SUMMARY OF MAGNITUDE WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS ON DETERMINING EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES FROM DIGITAL DATA



Similar documents
Earthquake Magnitude Calculator for the AS-1 Seismograph 1

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

The earthquake source

Data Analysis and Seismogram Interpretation

Boston College. The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. Department of Geology and Geophysics

Earthquake Magnitude

Locating the Epicenter and Determining the Magnitude of an Earthquake

Seismic Observations during September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attack

Name: Date: Class: Finding Epicenters and Measuring Magnitudes Worksheet

NATURAL DISASTERS Vol. I - Earthquake Parameters Including Strong Earthquakes- S.L.Yunga EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS INCLUDING STRONG EARTHQUAKES

Earthquakes, faulting, beach-balls, magnitude scales

Observed Characteristics of Regional Seismic Phases and Implications for P/S Discrimination in the European Arctic

Bandwidth-dependent transformation of noise data from frequency into time domain and vice versa

ABSG Consulting, Tokyo, Japan 2. Professor, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan 3

Networks, instruments and data centres: what does your seismic (meta-) data really mean? Joachim Wassermann (LMU Munich)

EARTHQUAKES. Compressional Tensional Slip-strike

Class Notes from: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering By Steven Kramer, Prentice-Hall. Ground motion parameters

Real time earthquake monitoring for early warning of tsunamis

Seismic Waves Practice

Mapping the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Mohos across the northern and central Apennine chain through teleseismic receiver functions

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

SEISMIC WAVES AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATION

CyberShake Simulations for Path Effects near SONGS

Unit 4 Lesson 6 Measuring Earthquake Waves. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

PROHITECH WP3 (Leader A. IBEN BRAHIM) A short Note on the Seismic Hazard in Israel

SOFTWARE FOR GENERATION OF SPECTRUM COMPATIBLE TIME HISTORY

Simulating Aftershocks for an On Site Inspection (OSI) Exercise

Earthquake Focal Parameters and Lithospheric Structure of the Anatolian Plateau from Complete Regional Waveform Modeling

1 Introduction. External Grant Award Number: 04HQGR0038. Title: Retrieval of high-resolution kinematic source parameters for large earthquakes

Building 1D reference velocity model of the Irpinia region (Southern Apennines): microearthquakes locations and focal mechanism

Earthquakes. Earthquakes: Big Ideas. Earthquakes

DYNAMIC CRUST: Unit 4 Exam Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes

Coda wave attenuation in Mara Rosa seismic zone Goiás state, Brazil

Figure 1: 3D realisation of AST electrode firing head discarging high voltage charge within borehole.

Introduction to SEISAN and Computer exercises in processing earthquake data

Earthquake Lab. A. Locate the Epicenter. Name: Lab Section:

SEISAN tutorial By Jens Havskov, Lars Ottemöller and Peter Voss September 2014

The seismic activity in the area of Greece between 1966 and 1969

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp , June 1993

Practice Test SHM with Answers

CONTRASTING DISPLACEMENT DEMANDS OF DUCTILE STRUCTURES FROM TOHOKU SUBDUCTION TO CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKE RECORDS. Peter Dusicka 1 and Sarah Knoles 2

Antelope Contributed Software Development Status for Detectors, Focal Mechanisms, Moment Tensors, Locations

Welcome to Vibrationdata

Source Estimation from Broadband Regional Seismograms

Building a simple seismometer

A STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF SURFACE WAVES GENERATED

How do scientists measure earthquakes?

THE 2004 SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE AND INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI: WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY

Geology for Engineers Earthquakes

Simple Harmonic Motion

Lessons learned from the tsunami disaster caused by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and improvements in JMA's tsunami warning system

Name Date Class. By studying the Vocabulary and Notes listed for each section below, you can gain a better understanding of this chapter.

1.3. DOT PRODUCT If θ is the angle (between 0 and π) between two non-zero vectors u and v,

UrEDAS, URGENT EARTHQUAKE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM, NOW AND FUTURE

Seismographs. Lesson 7. Seismographs recording activity on Kilauea

Surface sediment effects on teleseismic P wave amplitude

Monday 11 June 2012 Afternoon

Earthquakes.

FIRST ACTUAL P-WAVE ALARM SYSTEMS AND EXAMPLES OF DISASTER PREVENTION BY THEM

AP Physics C. Oscillations/SHM Review Packet

Instrumentation. Earthquake Seismology

A Strong Motion Velocity Meter in a Modern Seismic Network?

Columbia University Department of Physics QUALIFYING EXAMINATION

Sonic Logging in Deviated Boreholes of an Anisotropic Formation: Laboratory Study

THE NEW BRAZILIAN STANDARD FOR SEISMIC DESIGN

Brief Review of Global Earth Velocity Structures and Seismology

AP1 Oscillations. 1. Which of the following statements about a spring-block oscillator in simple harmonic motion about its equilibrium point is false?

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Finding Equations of Sinusoidal Functions From Real-World Data

Physics Notes Class 11 CHAPTER 3 MOTION IN A STRAIGHT LINE

The Severity of an Earthquake U.S. Department of the Interior/Geological Survey

Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko. Basic Geophysical Concepts

Earthquakes. Seismograph stations operated by the British Geological Survey

FKPE Recommendations on Seismic Monitoring of Induced Seismicity

Plotting Earthquake Epicenters an activity for seismic discovery

Physics 231 Lecture 15

The Dynamic Crust 2) EVIDENCE FOR CRUSTAL MOVEMENT

Chapter 15, example problems:

SIESMIC SLOSHING IN CYLINDRICAL TANKS WITH FLEXIBLE BAFFLES

Chapter 5: Earthquakes

Activity #1-HS What is a Seismometer? High School Level

Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems

Which physics for full-wavefield seismic inversion?

FOURTH GRADE EARTHQUAKES 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

ACOUSTIC EMISSION SIGNALS GENERATED BY MONOPOLE (PEN- CIL-LEAD BREAK) VERSUS DIPOLE SOURCES: FINITE ELEMENT MODELING AND EXPERIMENTS

Instrument Testing and Evaluation for the Taiwan Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program

Lecture 12 Earthquake Magnitude

AP Physics 1 and 2 Lab Investigations

HSC Mathematics - Extension 1. Workshop E4

DECISION PROCESS AND OPTIMIZATION RULES FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMS. T. Zikas 1 and F. Gehbauer 2

Transcription:

B SUMMARY OF MAGNITUDE WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS ON DETERMINING EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES FROM DIGITAL DATA The Working Group on Magnitudes (Magnitude WG) of the International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth s Interior (IASPEI) Commission on Seismological Observation and Interpretation (CoSOI) was established to recommend standard procedures for making measurements from digital data to be used in calculating several widely used types of earthquake magnitude. The recommended procedures from the Magnitude WG have been approved by the IASPEI Commission on Seismological Observations and Interpretations and are expected to be implemented by all seismological centres. We henceforth refer to the proposed procedures as the IASPEI standard procedures for magnitude determination. The Magnitude WG is planning to publish an article, in the open literature, that explains the reasons and arguments that lead to the IASPEI standard procedures. The IASPEI standard procedures address the measurement of amplitudes and periods from digital data for use in calculating the generic magnitude types M L, M S, m b, m B, and mb(l g ). For M S, standard procedures are proposed for two different traditions M S measured from waves with periods near 20s [here denoted M S (20)] and M S measured from waves in a much broader period-range [here denoted M S (BB)]. For the generic intermediate-period/broadband body wave magnitude m B, we propose a procedure based on the maximum amplitude of the P-wave measured on a velocityproportional trace: we denote the resulting magnitude m B (BB). The IASPEI standard procedures also specify a standard equation for M W from among several slightly different equations. Abbreviated provisional descriptions of the procedures are described below. The magnitude WG is currently monitoring a test implementation of the IASPEI standard procedures, to be sure that descriptions of the procedures, such as described below, are consistent with the intent of the WG. When this test has been completed, we will provide at this site a more complete description of the IASPEI standard procedures, including filter parameters that will be necessary to replicate the responses of standard instruments that are specified in the standard procedures. The amplitudes used in the magnitude formulas are generally to be measured as onehalf the maximum peak-to-adjacent-trough deflection of the seismogram trace. None of the magnitude formulas presented in this article are intended to be used with the full peak-to-trough deflection as the amplitude. M L -- local magnitude consistent with the magnitude of Richter (1935) For crustal earthquakes in regions with attenuative properties similar to those of Southern California, the standard equation is (1) M L = log 10 (A) + 1.11 log 10 R + 0.00189*R - 2.09 where: A = maximum trace amplitude in nm that is measured on output from a horizontal-component instrument that is filtered so that the response of the 1

seismograph/filter system replicates that of a Wood-Anderson standard seismograph but with a static magnification of 1; R = hypocentral distance in km, typically less than 1000 km. Equation (1) is an expansion of that of Hutton and Boore (1987). The constant term in equation (1), -2.09, is based on an experimentally determined static magnification of the Wood-Anderson of 2080, rather than the theoretical magnification of 2800 that was specified by the seismograph s manufacturer. The formulation of equation (1) reflects the intent of the Magnitude WG that reported M L amplitude data not be affected by uncertainty in the static magnification of the Wood-Anderson seismograph. For crustal earthquakes in regions with attenuative properties that are different than those of coastal California, and for measuring magnitudes with vertical-component seismographs, the standard equation is of the form: (2) M L = log 10 (A) + C(R) + D where A and R are as defined in equation (1), except that A may be measured from a vertical-component instrument, and where C(R) and D have been calibrated to adjust for the different regional attenuation and to adjust for any systematic differences between amplitudes measured on horizontal seismographs and those measured on vertical seismographs. M S (20), teleseismic surface-wave magnitudes at period of ~ 20 sec. where: (3) M S (20) = log 10 (A/T) + 1.66 log 10 Δ + 3.3 A = vertical-component ground displacement in μm measured from the maximum trace-amplitude of a surface-wave phase having a period between 18s and 22s on a waveform that has been filtered so that the frequency response of the seismograph/filter system replicates that of a World-Wide Standardized Seismograph Network (WWSSN) long-period seismograph (seismometer period 15s, galvanometer period, 90s); T = period in seconds (18s T 22s); Δ = epicentral distance in degrees, 20 Δ 160 ; and where the earthquake has a focal-depth of less than 60 km. M S (BB) surface-wave magnitudes from Broad Band instruments. 2

where (4) M S (BB) = log 10 (A/T) max + 1.66 log 10 Δ + 3.3 (A/T ) max = (V max /2π), where V max = ground velocity in μm/s associated with the maximum trace-amplitude in the surface-wave train as recorded on verticalcomponent seismogram that is proportional to velocity, and where the period T, 3s < T < 60s, should be preserved together with A or V max in bulletin databases; Δ = epicentral distance in degrees, 2 Δ 160, focal depth less than 60 km. m b short-period body-wave magnitude where, (5) m b = log 10 (A/T) + Q(Δ, h) A = P-wave ground displacement in μm calculated from the maximum traceamplitude in the entire P-phase train (time spanned by P, pp, sp, and possibly PcP and their codas, and ending preferably before PP); T = period in seconds, T < 3s; A and T are measured on output from a vertical-component instrument that is filtered so that the frequency response of the seismograph/filter system replicates that of a WWSSN short-period seismograph; Q(Δ, h) = attenuation function for PZ (P-waves recorded on vertical component seismographs) established by Gutenberg and Richter (1956); Δ = epicentral distance in degrees, 21 Δ 100 ; h = focal depth. m B (BB) broadband body-wave magnitude where, (6) m B B = log10(a/t) max + Q(Δ, h) (A/T ) max = (V max /2π), where V max = ground velocity in μm/s associated with the maximum trace-amplitude in the entire P-phase train (time spanned by P, pp, sp, and possibly PcP and their codas, but ending preferably before PP) as recorded on a vertical-component seismogram that is proportional to velocity in the period-range 0.2s < T < 30s, and where T should be preserved together with A or V max in bulletin data-bases; 3

Q(Δ, h) = attenuation function for PZ established by Gutenberg and Richter (1956), as discussed above with respect to m b ; Δ = epicentral distance in degrees, 21 Δ 100 ; h = focal depth. M W moment magnitude (7a) M W = (2/3) (log 10 M 0 9.1) where M 0 = scalar moment in N m, determined from waveform modelling or from the long-period asymptote of spectra. or its CGS equivalent (M 0 in dyne cm), (7b) M W = (2/3) (log 10 M 0 16.1), m b (L g ) regional Lg magnitude measured in a narrow period range around 1s. where, (8) m b (L g ) = 5.0 + log 10 [A i (10)/110] A i (10) = ground displacement in μm of hypothetical Lg wave at a distance of 10 km, extrapolated from observation at station i. The extrapolated amplitude A i (10) is calculated as: (9) A i (10) = A(r i ) (r i /10) 1/3 [sin(r i /111.1)/sin(10/111.1)] 1/2 exp[γ(r i 10)] where: A(Δ i ) = sustained ground-motion amplitude in μm at ith station, defined as the third largest amplitude in the time window corresponding to group velocities of 3.6 to 3.2 km/s, in the period-range 0.7 to 1.3s. r i = epicentral distance of ith station, in km. γ = coefficient of attenuation in km -1. γ is related to the quality factor Q through the equation γ = π/(q U T), where U is group velocity and T is the wave period of the L g wave. γ is a strong function of crustal structure and should be determined specifically for the region in which the m b (L g ) is to be used. A and T are measured on output from a vertical-component instrument that is filtered so that the frequency response of the seismograph/filter system replicates that of a WWSSN short-period seismograph. Arrival times with respect to the origin of the 4

seismic disturbance are used, along with epicentral distance, to compute group velocity U. At the regional and near-teleseismic distances within which m b (L g ) is typically used, equations (8) and (9) may be simplified to: (10) m b (L g ) = 2.96 + 0.833log 10 [r i /10] +.4343γr i + log 10 (A i ) 5

REFERENCES Hutton, L.K., and D.M. Boore (1987). The M L scale in southern California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 77, 2074-2094. Richter, C. F. (1935). An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 25, 1-32. Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter (1956). Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Annali di Geofisica, 9, 1-15. MAGNITUDE WG MEMBERS James W. Dewey (chair, dewey@usgs.gov) Peter Bormann (pb65@gmx.net) Irina Gabsatarova (ira@gsras.ru) Sören Gregersen (sg@geus.dk) Alexander A. Gusev (gusev@emsd.iks.ru) Won-Young Kim (wykim@ldeo.columbia.edu) Klaus Klinge (klinge@szgrf.bgr.de) Howard J. Patton (patton@lanl.gov) Bruce W. Presgrave (presgrave@usgs.gov) Liu Ruifeng (ruifengliu@eq-igp.ac.cn) Joachim Saul (saul@gfz-potsdam.de) Dmitry Storchak (dmitry@isc.ac.uk) Robert A. Uhrhammer (bob@seismo.berkeley.edu) Karl Veith (Karl.Veith@itt.com). 6