Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C.



Similar documents
Facing Broadband Service Support Challenges

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Kelly Cameron +1(301) janvier 2015

Re: Special Access for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF VONAGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION

Federalism Principles ( Draft Principles ) developed by the National Association of Regulatory Utility

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C.

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

US Telecom Industry - A Case Study in Service Decisions

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report

Before the. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

How To Get More Spectrum For Unlicensed Devices

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF JOHN STAURULAKIS, INC.

BEFORE THE SENATE COMMUNICATIONS AND HIGH TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC RURAL BROADBAND EXPERIMENTS ) Docket Nos ,

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

BIT Wireless Broadband Opportunities

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

Public Notice Submissions

BROADBAND ACCESS IN MICHIGAN

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF SOUTHERNLINC WIRELESS

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF COMCAST CORPORATION

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

COMMENTS OF THE WIRELESS INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS ASSOCIATION. History

Ethernet Over Copper: The New Wave for Service Industry

NextWeb, Inc. Comments for FCC Wireless Broadband Forum. May 19, 2004

Statement by. Mitzie Branon General Manager Yadkin Valley Telephone Membership Corporation Yadkinville, NC. On behalf of the

( NBP ). 4 See

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

APPLICANT: LCB Communications LLC. Page 2

Analysis of the U.S. Dedicated Internet Access Services Market, 2012 Back On Track with Robust Recovery

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

America s Broadband Connectivity Plan

How To Write A Reply To The High Tech Broadband Coalition'S Comments To The Fcc.Com Website

Review Of The Commission Workplace (O1) And Its Role In SIP Interconnection Services

Persistent Connectivity: Emerging Opportunities Based on DSL

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, D.C

Testimony of. Mr. Garry Betty. April 23, 2002

Lab Researching Broadband Internet Access Technologies (Instructor Version)

Please contact the undersigned with any questions about this submission.

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Community Forum Agenda October 2012

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C In the Matter of ) ) Rural Call Completion ) WC Docket No.

U.S. Dedicated Internet Access Services Market Update N88E-63 February 2011

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Unserved Wireless Network - A Reality of Rapid Deployment and Competition

The Future of Broadband Internet Access in Canada

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF COMCAST CORPORATION

Broadband Definitions and Acronyms

Getting Broadband. FCC Consumer Facts. What Is Broadband?

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) Reply Comments of ACUTA

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: October 22, 2013 Released: October 22, 2013

America s Broadband Heroes:

State Telecom Legislation: Broken Promises

Preparing for CAF Phase II and Tribal Mobility Funding Opportunities

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN

Broadband Project Frequently Asked Questions

APPLICATION GUIDE CONNECTING BRITISH COLUMBIA PROGRAM

Telecom Market Highlights Regulatory Perspectives

Before the Department of Energy ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.

the amount of data will grow. It is projected by the industry that utilities will go from moving and managing 7 terabytes of data to 800 terabytes.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

4G LTE Wireless Local Loop:

Instructions for Completing / Data Collection Form * * * * *

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C.

Brookline Wireless Network

Fixed Line Broadband Performance (ADSL) in New Zealand. April June 2013

Central Superfast Broadband Project Frequently Asked Questions

ASSESSING HIGH-SPEED INTERNET ACCESS IN THE STATE OF IOWA: SIXTH ASSESSMENT

Ex Parte Notice Request For Updated Information And Comment on Wireless Hearing Aid Compatibility Regulations, WT Docket Nos.

Before The Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, DC 20006

MEMORANDUM THE FCC S 2015 OPEN INTERNET ORDER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE PROVIDERS SAMPLE

CML s 91 st Annual Conference June 18 21, 2013 Vail, Colorado. Why Municipal Broadband? 6/21/2013

NEWS Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C

Public Notice Submissions

Broadband What is it?

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission th St., S.W. Washington, D.C

The Ofcom internet and broadband update

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

How to Provide Seamless Services in Fragmented NGA Networks The Open Access Concept of VATM

The Long-Term Telephone Number & Regulation Meeting

EMERGENCY FLEXIBLE BACK-UP. Internet packages to support your business

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

AT&T Rural Broadband Coverage in North Carolina

Before the U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF WTA: ADVOCATES FOR RURAL BROADBAND

FILED :59 PM

Transcription:

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. In the matters of Special Access Rates for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers AT&T Corp. Petition for Rulemaking to Reform Regulation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Rates for Interstate Special Access Services WC Docket No. 05-25 RM-10593 AMENDED REPLY COMMENTS OF LAURENCE BRETT ( BRETT GLASS, d/b/a LARIAT, A WIRELESS INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER SERVING ALBANY COUNTY, WYOMING Laurence Brett ( Brett Glass, a sole proprietor doing business as LARIAT, a wireless Internet service provider serving Albany County, Wyoming, responds to comments filed regarding the above captioned matters 1 with the following comments. This document is intended to replace and supercede an earlier version of the same comments filed on 24 February, 2010, and is essentially the same but for minor corrections and clarifications. LARIAT was among the first, if it was not the very first, of the wireless Internet service providers (WISPs now doing business within the continental United States. LARIAT has been providing high quality, high speed broadband Internet service to a large and growing service area in rural Wyoming for more than 18 years, and has developed technologies and business models which afford it the lowest last mile deployment cost, per square mile, of any form of terrestrial broadband. 2 1 Parties Asked to Comment on Analytical Framework Necessary to Resolve Issues in the Special Access NPRM, WC Docket No. 05-25, RM-10593, Public Notice, at 3, 2009 FCC LEXIS 5701 (rel. Nov 5, 209 2 See FCC National Broadband Plan Workshop, Deployment: Unserved/Underserved, August 12, 2009; Slides and video available at http://broadband.gov/ws_deployment_unserved.html

Ironically, the single greatest obstacle to LARIAT s progress toward its goal of providing ubiquitous, economical, high speed broadband is not the low population density, rugged terrain, large distances, or harsh weather conditions of Wyoming. Rather, it is the ability to obtain reasonably priced Internet backbone bandwidth at wholesale to resell to its customers at retail. While Qwest, the incumbent local exchange carrier serving LARIAT s coverage area, offers complete retail ADSL service in Laramie with download speeds of 7 Mbps and additional services such as backup storage and nationwide hotspot access for a promotional price of $25.00, 3 it charges more than ten times this amount for wholesale middle mile data transport, which is only one component of the wholesale cost of Internet bandwidth. In fact, Qwest s special access charge to transport data approximately 175 miles from Laramie, Wyoming to Denver, Colorado is approximately double what Internet backbone providers charge to transport the same amount of data to the entire rest of the globe. 4 Other independent ISPs report similarly exorbitant charges, with many paying as much as $450 per month for 1.5 Mbps T1 lines to the Internet backbone. 5 While some commenters suggest that the motive for these overcharges is primarily or entirely to collect monopoly rents, 6 this extreme inversion of wholesale vs. retail pricing has the even more insidious 3 See Appendix A: Qwest promotional flyer received by Qwest retail customers in Laramie, Wyoming in Februrary, 2010. Flyer offers 7 Mbps ADSL at an initial promotional price of $25.00 per month, increasing to $36.99 per month with an additional 2 year commitment or $39.99 per month with no commitment after the end of the promotional period. The lowest of these rates constitutes a price per downstream Mbps of less than $4 per month; the highest less than $6 per month. 4 See Appendix B: December, 2009 Bandwidth Quotation from Cogent Communications, including breakouts of recurring charges, for 45 Mbps (T3 and 155 Mbps (OC3 of bandwidth. 5 See comments of WISPA in response to Public Notice, Comment Sought on Impact of Middle and Second Mile Access on Broadband Availability and Deployment, DA 09-2186, ON Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51 & 09-137 (rei. Oct. 8,2009, filed November 4,2009, available at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020244726, p. 14 passim. 6 See, e.g., Reply Comments of Level3 Communications LLC, WC Docket No. 05-25, RM-10593 (filed Feb. 24, 2010, available at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020390420 and Comments of the Nochokepoints Coalition, WC Docket No. 05-25, RM-10593 (filed Jan. 19, 2010, available at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020382062

and destructive effect of forestalling competition in the broadband marketplace. As users shift more and more activities, such as video viewing, to the Internet, they expect bandwidth prices to decrease, despite the fact that they use the full capacity of their connections a larger percentage of the time and oversale of bandwidth once a common practice becomes infeasible. However, due to the special access component of bandwidth costs, the net wholesale cost of bandwidth to competitive providers such as LARIAT is actually increasing, not decreasing making it difficult if not impossible for them to remain competitive. 7 Exorbitant special access pricing also hinders the rollout of broadband to unserved and underserved areas, and could well place the 100 squared" goal recently articulated by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski 8 utterly out of reach. At a wholesale cost of more than $100 per Mbps per month, the retail price of 100 Mbps service to the home would be too high for all but a multimillionaire to afford. Prompt action on the above captioned matters is imperative if small, competitive, rural, and wireless broadband providers are to continue to do the important work of providing competitive options to existing broadband customers and rolling out broadband to unserved areas. LARIAT therefore urges the Commission to act immediately to deal with the issue of excessive special access pricing, lest our nation s broadband consumers be confronted in the future with, at best, a duopoly. Respectfully submitted, Laurence Brett ( Brett Glass, d/b/a LARIAT PO Box 383 Laramie, WY 82073-0383 7 See Appendix C: E-mail communication from customer who switched from LARIAT s services to Qwest ADSL. Note that to offer similar pricing, LARIAT which, due to Qwest special access rates, cannot obtain bandwidth for less than $100 per megabit per second per month at wholesale would have to sell bandwidth below cost and would therefore lose money on every customer. Also note that the rate which motivated the customer to switch was higher than the promotional rate offered in the flyer shown in Appendix A. 8 Prepared Remarks of Chairman Julius Genachowski, Federal Communications Commission, Broadband: Our Enduring Engine for Prosperity and Opportunity, NARUC Conference, Washington, D.C., February 16, 2010, available at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/doc-296262a1.pdf

Appendix A: Qwest promotional flyer received by Qwest retail customers in Laramie, Wyoming in Februrary, 2010. Flyer offers an introductory price of $25.00 for 7 Mbps ADSL service for the first year, increasing to $36.99 thereafter with an additional 2 year commitment or $39.99 with no commitment.

Appendix B: December, 2009 Bandwidth Quotation from Cogent Communications, including breakouts of recurring charges, for 45 Mbps (T3 and 155 Mbps (OC3 of bandwidth. Note that the LOOP MRC (backhaul over special access lines by Qwest far exceeds the cost of the bandwidth itself.

Appendix C: E-mail communication from customer who switched from LARIAT s services to Qwest ADSL, which offered retail bandwidth at a price below LARIAT s wholesale bandwidth cost. Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:56:25-0700 Subject: Switching to Qwest for internet connectivity From: Derek Sonderegger To: Brett Glass As per our discussion about me switching to Qwest, here is my rational and you may quote this email to whomever you like. I hope it can help. I also sent this same message through the online email at the lariat.net webpage. I made the decision to switch to Qwest DSL for my internet service because of the price difference between Lariat. From Qwest I am able to get a 1.5 Mb/s connection (my observed speeds have been approximately 1.3 Mb/s for $25 per month. To obtain the same service from Lariat would be approximately $125 per month. While I often willing to pay more for a local service, and you and your staff have been wonderful to work with, a price difference of 500% is not reasonable to expect from even the most sympathetic of consumers. Derek -- Derek Sonderegger Dept. of Botany University of Wyoming