AN IMPORTANT MIDDLE BRONZE AGE CEMETERY AT WEST-CENTRAL ANATOLIA: DEDE MEZARI



Similar documents
Field Report: Caere Project 2015

ALGORITHM DEVELOPING FOR LAND CONSOLIDATION SOFTWARE

An Archaeological Settlement Analysis of Goshono Site

Hopewell Archeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley Volume 6, Number 1, September 2004

Labraunda Preliminary report

CURRICULUM VITAE PERSONEL INFORMATION

Bedwyn Brail, Wiltshire: Geophysical and Earthworks Survey

Field School Scholarship, I had the opportunity to attend the American Excavations at

Works on the Geographical Information System (GIS) in the Ancient Town Kelenderis in Turkey

ACQUIRING MINERAL RIGHTS IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

Consolidation of bank slippage Mount Sandel Fort (LDY 007:020) Coleraine County Derry

An archaeological evaluation at St Benedict s College, Norman Way, Colchester, Essex September 2003

Ancient Greek Arts and Architecture

A PLAN FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION OF LYSTRA (ZOLDURA HÖYÜK)

Summer Field Research Grants for Graduate Students in Latin America, the Caribbean, and the Iberian Peninsula

Registration Problems In Cappadocia/Turkey

Archaeological Finds Advice

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Lecture 11: Land Division Systems

Cultural heritage works of the Gebze-İzmir Motorway Project in the west of Turkey

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR SURVEY

STRATFORD CAMPUS, UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESKTOP STUDY

Case Study: Groundwater Contamination

Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of a Portion of the Riverside Cemetery, Hopkinsville, Kentucky

RESEARCH INTERESTS: Plantations, Carolina frontier, European contact era, Spanish settlements, creolization

MAP USE EFFICIENCY IN GEOGRAPHY LESSONS: A CASE STUDY IN PRIMARY EDUCATION IN KONYA TURKEY

PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeology by the People for the People GESSICA BARRY

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Investigations at Fort Pulaski National Monument, Chatham County, Georgia. Prepared for:

MEMORANDUM. Further discussion regarding the Community s solid waste facility is described further in this memorandum.

Chapter 3. Exploration Results at the Krang Kor Site

Dubai Expedition

WHAT MAPS SHOW US Maps do 4 things:

Guidelines Iowa Archaeological Certification Program

Description of Simandou Archaeological Potential Model. 13A.1 Overview

Residential Window Replacement Design Guidelines

Create your own dig! bbc.co.uk/history/handsonhistory

A Model for Solving Informal Settlement Issues in Developing Countries

THE POTTERY MOUND MONITORING PROGRAM, 2008

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis I.2. Cultural Resources Archaeological Resources

MAPPING THE PREHISTORIC STATUE ROADS ON RAPA NUI USING REMOTE SENSING SATELLITE IMAGERY

Prehistoric timber circle from Holme

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

oi.uchicago.edu The 2008 Season Ronald L. Gorny

HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY (Taught in Bulgarian)

Data Sharing System (DSS) Data Entry Instruction for Archaeological Survey

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

September 2007 Newsletter

BERMUDA MARITIME SECURITY (HARBOUR AREAS) (RESTRICTED ZONES) ORDER 2010 BR 79 / 2010

3. TOWN/NEAREST TOWN: Millsboro vicinity? 4. MAIN TYPE OF RESOURCE: building structure site object landscape district

Carlo Scarpa and the Brioni family cemetery

Surface Decoration. Design techniques used to put on the surface of the pottery. Slip Oxides Glaze Embossed Incised Wax on wet Altered from the wheel

PETRA GARDEN & POOL-COMPLEX 2003 End of Season Report submitted to Michel Conan Dumbarton Oaks

Concept for an Ontology Based Web GIS Information System for HiMAT

Unit 5 - The Discovery of Human Remains: Best Practices


VİT-VAROL C O N S T R C T I O N INTRODUCTION FILE

COUNTRY REPORT GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT IN NEPAL

Prof. Dr. İsmet Vildan ALPTEKİN Department of Landscape Architecture

A historic sea wall revealed; archaeological trial-trenching at the Proctor & Gamble London site, West Thurrock, Essex February 2013

STONE ALIGNMENT WITH SOLAR AND OTHER SIGHTLINES IN SOUTH INDIA

BUILDING WITH STONE AND EARTH

R U PREVENTING CHILD LABOR COMBATING AFLATOXIN

3D Visualization of Seismic Activity Associated with the Nazca and South American Plate Subduction Zone (Along Southwestern Chile) Using RockWorks

Chapter 3: Early People of Ohio

Assist.Prof.Dr. Hasan ÇİÇEK

Forensic Anthropology

NASA s World Wind Planetary Visualisation software identifies proposed site of ancient Ithaca

3D DATA ACQUISITION AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTATION

Watershed Delineation

Concord MA Walking Tour

KOURION LIMASSOL, CYPRUS

Phase III: Data Recovery and Mitigation

SECTION CEMENT-MORTAR LINED AND COATED STEEL PIPE

COMPARISON OF SRTM AND 25K TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS IN TURKEY

REPORT OF WORK GUIDELINES

Rural Settlement Patterns

Suzanna Narkaus Paviken Paper for 2013 Excavations Coins and Silver August 23, 2013 Instructor: Dan Carlsson

After reading this lesson you will be able to: 12.3 IMPORTANCE OF ROOF 12.4 TYPES OF ROOF IN A HOUSE

Topographic Maps Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007

How to Build a Dry Stone Wall

TURKISH CONTRACTING IN THE INTERNATIONAL MARKET

Irrigation Water Management: Training Manual No. 2 - Elements of Topographic Surveying

Watershed Works Manual

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CHAIN LINK INSTALLATION Chain Link fence & Posts Meshdirect.co.uk

ROME RESOURCES LTD Fraser Highway Surrey, B.C. V4N 0G2

MD5-26 Stacking Blocks Pages

East Beach Pond, Selsey, West Sussex

Hot Spots & Plate Tectonics

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

Using LIDAR to monitor beach changes: Goochs Beach, Kennebunk, Maine

Letter Report Geophysical Subsurface Investigation Activities and Results Suspected Burial Site, Corpus Christi, Texas W.O. No

Foundations of Technology, Third Edition / Technology, Engineering, and Design

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: DISCUSSION ITEM DISCUSSION OF ANDERSON SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ADDITION, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS

DEEP AZIMUTHAL SEISMIC ANISOTROPY IN THE WESTERNANATOLIA AND AEGEAN SUBDUCTION ZONE

KONTENJANLARI (TABLO 4)/TABLE: THE GU

What is Art History? Art History at Creighton Course of Study Learning Assessment Plan Internships and Study Abroad

MATHEMATICS Y6 Geometry 6750 Use co-ordinates and extend to 4 quadrants Equipment MathSphere

Topographic Survey. Topographic Survey. Topographic Survey. Topographic Survey. CIVL 1101 Surveying - Introduction to Topographic Modeling 1/8

Chapter Overview. Bathymetry. Measuring Bathymetry. Echo Sounding Record. Measuring Bathymetry. CHAPTER 3 Marine Provinces

HANWORTH PARK Boundary: Date of Designation: Date of alteration and extension: Additional protection to the area:

Transcription:

AN IMPORTANT MIDDLE BRONZE AGE CEMETERY AT WEST-CENTRAL ANATOLIA: DEDE MEZARI O. Kocak a, M. Uyumez b, T. Cay c, A. Ilasli b, F. Iscan c a Selcuk University Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of History, Konya-TURKEY, ozdekocak@hotmail.com b Director of the Afyon Museum, Afyon-TURKEY, muyumaz@hotmail.com c Selcuk University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Konya- TURKEY, (tcay, fiscan)@selcuk.edu.tr KEYWORDS: Dede Mezarı Cemetery, Middle Bronze Age, Early Hittite Period, topographical map, geophysical work, Köy Kalesi. ABSTRACT Systematic work was performed at the Dede Mezarı Cemetery in 2005-2006. We started with geodesic work and continued by laying grids in the planned excavation area. This excavation was carried out by the Afyonkarahisar Archaeological Museum with permission from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. In 2005-2006, an excavation was carried out at the Dede Mezarı cemetery in Yukarı Çaybelen village, district of Bayat, province of Afyonkarahisar. The results show that this cemetery was in use from the beginning of the 2. Millenium B.C. to the middle of this millenium. There are some problems with this region of West-Central Anatolia concerning especially the Assyrian Trade Colonies Period and the Early Hittite Period. This research area is one of the few cemeteries dated to this period. The findings from this cemetery are contemporary with, and give the same results as, the findings at Yanarlar (10 km to the Northwest), at the Çavlum and Demircihöyük-Sarıket cemeteries in Eskişehir. Drawing the cadastre began only recently and property maps have not yet been prepared. Points P.30, P.31 and P.39 were used in the topography, and grids were laid out. over the whole of the Dede Mezarı. In addition, a 10m x 10m. plan of the 200m x 200m area was prepared. We continued with geophysical work in an area of 4500 m² where the excavation would be carried out. This helped us to determine the first area to be excavated. We took three human bone fragments from graves which were analyzed by the Beta Analytic Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory. According to these analyses, the samples from the graves date to between 1950-1520 B. C. These radiocarbon analyses concur with our evaluation of the archaeological findings. 1. LOCATION OF THE DEDE MEZARI CEMETERY The Köy Kalesi settlement is located 500 m west of Yukarı Çaybelen Village (Yukarı Maçaklı), 50 m west of the Cevizli road and 30 m east of the Havuzun Başı Deresi (Map)(Koçak, 2004, 48). There is some agricultural activity on the settlement. The field extends from northwest to southeast (N. 38 50.072; E: 030 55.631; h: 1300). The length northwest-southeast is 160 m, the length southwest-northeast is 110 m and the elevation is 21 m. There are Bronze Age sherds and stone implements here. The Köy Kalesi has to be the settlement of the Dede Mezarı Cemetery, because of its localization and findings dating to the Middle Bronze Age (MBA). Gavur İni Önü Cemetery was another field examined in the Köy Kalesi area. It is situated on a slope 200 m. south of the Köy Kalesi settlement and 600 m west of Yukarı Çaybelen. An Early Bronze Age (EBA) large pithos graves and sherds were found here. Dede Mezarı Cemetery is 400 m west of Yukarı Çaybelen, on the ridge of the Havuzun Başı Deresi and 400 m southeast of the Köy Kalesi mound. This excavation conducted under the supervision of the Afyon Archaeological Museum demonstrates that this may be a MBA cemetery (Figure 1, Map, Plan). This project (no. 05401012) is sponsored by the Selçuk University BAP West-Central Anatolia s links to the West in the Early Periods. We would like to express our gratitude to the coordinators. Corresponding author Ozdemir Kocak, Assoc. Prof., Selcuk University Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of History, Konya-TURKEY, ozdekocak@hotmail.com

XXI International CIPA Symposium, 01-06 October, Athens, Greece The other was placed in 197-198/ 223-224 plan square and called as F trench (Figure 4, Plan) Trench E E1 pithos grave was located in the northwest of Trench E. This grave was destroyed by illegal excavators. In the deep part of this grave there was a pot made of clay. We discovered three bronze rings in the same place. Figure 1: Dede Mezarı There are important MBA cemeteries in West-Central Anatolia and in Western Anatolia. The most important of them is Yanarlar Cemetery, which is situated 10 km northwest of Yukarı Çaybelen (Emre, 1978, 65). Besides this, the Çavlum Cemetery 16 km east of Eskişehir is another which yields characteristic regional MBA materials (Bilgen, 2002, 60; Bilgen, 2004, 142, Bilgen, 2005, 44). There are also findings dated to this period in Kusura, 45 km southwest of Afyonkarahisar. Figure 2: Trench E Yanarlar, Çavlum, Sarıket and Dede Mezarı are contemporary sites and their findings are similar. One may say that these yielded unique materials characteristic of the MBA that are uncommon in this part of Anatolia (Emre, 1978, 15 ff; Bilgen, 2002, 60; Bilgen, 2004, 139 ff). Asarcık, Bozyer and Dura Yeri are the other cemeteries and settlements in the region, which broaden our knowledge about the West-Central Anatolian MBA cultures (Özgüç, 1974, 151; Lloyd-Mellaart, 1965, 76 ff ). The two parallel and adjacent huge stones were dug out in the west-southwest of Trench E. This is the cemetary of E2 cist grave (Figure 3). A breaking over the geologic filling which was discovered has an oval shape. The base of this grave was discovered over a flattened cist layer. Flat,huge and block stones were used around the four sides of the grave. There is an obstacle(rubble) caused by huge stones leaning to the the southeast of the grave. We discovered bone fragments in the east side of the grave. 2. GEODESIC AND GEOPHYSICAL STUDIES Systematic work was performed at the Dede Mezarı Cemetery in 2005. We started with geodesic work and continued by laying grids in the planned excavation area. This excavation was carried out by the Afyonkarahisar Archaeological Museum with permission from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Drawing the cadastre began only recently and property maps have not yet been prepared. Points P.30, P.31 and P.39 were used in the topography, and grids were laid out. over the whole of the Dede Mezarı. In addition, a 10m x 10m. plan of the 200m x 200m area was prepared. We continued with geophysical work in an area of 4500 m² where the excavation would be carried out. This helped us to determine the first area to be excavated. 3. THE EXCAVATION OF DEDE MEZARI CEMETERY 2006 Figure 3: E2 cist grave The excavation studies were planned in two regions 10x10 m size at the Dede Mezarı Cemetery in 2006 and the it has been performed succesfully. We discovered a pithos grave (E3) which was partly destroyed in the middle of Trench E. The fragments of the bones alone were just recognized in the pithos grave. The part of the mouth was covered by the stones. One of them was placed in 307-308/ 323-324 plan squares and called E trench (Figure 2, Plan). A destroyed pithos grave (E4) was discovered in the southmiddle of Trench E. There were huge stones on the upper side

XXI International CIPA Symposium, 01-06 October, Athens, Greece of the pithos grave. Bone fragments were discovered. The pithos grave was located over a region in which an oval-shaped grave hole was being dug up. The grave was destroyed from illegal excavators. The fragments of a pithos which was completely oxide was discovered in the grave hole. The findings of stones and bones in the northeast corner of the Trench E indicate that there might have been a double buried grave (E5). Trench F F1 pithos grave was located in the southeast corner of the Trench F. The rim of pithos was surrounded and supported by stones. The body of the pithos extended to the bottom of the cist layer. Bone fragments and metal pieces were discovered. F2 buried grave was constructed in a rectangle hollow by digging the geologic filling in the east-middle of Trench F. And it was covered by three flat stones. Sherds of potteries were discovered over the rock-carved grave. In this simple grave a human skeleton was discovered. F3 pithos grave was located in the northeast corner of the Trench F and was probably destroyed by illegal excavators. Some sherds of potteries and bones fragments were found here. Figure 5: Northwest side of Trench F There was a F8 pithos grave next to the F5 pithos grave (Figure 5, 6). This pithos was situated in an area which was acquired by the excavating of the cist layer according to the shape of pithos. Also a second pithos was inserted into this pithos. We discovered cremation remains and next to them were pieces of beads. Figure 4: Trench F F4 pithos grave was located in the southwest corner of the Trench F. The rim of the pithos was surrounded and supported by stones. We dug in the F5 pithos grave in the middle northwest of Trench F. We discovered decorated metal ornaments, a piece of needle and pieces of beads. Also three potteries were discovered on the rim of the F5 pithos (Figure 5). We dug in the F6 simple grave in the northwest corner of Trench F. The grave was located over a region in which an oval-shaped cist layer was dug up and the upper side was covered by stones. An extramural buried grave was discovered. Figure 6: F8 pithos grave There were three canals, extended to the southwest-northeast in a parallel way in the Trench F. The MBA graves were not demolished by the canals. The graves were almost connected to each other. Learning the functions of the canals left us in vain. Further information may be obtained after excavations that will be carried out in a future. The discovered bones were examined by the team from the anthropology Department of Ankara University.

4. CONCLUSION Our excavation area, Dede Mezarı Cemetery, is located on the Paşadağ range. The fields of the cemeteries in this region have similar geographical shapes and yield similar materials, which lead us to the conclusion that there was once a common cultural MBA group in the eastern part of the Afyon region. These components were spread across a wide area as in the findings at Kütahya and Eskişehir. There are many MBA necropolises and settlements in Paşadağ and its surroundings where there are the necropolises of Yanarlar and Dedemezarı around it in the East of Afyon. Asarcık, Bozyer, Dura Yeri, Çalışlar are the main necropolis areas and Köy Kalesi, Asarcık Höyük (Bayat), Söğütlüpınar (Bayat), İnlerönü (İscehisar Doğlat Village), Çalışlar (İscehisar Çalışlar Village), Çayır 1 (Emirdağ Gözeli Village) are the main settlements from these. Apart from these, as we have enlighten above, it is known that many findings in this period and region were handed over to the Archaeological Museum in Afyon. Contrary to the thoughts, this region had intensity in settlement and limited knowledge of the region about MBA is due to the lack of surveys. REFERENCES Akyurt, İ. M. 1998, M. Ö. 2. Binde Anadolu da Ölü Gömme Adetleri, Ankara. Bilgen, A. N. 2002, Çavlum Köyü Mezarlığı Eskişehir Alpu Ovası nda Yeni Bir Orta Tunç Çağı Mezarlığı, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, I-3, 39-102. Bilgen, A. N. 2004, 2002 Yılı Çavlum Köyü Mezarlık Kazısı, Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, XXV/1, 139-146. Bilgen, A. N. 2005, Çavlum, Eskişehir Alpu Ovası nda Bir Orta Tunç Çağ Mezarlığı, Eskişehir. Emre, K. 1978, Yanarlar, Afyon Yöresinde Bir Hitit Mezarlığı, A Hittite Cemetery Near Afyon, Ankara. Koçak, Ö. 2004, Erken Dönemlerde Afyonkarahisar Yerleşmeleri, Kömen Yayınevi, Konya. Lloyd, S.-Mellart, J. 1965, Beycesultan, Vol.II, Middle Bronze Age Architecture And Pottery, London. Özgüç, T. 1974, Five Vessels Belonging to the Late Assyrian Trading Colony Period, BaM (Baghdader Mitteilungen), 7, 149-153. Map: Some Important Necropolis in Turkey (Akyurt, 1998, map 1)

Plan: Dede Mezarı Necropolis area