APPLICATION EXAMINATION STATISTICS

Similar documents
TRADEMARK REGISTRATION AS

Form 901 Instructions (Trade or Service Mark Application)

READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE STARTING THE APPLICATION.

Business Major Industries Summary

Protection and Enforcement of Trademarks, in the U.S. and Abroad

in the Trademark Journal Foreign within 30

PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANY

Access Your Global Network.

International Trademark Registration with Madrid

Foreign Direct Investors Outlays to Acquire or Establish U.S. Businesses Rose in 2004

THE MADRID PROTOCOL: WHAT TRADEMARK OWNERS AND PRACTITIONERS SHOULD KNOW

21 - MINING % 221 Utilities % 6, CONSTRUCTION

June 21, Submitted via

Supplier Diversity Program. Ensure a diversity of small businesses work with the Smithsonian to accomplish the Institution s mission.

Inteligencia-Economica-exportaciones-por-naics

Filing Application for Patent or PCT Nationalization 130,000 14,000. Filing Application for UTILITY MODEL or PCT Nationalization 130,000

To: The Executors of the Franklin E. Kameny ETC. ( ABTrademarkApp@gmail.com) Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO GAY IS GOOD - N/A

Women s Forum of Colorado March 19, 2015

DRAFT. All NAICS. 3-Digit NAICS BP C 3 P 76 X 0 BP C 0 P 0 X 2 OC C 29 P 44 X 35 OC C 0 P 0 X 2 MH C 96 MH C 8 P 37 X 62 P 1107 X 587

Trademark, Patent and Copyright Information

Copyright: SFSO Neuchâtel 2002 Reproduction with mention of source authorized (except for commercial purposes)

TOTAL FDI Inflow to KSA (Millions of dollars) FDI by Source :

1997 NAICS Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Mining Utilities

TrademarkAuthority Legal Services Engagement Agreement

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

FOURTH QUARTER 2014 DATA FROM THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: U.S. MANUFACTURING, MINING, WHOLESALE TRADE, AND SELECTED SERVICE INDUSTRIES

US Exports to China by State

Services and Distribution

Business-Facts: 3 Digit NAICS Summary 2014

LIST OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES

12 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 69. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall Articles THE MADRID PROTOCOL: SPECIAL ISSUES FOR U.S.

GENERAL INFORMATION FORM -- AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION NAICS CODES GENERAL INFORMATION

Chinese Economy and Business Opportunities

Business-Facts: 3 Digit NAICS Summary 2015

REMI Industries for v9 Models

INDUSTRIES W/PEER GROUPS 11/30/2015 CONSUMER SECTOR

Comments on Trademarks Next Generation Information Technology Initiative

Map of proposed GRI Business Activity Groups to Thomson Reuters Business Classification (TRBC)

OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, D. C GUIDE FOR PROSPECTIVE INDIGENT PETITIONERS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI

RECENT TRADEMARK DEVELOPMENTS

Item 7.1, September 10, 2002

STAREGISTER INTERNATIONAL INC 250 NORTH WASHTENAW AVENUE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60612

PROTECT YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Creating a business in the digital age developing entrepreneurship competencies for young Europeans through ementorship (CREBUS) PROJECT

Standard Industrial Classification for Companies and Enterprises SIC-C (1980)

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE OFFICE ACTION

VERMONT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES, BENEFITS, CONTRIBUTIONS AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY CALENDAR YEAR 2014

ISIC REV. 3 TECHNOLOGY INTENSITY DEFINITION

U. S. TRADEMARK LAW RULES OF PRACTICE & FEDERAL STATUTES U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

3. USPTO sends international application data to WIPO (2-month deadline for USPTO to do so in order to maintain international registration date)

Brewing Up a Branding Strategy for the Craft Brewers Conference

NAICS CHANGES IN CES PUBLISHING DETAIL CHANGES FROM SIC TO NAICS By: Joseph F. Winter, CES Supervisor

EXAMINATION GUIDE NO. 2-99

Employment Change Due to Carbon Pricing, 2035 Policy Scenario Vs Baseline Industry Name North American Industrial Classification System # (NAICS)

(8 groups) (28 sectors) SET Industry Group and Sector Classification Structure. Industry Group. Sector Sector Sector

Industrial Companies Survey Year 2013

Trademark Use in the United States & Canada

Map of Industry Classification Benchmark (ICB) to proposed GRI Business Activity Groups

U. S. TRADEMARK LAW RULES OF PRACTICE & FEDERAL STATUTES U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

Intellectual Property Legal Services in Canada

BRAND REPORT FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 2014

U. S. TRADEMARK LAW RULES OF PRACTICE & FEDERAL STATUTES U. S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE

World Manufacturing Production

The Global Chemical Industry: US, China and Global Status and Opportunities, 2015

Registration is the process of formally recording your trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( PTO ).

MARKETING INNOVATION CRISTAL

Wisconsin's Exports A Special Report on Wisconsin's Economy

Survey Data Analysis with China and US Geo-Explorers. Shuming Bao China Data Center University of Michigan

North Bay Industry Sector Rankings (By County) October 2015 Jim Cassio

The GI System in the United States of America (USA)

SECTOR SUB-SECTOR BRANCH SUB-BRANCH

INDUSTRY CODES. MINING 040 Metal mining 041 Coal mining 042 Oil and gas extraction 050 Nonmetallic mining and quarrying, except fuels

Industry Clusters in New York s Economy: A Statewide and Regional Analysis

Afghanistan Statistical Yearbook

Notice of Opposition

European Union, Trade in goods with Mexico

The Town of Aurora Business Directory (the Directory ) is published by The Corporation of the Town of Aurora (the Town ) on an annual basis.

education. In contrast, workers engaged in fishing worked an average of 61.7 hours per

SWITCH TO THE NEW CLASSIFICATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES (NACE REV2)

SACU MERCHANDISE TRADE STATISTICS 2010 (No 2) MERCHANDISE TRADE STATISTICS 2010

DISTRIBUTIVE TRADE AND SERVICE INDUSTRIES STATISTICS

Thomson Reuters Business Classification

Industry Clusters in New York s Economy: A Statewide and Regional Analysis June 2014

Policy on Scoping Quality/Environmental Management Systems Certification Bodies

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Makiki Electronics v. Douglas Mervyn Gray and David William Holloway

CRMP Customer Relationship Management Professional Certification Application Form

ORAL ARGUMENT IN CASE NO SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 21, Case Nos and

1.0 Background 1.1 TOWN OF GANANOQUE 1.2 DOWNTOWN CORE

Hunt Biggs LLP is a multi-discipline practice existing under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada and the Law Society of Upper Canada.

COMMENTARY. Issue JONES DAY

College Park Latitude: Edgewater Dr & W Princeton St, Orlando, FL Longitude: Ring: 1.5 Miles

#ILMEast #ILMQ (Q&A s)

An Introduction to Trademark & Patent Law

European Union, Trade in goods with USA

ΙΕΘΝΕΙΣ ΕΚΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΣΤΗ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΑ 2014 ΟΝΟΜΑΣΙΑ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΚΘΕΣΗΣ ΚΛΑ Ο ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΑ ΗΜΕΡΟΜΗΝΙΑ ΙΕΞΑΓΩΓΗΣ

World Book. Protection of IP Canada TRADE-MARKS 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 REGISTERED TRADE-MARKS

U.S. TRADEMARK LAW PART 2. Presented by Hershkovitz & Associates, LLC H&A Intellectual Property Law, PLLC

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service High Street, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 4UN, UK

NEW YORK DBL BENEFITS FROM THE HARTFORD.

Transcription:

1201 New York Ave., N.W. 7 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel 202.434.1500 Fax 202.434.1501 http://www.staasandhalsey.com USPTO TRADEMARK STATISTICS Fiscal 2013-14 (October 1, 2013-September 30, 2014) FISCAL YEAR APPLICATION EXAMINATION STATISTICS U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS FILED, REGISTERED AND MAINTAINED (Measured in total number of International ) * APPLICATIONS FILED REGISTRATIONS ISSUED RENEWALS FILED AFFIDAVITS OF USE (Sect.8) FILED 2014 455,017 206,555 56,166 155,108 2013 433,654 193,121 63,709 93,174 2012 415,026 182,761 59,871 76,646 2011 398,667 177,661 44,284 65,771 2010 368,939 164,330 48,214 61,499 2009 352,051 180,520 43,953 65,322 2008 401,392 209,904 42,388 68,470 2007 394,368 150,064 40,786 49,241 2006 354,775 147,118 36,939 48,444 2005 323,501 112,495 39,354 47,752 2004 298,489 120,056 32,352 41,157 FIRST ACTION & PENDENCY OF U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS (FISCAL YEARS 2004-2014) PENDENCY (Avg. Months Elapsed) Examiner's First Action Notice of owance (including suspended and inter partes proceedings) Notice of owance (excluding suspended and inter partes proceedings) Post-registration Renewal (Days) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 6.6 6.3 4.8 2.9 3 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 19.5 19.6 18 15.1 13.9 13.5 13.0 12.6 12 11.7 11.5 16.2 17.2 15.5 13.4 11.8 11.2 10.5 10.5 10.2 10.0 9.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.5 9 25.2 15.8 13.0 12.5 * Since some applications contain more than one International Class, these quantities of are greater than the number of applications actually filed during the relevant period. -1-

USPTO TRADEMARK STATISTICS Fiscal 2013-14 Applications and their Pendency by Filing Method No. of Applications 1 st Action Pendency (Months) Total Pendency (Months) Madrid REPs 37,943 0.7 11.2 TEAS 264,096 3.2 10.6 TEAS-Plus 150,721 3.2 8.8 Paper Filed 2,257 3.5 11.5 Total 455,017 --- --- Madrid REPs = Requests for Extensions of Protection from an application or registration filed in a foreign country that seeks registration of the same mark and goods in the U.S. under the Madrid Protocol treaty. TEAS and TEAS-Plus = Trademark Electronic Application System. The electronic trademark application form on the web site of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office which transmits applications to the USPTO through this web page. TEAS-Plus refers to the reduced filing fee ($225 per Class) application when the application is filed without requiring any additional amendments (including to the identification of goods/services because using an ID in the USPTO s ID Manual). First and Final Action Quality * Percentage Error-Free (Target = 95.5%) Last 3 s First Action Quality Final Action Quality 2012 2013 2014 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 94.1 96.3 95.3 96.2 95.0 95.4 96.0 96.3 96.4 95.8 95.8 95.8 96.4 97.1 97.1 97.1 95.4 96.2 96.4 97.1 97.4 96.8 97.2 97.2 * Examination quality is determined through an in-process review and evaluation of the statutory bases for which the office action raises issues and refuses registration of the mark based upon the first office action and the application s approval or denial by the examiner. Non-U.S. Origin Applications Top 6 Foreign Countries to have Filed U.S. Applications in FY 2014 Country Number of Filings United Kingdom 10,779 Canada 10,268 Germany 10,042 China 8,776 France 5,959 Japan 5,786 Residents of foreign countries filed 99,913 U.S. trademark and service mark applications in Fiscal (FY) 2014 a decrease of 0.04% over Fiscal 2013 numbers. Residents of the United States * filed 355,104 U.S. trademark and service mark applications in Fiscal (FY) 2014 - an increase of 6.4% over Fiscal 2013 numbers. * Includes residents of American Samoa, Guam, and miscellaneous U.S. Pacific Islands. -2-

USPTO TRADEMARK STATISTICS Fiscal 2013-14 INT CLASS Filing (by International Class) SHORT TITLE -3- FY 2013 FY 2014 1 Chemicals 5,291 1.2% 5,867 1.2% 2 Paints 1,205 0.3% 1,480 0.3% 3 Cosmetics and cleaning preparations 13,100 3.0% 13,552 3.0% 4 Lubricants and fuels 1,655 0.4% 1,808 0.4% 5 Pharmaceuticals 15,871 3.6% 16,156 3.6% 6 Metal goods 3,716 0.8% 3,972 0.8% 7 Machinery 6,255 1.4% 6,187 1.4% 8 Hand tools 2,292 0.5% 2,481 0.5% 9 Electrical and scientific apparatus 47,625 10.9% 50,874 10.9% 10 Medical apparatus 7,275 1.7% 7,311 1.7% 11 Environmental control apparatus 6,677 1.5% 7,277 1.5% 12 Vehicles 5,023 1.2% 5,301 1.2% 13 Firearms 980 0.2% 1,121 0.2% 14 Jewelry 6,230 1.4% 6,473 1.4% 15 Musical instruments 725 0.2% 711 0.2% 16 Paper goods and printed matter 14,957 3.7% 14,376 3.7% 17 Rubber goods 2,064 0.5% 1,985 0.5% 18 Leather goods 6,338 1.4% 6,534 1.4% 19 Non-metallic building materials 2,720 0.6% 2,851 0.6% 20 Furniture and articles not otherwise classified 6,047 1.4% 6,238 1.4% 21 House wares and glass 6,752 1.4% 7,088 1.4% 22 Cordage and fibers 876 0.2% 880 0.2% 23 Yarns and threads 249 0.0% 252 0.0% 24 Fabrics 3,416 0.7% 3,522 0.7% 25 Clothing 33,565 7.5% 34,538 7.5% 26 Fancy goods 1,401 0.3% 1,400 0.3% 27 Floor coverings 966 0.2% 952 0.2% 28 Toys and sporting goods 11,849 2.7% 11,992 2.7% 29 Meats and processed foods 6,863 1.5% 7,037 1.5% 30 Staple foods 11,945 2.6% 12,764 2.6% 31 Natural agricultural products 3,383 0.8% 3,549 0.8% 32 Light beverages 7,267 1.5% 7,991 1.5% 33 Wines and spirits 8,301 1.8% 8,526 1.8% 34 Smokers' articles 2,521 0.4% 3,006 0.4% GOODS SUB 255,400 57.8% 266,053 57.8% 35 Advertising and business 43,885 10.6% 46,749 10.6% 36 Insurance and financial 16,148 3.7% 16,929 3.7% 37 Repair & Building Construction 7,052 1.7% 7,706 1.7% 38 Telecommunications 6,586 1.6% 6,826 1.6%

USPTO TRADEMARK STATISTICS Fiscal 2013-14 INT CLASS SHORT TITLE FY 2013 FY 2014 39 Transportation and storage 4,900 1.2% 5,057 1.2% 40 Treatment of materials 3,929 1.0% 4,065 1.0% 41 Education and entertainment 40,226 9.5% 42,001 9.5% 42 Computer, scientific and legal 25,937 6.0% 28,116 6.0% 43 Hotels and restaurants 10,115 2.3% 11,420 2.3% 44 Medical, beauty and agricultural 10,539 2.5% 11,195 2.5% 45 Personal 7,905 1.9% 8,245 1.9% SERVICES SUB 177,222 42.0% 188,307 42.0% 200 COLLECTIVE MEMBERSHIP 204 0.0% 184 0.0% A CERTIFICATION 210 0.1% 178 0.1% B CERTIFICATION 311 0.1% 295 0.1% SUB 725 0.2% 657 0.2% GRAND 433,360 100.0% 455,017 100.0% USPTO TRADEMARK STAFFING 711 Trademark employees 444 examining attorneys INITIAL APPLICATION FEE LEVELS TEAS Plus Application o $225 per class of goods/services TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) Application*: o $275 per class of goods/services TEAS Regular Application: o $325 per class of goods/services Paper Application: o $375 per class of goods/services *Option introduced January 17, 2015. The option most used by Staas & Halsey LLP. -4-

USPTO TRADEMARK STATISTICS Fiscal 2013-14 TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (TTAB) STATISTICS Incoming Filings and Performance Measures for Decisions Type of Filing Appeals Extensions of Time to Oppose Oppositions 2015 1 ~3,100 ~16,300 ~5,100 (+11.5%) (-5.8%) (-7.4%) 2014 2,794 17,285 5,509 (4.1%) (2.0%) (4.4%) 2,685 16,939 5,278 2013 (+0.2%) (+0.0%) (+2.3%) 2,634 16,946 5,160 2012 (-0.1%) (+3.2%) (+3.5%) 2011 2,639 16,420 4,985 1,362 2010 2,895 15,424 4,513 1,374 2 ACR = Accelerated Case Resolution -5- Cancellations ~1700 (~0%) 1,722 (13.8%) 1,513 (+3.4%) 1,463 (+7.4%) Final Decisions on Merits (Appeals and Trial Cases Combined) Issued Average Pendency of Issued Decisions: Awaiting Decision at End of Decisions Ready for Decision to Mailing 4 th Quarter 2015 1 ~600 9.5 weeks --- 2014 537 9.2 weeks 105 2013 676 17.7 weeks 88 2012 534 24 weeks 256 2011 452 17.9 weeks 213 2010 456 12.4 weeks 127 Appeals Commencement to Completion Processing Times Median Total Appeals Trial Cases Median Total Trial Cases ACR 2 Trial Cases (#ACR Decisions) 2015 1 44.1 weeks --- 154.9 weeks --- --- 2014 43.8 weeks 36 weeks 165.2 weeks 142 weeks 136.3 (21) weeks 2013 50.9 weeks 44 weeks 189.5 weeks 165 weeks 114.2 (6) weeks 2012 76.8 weeks 53 weeks 203.3 weeks 186 weeks 140.8 (9) weeks 2011 51.2 weeks 43 weeks 213.3 weeks 176 weeks 109.3 (6) weeks 2010 45.5 weeks 38 weeks 203.7 weeks 169 weeks 95 (6) weeks Contested Motions No. Motions Average No. % Decisions Awaiting Resolved by from Ready for Decisions Involving Phone Decision at end Issued Decision to Issued Conference of 4 th Quarter Decisions Issuance 2014 974 1358 9.0 weeks N/A 135 2013 829 1167 13.3 weeks 13.5% 130 2012 793 1100 8.7 weeks 29.9% 199 2011 785 1045 9.6 weeks 24.6% 150 2010 920 1322 7.8 weeks 25% 151 1 FY 2015 statistics are projected from data for the first half of FY 2015 (Oct. 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015)