Understanding Universal Service Reform. Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA



Similar documents
Regulatory,Taxand BusinessImplicationsof. RelatedtoEnhanced Communications

Kelly Cameron +1(301) janvier 2015

White Paper Understanding and Navigating Your Telecommunications Tax and Regulatory Requirements

VoIP Service Provider Regulatory Compliance Guide:

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF JOHN STAURULAKIS, INC.

Telecom Audit Training Module. Understanding Telecom Taxes, Fees, and Surcharges

INTERCONNECTED VOIP REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MANUAL

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Implementing InterCall: USF Implications for the Conference Call Industry

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Federal Telecom Issues: What s Going on in D.C.? Montana Telecoms. Assn. 9/01/15

Taxing Telecommunications

An electronic clearing house and settlement system for exchanging electronic transactions among banking institutions.

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report

Regulatory and Tax Issues Impacting Non-Interconnected VoIP and Other One-Way VoIP Services

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

Federal Universal Service System

Low Income Program. Best Practices

TAXING THE CLOUD: State and Local Tax Issues and Implications of Cloud Communications Services on Cloud Computing

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Core-Edge Working Group Meeting, September 28-29, 2004 Chintan Vaishnav Research Assistant, MIT CFP

Telecommunications Deregulation: Updating the Scorecard for 2013

AT&T Billing Glossary

How Does Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Affect You?

Regulatory Landscape: FCC Regulation of Non-Interconnected VoIP Services and the Cloud

COMMENTS OF COX COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

How To File the FCC Form 499-A

The Future of IDAHO S UNIVERSAL SERVICE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT

Enhancing Broadband Capabilities in the New Native America

A Webinar March

GAO. Federal and State Universal Service Programs and Challenges to Funding TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

THE YEAR IN WIRELINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION SEPTEMBER 2010 SEPTEMBER 2011

Report to the 82 nd Texas Legislature

Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services

Telecom Regulatory Reporting

Telecommunications Competition: Where is it and Where is it Going? DAVID BREVITZ, C.F.A. 36 TH ANNUAL PURC CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5, 2009

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

How To Review Chapter 364 Of The Florida State Constitution

Good Filing Practices

` Instructions for Completing the Service Provider and Billed Entity Identification Number and Contact Information Form

Addendum StartPage: 0

Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere?

New FCC Regulations for Prepaid Card Providers

REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET

Remarks As Prepared for Delivery by Jonathan Adelstein NARUC Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA

INSPECTOR GENERAL STATEMENT ON THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION S MAJOR MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES FISCAL YEAR 2005

Financial Analysis for Frontier Communications Corp. (FTR)

Transcription:

Understanding Universal Service Reform Jonathan S. Marashlian, Esq. Robert Dumas, CPA

Speaker Bios Jonathan Marashlian, Esq. Jonathan Marashlian, partner at Helein & Marashlian, LLC, The CommLaw Group, assists clients with regulatory compliance and strategies, transactional, litigation and regulatory defense matters before the FCC and state regulatory agencies across the nation. He counsels clients in all aspects of state and federal regulatory matters, focusing on compliance with the Universal Service Fund and similar regulatory programs through his firm s unique Compliance & Reporting service, The Commpliance Group. Jonathan earned his J.D. from the George Mason University School of Law. Robert Dumas, CPA Accountant, consultant and entrepreneur Robert Dumas began his public accounting career on the tax staff at Arthur Young & Co., followed by a brief stint at Grant Thornton. In the late 1980s, Robert joined BellSouth Corporation s tax department. In 1996, he left BellSouth to pursue a career as an independent consultant. Three years later, Robert founded Tax Partners, which became the largest sales tax compliance service bureau in the country. Robert served as president of Tax Partners and helped grow the business to $16 million in seven years. The company was sold to Thomson Corporation in March 2005, and Robert served as vice president of operations in Thomson s transaction tax business unit until founding TaxConnex in 2006. Robert is a nationally recognized expert on telecommunications taxation and a frequent speaker on the subjects of transaction tax, business process outsourcing and sales tax compliance. He is a graduate of the University of Georgia, and holds a masters degree in accountancy, with a tax emphasis.

What is Universal Service? Section 254 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to establish regulations to ensure: Support for the universal availability of telecommunications to all Americans at just and reasonable rates, including: Support for high cost areas Support for public schools & libraries Support for rural heathcare/telemedicine All providers of interstate telecommunications and interconnected VoIP providers must contribute to the support of Federal universal service in an equitable and nondiscriminatory manner by making quarterly contributions to the Universal Service Fund ( USF )

How USF works today: Revenue-Based Contributions Since 1996, USF funding is based on a percentage of telecom provider revenue Interstate & international billed and collected end user telecommunications revenue The FCC has extended this contribution obligation to Interconnected VoIP providers USAC sets the contribution factor each quarter based on projected fund requirements Contribution factor steadily increasing

Why does current USF need reform? No support for broadband The current USF does not include broadband internet access as a supported service Declining revenue base Primary contributors under current system experiencing historic declines in revenue Fierce competition among IXCs forcing prices to all-time lows Inter-model competition from wireless and broadband/ip Bundling of local, long distance, wireless & video in non-usage sensitive packages resulting in minimized interstate revenue Interstate long distance revenues are being cannibalized by new technologies These developments have led to ever increasing contribution factor < 4% in 1996 Currently 12.9% (peaked at 15.3% in 2Q FY 2010) High USF contribution factor beckons regulatory arbitrage and non-compliance

USF Reform: Overview Reform efforts have been ongoing since the USF was created in 1997 Both in Congress and by the FCC Most recent reform proposals have centered on: Including broadband as a supported service Reducing inefficiencies Limiting the size of the USF Reforming contribution methodology Reform is controversial and the stakes are high

USF Reform: Proposals at the FCC National Broadband Plan: proposed USF reform, to be implemented in two stages: Stage One: (2010-2011) Identify current funding to shift to support broadband Connect America Fund: Support broadband in unserved areas Mobility Fund: Provide one-time support for deployment of 3G networks Establish a long-term plan for Intercarrier Compensation reform, and examine middle-mile costs and pricing Stage Two: (2012-2016) Begin disbursements from CAF and Mobility Fund Implement ICC/middle mile pricing reform Begin USF Contribution Reform

USF Reform: FCC Implementation of the NBP s USF Reform Proposals The FCC has begun efforts to implement the NBP s proposal for USF Reform Connect American Fund NOI/NPRM (rel. Apr. 21, 2010) NOI sought comment on cost model to determine USF support for broadband and ways to target funding for broadband deployment in unserved areas NPRM sought comment on ways to cap USF growth and cut inefficient funding in legacy high-cost support mechanisms and shift savings toward broadband Mobility Fund NPRM (rel. Oct. 14, 2010) Seeks comment on the creation of the Mobility Fund as one mechanism to support broadband Proposes to use USF funds freed up by the Verizon and Sprint voluntary merger commitments to surrender high-cost USF support

USF Reform: FCC USF Reform Moving Forward Absent Congressional action, contribution reform will be addressed in Stage Two of the NBP USF Reform Proposal Current Proposals Include: Numbers Plan Connections Plan Numbers/Hybrid Plan Modified Revenue-Based Contribution Scheme Expanding the Contribution Base

USF Reform: Contribution Reform Proposals Numbers Plan: all communications service providers with working, in use telephone numbers (or equivalents) would be assessed a flat, per number fee Connections Plan: all connections to an interstate public or private network would be assessed a flat, per number fee Numbers/Connections Hybrid Plan: would assess residential users a fee based on working numbers and business users a fee based on working connections

USF Reform: Contribution Reform Proposals (cont.) Modified Revenue-based System: maintain aspects of the current revenue-based system. Could be inspired by European Value Added Tax (VAT) Expanding Contribution Base: maintain current system, require broadband providers and other communications service providers to contribute

USF Reform: Congressional Action Universal Service Reform Act of 2010: Introduced in the House on July 21 st by Reps. Rich Boucher (D-VA) and Lee Terry (R-NE) Declares broadband to be a supported service Limits USF so it does not unreasonably burden consumers Expands contribution base to include: Broadband providers Non-interconnected VoIP providers Current contributors Defers to FCC to decide whether to base contribution methodology on revenues, numbers, or combination. Potential for increased contributions: If FCC opts for a revenue-based approach it can assess contributions on Interstate, Intrastate, and International communications services!

USF Reform: Congressional Action (cont.) Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010: Requires all VoIP providers (both interconnected and non-interconnected) to contribute to the Telecommunications Relay Service Fund Demonstrates Congress willingness to expand federal contribution obligations beyond telecommunications carriers and Interconnected VoIP providers

What does this all mean? Reform to the USF is imminent and the contribution base will be expanded USF contribution obligations will likely be extended to: Broadband providers Non-interconnected VoIP providers A revenue-based system will likely be maintained USF Contribution obligations have tax implications

The Commpliance Group and TaxConnex: We Are Here to Help! The Commpliance Group Services: In association with TaxConnex (www.taxconnex.com) the Commpliance Group provides clients with Total Outsourced Regulatory Compliance (TORC) TORC fulfills the triumvirate of Regulatory, Corporate, and Tax compliance servicing needs of companies operating in the regulated communications industry TORC is available on a nationwide, multi-state or state-bystate basis Provides the communications industry with the only true onestop, professionally-serviced and custom-tailored solution to fulfill every Regulatory, Corporate and Tax compliance need

The Commpliance Group and TaxConnex: We Are Here to Help! (cont.) TaxConnex is the leading choice for complete telecom, sales & use tax services and information from experienced sales tax professionals TaxConnex provides the full spectrum of telecom, sales & use tax services, including: Multi-state consultation on nexus, taxability and audits Multi-state compliance, return preparation and remittance Customized, client-intimate Service Delivery for your particular situation

Contact Us for More Information Jonathan Marashlian www.commlawgroup.com jsm@commlawgroup.com (703) 714-1313 Robert Dumas www.taxconnex.com robert.dumas@taxconnex.com (877) 893-5304