INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF HOURLY COMPENSATION COSTS



Similar documents
- 2 - Chart 2. Annual percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates,

Internet address: USDL:

International Labor Comparisons

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

Foreign Taxes Paid and Foreign Source Income INTECH Global Income Managed Volatility Fund

World Consumer Income and Expenditure Patterns

41 T Korea, Rep T Netherlands T Japan E Bulgaria T Argentina T Czech Republic T Greece 50.

BT Premium Event Call and Web Rate Card

Health Care in Crisis

relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates

PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WORKERS

Consumer Credit Worldwide at year end 2012

DEMOGRAPHICS AND MACROECONOMICS

The Role of Banks in Global Mergers and Acquisitions by James R. Barth, Triphon Phumiwasana, and Keven Yost *

How many students study abroad and where do they go?

193/ December Hourly labour costs in the EU28 Member States, 2012 (in )

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLANS IN CANADA

Appendix 1: Full Country Rankings

PORTABILITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH CARE BENEFITS IN ITALY

Supported Payment Methods

BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS P.O. BOX, 4002 BASLE, SWITZERLAND

Trends in Digitally-Enabled Trade in Services. by Maria Borga and Jennifer Koncz-Bruner

All persons gainfully employed under age 60. Self-employed are covered also.

Health Systems: Type, Coverage and Financing Mechanisms

Supported Payment Methods

Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria. England. Belgium (Fl.) United States 2. Finland 2. Norway 2. Belgium (Fr.) Australia. Austria Norway 2, 4.

STATISTICS FOR THE FURNITURE INDUSTRY AND TRADE

Capital Markets, Savings Division Annual Report Insurance

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

Brochure More information from

2014 UXPA Salary Survey. November 2014

Waiting times and other barriers to health care access

Delegation in human resource management

How To Calculate Tertiary Type A Graduation Rate

Report on Government Information Requests

Configuring DHCP for ShoreTel IP Phones

ANNUAL HOURS WORKED. Belgium:

OCTOBER Russell-Parametric Cross-Sectional Volatility (CrossVol ) Indexes Construction and Methodology

What Is the Total Public Spending on Education?

Global Effective Tax Rates

Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison

IMD World Talent Report. By the IMD World Competitiveness Center

Corporate Office Von Karman Ave Suite 150 Irvine, California Toll Free: Fax:

Social insurance, private insurance and social protection. The example of health care systems in some OECD countries

Lawson Business Intelligence. Solutions for Healthcare

IMD World Talent Report. By the IMD World Competitiveness Center

What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education?

Insurance corporations and pension funds in OECD countries

Motion Graphic Design Census. 10 hrs. motiongraphicdesigncensus.org. 9 hrs.

U.S. Trade Overview, 2013

Canada GO 2535 TM World Traveller's edition Maps of North America (Canada, US, Mexico), Western and Central Europe (including Russia) CAD 349,95

MERCER S COMPENSATION ANALYSIS AND REVIEW SYSTEM AN ONLINE TOOL DESIGNED TO TAKE THE WORK OUT OF YOUR COMPENSATION REVIEW PROCESS

Triple-play subscriptions to rocket to 400 mil.

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD

Hong Kong s Health Spending 1989 to 2033

B Financial and Human Resources

GLOBAL HRMONITOR NEW DIMENSIONS IN ONLINE HR INFORMATION TALENT HEALTH RETIREMENT INVESTMENTS

GfK PURCHASING POWER INTERNATIONAL

Make the invisible visible! SENSORS WITH EXCELLENT BACKGROUND SUPPRESSION

Women s Earnings and Income

Access the world. with Schwab Global Investing Services

How To Get A New Phone System For Your Business

A Nielsen Report Global Trust in Advertising and Brand Messages. April 2012

IOOF QuantPlus. International Equities Portfolio NZD. Quarterly update

Review of R&D Tax Credit. Invitation for Submissions

The investment fund statistics

Global Economic Briefing: Global Inflation

How To Tax On Pension Income For Older People In European Countries

Schedule R Teleconferencing Service

Accuracy counts! SENSORS WITH ANALOG OUTPUT

The big pay turnaround: Eurozone recovering, emerging markets falter in 2015

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD By Kyle Pomerleau

Table 1: TSQM Version 1.4 Available Translations

MAUVE GROUP GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS PORTFOLIO

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments

Global Marine Insurance Report 2008

Overview menu: ArminLabs - DHL Medical Express Online-Pickup: Access to the Online System

DSV Air & Sea, Inc. Aerospace Sector. DSV Air & Sea, Inc. Aerospace

The value of accredited certification

AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INSOLVENCY LAWS. Meeting held on April 2006

Report on Government Information Requests

PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA. Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007

IFI SPONSOR & PARTNER OPPORTUNITIES CELEBRATING 50 YEARS

Friends Life Protection Account Key features of Income Protection Cover

As of 2014, the SIC contribution will increase to %, capped at 48times average monthly wage per year (CZK 1,242,432 for 2013)

Building a Global Internet Company: Driving Traffic to Your Site. Benjamin Edelman Harvard Business School

NERI Quarterly Economic Facts Summer Distribution of Income and Wealth

Know the Facts. Aon Hewitt Country Profiles can help: Support a decision to establish or not establish operations in a specific country.

International Call Services

ON OECD I-O DATABASE AND ITS EXTENSION TO INTER-COUNTRY INTER- INDUSTRY ANALYSIS " Norihiko YAMANO"

Agenda. Company Platform Customers Partners Competitive Analysis

Global AML Resource Map Over 2000 AML professionals

PUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA

July Figure 1. 1 The index is set to 100 in House prices are deflated by country CPIs in most cases.

Eliminating Double Taxation through Corporate Integration

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Internationalization and higher education policy: Recent developments in Finland

Australia s position in global and bilateral foreign direct investment

Country note China. More than 255 million people in OECD and G20 countries have now attained tertiary education (Table A1.3a).

Transcription:

For release 10:00 a.m. (EST) Tuesday, March 8, 2011 USDL-11-0303 Technical Information: (202) 691-5654 ilchelp@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ilc Media Contact: (202) 691-5902 PressOffice@bls.gov INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF HOURLY COMPENSATION COSTS IN MANUFACTURING, 2009 Manufacturing hourly compensation costs in the United States in 2009 were lower than in 12 European countries and Australia, but higher than in 20 other countries covered by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (see chart 1). U.S. hourly compensation costs rose about 4 percent from the previous year to $33.53. The 8 countries with the highest costs in Europe were 30-60 percent higher than the U.S. level, but costs in Canada and Japan were about 10 percent lower than the United States (see table 1). Chart 1. Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, U.S. dollars, 2009 Norway 53.89 Spain 27.74 Denmark 49.56 Greece 19.23 Belgium 49.40 Israel 18.39 Austria 48.04 Singapore 17.50 Germany 46.52 New Zealand 17.44 Switzerland 44.29 Korea, Republic of 14.20 Finland 43.77 Portugal 11.95 Netherlands 43.50 Slovakia 11.24 France 40.08 Czech Republic 11.21 Sweden 39.87 Argentina 10.14 Ireland 39.02 Estonia 9.83 Italy 34.97 Hungary 8.62 Australia 34.62 Brazil 8.32 United States 33.53 Taiwan 7.76 United Kingdom 30.78 Poland 7.50 Japan 30.36 Mexico 5.38 Canada 29.60 Philippines 1.50 0 20 40 60 0 20 40 60

- 2 - Changes in a country s compensation costs in U.S. dollars are roughly equivalent to the change in compensation costs in a country s national currency plus the change in the value of the country s currency relative to the U.S. dollar. This relationship is illustrated in chart 2, where the bars in the right panel for each country can be summed to equal the bars in the left panel. In 2009, modest increases or declines in hourly compensation costs in national currency combined with depreciations in national currency relative to the U.S. dollar produced declines in U.S. dollar-denominated hourly compensation costs for 27 out of 33 foreign countries. Chart 2. Annual percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates, 2008-2009 Pct. change in hourly compensation (U.S. dollars) Japan United States Slovakia Argentina Switzerland Austria Spain Ireland Denmark Greece Brazil Finland Italy Portugal Netherlands Belgium Philippines Germany Estonia France Israel Australia Singapore Norway Czech Republic New Zealand Canada Sweden Taiwan Hungary Mexico Korea, Republic of United Kingdom Poland -25-15 -5 0 5 15 25 Pct. change in hourly compensation (National currency) Pct. change in value of foreign currency relative to U.S. dollar Japan United States Slovakia Argentina Switzerland Austria Spain Ireland Denmark Greece Brazil Finland Italy Portugal Netherlands Belgium Philippines Germany Estonia France Israel Australia Singapore Norway Czech Republic New Zealand Canada Sweden Taiwan Hungary Mexico Korea, Republic of United Kingdom Poland -25-15 -5 0 5 15 25

- 3 - China and India BLS has developed estimates of hourly compensation costs for employees in the Chinese and Indian manufacturing sectors. 1, 2 Due to various data gaps and methodological issues, compensation costs for China and India are not directly comparable to each other or with the data for other countries found in this release, and therefore are presented separately. 3 For China, BLS approximates average hourly compensation costs in manufacturing by filling important data gaps for hours worked per year and for benefit components of labor compensation. Further, the concepts and coverage of Chinese statistics on manufacturing employment and wages often do not follow international standards and can be difficult to understand. Largely because of these data gaps and challenges, BLS estimates for China cannot be considered as robust as the manufacturing statistics for the other countries in this news release. 4 For India, BLS estimates of compensation costs refer to organized (or formal) manufacturing only, rather than to total manufacturing in the country. Unorganized sector manufacturing workers account for approximately 80 percent of total manufacturing employment in India and earn substantially less than their organized sector counterparts. For this reason, employers average compensation costs in organized manufacturing overstate average compensation costs for Indian manufacturing as a whole. Chart 3. Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing for China and India, in U.S. dollars, 2003-2008 China India 2008 1.36 2008 NA 2007 1.06 2007 1.17 2006 0.81 2006 0.95 2005 0.73 2005 0.91 2004 0.66 2004 0.85 2003 0.62 2003 0.81 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 (1) For the most recent BLS work on China, see Judith Banister and George Cook, China s employment and compensation costs in manufacturing through 2008, Monthly Labor Review, forthcoming March 2011, on the Internet at www.bls.gov/opub/mlr. (2) For the most recent BLS work on India, see Jessica R. Sincavage, Labor costs in India s organized manufacturing sector, Monthly Labor Review, May 2010, pp. 3 22, on the Internet at www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2010/05/art1full.pdf. (3) For a discussion of the limitations associated with comparing compensation costs for China and India, see Sincavage, Labor costs in India s organized manufacturing sector. (4) For additional information on employment and compensation costs in China, see www.bls.gov/ilc/china.htm.

- 4 - Chart 4. Benefit components of hourly compensation costs as a percent of total compensation, 2009 1 Social insurance expenditures Directly-paid benefits 2 Brazil Sweden France Italy Belgium Slovakia Greece Czech Republic 3 Mexico Estonia Spain Hungary Austria United States Netherlands Germany Finland United Kingdom Australia Canada Portugal 3 Norway Japan 3 Korea, Republic of Argentina Israel Poland Ireland Switzerland Taiwan3 Singapore Denmark Philippines New Zealand 0 10 20 30 40 50 Percent (1) Social insurance expenditures include labor-related taxes net of subsidies. (2) Directly-paid benefits are primarily pay for leave time, bonuses, and pay in kind. (3) For Mexico, Norway, Republic of Korea, and Taiwan, separate measures of directly-paid benefits are not available. Chart 4 shows the benefit components of manufacturing employers compensation costs as a percent of total costs. (See table 3 for data in U.S. dollars.) Economies are ordered based on social insurance expenditures as a

- 5 - percent of total compensation. In countries with the highest ratio of social insurance costs, such as Brazil, Sweden, and France, social insurance makes up approximately one-third of total compensation costs. In the United States, social insurance costs account for about 24 percent of total compensation, while in the Asian countries social insurance is less than 20 percent. Directly-paid benefits comprise pay for leave time, bonuses, and pay in kind. The percentage of compensation that is directly-paid benefits tends to be higher in many European countries (due in large part to leave pay) and in Japan (where seasonal bonuses are a large portion of costs). Directly-paid benefits are a relatively smaller portion of costs in countries such as the United States, Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The total benefits portion of compensation costs can be seen by combining social insurance with directly-paid benefits. Total benefits surpass 40 percent in 15 countries. In contrast, the ratio of benefit costs in the United States is about 31 percent. Changes in this news release New country estimates for Estonia: For the first time, this news release includes data for Estonia. Revised estimates for Mexico: Compensation cost estimates for Mexico in this release are significantly higher due to a change in the primary data source used. This change was made to bring the employment coverage of BLS estimates for Mexico more in line with that for other countries. Additional indicators and time series data: Full time series of compensation costs in U.S. dollars and in national currencies, indexes of costs, and the components of compensation are available at www.bls.gov/web/ichcc.supp.toc.htm. Production worker and trade-weighted data: Compensation costs for production workers and for tradeweighted country groupings are no longer shown in this news release. These data are available in the time series tables at www.bls.gov/web/ichcc.supp.toc.htm. 2009 is the final year for which updated production worker data will be available. Send us your inquiries or feedback We appreciate your inquiries and feedback. Feel free to email ILCHelp@bls.gov or call (202) 691-5654. Subscribe to ILC s e-newsletter The e-newsletter provides links to the latest ILC releases, which usually occur once or twice per month. Email mailto:ilcpr@bls.gov with subscribe in the subject line.

- 6 - Table 1. Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, U.S. dollars, and as a percent of costs in the United States Hourly Compensation Costs in U.S. dollars U.S.=100 1997 (1) 2009 1997 (1) 2009 Norway 26.97 53.89 119 161 Denmark 24.64 49.56 109 148 Belgium 28.23 49.40 125 147 Austria 27.38 48.04 121 143 Germany 29.26 46.52 129 139 Switzerland 28.33 44.29 125 132 Finland 22.17 43.77 98 131 Netherlands 23.44 43.50 103 130 France 24.99 40.08 110 120 Sweden 25.11 39.87 111 119 Ireland 17.15 39.02 76 116 Italy 19.67 34.97 87 104 Australia 19.12 34.62 84 103 United States 22.67 33.53 100 100 United Kingdom 18.24 30.78 80 92 Japan 22.28 30.36 98 91 Canada 18.89 29.60 83 88 Spain 13.91 27.74 61 83 Greece NA 19.23 NA 57 Israel 12.32 18.39 54 55 Singapore 12.15 17.50 54 52 New Zealand 12.37 17.44 55 52 Korea, Republic of 9.42 14.20 42 42 Portugal 6.38 11.95 28 36 Slovakia 2.86 11.24 13 34 Czech Republic 3.24 11.21 14 33 Argentina 7.43 10.14 33 30 Estonia NA 9.83 NA 29 Hungary 3.05 8.62 13 26 Brazil 7.11 8.32 31 25 Taiwan 7.04 7.76 31 23 Poland 3.13 7.50 14 22 Mexico 3.30 5.38 15 16 Philippines 1.14 1.50 5 4 NA=data not available. (1) With the exception of Estonia and Greece, 1997 is the first year data are available for all countries.

- 7 - Table 2. Average annual percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates U.S. dollar change (1) 1997-2009 2008-2009 National currency change Exchange rate change (2) U.S. dollar change (1) National currency change Exchange rate change (2) Japan 2.6 0.5 2.2 9.2-1.0 10.4 United States 3.3 3.3 0.0 4.1 4.1 0.0 Slovakia 12.1 8.1 3.8 3.3 6.0-2.6 Argentina 2.6 14.5-10.4 2.0 20.3-15.3 Switzerland 3.8 1.3 2.4 1.2 1.7-0.5 Austria 4.8 3.0 1.8 0.5 6.2-5.4 Spain 5.9 4.1 1.7 0.4 6.1-5.4 Ireland 7.1 5.7 1.3-0.9 4.7-5.4 Denmark 6.0 4.2 1.8-1.0 4.2-5.0 Greece NA NA 0.9-1.8 3.8-5.4 Brazil 1.3 6.7-5.0-1.9 7.0-8.3 Finland 5.8 4.1 1.7-2.0 3.5-5.4 Italy 4.9 3.1 1.7-2.2 3.3-5.4 Portugal 5.4 3.6 1.7-2.4 3.2-5.4 Netherlands 5.3 3.5 1.8-2.7 2.8-5.4 Belgium 4.8 2.9 1.8-2.8 2.7-5.4 Philippines 2.4 6.6-3.9-3.1 4.3-7.0 Germany 3.9 2.1 1.8-3.5 1.9-5.4 Estonia NA NA NA -5.0 0.0-5.0 France 4.0 2.2 1.8-5.1 0.3-5.4 Israel 3.4 4.5-1.1-5.8 3.3-8.8 Australia 5.1 4.5 0.5-6.2 1.0-7.2 Singapore 3.1 2.9 0.2-7.2-4.5-2.8 Norway 5.9 4.9 1.0-7.4 3.3-10.4 Czech Republic 10.9 6.5 4.2-8.1 4.3-11.9 New Zealand 2.9 3.4-0.5-8.8 2.6-11.1 Canada 3.8 2.2 1.6-9.5-3.1-6.6 Sweden 3.9 3.9 0.0-9.6 5.1-14.0 Taiwan 0.8 2.0-1.1-10.7-6.4-4.5 Hungary 9.0 9.8-0.7-11.8 3.7-14.9 Mexico 4.2 8.9-4.4-12.0 6.6-17.5 Korea, Republic of 3.5 6.1-2.4-12.7 1.3-13.8 United Kingdom 4.5 4.8-0.4-13.9 1.9-15.6 Poland 7.6 7.1 0.4-20.1 3.5-22.8 NA=data not available. (1) U.S. dollar changes are approximately equal to national currency changes plus exchange rate changes for each country. (2) Exchange rates are value of foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.

- 8 - Table 3. Components of hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, U.S. dollars, 2009 Total Hourly Compensation Costs Social Insurance (1) Directly-Paid Benefits (2) Total Direct Pay Pay for Time Worked (3) Norway 53.89 9.91 43.97 (4) Denmark 49.56 5.04 8.99 35.53 Belgium 49.40 14.72 9.68 25.00 Austria 48.04 12.16 10.17 25.72 Germany 46.52 10.37 9.24 26.90 Switzerland 44.29 6.57 8.97 28.75 Finland 43.77 9.45 8.69 25.62 Netherlands 43.50 10.05 8.36 25.09 France 40.08 12.51 4.99 22.58 Sweden 39.87 12.69 4.22 22.96 Ireland 39.02 5.96 5.36 27.70 Italy 34.97 10.63 5.15 19.19 Australia 34.62 7.13 3.27 24.22 United States 33.53 7.90 2.60 23.03 United Kingdom 30.78 6.46 3.18 21.14 Japan 30.36 5.42 7.56 17.39 Canada 29.60 5.99 2.92 20.69 Spain 27.74 7.29 5.47 14.99 Greece 19.23 5.31 3.54 10.38 Israel 18.39 2.98 1.39 14.02 Singapore 17.50 2.45 3.41 11.65 New Zealand 17.44 0.52 2.40 14.52 Korea, Republic of 14.20 2.52 11.68 (4) Portugal 11.95 2.41 2.09 7.44 Slovakia 11.24 3.22 1.93 6.10 Czech Republic 11.21 3.06 1.50 6.64 Argentina 10.14 1.77 1.42 6.96 Estonia 9.83 2.58 0.88 6.36 Hungary 8.62 2.24 1.58 4.81 Brazil 8.32 2.70 1.18 4.45 Taiwan 7.76 1.14 6.61 (4) Poland 7.50 1.18 1.77 4.55 Mexico 5.38 1.45 3.93 (4) Philippines 1.50 0.13 0.25 1.13 (1) Social insurance includes labor-related taxes net of subsidies. (2) Directly-paid benefits are primarily pay for leave time, bonuses, and pay in kind. (3) Pay for time worked is wages and salaries for time actually worked. (4) Data relate to total direct pay.

- 9 - TECHNICAL NOTES The international comparisons of hourly compensation costs in manufacturing are prepared to assess differences in employer labor costs among countries. BLS compensation data permit more meaningful comparisons of employer labor costs than data based solely on average earnings. Definitions of average earnings differ considerably by country and do not include many items of labor cost that frequently make up a large portion of total cost. BLS compensation data include nearly all labor costs incurred by employers. Below is a summary of the concepts used in this release. For more detailed information, see http://www.bls.gov/ilc/#compensation. Definitions. Hourly compensation costs include (1) total hourly direct pay (all payments made directly to the worker, before payroll deductions of any kind) (2) social insurance expenditures (employer payments to secure entitlement to social benefits for employees) and (3) labor-related taxes. The data relate to all employees in manufacturing, including part-time and temporary workers. The selfemployed, unpaid family workers, contract workers, and workers in private households are excluded. Hourly Compensation Costs Pay for Time Worked Total Hourly Direct Pay Directly-Paid Benefits Employer Social Insurance Expenditures and Labor-related Taxes Basic wages Piece rate Overtime premiums Shift, holiday, or night work premiums Cost-of-living adjustments Bonuses and premiums paid each pay period Pay for time not worked (vacations, holidays, and other leave, except sick leave) Seasonal and irregular bonuses Allowances for family events, commuting, etc. Payments in kind Severance pay explicitly not linked to a collective agreement Retirement and disability pensions Health insurance Income guarantee insurance and sick leave Life and accident insurance Occupational injury and illness compensation Unemployment insurance Severance pay linked to a collective agreement Other social insurance expenditures Taxes (net of subsidies) on payrolls or employment Methodology. In general, total compensation for each economy is calculated by adjusting earnings series to include items of direct pay, social insurance, and labor-related taxes and subsidies not included in earnings. For economies for which earnings data are not available on a per hour worked basis, BLS makes adjustments in order to approximate compensation per hour worked. Compensation costs are converted to U.S. dollars using the average daily exchange rate for the reference year.

- 10 - Earnings statistics are typically obtained from establishment surveys. Data on the other components of hourly compensation are typically obtained from periodic labor cost surveys, censuses of manufacturers, employer confederations, and other sources. For the United States, the results and methods used differ somewhat from those used for other BLS series on U.S. compensation costs. The statistics are adjusted, where possible, to account for major differences in worker coverage; differences in industrial classification systems; and changes over time in survey coverage, sample benchmarks, or frequency of surveys. More information on exceptions to these methods, as well as data sources used, can be found in Country Notes and Sources located at http://www.bls.gov/ilc/#compensation. Data availability. Detailed time series with data for all years from 1996 can be found at http://www.bls.gov/web/ichcc.supp.toc.htm. The compensation measures in this news release are based on statistics available to BLS as of December 2010. These measures may be subsequently revised as data are collected to update compensation measures for submanufacturing industries. Data for sub-manufacturing industries are available at http://www.bls.gov/ilc/flshcaeindnaics.htm.