Cell Phone Use and Traffic Characteristics



Similar documents
Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

Effect of driver's personal characteristics on traffic accidents in Tabuk city in Saudi Arabia

Star rating driver traffic and safety behaviour through OBD and smartphone data collection

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2012

New York Study of Booster Seat Effects on Injury Reduction Compared to Safety Belts in Children Aged 4-8 in Motor Vehicle Crashes

Exploring the Association between Working Memory and Parkinson's Disease in a Driving Simulator

Speeding. Probability of death at different impact speeds

CELL PHONE USE WHILE DRIVING April, 2014


Quantifying the Influence of Social Characteristics on Accident and Injuries Risk: A Comparative Study Between Motorcyclists and Car Drivers

Motorcycle Accident Investigation

Road Safety and Simulation International Conference. RSS October 2013 Rome, Italy

PERCEPTION OF SAFETY AMONG CYCLISTS IN DUBLIN CITY

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

CITY OF MILWAUKEE POLICE SATISFACTION SURVEY

Roadway and Human Factors of Motorcycle Crashes in Puerto Rico

MEP Y9 Practice Book A

Factors affecting online sales

Reported road accidents involving young car drivers: Great Britain 2011

2013 State of Colorado Distracted Driver Study

SAMPLE VEHICLE FLEET SAFETY & USAGE POLICY

Adverse Impact and Test Validation Book Series: Multiple Regression. Introduction. Comparison of Compensation using

How To Reduce Drink Driving

II. DISTRIBUTIONS distribution normal distribution. standard scores

BASELINE Trading Co. Ltd. W.L.L P O box 2185 Doha, Qatar Tel mob DRIVING IN QATAR

VEHICLE TRACKING SYSTEM USING DIGITAL VCR AND ITS APPLICATION TO TRAFFIC CONFLICT ANALYSIS FOR ITS-ASSIST TRAFFIC SAFETY

Analysis of Accidents by Older Drivers in Japan

Seat belt and mobile phone use surveys: England and Scotland, 2014

Motorcycle Related Crash Victims (What the Statistics Say) Mehdi Nassirpour Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Safety

A STUDY OF CONNECTICUT DISTRACTED DRIVING

Analysing Questionnaires using Minitab (for SPSS queries contact -)

Chapter 7: Simple linear regression Learning Objectives

ESTIMATION OF FREE-FLOW SPEEDS FOR MULTILANE RURAL AND SUBURBAN HIGHWAYS

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel


Young Researchers Seminar 2011

Cell Phone Use and Text Messaging While Driving Collected Jan 2009 Dec 2009 Analyzed October 2012

11. Analysis of Case-control Studies Logistic Regression

Figure 1.1 Percentage of persons without health insurance coverage: all ages, United States,

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

FINAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF CONGESTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES USING ITS INFORMATION. Sarah B. Medley Graduate Research Assistant

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Principles of Road and Traffic Engineering Designs for Mixed Traffic Flow with a Numerous Motorcycles

Adaptive controlled traffic lights - a progress report from Uppsala. Sampo Hinnemo

Simple Predictive Analytics Curtis Seare

Analyses of the Critical Thinking Assessment Test Results

SAFE Streets for CHICAGO

Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: 2013 Annual Report

Cell Phone Distracted Driving is Impaired Driving. John Ulczycki National Safety Council

Year Fatalities Injuries

Is it statistically significant? The chi-square test

Examining Differences (Comparing Groups) using SPSS Inferential statistics (Part I) Dwayne Devonish

Theme: 18. RULES OF DRIVER S BEHAVIOUR IN CASE OF ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT

CLAIM FORM A. To be completed by the registered operator/ owner or driver of the vehicle

The application of root cause analysis for definition of scenarios in automotive domain

Boston Traffic Management Center Activity Report for FY 2013 Real-time Traffic Signal Adjustments

T. Hugh WOO, Ph.D., P.E. Jawkuan LIN, Ph.D., P.E.

Odds That An Involved Driver Was Drinking: Best Indicator Of An Alcohol-Related Crash?

The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers

Alcohol consumption and cycling in contrast to driving. Carmen Hagemeister & Markus Kronmaier (TU Dresden)

Distracted Driving is Impaired Driving

What is a definition of insurance?

Stat 412/512 CASE INFLUENCE STATISTICS. Charlotte Wickham. stat512.cwick.co.nz. Feb

Investigation of Road and Cross-country Traffic Accidents

Word Count: Body Text = 5, ,000 (4 Figures, 4 Tables) = 7,500 words

Legislation and Enforcement

When to Use a Particular Statistical Test

Continuous Insurance Enforcement (CIE) Frequently Asked Questions

Users Perceptive Evaluation of Bus Arrival Time Deviations in Stochastic Networks

Student Transportation Policies and Procedures

Author: Hamid A.E. Al-Jameel (Research Institute: Engineering Research Centre)

The Effects of Different Types of Driver Distractions: Findings from the EU

Oxfordshire Local Transport Plan Revised April Objective 3 Reduce casualties and the dangers associated with travel

Independent t- Test (Comparing Two Means)

World Bank Bike Commuter Safety Survey. Anne Gaëlle Selod, MD Health Services Department, The World Bank Group

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Performance Report

ISyE 2028 Basic Statistical Methods - Fall 2015 Bonus Project: Big Data Analytics Final Report: Time spent on social media

Graduated Driver Licensing

Influence of Various Restrictions on Speed-Flow Models

Crash Report Calendar Years 2003 through 2006 August 2007

Presented by Ronald Fuller Regional Manager Safety & Loss Control rfuller@lancer-ins.com UMA Safety Seminar- December 2008

How To Determine The Effectiveness Of A Speed Camera Program In A County

V. Martínez Ruiz, E. Jiménez Mejías, C. Amezcua Prieto, J.D. Luna del Castillo, P. Lardelli Claret, J.J. Jiménez Moleón

THE BELGIAN DRINK DRIVING ROADSIDE SURVEY

Motorcycle Freeway Traffic Management System Performance Study

Motor Vehicle Collisions in Eastern Ontario. Supplement to the Eastern Ontario Health Unit Injury Report

Road Traffic Accidents. Everything you need to know

Factors Influencing Night-time Drivers Perceived Likelihood of Getting Caught for Drink- Driving

Incident and Accident Reporting and Investigation. October 20, 2015

R00803B (03-15) CAR INSURANCE. WHAT TO do AT THE SCENE Of AN ACCIdENT IMPORTANT! IN YOUR glove BOx!

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

VA Medical Review of Drivers. Jackie Branche, MBA, R.N. Medical Compliance Officer Virginia DMV

The City University of New York. Revised April Table of Contents

are the leading cause of teen fatalities, accounting for

ALCOHOL, 2013 HIGHLIGHTS

Traffic Simulation Modeling: VISSIM. Koh S.Y Doina 1 and Chin H.C 2

Simple Linear Regression Inference

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2012

SPORT CLUB TRAVEL GUIDE

Drivers perception of risk on rural New Zealand roads

Transcription:

National Technical University of Athens School of Civil Engineering Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering Cell Phone Use and Traffic Characteristics George Yannis, Associate Professor Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD, Researcher Panagiotis Papantoniou, Transportation Engineer Nikolaos Petrellis, Transportation Engineer WCTR 2010 Lisbon, 11-15 July 2010

Background The use of cell phones is blamed for increased risk of provoking or failing to avoid a road accident. Road accident risk is from 2.5 to 4 times higher when using a cell phone while driving. Young drivers and male drivers are at particular high risk when using a cell phone while driving. The effect is attributed to the distraction of driver's attention. Drivers may attempt to compensate for this by adapting their speed. Speed reduction is expected to be higher in more complex (e.g. urban) settings. Older drivers and females are associated with higher speed reduction when using a cell phone while driving. Related results on vehicle headways are rather contradictory. Most existing studies used driving simulator or stated preference data, i.e. the effects are seldom explored in real traffic conditions. 2/13

Objectives The objective of this paper is to extend existing research on the effect of using a cell phone while driving on traffic speed and headways. The effect of several factors, on traffic speed and headways is analyzed. Cell phone use Driver age and gender Vehicle type Vehicle speed 3/13

Methods A roadside survey is carried out in actual traffic conditions in an appropriate setting in Athens, Greece. a very low drivers compliance is observed, combined with a lack of systematic police enforcement of the use of cell phones. Linear regression models are developed in order to examine the effect of various parameters on traffic speed and headways. Speeds and headways are considered continuous normally distributed response variables. Variable elasticities are estimated. the point elasticity (e i ) for each driver (i) is calculated as follows, and the overall elasticity (e) is the average of (e i ) in the sample: e i = ( Υ i / X i ) (X i / Y i ) = β i (X i / Y i ) Sensitivity analysis is carried out 4/13

Data collection Traffic data were recorded on a four-lane urban arterial segment near the National Technical University of Athens Campus, in Athens, Greece. A video camera was used for the measurement of vehicle arrivals and headways Vehicle headways were measured as the time difference of the front of a vehicle passing from a specific cross-section and of the vehicle ahead of it. This was achieved by means of detailed analysis of the video recordings. A speed gun was used for the measurement of vehicle speeds. Measurements concerned vehicles traveling along the right and the middle lanes, on typical weekdays and during off-peak hours Driver's age group and gender, as well as the vehicle type and cell phone use were also recorded. In total, 3,048 consecutive vehicles were captured during the roadside survey. 5/13

Variables and values Vehicle speed (v) Driver gender (gender) Driver age group (18-25, 25-55, >55) Use of cell phone (yes / no) Headway (Hw) Headspace (Hs), i.e. headways expressed in distance by multiplying the vehicle speed with the time headway. The absolute difference in the speed of each vehicle from the vehicle ahead (dv) The absolute difference in headway of each vehicle from the headway of the vehicle ahead (dhw). The last two variables capture the fact that vehicle headways are largely affected by traffic conditions (free flow or congestion), resulting in dependences between speed and headway of a given vehicle and those of the vehicle ahead. 6/13

Modelling vehicle speeds and headspaces (1/5) Parameter estimates and fit Vehicle speed (V) Headspace (Hs) Variable β t-test p-value β t-test p-value Constant 51.490 118.897 0.000-8.666-1.738 0.082 Taxi 0.692 1.914 0.055 - - - Gender -0.688-2.537 0.011 - - - Age 18-25 0.441 1.642 0.100 - - - Age 25-55 - - - 7.299 1.386 0.166 Age >55-1.503-3.828 0.000 - - - Cell phone use -0.726-1.849 0.064-28.824-3.271 0.001 Speed difference dv - - - 7.134 16.995 0.000 Headways difference dhw - - - 7.174 46.108 0.000 R 2 0.45 0.47 Headspace was proved to be a more efficient dependent variable than headways A variable is considered to be statistically significant at a 90% confidence interval, when its t-value is higher than 1.64 and consequently its p-value is lower than 0.100. 7/13

Modelling vehicle speeds and headspaces (2/5) Analysis of parameter estimates Some of the variables that were significant in the speed model were not found to be significant in the headspace model (e.g. gender, taxi), and vice versa (e.g. difference in headways). Interactions between variables were tested, but were not found to add explanatory power to the model. Male drivers, young drivers (18-25 years) and taxi drivers travel at increased speeds, whereas older drivers (>55 years) travel at reduced speeds. The use of a cell phone while driving results in reduced speeds for all drivers. Cell phone use is significantly associated with reduced headspaces. Increased speed and headway differences between consecutive vehicles result in increased headspaces as well. 8/13

Modelling vehicle speeds and headspaces (3/5) Variable elasticities Vehicle speed (V) Headspace (Hs) Variable β e e* β e e* Taxi 0.692 0.002 1.130 - - - Gender -0.688 0.003 2.340 - - - Age 18-25 0.441 0.002 1.680 - - - Age 25-55 - - - 7.299 0.147 1.630 Age >55-1.503 0.003 2.180 - - - Cell phone use -0.726 0.001 1.000-28.824 0.090 1.000 Speed difference dv - - - 7.134 0.878 9.730 Headways difference dhw - - - 7.174 1.287 14.260 (e*) is a normalization of the estimated elasticities in relation to the lowest one Vehicle speeds are largely affected by driver age and gender, and less affected by the use of cell phone. Headspaces are mostly affected by the differences in speeds and in headways from the vehicle ahead, due to the obvious correlation between the three traffic measures. Headspace elasticity to age is also considerable, whereas the use of cell phone presents the lowest elasticity. 9/13

Modelling vehicle speeds and headspaces (4/5) Sensitivity analysis of headspaces to the difference in speeds for drivers using or not using a cell phone while driving (under constant difference in headways). Headspaces increase with the difference in vehicle speeds for all drivers. Drivers using their cell phones have smaller headspaces regardless of the difference in speeds with the vehicle ahead. These general patterns are not affected by age effects. 10/13

Modelling vehicle speeds and headspaces (5/5) Sensitivity analysis of headspaces to the difference in headways for drivers using or not using a cell phone while driving (under constant difference in speed) Headspaces generally increase with the difference in headways between consecutive vehicles. Drivers using their cell phone have systematically lower headspaces, regardless of the difference in headways. 11/13

Conclusions The results suggest that the use of cell phone brings a decrease of vehicle speeds. Drivers reduce their speeds to compensate for the increased requirements for cognitive and motor effort coming from the use of a cell phone while driving. Young drivers and males (18-25 years old) drive at increased speeds, regardless of the use of cell phone. The use of cell phone while driving also reduces vehicle headspaces. The driver is distracted by the cell phone conversation, failing to keep the appropriate distance from the vehicle ahead. Middle aged drivers (25-55 years old) are associated with increased headspaces, possibly resulting from a combination of more driving experience and better skills. A reduction of vehicle speed might be associated with a benefit in terms of road safety, given that most cases lower speeds correspond to lower accident risk and accident severity. In this case, however, this reduction in speed is just another aspect of driver distraction when using a cell phone, and consequently accident risk increases. 12/13

National Technical University of Athens School of Civil Engineering Department of Transportation Planning and Engineering Cell Phone Use and Traffic Characteristics George Yannis, Associate Professor Eleonora Papadimitriou, PhD, Researcher Panagiotis Papantoniou, Transportation Engineer Nikolaos Petrellis, Transportation Engineer WCTR 2010 Lisbon, 11-15 July 2010