Aligning Grant Management and Evaluation to Achieve Desired Program Outcomes



Similar documents
Strategic Plan San Luis Obispo County Community College District

Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System

Working with data: Data analyses April 8, 2014

Texas Continuous Improvement Process Public Input and Information Meetings

Grant Writing Fundamentals: Positioning Your Organization for Success

Pathways to Postsecondary Completion: Technical Appendix

USAID/Macedonia Secondary Education Activity, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Idaho Center of Excellence Healthcare Partnership Program Evaluation Plan

WV School Counseling Program Audit

STANDARD #2. Strategic Planning

Course Description: Required texts: Course Requirements: Course evaluation will be based on a number of different elements described briefly below.

Ready from Day One : A Model for Success Initiative

Increasing Degree Completion for General Studies Majors through Intrusive Advising

The Civil Engineering Systems Course at Georgia Institute of Technology. Adjo Amekudzi, Ph.D. 1 Michael Meyer, Ph.D., P.E. 2

Academic Program Review Handbook

WHEELOCK COLLEGE FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION PROGRAM

Project Management Professional (PMP) Training

Step 1: Analyze Data. 1.1 Organize

Creating a Successful Competency-Based Performance Management System Guide for Replication

DOCTORATE IN in EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP

Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses

Louisiana Tech University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN. FY through FY

Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP) Quality Assurance (QA) Report for Baccalaureate/Graduate Degree Programs

Highlights of Special Education Law

Performance Measures for Internal Auditing

Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition

PROJECT MANAGEMENT TRAINING MODULES

School of Public Health and Health Services. Doctor of Public Health Health Behavior Department of Prevention and Community Health.

Human Resource Planning

Technical Review Coversheet

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP )*

Peirce College. Summary of Strategic Plan

Colville Junior High. School Improvement Plan School Wide Title I Plan. Colville School District

Audit of the Test of Design of Entity-Level Controls

Chenoa S. Woods, Ph.D.

Action Project 11. Project Detail

Transfer & Articulation Oversight Committee Meeting

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

New and Prospective Managers: Competency Development and Learning Plan

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Graduate School - An Overview

A Guide to Curriculum Development: Purposes, Practices, Procedures

Southern University College of Business Strategic Plan

Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards

Apply an ecological framework to assess and promote population health.

Strategies for Promoting Gatekeeper Course Success Among Students Needing Remediation: Research Report for the Virginia Community College System

Six Years of Philadelphia GEAR UP

Strategic Planning: A Small College s Approach and Implementation

Illinois State Board of Education. Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts

Admissions Marketing Plan Assessments

Wichita State University Elliott School of Communication Master s Thesis Guidelines

SPRING-FORD IS MAKING EVERY DAY COUNT! Dr. David Goodin Spring-Ford Area School District Year In Review

What We Know About Online Course Outcomes

Outcome: Compare and contrast different research methods used by psychologists including their respective advantages and disadvantages.

The criminology and criminal justice graduate program adheres to the following admission criteria:

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Primer for DRL Grantees

This standard is 100% met for the baccalaureate program. This standard is 100% met for the master s program.

A. Terms and Definitions Used by ABET

Annual Program Evaluation of DoDEA Project Qualitative Data Example

UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY HUMAN RESOURCES SERVICE

How To Learn To Learn

Participant Responsibilities and Data Flow in the Assurance of Learning Process

The Ohio Resident Educator Program Standards Planning Tool Final

Factors Influencing Retention of Students in an RN-to-BSN Program

Licensure Handbook. Career and Technical Education Teacher Licensure Program

PERFORMANCE FUNDING STANDARDS, through

Student and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet

Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric

APPLICATION ANNUAL WORK PLAN (ONE OBJECTIVE PER PAGE)

Proposal for Dual Degree Program Master of Education in Higher Education (M.Ed.) / Master of Public Policy and Administration (MPPA)

College of Health Sciences Department of Health Master of Public Health Program ***************** Council on Education for Public Health

Grambling State University FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN. FY through FY

Strengthening the Performance Framework:

Research Methods. Fall 2011

Program Step III: Evaluate HIV Quality Management Program.

Transcription:

Aligning Grant Management and Evaluation to Achieve Desired Program Outcomes

Convener: Sandi Sheppeard PA State GEAR UP Director PA State System of Higher Education, Harrisburg, PA Presenters: Diana Fischer PA State GEAR UP Coordinator PA State System of Higher Education, Harrisburg, PA David Jochelson Project Manager College Access Programs FHI 360, Washington, DC

What is your most important lesson learned regarding GEAR UP Evaluation or Grants Management?

Learning Objectives Understand the multiple evaluation data sources and strategies Understand integrated quarterly evaluation and grant management process Understand SMART Goals used in action plans Learn how evaluation report results are shared Understand future evaluation process changes

Overview of the Session Introduction and Background Information Planning and Implementation Reporting and Utilizing Feedback from Reports Conclusion Questions and Discussions

Pennsylvania State GEAR UP Snap Shot State grant 2 nd cycle began in 2008 Completing Year 6 of grant Single cohort model Graduated in 2013-14 Serving: 3 School Districts 8 High Schools 3,000+ Students

Background of Evaluation Process 2011 GEAR UP Director retired and New Director hired Semi-annual evaluation reports in place Data reports too late to make effective changes that year Developed quarterly evaluation reports to: Guide program changes Keep partners on track to meet target goals

Next Steps PASSHE GEAR UP Staff and Evaluation Team: All day planning session to develop quarterly evaluation process, report format, and action plan changes to SMART goals Adjustments and changes were made as needed: Modification Forms Data Review Meetings

FHI 360 s Role (as External Evaluator) Overall Program Evaluation Support Federal Annual Performance Reporting (APR) Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) External Program Evaluators (FHI 360) Allentown School District GEAR UP Harrisburg School District GEAR UP School District of Philadelphia GEAR UP 2 GEAR UP High Schools 2 GEAR UP High Schools 4 GEAR UP High Schools

Planning and Implementation Action Planning and Participation Target Setting Coordinators work with districts annually to set targets referring to baseline data SMART Goals (Why beneficial?) Evaluator Review of Targets (Annual review prior to program year to ensure that objectives are SMART ) Management of District Program Modification Forms (Process to modify plans or targets)

Action Planning Action Plan development meetings are scheduled in the spring between PASSHE and district GEAR UP teams Each GEAR UP activity is aligned with 1. PA State GEAR UP s objectives and performance measures, 2. PA Career Education and Work Standards, and 3. USDE s Federal Service Categories Activities include the following components: 1. Federal Service Category Alignment, 2. Description of the Activity, 3. Performance Measure Alignment, 4. Resources/Budget, 5. Who is Responsible? 6. Timeline 7. Participation Target (SMART GOALS)

Action Planning (cont.) Once a draft action plan has been developed, it is presented to the PA State GEAR UP Director and grant evaluators (FHI360) for final review. Emphasis on SMART GOALS. After all edits/updates have been incorporated, a final version is submitted to the PA State GEAR UP Director for approval. Once approved, the action plan acts as a framework for the district s GEAR UP program.

Participation Target Setting PASSHE analyzes prior years participation data using our online database system (Cayen Systems) to determine baselines for GEAR UP activities. Baselines are used to create reasonable and achievable participation targets for each GEAR UP activity listed in the action plan. Participation targets are set to ensure each activity has a measurable goal which can be evaluated to determine the district s ability to reach the GEAR UP population and achieve PA State GEAR UP s objectives.

Action Plan SMART goals/objectives SMART Plans SMART Plans Specific Measurable Attainable Realistic Time bound

SMART Goals & Objectives A systematic way to think about and identify the key elements of the evaluation plan and measurement Indicators & performance measures Used to guide program implementers in setting objectives for: Employee performance management; Personal development plans; Performance indicators; or Action plans

Management of District Program The action plan is the main management tool used. Action Plan = Road map for the entire year All GEAR UP staff are provided a yearly program manual which includes: 1. Action Plan, 2. Budget 3. Participation Targets Chart, 4. Year-at-a-Glance Calendar, 5. Data Entry and Reporting Schedules, 6. Data Entry Guidelines, 7. Grant Procedures PASSHE s State Coordinator and each GEAR UP team conduct monthly meetings to assess the district s ability to successfully complete the activities outlined in the action plan.

Management of District Program (cont.) The action plan is a LIVING DOCUMENT. Remember: Plans Change. Action Plans must be modified when needed for the program to remain successful. PASSHE developed two types of Modification Forms for districts in the event an action plan activity needed to be changed: Modification Form #1 Approved by State Director - to be used for activity description changes, adding new activities, or deletions before the activity occurs. This includes activity budget and match changes. Modification Form #2 Approved by District Manager - to be used to change dates/locations of activities or participation targets before the activity occurs.

Management of District Program (cont.) Approved modification forms are collected and incorporated into the action plan and budget each marking period by the State Coordinator. Modifications to the action plan are listed in an Appendix of the action plan. The updated action plan is shared with the PA State GEAR UP Director, FHI360, and the district team after each marking period. Updates to the action plan are reflected in the next quarterly evaluation report.

Reporting and Utilizing Feedback from Reports Format and Frequency of Reports Data Sources (Quantitative and Qualitative) Analytical and Tracking Tools Sharing findings with Stakeholders Managing the process (Using Project Management Tool)

Format and Frequency of Reports Evaluation Report Format Outline (handout) Frequency: After each marking period (4x/year for each school district)

Data Sources (Quantitative and Qualitative) District Data Demographics School Attendance Course Grades Participation Data (from online database) Site Visit Observations Phone Interviews Survey Results

Analytical and Tracking Tools Statistical Software (SAS, SPSS, STATA) Qualitative Software (Atlas.ti, NVivo) GEAR UP Tracking Database (Cayen Systems, Xcalibur Scribe, Cobro Compass)

Sharing Findings with Stakeholder Quarterly evaluation meetings with report review as only agenda item Schedule face-to-face or virtual meetings Invite as many stakeholders as possible GEAR UP staff District staff Other partners Share report via email to other stakeholders as appropriate

Project Management Tool

Future Changes to Improve the Process Internal Evaluator Track quarterly data toward targets Produce quarterly data reports without analysis External Evaluators Semi-annual reports with in-depth analysis One on-site visit at the end of the semester

Questions and Discussion

Contact Information: Sandi Sheppeard PA State GEAR UP Director PA State System of Higher Education Harrisburg, PA Tel. 717-720-7238 E-mail: ssheppeard@passhe.edu Diana Fischer PA State GEAR UP Coordinator PA State System of Higher Education, Harrisburg, PA Tel. 717-720-4047 E-mail: dfischer@passhe.edu David Jochelson Project Manager College Access Programs FHI 360 - Washington, DC Tel. 202-884-8250 E-mail: djochels@fhi360.org

Pennsylvania State GEAR UP Program The PA State GEAR UP (Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) grant is designed to assist underserved school districts with making students' dreams of attending college become a reality. The program ensures that students and their families have access to the necessary resources in order to graduate from high school and continue on to post-secondary education.