Using estrus-detection patches to optimally time artificial insemination (AI) and improve pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows in a timed AI program

Similar documents
Estrus Synchronization Protocols for Cows

Animal Sciences. Timed-Artificial Insemination in Beef Cows: What are the Options?

Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows 1

G. Cliff Lamb. North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, Florida University of Florida. Introduction

COMPARISON OF FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION VS. NATURAL SERVICE IN BEEF COWS: REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND SYSTEM COST

Getting It Right With A.I. and Estrus Synchronization Willie Altenburg, Fort Collins Colorado

Artificial Insemination

New product approval for Fixed-Time AI. John Lee, DVM Zoetis Dairy Technical Services

GnRH Based Estrus Synchronization Systems for Beef Cows

licle by expressing estrus (heat) and producing an LH surge. The LH surge causes ovulation, which begins the heifer s first cycle.

Artificial Insemination (AI) in Cattle

Economics of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination. Dr. Les Anderson and Paul Deaton University of Kentucky

Pregnancy Rates Per Artificial Insemination for Cows and Heifers Inseminated at a Synchronized Ovulation or Synchronized Estrus 1

Getting Cows Pregnant: Are Problem Cows Really the Problem?

ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION: A REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT TOOL by Mel DeJarnette, reproduction specialist Revised February 2004

STRATEGIES TO OPTIMIZE USE OF AI IN COW/CALF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: FOCUS ON FIXED-TIME AI PROTOCOLS FOR COWS 1

PRODUCERS can choose to use natural

Ovarian Cysts in Dairy Cattle

Abbreviation key: NS = natural service breeding system, AI = artificial insemination, BV = breeding value, RBV = relative breeding value

Artificial Insemination (AI) and Oestrus Synchronisation of Beef Cattle

Four Systematic Breeding Programs with Timed Artificial Insemination for Lactating Dairy Cows: A Revisit

Setting up Cows for First Postpartum Artificial Insemination. Paul M. Fricke, Ph.D. Professor of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin Madison

reprodaction Technical Publications Basic guidelines to select the right synchronization protocol for Timed Artificial Insemination in cattle

EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT OF FOLLICULAR CYSTS IN COWS

SYNCHRONIZATION OF CATTLE

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION SUMMARY SUPPLEMENTAL NEW ANIMAL DRUG APPLICATION NADA Progesterone. EAZI-BREED CIDR Cattle Insert SPONSORED BY:

Artificial Insemination in Cattle

Unit B: Understanding Animal Reproduction. Lesson 3: Understanding Animal Reproduction Technology

RATES OF CONCEPTION BY ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF. 1 Miss. Rohini Paramsothy Faculty of Agriculture University of Jaffna

Reproductive Performance in Dairy Cows Synchronized with the Ovsynch Protocol at Different Stages of the Estrus Cycle

Successful Timed AI Programs: Using Timed AI to Improve Reproductive Efficiency in High Producing Dairy Cattle

ANP 504 : ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION COURSE LECTURERS

Effects of timed artificial insemination following estrus synchronization in postpartum beef cattle

Natural Breeding vs. Artificial Insemination: A Cost Comparison Analysis. By Patrick Jacobsen

Reproductive Anatomy and Fertility

THE STIMULATION OF OVULATION DURING HIGH TEMPERATURE, AN TECHNIQUE OF FERTILITY INCREASING IN COWS

Genetic improvement: a major component of increased dairy farm profitability

MINISTRY OF LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT SMALLHOLDER DAIRY COMMERCIALIZATION PROGRAMME. Artificial Insemination (AI) Service

SYNCHRONIZATION OF BOS INDICUS-INFLUENCED CATTLE FOR TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

Herd Navigator and reproduction management

ANS 3319C Reproductive Physiology and Endocrinology Artificial Insemination in Cattle. Objectives. What are the advantages and disadvantages of AI?

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Influence of Nutrition on Reproduction in the Beef Cow Herd

TECHNICAL BULLETIN FAC February Zoetis 100 Campus Drive Florham Park, New Jersey KEY POINTS

Value of Managing Beef Cattle Genetics

Understanding Animal Reproduction Technology

Enrollment Snapshot of Radiography, Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs 2014

Evaluation of the reproductive performance and effectiveness of artificial insemination on smallholder dairy farms in Zambia

Enrollment Snapshot of Radiography, Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs 2015

THE WHY, HOW-TO, AND COST OF PROGRAMED AI BREEDING OF DAIRY COWS. J. S. Stevenson

Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle

2016 Protocols for Synchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in Beef Cows and Heifers

Evaluations for service-sire conception rate for heifer and cow inseminations with conventional and sexed semen

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return on Investment Calculation Decision Aids

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 11 and 12, 2007, Billings, Montana NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR REPRODUCTION IN CATTLE

Timed Artificial Insemination with Estradiol Cypionate or Insemination at Estrus in High-Producing Dairy Cows

Reproductive Performance and Factors Affecting the Success Rate of Artificial Insemination of Cattle in Up-country Multiplier Farms of Sri Lanka

How To Rate Plan On A Credit Card With A Credit Union


Factors affecting conception rate in artificially inseminated cattle under farmers condition in Ethiopia

Department of Business and Information Technology

COLD STRESS IN COWS. Brian Tarr, Ruminant Nutritionist Shur Gain, Nutreco Canada Inc.

Hormonal treatment and estrus synchronization in cows: A mini-review

Artificial insemination:

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION IN LIVESTOCK - Reproductive management in Cattle and Sheep - Marcos G. Colazo and John P. Kastelic

Sorting process increases cost and limits availability

Beef Supply Chain Get Connected!

Enrollment Snapshot of Radiography, Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs 2013

Scope for the Use of Pregnancy Confirmation Data in Genetic Evaluation for Reproductive Performance

Which Loan Is Best. For You?

Managing Anovulation and Cystic Ovaries in Dairy Cows

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

A POWERFUL IN VITRO FERTILIZATION

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Weekly Progress Report on Recovery Act Spending

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Report

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

Artificial Insemination in Dairy Cattle 1

Table 12: Availability Of Workers Compensation Insurance Through Homeowner s Insurance By Jurisdiction

New Technologies to Improve Dairy Cattle Reproduction

kaiser medicaid uninsured commission on March 2013 Key Facts on Health Coverage for Low-Income Immigrants Today and Under the Affordable Care Act

REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS USING DC305

TIMING THE FERTILE PERIOD OF THE BITCH: BRIEF REVIEW

Regional Electricity Forecasting

NAAUSA Security Survey

MT/editor Total Responses: 516 full-time, 212 part-time, with 872 total respondents in the MT field (MTs/editors; QA; MT supervisors)

Transcription:

Using estrus-detection patches to optimally time artificial insemination (AI) and improve pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows in a timed AI program Hill, S. L., D. M. Grieger, K. C. Olson, J. R. Jaeger, C. R. Dahlen, S. R. Underdahl, G. A. Bridges, J. E. Larson, J. K. Ahola, M. C. Fischer, G. A. Perry, T. L. Steckler, W. D. Whittier, J. F. Currin, and J. S. Stevenson

THE BULL YOU WANTED Production Carcass CED BW WW Milk YW SC Marb RE Fat Incredibull +33-5.0 +80 +50 +150 +2.0 +1.11 +1.50 -.56

THE BULL YOUR SPOUSE WANTED Production Carcass CED BW WW Milk YW SC Marb RE Fat Compatabull +23-3.0 +60 +40 +110 +1.0 +.95 +1.00 -.36

THE BULL THE AUCTIONEER WANTED YOU TO BUY Production Carcass CED BW WW Milk YW SC Marb RE Fat Capibull +13-1.0 +50 +20 +100 +.50 +.65 +.50 -.16

THE BULL YOU BOUGHT Production Carcass CED BW WW Milk YW SC Marb RE Fat Terrabull +0 -.0 +0 +0 +00 +.00 +.00 +.00 -.00

THE BULL YOU SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT

Insemination by Appointment (FTAI) Effective Efficient Labor saving Best fit

Time to estrus 100 Hours 80 60 40 62.3 76.7 62.9 20 0 6 to 9 10 to 13 14 to 18 Day of estrous cycle Floyd et al., 2014

Busch et al., 2008

Hypothesis: The proportion of cows becoming pregnant from timed AI will be greater when two compared with one insemination time are employed after use of estrus-detection patches to identify estrus

Patch evaluation* TAI + GnRH -2 Estrus (+) control (*activated patch) GnRH-1 TAI + GnRH-2 Nonestrus ( ) control Early-Early (E-E) (*nonactivated patch) 17 BS 7 BS CIDR GnRH-2 TAI Early-Delayed (E-D) (*nonactivated patch) TAI + GnRH-2 0 60 h 75 h Delayed-Delayed (D-D) (*nonactivated patch)

Patch evaluation* TAI + GnRH -2 Estrus (+) control (*activated patch) GnRH-1 TAI + GnRH-2 Nonestrus ( ) control Early-Early (E-E) (*nonactivated patch) 17 BS 7 BS CIDR GnRH-2 TAI Early-Delayed (E-D) (*nonactivated patch) TAI + GnRH-2 0 60 h 75 h Delayed-Delayed (D-D) (*nonactivated patch)

Patch evaluation* TAI + GnRH -2 Estrus (+) control (*activated patch) GnRH-1 TAI + GnRH-2 Nonestrus ( ) control Early-Early (E-E) (*nonactivated patch) 17 BS 7 BS CIDR GnRH-2 TAI Early-Delayed (E-D) (*nonactivated patch) TAI + GnRH-2 0 60 h 75 h Delayed-Delayed (D-D) (*nonactivated patch)

Patch evaluation* TAI + GnRH -2 Estrus (+) control (*activated patch) GnRH-1 TAI + GnRH-2 Nonestrus ( ) control Early-Early (E-E) (*nonactivated patch) 17 BS 7 BS CIDR GnRH-2 TAI Early-Delayed (E-D) (*nonactivated patch) TAI + GnRH-2 0 60 h 75 h Delayed-Delayed (D-D) (*nonactivated patch)

Patch evaluation* TAI + GnRH -2 Estrus (+) control (*activated patch) GnRH-1 TAI + GnRH-2 Nonestrus ( ) control Early-Early (E-E) (*nonactivated patch) 17 BS 7 BS CIDR GnRH-2 TAI Early-Delayed (E-D) (*nonactivated patch) TAI + GnRH-2 0 60 h 75 h Delayed-Delayed (D-D) (*nonactivated patch)

Characteristics of Experimental Units Location No. of cows BCS Days postpartum at AI Parity Cycling status 1 (%) CO 93 5.8 ± 0.7 73.7 ± 16.5 4.1 ± 2.8 * IL 150 5.2 ± 0.7 67.0 ± 12.6 5.6 ± 2.6 * KS-1 179 5.7 ± 0.5 92.9 ± 14.4 4.0 ± 2.4 96 KS-2 57 6.9 ± 0.8 67.4 ± 21.6 2.3 ± 0.5 74 KS-3 65 4.8 ± 0.5 75.1 ± 13.7 4.6 ± 2.3 66 KS-4 51 4.5 ± 0.4 65.1 ± 15.3 4.3 ± 2.6 59 KS-5 29 6.8 ± 0.6 60.6 ± 22.5 2.2 ± 0.4 59 KS-6 18 6.4 ± 0.6 73.8 ± 16.7 5.7 ± 2.1 44 MN 125 4.9 ± 0.7 69.8 ± 25.8 2.5 ± 0.7 61 MS 50 5.4 ± 0.5 67.4 ± 19.5 4.2 ± 2.3 * ND 174 5.4 ± 0.6 70.9 ± 11.8 3.8 ± 2.7 * SD 102 5.6 ± 0.4 81.5 ± 15.3 3.3 ± 2.6 32 VA-1 214 4.5 ± 0.9 78.6 ± 20.2 4.9 ± 3.3 63 VA-2 218 4.2 ± 0.6 75.2 ± 17.8 4.8 ± 3.1 52 Total 1,524 5.1 75.1 4.2 61 1 Cycling determined by serum progesterone concentration before CO-Synch + CIDR program was initiated.*locations with no blood collection.

Estrus expression by location Location Estrus by 60 h Estrus by 75 h N CO 40.9 67.7 93 IL 53.3 74.7 150 KS-1 38.2 64.0 178 KS-2 68.4 94.7 57 KS-3 49.2 55.4 65 KS-4 55.1 77.6 49 KS-5 51.7 82.8 29 KS-6 77.8 88.9 18 MN 48.0 68.0 125 MS 32.0 68.0 50 ND 57.5 80.9 174 SD 58.8 81.4 102 VA-1 30.3 61.6 211 VA-2 34.9 78.4 218 Total 45.6 72.6 1519

Estrus expression by prior cycling status % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 a Cycling b Anestrus 60h estrus 75h estrus a, b : p<0.05

Estrus at 75h by Treatment Estrus (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 a 49.0 50.0 Early GnRH - Early TAI Early GnRH - Delayed TAI 56.9 280 270 281 b Delayed GnRH - Delayed TAI LS means a,b tend to differ p=0.10

Pregnancy Rate by Estrus and Treatment (n) In heat by 75 h Estrus EE ED DD Total NO 44.0 (109) 46.0% (100) 38.9% (90) 43.1% (299) YES 68.9% (591) 53.5% (101) 71.1% (97) 69.8% (116) 67.5% (905) Total 68.9% (591) 48.6% (210) 58.4% (197) 56.3% (206) 61.4% (1204)

Pregnancy Rate by Estrus and Treatment (n) In heat by 75 h Estrus EE ED DD Total NO 44.0 (109) 46.0% (100) 38.9% (90) 43.1% (299) YES 68.9% (591) 53.5% (101) 71.1% (97) 69.8% (116) 67.5% (905) Total 68.9% (591) 48.6% (210) 58.4% (197) 56.3% (206) 61.4% (1204)

Pregnancy Rate by Estrus and Treatment (n) In heat by 75 h Estrus EE ED DD Total NO 44.0 (109) 46.0% (100) 38.9% (90) 43.1% (299) YES 68.9% (591) 53.5% (101) 71.1% (97) 69.8% (116) 67.5% (905) Total 68.9% (591) 48.6% (210) 58.4% (197) 56.3% (206) 61.4% (1204)

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Pregnancy by location

Pregnancy at 35d by treatment 70 65.9 a Pregnancy per AI (%) 60 50 40 30 44.0 c b 54.6 53.0 b 20 10 689 281 270 279 0 Estrus Early GnRH - Early TAI Early GnRH - Delayed TAI Delayed GnRH - Delayed TAI a, b, c : p<0.05

STAI vs FTAI models Single Fixed AI time at 60h Estrus + 3(EE) = all cows bred at 60h 60h: 825/1531 = 53.9% Split timing of AI at 60 and 75h Estrus + 3(ED) = estrus cows bred at 60h, non-estrus cows at 75h 60h and 75h: 915/1531 = 59.7%

Cost-benefit associated with Split-TAI compared with Fixed -TAI Expenses /unit cost Units Additional Pregnancies Item Total Sub Total Heat Patches 1.3 100 130 Handling Labor 1.5 55 82.5 Facilities 1.8 55 99 311.5 Income 42 # age 2 42 5.8 487.2 20 # genetic 2 20 5.8 232 calving int 2 21 5.8 243.6 AI labor 0 0 5.8 0 Bull Cost 66 1 5.8 382.8 1345.6 Net 1034.1

Summary More cycling cows express estrus by 75h 73% of cows expressed estrus by 75h 65% of cows showing estrus by 75h were pregnant to AI at 35d Timing AI at 75h as compared to 60h increased pregnancies/ai in cows not showing estrus at 60h

Future direction Continue to explore timing options Examine the necessity of GnRH in estrus cows Consider options to simplify treatments

Questions?