 0.96 0.36 C100 0.36 0.50 0.81 0.81 0.96 0.40 AREA 20.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.021 AREA 10.77 1.49 0.53 0.00 0.00 12.788 TOTAL AREA 1.965 acres TABLE RO-2 (taken from UDFCD Manual - Vol. I) A3 Landscaping Gravel Building Concrete Asphalt Type of Land Surface Conveyance coefficie EFFECTIVE Heavy Meadow 2.5 I 2 40.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 17.71 Tillage/field 5 C5 0.09 0.30 0.73 0.73 0.90 0.19 Short pasture/lawns 7 C10 0.17 0.36 0.75 0.75 0.92 0.26 Nearly Bare Ground 10.00 C100 0.36 0.50 0.81 0.81 0.96 0.43 Grassed Waterway 15.00 Paved areas and shallow paved swale 20.00 AREA 1.44 0.30 0.22 0.00 0.00 1.965. EFFECTIVE IMP A BASINS 5.86 Effective C100 value (weighted avg) 0.400

REQUIRED DETENTION (EMPIRICAL for COMPARISON) K100 = (1.78*I -.002*I^2-3.56)/910 UDFCD K10= (0.95*I-1.9) / 1000 10 YEAR 100 YEAR 10 YEAR 100 YEAR VOLUME = KA VOLUME = KA VOLUME = KA VOLUME = KA I A K10 K100 acre-ft acre-ft cubic feet cubic feet A1 2.00 20.02 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 (0.00) 0 (7) A2 10.08 12.79 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.20 4,277 8,681 A3 17.71 1.97 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.06 1,277 2,571 TOTAL 5.86 34.77 0.00 0.01 0.13 0.26 5,554 11,244 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS WQCV = a(0.91*i^3-1.19*i^2 -.78*I) a = 1.0 for 40 hour drain time A WQ WQCV WQCV TOTAL w/ 10 yr TOTAL w/ 100 yr TOTAL w/ 10 yr TOTAL w/ 100 yr acres (in/watershed) ac-ft cubic feet acre ft acre ft cubic feet cubic feet** A1 20.02 0.02 0.03 1,320 0.03 0.03 1,320 652 A2 12.79 0.07 0.09 3,759 0.18 0.29 8,035 10,560 A3 1.97 0.11 0.02 906 0.05 0.08 2,183 3,024 TOTAL 34.77 0.19 0.14 5,984 0.26 0.40 11,538 14,236 APPROXIMATE POND SIZES Square Area A WQCV Assume 3 foot Depth Length to Width - 2X Ratio Length Area Check Volume Check acres cubic feet w/ Freeboard (square feet) Width (feet) feet square feet cubic feet A1 20.02 1,320 440 15 30 440 1320 A2 12.79 3,759 1253 25 50 1253 3759 A3 1.97 906 302 12 25 302 906 34.77 5,984 1,995 5,984 RELEASE RATES A SOIL TYPE 5 YR COEFF 5 YR RATE 10 YR COEFF 10 YR RATE 100 YR COEFF 100 YR RATE acres UDFCD cfs UDFCD cfs UDFCD cfs A1 20.02 B 0.13 2.60 0.23 4.60 0.85 17.02 A2 12.79 B 0.13 1.66 0.23 2.94 0.85 10.87 A3 1.97 B 0.13 0.26 0.23 0.45 0.85 1.67 TOTAL 34.77 4.52 8.00 29.56

Calculating the WQCV and Volume Reduction Chapter 3 Once the WQCV in watershed inches is found from Figure 3-2 or using Equation 3-1 and/or 3-2, the required BMP storage volume in acre-feet can be calculated as follows: Where: V = WQCV A Equation 3-3 12 V A WQCV = required storage volume (acre-ft) = tributary catchment area upstream (acres) = Water Quality Capture Volume (watershed inches) Figure 3-2. Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on BMP Drain Time 3-6 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District August 2011 Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3

Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A2 - Grass, Min Capacity Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n n = 0.030 Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 0.50 ft Design Water Depth Y = 1.00 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = 31.52 cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.81 Flow Velocity V = 3.94 fps Flow Area A = 8.00 sq ft Top Width T = 11.00 ft Wetted Perimeter P = 11.32 ft Hydraulic Radius R = 0.71 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 0.73 ft Specific Energy Es = 1.24 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 0.44 ft Specific Force Fs = 0.46 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A2 grass Max Cap.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:03 PM

Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A2 - Grass, Required Capacity Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q= 32.00 cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y= 0.90 ft Critical Flow Area A = 6.88 sq ft Critical Top Width T= 10.37 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.66 ft Critical Flow Velocity V= 4.65 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.01 Critical Wetted Perimeter P= 10.66 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R= 0.65 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc= 1.23 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc= 0.34 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc= 0.44 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A2 grass Max Cap.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:03 PM

Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A2 - Grass, Min Capacity Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n n = 0.030 Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 0.50 ft Design Water Depth Y = 1.50 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = 70.00 cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.86 Flow Velocity V = 4.91 fps Flow Area A = 14.25 sq ft Top Width T = 14.00 ft Wetted Perimeter P = 14.49 ft Hydraulic Radius R = 0.98 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 1.02 ft Specific Energy Es = 1.87 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 0.63 ft Specific Force Fs = 1.23 kip Saucedo-UD-Channels Swale A2 grass Max Cap with offsites.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:08 PM

Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A2 - Grass, Required Capacity Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q= 55.00 cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y= 1.21 ft Critical Flow Area A = 10.44 sq ft Critical Top Width T= 12.26 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.85 ft Critical Flow Velocity V= 5.27 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.01 Critical Wetted Perimeter P= 12.65 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R= 0.83 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc= 1.64 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc= 0.44 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc= 0.85 kip Saucedo-UD-Channels Swale A2 grass Max Cap with offsites.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:08 PM

Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A3 - Grass, Min Capacity Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = 0.0120 ft/ft Manning's n n = 0.030 Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 0.50 ft Design Water Depth Y = 0.50 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = 9.57 cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.81 Flow Velocity V = 2.94 fps Flow Area A = 3.25 sq ft Top Width T = 8.00 ft Wetted Perimeter P = 8.16 ft Hydraulic Radius R = 0.40 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 0.41 ft Specific Energy Es = 0.63 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 0.23 ft Specific Force Fs = 0.10 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A3 grass Max Cap.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:04 PM

Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A3 - Grass, Required Capacity Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q= 6.00 cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y= 0.33 ft Critical Flow Area A = 1.98 sq ft Critical Top Width T= 6.98 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.28 ft Critical Flow Velocity V= 3.04 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.01 Critical Wetted Perimeter P= 7.09 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R= 0.28 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc= 0.47 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc= 0.15 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc= 0.05 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A3 grass Max Cap.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:04 PM

Normal Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A3 - Grass, Min Capacity Design Information (Input) Channel Invert Slope So = 0.0120 ft/ft Manning's n n = 0.030 Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Freeboard Height F = 1.00 ft Design Water Depth Y = 1.00 ft Normal Flow Condtion (Calculated) Discharge Q = 34.52 cfs Froude Number Fr = 0.89 Flow Velocity V = 4.32 fps Flow Area A = 8.00 sq ft Top Width T = 11.00 ft Wetted Perimeter P = 11.32 ft Hydraulic Radius R = 0.71 ft Hydraulic Depth D = 0.73 ft Specific Energy Es = 1.29 ft Centroid of Flow Area Yo = 0.44 ft Specific Force Fs = 0.51 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A3 grass Max Cap w offsite.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:06 PM

Critical Flow Analysis - Trapezoidal Channel Project: Channel ID: Saucedo Swale A3 - Grass, Required Capacity Design Information (Input) Bottom Width B = 5.00 ft Left Side Slope Z1 = 3.00 ft/ft Right Side Slope Z2 = 3.00 ft/ft Design Discharge Q= 30.00 cfs Critical Flow Condition (Calculated) Critical Flow Depth Y= 0.87 ft Critical Flow Area A = 6.57 sq ft Critical Top Width T= 10.19 ft Critical Hydraulic Depth D = 0.64 ft Critical Flow Velocity V= 4.57 fps Froude Number Fr = 1.00 Critical Wetted Perimeter P= 10.47 ft Critical Hydraulic Radius R= 0.63 ft Critical (min) Specific Energy Esc= 1.19 ft Centroid on the Critical Flow Area Yoc= 0.33 ft Critical (min) Specific Force Fsc= 0.40 kip Culligan-UD-Channels Swale A3 grass Max Cap w offsite.xls, Basics 8/1/2014, 12:06 PM

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part August 1, 2014

Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http:// offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3

Contents Preface...2 How Soil Surveys Are Made...5 Soil Map...7 Soil Map...8 Legend...9 Map Unit Legend...10 Map Unit Descriptions...10 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part...12 44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes...12 69 Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes...13 70 Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes...14 72 Vona loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes...15 73 Vona loamy sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes...16 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes...17 References...19 4

How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the 5

Custom Soil Resource Report individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soillandscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 6

Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 7

104 46' 18'' W Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 104 45' 32'' W 40 8' 0'' N 4441200 4441300 4441400 4441500 4441600 4441700 4441800 4441900 4442000 4442100 4442200 4442300 4442400 4442500 4442600 519500 519600 519700 519800 519900 520000 520100 520200 520300 520400 520500 4441200 4441300 4441400 4441500 4441600 4441700 4441800 4441900 4442000 4442100 4442200 4442300 4442400 4442500 4442600 40 8' 0'' N 40 7' 13'' N 40 7' 13'' N 519500 519600 519700 519800 519900 520000 520100 520200 520300 520400 520500 104 46' 18'' W N Map Scale: 1:7,070 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 300 600 1200 1800 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 8 104 45' 32'' W

Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 12, Jan 3, 2014 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 22, 2011 Apr 13, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 9

Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (CO618) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes 69 Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes 70 Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes 72 Vona loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes 73 Vona loamy sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 64.6 24.6% 2.1 0.8% 75.3 28.7% 97.2 37.0% 23.5 9.0% 0.0 0.0% Totals for Area of Interest 262.7 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially 10

Custom Soil Resource Report where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha- Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11

Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 11 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 125 to 175 days Map Unit Composition Olney and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Olney Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed deposit outwash Typical profile H1-0 to 10 inches: loamy sand H2-10 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam H3-20 to 25 inches: sandy clay loam H4-25 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Minor Components Vona Percent of map unit: 8 percent Zigweid Percent of map unit: 7 percent 12

Custom Soil Resource Report 69 Valent sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,650 to 5,100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 180 days Map Unit Composition Valent and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Description of Valent Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits Typical profile H1-0 to 8 inches: fine sand H2-8 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.6 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Deep Sand (R067BY015CO) Minor Components Osgood Percent of map unit: 10 percent 13

Custom Soil Resource Report 70 Valent sand, 3 to 9 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,650 to 5,100 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 180 days Map Unit Composition Valent and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Description of Valent Setting Landform: Plains Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian deposits Typical profile H1-0 to 8 inches: fine sand H2-8 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 9 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.6 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Deep Sand (R067BY015CO) Minor Components Osgood Percent of map unit: 5 percent 14

Custom Soil Resource Report 72 Vona loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Vona Setting Landform: Plains, terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile H1-0 to 6 inches: loamy sand H2-6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3-28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of local importance Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit: 10 percent Valent Percent of map unit: 5 percent 15

Custom Soil Resource Report 73 Vona loamy sand, 3 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Vona Setting Landform: Plains, terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile H1-0 to 6 inches: loamy sand H2-6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3-28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit: 8 percent Valent Percent of map unit: 7 percent 16

Custom Soil Resource Report 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost-free period: 130 to 160 days Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Vona Setting Landform: Plains, terraces Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile H1-0 to 6 inches: sandy loam H2-6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3-28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches) Interpretive groups Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: Sandy Plains (R067BY024CO) Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit: 9 percent Olney Percent of map unit: 3 percent 17

Custom Soil Resource Report Julesburg Percent of map unit: 3 percent 18

References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 19

Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/internet/fse_documents/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 20