Executive Summary. Abstract. Heitman Analytics Conclusions:



Similar documents
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan,

Mortgage Terms Glossary

Federal Housing Finance Agency

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

CREDIT UNION TRENDS REPORT

Share of Dealership Profits. Auto Lending Abuses: The Pitfalls of Financing Cars. Car Lending Abuses. The Trust Tax.

Mortgage Strategies in the Current Economic Environment. Katie Hopkins SVP, Investment Strategies

Investment Symposium March 14-15, 2013 New York, NY. Session E5, U.S. Economic Conditions and the Housing/Mortgage Market

Volatility in the Overnight Money-Market Rate

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan,

Sensex Realized Volatility Index

Monetary Policy and Mortgage Interest rates

IT S ALL ABOUT THE CUSTOMER FORECASTING 101

Pricing and Strategy for Muni BMA Swaps

Volatility: Implications for Value and Glamour Stocks

Economic indicators dashboard

Risks and Rewards in High Yield Bonds

Statistics in Retail Finance. Chapter 6: Behavioural models

Homeownership. Your First Steps toward. Getting Started. Know Your Finances. Which Mortgage Is Right for You?

ZMdesk. ZM Unified Total Prepayment Model VERSION UPDATE JANUARY Practical Solutions to Complex Financial Problems

Housing Affordability Report

HIGH DIVIDEND STOCKS IN RISING INTEREST RATE ENVIRONMENTS. September 2015

The table below shows Capita Asset Services forecast of the expected movement in medium term interest rates:

Preparing for 2015 Housing Market Opportunities

Dr. Edward I. Altman Stern School of Business New York University

Compliance. Quality. Efficiency. Origination Insight Report

Natalia Orlova, Chief Economist December

Industry Environment and Concepts for Forecasting 1

Agency Conforming Fixed Rate Products. Agency 20 Year Fixed

Demand forecasting & Aggregate planning in a Supply chain. Session Speaker Prof.P.S.Satish

International competition will change mortgage lending

HOME FINANCING GUIDE

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

A. Volume and Share of Mortgage Originations

HOUSING FINANCE IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES

The Impact of Interest Rates on Real Estate Securities

Methodology For Illinois Electric Customers and Sales Forecasts:

Sector Rotation Strategies

Introduction. Strong growth continues. Implementing the strategy H2 Group revenue H1 Group revenue

Housing Price Forecasts, Illinois and Chicago MSA

Decomposing Mortgage Portfolio Risk: Default, Prepayment, and Severity YUFENG DING

Westpac Banking Corporation

Mortgage Business Transformation Program Using CART-based Joint Risk Modeling (and including a practical discussion of TreeNet)

FHA MIP Rate and Duration Changes starting April 1, 2013 and June 3, 2013 By Bahman Davani, Member of CCAR s REALTOR /Lender Committee

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT & FIDUCIARY SERVICES: Building a Better Portfolio: The Case for High Yield Bonds

Carry Strategies Don t get Carried away! Krishna Kumar Contact: kriskumar@earthlink.net

Macroeconomic drivers of private health insurance coverage. nib Health Insurance

Research Publication. Prepayment Modeling Challenges in the Wake of the 2008 Credit and Mortgage Crisis

Welcome First-Time Buyers

Taking stock of China s external debt: low indebtedness, but rapid growth is a concern

Diversifying with Negatively Correlated Investments. Monterosso Investment Management Company, LLC Q1 2011

Detailed guidance for employers

Module 6: Introduction to Time Series Forecasting

A Proven Approach to Stress Testing Consumer Loan Portfolios

Aurora Updates Aurora Dividend Income Trust (Managed Fund) vs. Listed Investment Companies

Variance swaps and CBOE S&P 500 variance futures

Anhanguera Educacional S.A.

Working Capital and the Financing Decision C H A P T E R S I X

CASE STUDY I FAIRHOLME. Ignore the crowd.

Predicting Credit Score Calibrations through Economic Events

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

The case for high yield

Canadian Life Insurance Industry

REAL ESTATE INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT RESOLUTION SERVICE DISCUSSION PAPER

Table of Contents How to Use the Closing Dis closure (CD) How to Compar e the Closing Dis closur e t o the L oan Estima

Central Bank of Ireland Macro-prudential policy for residential mortgage lending Consultation Paper CP87

Sonoma County Economic Development Board BUSINESS BAROMETER

Navigating Rising Rates with Active, Multi-Sector Fixed Income Management

Small Business Lending *

Portugal s Adjustment Program: Where are We?

Transcription:

Prepared By: Adam Petranovich, Economic Analyst apetranovich@heitmananlytics.com 541 868 2788 Executive Summary Abstract The purpose of this study is to provide the most accurate estimate of historical price elasticity. Heitman Analytics will limit the scope of this study to the Retail Texas mortgage market highlighting 30 Year Fixed conforming products. The data utilized in this repot ranges from January 1 st 2010 to November 1 st 2010. Volume data comes directly from lenders constituting a 60% sample size of the market. This study only reflects Locked loans; as funded loans are highly subjective to the individual lender. Heitman Analytics Conclusions: I. A 1.0% proportional change in rate was observed to cause a 3.13% proportional change in volume for Texas II. Increasing elasticity is observed from overall market stabilization of rates III. Texas housing market remains relatively stagnant but shows growth potential from increasing affordability of homes IV. Record low rates has caused a market wide increase in refinance products V. Consumer credit approval remains tight averaging 740+ FICO VI. Refinanced mortgage control the Texas market, showing the greatest sensitivity to mortgage rates VII. Average LTV observed 65.3% resembling refinance products driven by low rate demand, not distressed mortgages VIII. Purchase product demand shows inelasticity toward rate movements

Table of Contents Supporting Documents Executive Summary Market Conditions Housing... 3 Mortgage Products.. 4 Competitive Environment 5 Heitman Modeling Analysis Process and Rationale.6 Model Specifications 7 Quantified Findings 7 External Sources..7 Data Descriptions..8 Additional Charts..9 Appendix and Outputs...13 2

Market Conditions The Market is defined as the state of Texas. We will be limiting our analysis to the Retail mortgage channel favoring tier 1 and tier 2 lending institutions. To better understand the isolated effect of mortgage rates on volume several other macro economic variables must be considered. Heitman Analytics has organized exogenous variables into three categories: Housing, Products, and Competitive Environment. These categories are all capable of creating bias within our results and must be considered when moving forward. Housing Statistics 2010 Housing Starts and Sales The Texas housing market remains in a state of recovery and has shown little progress improving throughout 2010. Housing starts and home sales remain highly correlated but do not show significant movement of improving. Starts have outpaced sales; adding to the excess housing stock on the market. This excess supply of available homes continues to keep home prices low. Average home prices show a modest increase from $140,500 to $150,100. This 7% increase is not viewed as stable moving forward, which causes ambiguity in purchaser s decisions. 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 0 Housing Starts Home sales Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Month (2010) Wages and income gains have outpaced home prices resulting in a relative increase in the affordability of homes. Unfortunately, affordability has yet to translate into sales or upstarts. 3

Mortgage Product Composition For the purposes of this study, we have confined our final analysis to retail 30 year fixed conforming products. To obtain the most accurate analysis, we must also look at the dynamics and characteristics of other major products. Additional products examined include: 15YR fixed, 5/1 ARM, 30YR FHA, and 15YR FHA. These products incorporate an even wider array of products disclosed by many lenders within our dataset. However, in order to build a robust sample and promote consistency, similar products and nomenclature have been combined internally. The three most popular products in the Texas remain 30 Year Fixed, 15 Year Fixed and 30 Year FHA. These products continue to exhibit high positive correlation to one another and have yet to show signs of product cannibalization. $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 Weekly Locked Retail Product Volume 30YR Fixed 15YR Fixed 5/1 ARM 30YR FHA 15YR FHA $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $- 2/4/10 1/4/10 4/4/10 3/4/10 7/4/10 6/4/10 5/4/10 9/4/10 8/4/10 10/4/10 Rates have remained low throughout 2010. This has incentivized borrowers to refinance existing loans at the record lows the market is currently experiencing. The wave of refinances caused an upward push in volume of shorter term fixed products. This increased movement and demand for short term refinance products will have a negative effect on the demand for 30 year fixed mortgages. Elasticity will be compared and reported for 30 year fixed products with loan purpose both combined and separated. Refinanced mortgages exhibit increased volatility throughout 2010 when compared to purchase products. This comes from consumer rate % share 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 30YR Fixed Product Purpose Makeup Jan - May Jun - Nov CO REFI REFI Purchase Purpose anticipation. When a relative negative spike in rate is observed by consumers a spike in locks follows. As rates remain low, refinance mortgages are expected to continue to dominate the market. Texas has seen an increase in refinances to accumulate over 60% of locked loans. However, a refinance bubble may be developing if this trend is continued. Sustained low rates exhibited in the current market may be cannibalizing future demand for refinance products. The stock of refinance borrowers may not be able to sustain volume for extended periods of time, given current market conditions. 4

$200,000,000.00 $180,000,000.00 $160,000,000.00 $140,000,000.00 $120,000,000.00 $100,000,000.00 $80,000,000.00 $60,000,000.00 $40,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $- Texas 30YR Fixed Purpose CO REFI REFI Purchase 1/4/10 1/18/10 2/1/10 2/15/10 3/1/10 3/15/10 3/29/10 4/12/10 4/26/10 5/10/10 5/24/10 6/7/10 6/21/10 7/5/10 7/19/10 8/2/10 8/16/10 8/30/10 9/13/10 9/27/10 10/11/10 10/25/10 To ensure consistent results Heitman Analytics also considers any major changes in credit worthiness, loan amount or LTV statistics. Over the course of 2010 approved FICO, LTV and Loan amounts remained flat and consistent. When analyzing the 30YR Fixed Conforming product no major adjustments will need to be taken to remove data bias. The low average LTV and high Fico resemble primarily refinanced loans. This is consistent with demand not coming from distressed mortgages, but from borrowers seeking preferential rates. Competitive Environment From the recent consolidation of loan originators, the Texas retail market has become increasingly concentrated. In addition, many lenders are leaving channels and specific product lines which specializes market power. Over 58% of observed retail volume is generated by only four lenders. These four lenders exhibit relatively less elastic rate response than smaller lenders. The relative inelasticity is derived from large market presence, consumer awareness and large existing client base. Many existing mortgages are held by these large institutions, which once refinanced the loan stays within the lender increasing volume. 5

Heitman Modeling Analysis Heitman Analytics used a weighted average of several elasticity models to determine both market and lender volume sensitivity towards rate movements. Multiple multivariate linear and non linear regressions were considered when constructing a robust analysis. The final analysis was ultimately built on historical data; while relationships may vary in the future distorting results. Process and Rationale Heitman Analytics first created a point of reference to determine a fair market rate. Since mortgages are generally quoted with varying note rates and lenders choose to compete on several different rates, bias can arise from separate pricing strategies. Heitman has constructed an internal index (HANI) which normalizes individual lenders rate to a specified point quote. For the purposes of this study, all lenders rate quotes were normalized to a 0 point price. These rate values we built daily, and then averaged over a given week. Several rate indexes are used: Total Market HANI, Lender HANI and Market HANI (less said lender). Volume 1.20E+08 1.10E+08 1.00E+08 9.00E+07 8.00E+07 7.00E+07 6.00E+07 5.00E+07 4.00E+07 Forecasted vs Observed Market Volume 3.00E+07 2010M01 2010M04 2010M07 2010M10 Forecasted Market Observed Market Once pricing rates have been established, volume figures were complied. Limiting the study s scope to Texas Retail 30 Year Fixed Conforming Locked mortgages aided in providing accurate results. However, loan purpose qualification created significant variance in results. Ultimately mortgage volume had to be separated into two categories: Refinance and Purchase. These series behave differently and are driven by unique forces in the current market. Refinances respond more significantly to changes in rate and constitute the majority of market volume. Most of these refinances are made for rate adjustments and not for distressed mortgages, as seen in average quoted LTV. The purchase market is driven primarily by exogenous macroeconomic factors, showing little influence from rates. Home sales and housing starts are leading variables causing a lagged response from mortgage purchase loans. Multiple elasticity model specifications were used and compared to provide contrast to the analysis. First a naive regression was used to generate marketwide bench market for rate responsiveness. A dependent variable log specification was pursed due to the presence of heteroskedasticity in the observations. This naïve regression was then extended to a non linear form adding various macro variables and lagged terms to maximize its explanatory scope (see above). Next a comparison between lender specific HANI and refinance volume was created. Lender showed and increased responsiveness to changes in rate than the market as 5.400% 5.200% 5.000% 4.800% 4.600% 4.400% 4.200% 4.000% Jan-10 Feb-10 Base Rate - Texas Jun-10 May-10 Apr-10 Mar-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Market Lender 6

a whole experienced. Market HANI with removed lender rates was compared against Lender HANI to generate a spread. This choice was made to show elasticity for deviations from market price. This was later separated to an upside and downside elasticity. Lender volume responded uniquely when rates were observed as above or below market price. Another specification was introduced combining the total movement elasticity and the market deviation elasticity by introducing a binary variable denoting if that weeks lender rates were above the given market price. Additional macro economic variables were included to account for market conditions. Housing starts and homes sales were found to be most significant across all model specifications. Unemployment and housing affordability were omitted due to lack of significance. Model Specifications Not disclosed in product sample Quantified Findings Given a 1% change in observed rate, lender weekly refinance volume has responded by 3.13% over the given time interval. 1. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics 2. Federal Housing Administration 3. Federal Housing Finance Agency 4. Mortgage Bankers association 5. Texas Housing Authority 6. National Association of Home Builders External Sources 7

Data Series and Descriptions Affordability The home affordability index for Texas home buyers. Index provided by Texas housing administration, and comprises the average observed home price against the gdp per capita. HANILender A weekly normalized 0 point rate that represents the lender s 30YR fixed conforming rate for Texas. HANILessLender A weekly normalized 0 point 30YR Fixed Conforming rate of all lenders in Texas, less specific lender. HomePrice Average monthly observed home prices in Texas. HomeSales Monthly Home sales recoreded for the Texas Housing Administration. HousingStarts Monthly Homes starting construction in Texas. LenderCOrefiVolume Lenders reported Cash Out Refinance weekly volume. LenderPurchaseVolume Lenders reported weekly purchase volume. Lenderratespread The weekly difference between HANILessLender and HANILender. LenderRefiVolume Weekly recorded refinance volume for 30YR Fixed Conforming products from lender. LenderTotalVolume Total weekly 30 year Fixed Conforming volume from lender. Maretcorefivolume Market weekly Cash out Refinance volume of 30YR Fixed Conforming products. MarketHani A normalized 0 point rate observed by the Market for 30Yr fixed conforming products in Texas. MarketPurchaseVolume Weekly market volume for Purchased 30YR Fixed Conforming Mortgages in Texas. Marketrefivolume Weekly Obsered Refinance volume for 30Yr fixed conforming mortgages in Texas. MarkettotalVolume Total weely observed market volume for 30Yr fixed Conforming Mortgages. Totalunemplyed Total monthly unemplyed persons in Texas. Unemplymentrate Monthly Texas unemployment Rate. 8

Additional Charts 3% 21% Product Market Share 3% 30YR Fixed 15YR Fixed 44% 5/1 ARM 30YR FHA 15YR FHA 118.5 118 117.5 117 116.5 Home Affordibilty Index 29% 116 115.5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep $260,000.00 Weekly Average Loan Amount - TX $240,000.00 $220,000.00 $200,000.00 8/2/2010 7/19/2010 7/5/2010 6/21/2010 6/7/2010 5/24/2010 5/10/2010 4/26/2010 4/12/2010 3/29/2010 3/15/2010 3/1/2010 2/15/2010 2/1/2010 1/18/2010 1/4/2010 $180,000.00 $160,000.00 $140,000.00 TX $120,000.00 10/25/2010 10/11/2010 9/27/2010 9/13/2010 8/30/2010 8/16/2010 $100,000.00 9

780 Observed Weekly FICO score - TX 770 760 750 740 730 720 710 Total Of credit_score TX 10/25/2010 10/11/2010 9/27/2010 9/13/2010 8/30/2010 8/16/2010 8/2/2010 7/19/2010 7/5/2010 700 6/21/2010 6/7/2010 5/24/2010 5/10/2010 4/26/2010 4/12/2010 3/29/2010 3/15/2010 3/1/2010 2/15/2010 2/1/2010 1/18/2010 1/4/2010 Lender vs Market $120,000.00 $100,000.00 Market Purchase Volume Market Refinance Volume Lender Purchase Volume Lender Refinance Volume Thousands $80,000.00 $60,000.00 $40,000.00 4/12/2010 3/29/2010 3/15/2010 3/1/2010 2/15/2010 2/1/2010 1/18/2010 1/4/2010 8/2/2010 7/19/2010 7/5/2010 6/21/2010 6/7/2010 5/24/2010 5/10/2010 4/26/2010 $20,000.00 9/27/2010 9/13/2010 8/30/2010 8/16/2010 $- 10

May 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 Housing Starts Lender Purchase Volume $30,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 Thousands 0 $- Jan Feb Mar Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep $40,000.00 $35,000.00 Lender Purpose Purchase Refinance $30,000.00 Thousands $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $- 11

$120,000.00 $100,000.00 Refinanced Volume Market HANI 5.400% 5.200% $80,000.00 5.000% Thousands $60,000.00 $40,000.00 4.800% 4.600% 4.400% $20,000.00 4.200% $- 4.000% Jan Feb Mar Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 12

Appendix and Outputs 1.60E+08 1.40E+08 1.20E+08 1.00E+08 8.00E+07 6.00E+07 4.00E+07 Forecast: MARKETREFIF Actual: MARKETREFIVOLUME Forecast sample: 1/01/2010 10/01/2010 Adjusted sample: 1/01/2010 9/17/2010 Included observations: 38 Root Mean Squared Error 8053697. Mean Absolute Error 6666008. Mean Abs. Percent Error 9.392719 Theil Inequality Coefficient 0.053428 Bias Proportion 0.002810 Variance Proportion 0.041628 Covariance Proportion 0.955562 2.00E+07 1/08/102/12/103/19/104/23/105/28/107/02/108/06/109/10/10 MARKETREFIF 13