Health Information Technology and the National Quality Agenda. Daphne Ayn Bascom, MD PhD Chief Clinical Systems Officer Medical Operations



Similar documents
Meaningful Use Gap Analysis and Planning Engineering a Hit!

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

I. RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE TIMING OF STAGE 2

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Objectives

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Overview of Meaningful Use Objectives Pharmacy e-hit Collaborative Comments

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Stage 2 Meaningful Use - Public Health

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified

Meaningful Use - The Basics

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use Qualification Plan

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Administrator Training

Guide To Meaningful Use

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

Meaningful Use 2014: Stage 2 MU Overview. Scott A. Jens, OD, FAAO October 16, 2013

Meaningful Use Stage 1:

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

RPMS EHR Remote Support and Configuration

CMS EHR Incentive Programs:

2013 Meaningful Use Dashboard Calculation Guide

DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2015

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use. Goals and Principles

Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures

Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS (CAHS)

Where to Begin? Auditing the Current EHR System

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Stage 2

Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

hospital s or CAH s inpatient or professional guidelines

Meaningful Use Cheat Sheet CORE MEASURES: ALL REQUIRED # Measure Exclusions How to Meet in WEBeDoctor

Navigating Meaningful Use Stage 2

Dr. Peters has declared no conflicts of interest related to the content of his presentation.

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)

Of EHRs and Meaningful Use. Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

Are you ready? Meaningful Use Stage 2 HIT Summit July 26, 2014

MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage One Meaningful Use. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator October 16, 2014

Navigating Meaningful Use Stage 2

Impact of Meaningful Use and Healthcare Transformation On Patient Access

Quest to Attest 2014 Stage 1 Meaningful Use. Brett M. Paepke, OD Advisor, Stage 1 Meaningful Use

MU/REG 06: Stage 2 and. Preview. Presented by: Presented by: Robert Forrest Marketing Comm Manager

EHR Association: Detailed Commentary on Specific Objectives and Questions

Meaningful Use. NextGen Ambulatory EHR Path to. At NextGen Healthcare, we are ready to help. you demonstrate Meaningful Use.

Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Dentists as Eligible Professionals. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Using Health Information Technology to Improve Quality of Care: Clinical Decision Support

Meaningful Use Stage 2:

1/16/2015 HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL. We have no financial disclosures

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

Eligible Professionals (EPs) Purdue Research Foundation

EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)

MEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2

EMR Use in the Age of Healthcare Reform. C. Martin Harris, M.D. Chief Information Officer, Cleveland Clinic Executive Director, ecleveland Clinic

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

Lunch and Learn IFAF 09/24/11. Michael L. Brody, DPM

Meaningful Use Madness: Stage 3 Overview APRIL 08, 2015

Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA

Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use Implications for Population and Public Health

TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality

Electronic Medical Records

Stage Two Meaningful Use Measures for Eligible Professionals

Meaningful Use and Beyond. John D. Halamka MD CIO, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School

Modified Stage 2 Final Rule

An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

Meaningful Use. Michael L. Brody, DPM FACFAOM CCHIT Ambulatory Workgroup HITSP Physician Perspective Technical Committee NYeHC

Transcription:

Health Information Technology and the National Quality Agenda Daphne Ayn Bascom, MD PhD Chief Clinical Systems Officer Medical Operations

Institute of Medicine Definition of Quality "The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge."

Measures of Success? Outcomes - Functional - Quality of Life - Disease free Interval - Morbidity - Mortality Quality of Care - DVT prophylaxis - Medication administration - Perioperative complications

EMR ONC PHR MU ACO HIE

Drivers of Healthcare IT Adoption Rising Health Care Costs Declining Efficiency Clinical Leadership Industry Leadership Political Leadership Drivers of Health Information Technology Adoption

Goals of HIT Adoption Improved health outcomes Better integration and transfer of information across health care silos Decision support Cost efficiencies Improved patient provider provider satisfaction Ability to monitor health of the population

Health IT: The Challenges Provider Resistance Security and Privacy Safety Cost

1 in 7 hospital admissions occurs because care providers do not have access to previous medical records 12% of physician orders are not executed as written 20% of laboratory tests are requested because previous studies are not accessible 1 in 6.5 hospitalizations complicated by drug error Cannot have integrated care without integrated information! Essential to patient centered care

Role of Healthcare IT in Driving Quality Ubiquitous availability of information to providers Improve collaboration between providers Reduce human error at the point of care through Clinical Decision Support Provide workflow automation and improvement Enable Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Enable the 5 Rights of Medication Administration

How can an EHR make a difference? Structure Process Outcome Adoption Electronic Medical Record Record Implementation And And Adoption Effective Use Use Use Use key key EMR EMR features fully fully Smart Use Use Leverage EMR EMR decision support We are here Adapted from Role of the EHR in Healthcare Reform of Integrated Health Care Systems. Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc. Partners HealthCare System, Harvard Medical School. Meaningful Users of Information Technology

CCHS HealthCare IT Strategic Objectives Access to all pertinent clinical information at the point of care Improve care giver decision making Reduce medical errors Standardization and variance reduction Ability to evaluate data on a patient and population basis for quality, research and outcomes initiatives

CCHS HIT Related Quality Initiatives Core Measures - Implementation of standard nursing documentation tools - Implementation of Standard Physician Documentation - Point of Care Decision Support - Near real time reporting tools - Core measures dashboard Improving Surgical Care - Standard documentation tools (Surgical Navigator) - Standard Day of Surgery Order set

CCHS HIT Related Quality Initiatives Medication Administration Workflows - Improved Medication Reconciliation Tools - System wide formulary - Standardized concentrations of key IV solutions Decision Support - Key medication related alerts - Standard order sets and alerts for high risk or quality related processes Heparin VTE Insulin

Potential Challenges with the Implementation of HIT Change is hard Does not eliminate all potential medication errors Human error still possible Lack of an interface with other information systems may impact clinical workflows Automating bad process simply makes errors happen more quickly

E Iatrogenesis Electronic iatrogenesis: The unintended consequences resulting from the implementation of health information technology

Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert No. 42 1. Examine workflow processes and procedures 2. Actively involve clinicians and staff 3. Assess your organization s technology needs beforehand 4. During the introduction of new technology, continuously monitor for problems 5. Establish a training program 6. Develop and communicate policies delineating staff authorized and responsible 7. Prior to taking a technology live, ensure that all standardized order sets and guidelines are developed, tested on paper, and approved by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (or institutional equivalent).

Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert No. 42 8. Develop a graduated system of safety alerts in the new technology that helps clinicians determine urgency and relevancy. 9. Develop a system that mitigates potential harmful CPOE drug orders by requiring departmental or pharmacy review and sign off on orders that are created outside the usual parameters. 10. To improve safety, provide an environment that protects staff involved in data entry from undue distractions when using the technology. 11. After implementation, continually reassess and enhance safety effectiveness and error detection capability. 12. After implementation, continually monitor and report errors and near misses or close calls caused by technology through manual or automated surveillance technique. 13. Re evaluate the applicability of security and confidentiality protocols as more medical devices interface with the IT network.

EMR ONC PHR MU ACO HIE

National Health Care Transformation Plan Improving population health Improving the quality of care Improving the patient & provider experience of health care Improving objective and subjective outcomes Improving the value of money spent on health care

25550 Federal Register/ Vol. 74, No. 101/ Thursday, May 28, 2009/ Notices

Meaningful Use of Health IT There are three stages of Meaningful Use: - Stage 1 (2011): Implement an Electronic Health Record to Capture and Share Data - Stage 2 (2013): Use Advanced Care Processes with Decision Support - Stage 3 (2015): Demonstrate Improved Outcomes Source : Ashish K. Jha, Catherine M. DesRoches, Peter D. Kralovec and Maulik S. Joshi, A Progress Report On Electronic Health Records In U.S. Hospitals. Health Affairs, October 2010. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/29/10/1951.abstract

Stage 1 Final Rule HITPC Proposed Stage 2 Improving Quality, Safety, Efficiency & Reducing Health Disparities EP: >30% of unique patients with at least one med order have at least one med order entered using CPOE Implement drug drug and drug allergy interaction checks (enabled functionality) EP: Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically for >40% of prescriptions >50% of all unique patients have demographics recorded as structured data. (preferred language, gender race ethnicity, DOB, data and preliminary COD EH ONLY). Report CQM as per CMS attestation CPOE for 60% of Rx and lab ; radiology CPOE in use ( 1 order) (unless no radiology orders) Stage 1 Final Rule & HITPC Proposed Stage 2 Employ drug interaction (drug-drug, drug-allergy) checking; 50% of outpatient medication orders and 20% of hospital discharge medication orders transmitted as erx 80% of patients have demographics recorded and can use them to produce stratified quality reports using more granular demographic Report CQM electronically as per CMS Maintain an up to date problem list for >80% of all unique patients Maintain active med list for >80% of all unique patients Maintain problem list (80%) Maintain active med list (80%)

Stage 1 Final Rule HITPC Proposed Stage 2 Maintain active med allergy list for >80% of all unique patients Record and chart vital signs for >50% of all unique patients age 2 and over Maintain active med-allergy list (80%) 80% of patients have vital signs recorded during the reporting year 80% of patients have smoking status recorded Stage 1 Final Rule & HITPC Proposed Stage 2 Record smoking status for >50% of all unique patients 13 years or older Implement 1 clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority along with ability to track compliance Menu: Implement drug formulary checks with access to at least one drug formulary Menu: Record AD for 50% of all unique patients 65 years and older Menu: Incorporate clinical lab tests results as structured data for more than 40% of all lab tests results ordered New Use CDS; HITSC: Suggest changing certification criteria definition as indicated on comment summary Implement drug formulary checks according to local needs For hospitals, 50% of patients >65 who have recorded the result of an advance directive discussion and the directive itself if it exists; for EPs 10% of patients seen during reporting period Incorporate lab results as structured data (40%) (move to core EHs: Hospital labs send structured electronic lab results to outpatient providers for 40% of labs sent electronically

Quality Care and Healthcare Transformation Keys to Success Clinical and Executive Leadership Involve patients, physician and other care providers in the transformation Commitment to sustainability Health Information Technology Alignment of incentives Co ordination ordination of health and human resources Commitment to continuous quality improvement