CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report

Similar documents
National Foreclosure Report

Equity Report FOURTH QUARTER 2014

CoreLogic Equity Report

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Top Line Report. June 11, 2012

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

Hail-related claims under comprehensive coverage

Table 1: Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Expense as a Percentage of Net Operating Revenue

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION. Annual Asset-Based Lending and Factoring Surveys, 2008

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

ENS Governmental Format Status (As of 06/16/2008)

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

Health Insurance Exchanges and the Medicaid Expansion After the Supreme Court Decision: State Actions and Key Implementation Issues

Foreign Language Enrollments in K 12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

Cancellation of Debt (COD) R. Bruce McCommons Harford County, MD TrC 12/4/2013

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

AAIS Mobile-Homeowners 2008 Series

Health Insurance Coverage of Children Under Age 19: 2008 and 2009

Cancellation/Nonrenewal Surplus Lines Exemptions

Annual Survey of Public Employment & Payroll Summary Report: 2013

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

How To Regulate Rate Regulation

Benefits of Selling WorkLife 65

FR Y-14Q: Retail US Auto Loan Schedule Instructions

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

STATE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES IN 2009 FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE

NEW CARRIER SIGN UP REQUEST FORM

How To Get A National Rac (And Mac)

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans

The Case for Change The Case for Whopping Big Change

Community College/Technical Institute Mission Convergence Study

TABLE 1. Didactic/Clinical/Lab SEMESTER TWO (Apply for admission to Nursing Program during Semester Two)

How To Compare Ehealth To A Health Insurance Plan

Arizona Form 2014 Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State or Country 309

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

Recent Trends in Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment: Analysis of CMS Performance Measure Data through August 2014

Approved Mortgage Insurance Forms

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

*Time is listed as approximate as an offender may be charged with other crimes which may add on to the sentence.

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORMATION

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box Montgomery, AL. Alabama

ONLINE SERVICES FOR KEY LOW-INCOME BENEFIT PROGRAMS What States Provide Online with Respect to SNAP, TANF, Child Care Assistance, Medicaid, and CHIP

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Cost and Benefits of Individual and Family Health Insurance. December 2013

Resource Brief: Ombudsman Program Data Management Systems

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

Driving under the influence of alcohol or

STATE PERSONAL INCOME TAXES ON PENSIONS & RETIREMENT INCOME: TAX YEAR 2010

APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS

8. Network Usage and Growth

AAIS Personal and Premises Liability Program

NCCI Filing Memorandum Item B-1420

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

TAX PREP FEE PHILOSOPHY. Copyright 2013 Drake Software

Audio Monitoring And The Law: How to Use Audio Legally in Security Systems. Today s Learning Objectives

Pro Hac Vice Admission Rules

Mitigating the Loss of Private Insurance With Public Coverage for the Under-65 Population: 2008 to 2012

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Radiologic Sciences Staffing and Workplace Survey 2015

ASNT Conference Edition - Fall Salary Survey Your Path to the Perfect Job Starts Here.

Marketplaces (Exchanges): Information for Employers and Individuals Lisa Klinger, J.D.

2015 Mortgage Fraud Report

Closing the College Attainment Gap between the U.S. and Most Educated Countries, and the Contributions to be made by the States

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

Health Coverage for the Hispanic Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act

NYCOM 2009 Entering Class - Matriculant Comparison Data

22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy

Economic and Personal Finance Education in Our Nation s Schools

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

How To Get An R22 In Massachusetts

Impact of Undocumented Populations on 2010 Congressional Reapportionment

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

FAMILY LAW DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION ALIMONY, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER SPOUSAL SUPPORT (STATUTES) Thomson Reuters/West August 2010

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

Table of Mortgage Broker (and Originator) Bond Laws by State Current as of July 1, 2010

Health Reform. Health Insurance Market Reforms: Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions

Department of Banking and Finance

Building Codes in Effect by State

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 12, 2013

CPT Codes For Spirometry

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

State Insurance Information

First-Time Homebuyer Share and House Price Growth Page 2

The Vermont Legislative Research Shop

How to Invest $1.5 Billion in Small Business

The Nation s Report Card

University of Saint Joseph College of Pharmacy

AAIS Commercial Umbrella Liability Program

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Quality & Nondestructive Testing Industry. Salary Survey Your Path to the Perfect Job Starts Here.

Transcription:

CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report JUNE 2014

3.9% In June, the foreclosure inventory was down 3.9 percent from May 2014, representing 32 months of consecutive year-over-year declines. While 32 straight months of year-over-year decline in the foreclosure rate is cause for celebration, the total number of homes still in the foreclosure process remains almost four times as high as the average in the early 2000s. Additionally, there is concern over whether or not we can maintain this pace of improvement as the foreclosure inventory becomes more concentrated in judicial states with lengthier, more complex processes and timelines. Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic 2

Foreclosures National Overview through June 2014 There Were 49,000 Completed Foreclosures Nationally, Down From 53,000 in June 2013 Seriously Delinquent Rate Is at 4.3 Percent Approximately 648,000 Homes in the United States were in some stage of foreclosure Compared to 1 Million in June 2013 Completed Foreclosures 49K 9.9% 2.7% in June 2014 Decline Year Over Year Compared to May 2014 A CoreLogic analysis shows 49,000 foreclosures were completed in June 2014, a 9.9 percent year-over-year decline from 54,000* in June 2013. By comparison, before the decline in the housing market in 2007, completed foreclosures averaged 21,000 per month nationwide between 2000 and 2006. On a month-over-month* basis, completed foreclosures were up by 2.7 percent. Completed foreclosures are an indication of the total number of homes actually lost to foreclosure. * June 2013 data was revised. Revisions with public records are standard and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results. 2014 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JUNE 2014 3

National Foreclosure Inventory THE 12-MONTH SUM OF COMPLETED FORECLOSURES IS AT ITS LOWEST POINT SINCE DECEMBER 2007 AND HAS DECLINED EVERY MONTH FOR THE PAST 30 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS 35.0% 1.7% Compared to June 2013 Of All Homes with a Morgage Approximately 648,000 homes in the United States were in some stage of foreclosure as of June 2014, compared to nearly 1 million in June* 2013, a decrease of 35 percent. This was the 31st consecutive month with a year-over-year decline. As of May 2014, the foreclosure inventory represented 1.7 percent of all homes with a mortgage, compared to 2.5 percent in June 2013. * June 2013 data was revised. Revisions with public records are standard and to ensure accuracy, CoreLogic incorporates newly released data to provide updated results. The national inventory of foreclosed homes fell for the 32 nd straight month to just under 650,000 in June. Most of the U.S. has reduced its shadow inventory to pre-recession levels, but the Northeast, Florida and the Pacific Northwest remain elevated. The great news here is that the basic underpinnings of the housing market are strengthening, but there is still work to do. Anand Nallathambi, president and CEO of CoreLogic 4

Time Series National Overview JUL- 13 AUG- 13 SEP- 13 OCT- 13 NOV- 13 DEC- 13 JAN- 14 FEB- 14 MAR- 14 APR- 14 MAY- 14 JUN- 14 SDQ* 2,182 2,103 2,077 2,036 2,013 1,988 1,951 1,895 1,824 1,774 1,732 1,679 -MOM % Chg in # -1.9% -3.6% -1.3% -2.0% -1.1% -1.3% -1.8% -2.9% -3.7% -2.7% -2.4% -3.0% -YOY % Chg in # -23.7% -25.3% -25.4% -24.7% -24.6% -24.7% -25.1% -24.6% -24.8% -23.8% -23.3% -24.5% Foreclosure Inventory* -MOM % Chg in # -YOY % Chg in # Completed Foreclosures* 976 936 924 874 879 839 792 760 728 693 674 648-2.2% -4.1% -1.3% -5.4% -4.5% -5.6% -4.1% -4.2% -4.8% -2.8% -3.9% -30.6% -32.9% -31.7% -31.1% -28.5% -31.1% -33.4% -34.2% -36.5% -35.3% -35.5% -35.1% 57 57 67 54 44 44 52 42 43 41 48 49 24.5% THE NUMBER OF MORTGAGES IN SERIOUS DELINQUENCY DECLINED 24.5 PERCENT FROM JUNE 2013 TO JUNE 2014 -MOM % Chg in # 4.1% 1.3% 17.4% -19.6% -18.2% -1.4% 18.5% -18.7% 1.4% -3.7% 16.2% 2.7% -YOY % Chg in # -14.4% -22.1% -20.7% -23.6% -32.7% -18.0% -13.1% -18.9% -20.2% -28.2% -8.7% -9.9% -12-Month Sum* 732 716 699 682 660 651 643 633 623 606 602 597 *Thousands of Units THE FORECLOSURE INVENTORY RECORDED 21 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF YEAR-OVER-YEAR, DOUBLE-DIGIT DECLINES, AND 32 STRAIGHT MONTHS OF DECLINES 2014 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JUNE 2014 5

Foreclosure Inventory by State 1.6% 36 2.0% 2.2% 0.6% 1.1% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.9% 0.8% 1.0% 2.3% 0.6% 0.7% 1.7% 1.6% 0.7% 1.4% 0.6% 1.6% 2.7% 0.8% 4.3% 1.1% 2.7% 1.9% 2.1% 5.7% 2.2% 2.4% 2.0% states have an inventory of foreclosed homes lower than the national rate 0.9% 0.7% 1.6% 2.1% 1.0% 1.6% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% 1.4% 5 states with highest foreclosure inventory 0.7% as a percentage of mortgaged h 0.4% 5.0% 3.1% Thirty-six states Show declines of more than 30 percent in year-over-year foreclosure inventory, with Arizona and Utah experiencing more than 50 percent yearover-year declines As of June 2014 Source: CoreLogic Market Trends 0.4% 5.7% Five states with the highest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes 5 states with lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged ho New Jersey Florida New York Hawaii Maine 2.7% 3.1% 4.3% 5.0% 5.7% Five states with the lowest foreclosure inventory as a percentage of mortgaged homes Alaska Nebraska Minnesota North Dakota Wyoming 0.4% 0.4% 6

State Highlights 123,000 These five states account for almost half of all completed foreclosures nationally. 543 718 836 Judicial Non-Judicial Percent of Homes in Foreclosure AK MN ND NE WY AZ CO SD MO VA MT CA TN UT AL MI WV TX NH WI GA NC KS AR IA MS MA ID KY LA WA IN OK VT OH SC DC RI OR NM PA NV DE MD IL CT ME NY HI FL NJ 43,000 33,000 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% Source: CoreLogic June 2014 34,000 31,000 FL MI TX CA GA Five states with the highest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months 83 324 D.C. ND WV WY AK Five states, including the District of Columbia, with the lowest number of completed foreclosures during past 12 months Judicial 5.19x4.29 Layout>axes>primary horizontal axis>show right to left axis 8.5pt and 5.5pt Non-Judicial All but one state posted a year-over-year, double-digit decline in foreclosures. Wyoming saw a 5.1% Increase in foreclosures YOY. 2014 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JUNE 2014 7

State Foreclosure Data Judicial States JUDICIAL STATES FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JUN 2014) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE National Foreclosure Inventory: 1.7% Foreclosure Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: -0.8% Completed Foreclosures (12 months ending June 2014): 596,554 Serious Delinquency: 4.3% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: -24.5% YOY Florida 5.0% -3.6% 123,417 9.3% Ohio 1.7% -0.9% 29,089 4.7% Illinois 2.3% -1.4% 21,701 5.6% Pennsylvania 2.0% -0.7% 17,143 5.1% Indiana 1.5% -0.9% 16,672 4.2% Maryland 2.4% -1.0% 9,258 6.2% South Carolina 1.6% -1.0% 9,088 4.2% Louisiana 1.4% - 8,647 4.7% Oklahoma 1.6% -0.6% 8,520 4.0% New York 4.3% - 7,550 7.4% New Jersey 5.7% -0.6% 6,708 9.3% Connecticut 2.7% -1.4% 5,734 5.8% Iowa 1.0% -0.8% 5,320 2.7% Kansas 0.9% -0.4% 3,399 3.2% Kentucky 1.4% - 2,984 4.1% Massachusetts 1.1% -0.7% 2,917 4.2% New Mexico 2.1% -0.7% 2,289 4.5% Nebraska 0.4% -0.3% 1,743 2.0% Delaware 2.2% -0.4% 1,707 5.4% Maine 2.7% -1.4% 874 5.7% Hawaii 3.1% -0.7% 835 4.8% North Dakota -0.2% 324 1.1% South Dakota -0.3% 25 1.8% Vermont 1.6% -0.7% N/A 3.3% Source: CoreLogic June 2014 8

State Foreclosure Data Non-Judicial States NON-JUDICIAL STATES FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JUN 2014) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE Michigan 0.7% -0.4% 42,791 3.2% Texas 0.7% -0.4% 38,098 3.1% California 0.6% - 34,060 2.2% Georgia 0.9% -0.7% 30,831 4.2% North Carolina 0.9% -0.7% 24,982 3.5% Tennessee 0.7% - 16,539 4.0% Washington 1.6% - 16,259 3.8% Arizona -0.6% 15,990 2.1% Missouri 0.6% -0.3% 13,400 3.0% Virginia 0.6% -0.3% 11,381 2.6% Nevada 2.2% -1.7% 10,034 6.1% Wisconsin 0.8% -0.6% 7,932 2.6% National Foreclosure Inventory: 1.7% Foreclosure Inventory Pct. Point Change from a Year Ago: -0.8% Completed Foreclosures (12 months ending June 2014): 596,554 Serious Delinquency: 4.3% Decline in Seriously Delinquent Mortgages: -24.5% YOY Alabama 0.7% - 7,910 4.6% Colorado 0.6% -0.2% 7,352 1.9% Minnesota - 6,962 2.3% Arkansas 1.0% -0.7% 5,411 4.6% Oregon 2.0% -0.7% 4,550 4.0% Utah 0.6% -0.6% 4,295 2.4% Idaho 1.1% -0.8% 4,084 2.8% New Hampshire 0.8% -0.4% 1,926 2.9% Rhode Island 1.9% -0.6% 1,637 5.7% Mississippi 1.0% -0.6% 1,019 5.5% Montana 0.6% -0.3% 924 1.8% Alaska 0.4% -0.3% 894 1.5% Wyoming 0.0% 718 1.9% West Virginia 0.7% -0.3% 543 3.1% District of Columbia 2.0% -0.1% 83 4.5% Source: CoreLogic June 2014 2014 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JUNE 2014 9

Metropolitan Area Highlights Foreclosure Data for the Largest Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) METROPOLITAN AREA FORECLOSURE INVENTORY FORECLOSURE INVENTORY PCT. POINT CHANGE FROM A YEAR AGO COMPLETED FORECLOSURES (12 MONTHS ENDING JUN 2014) SERIOUS DELINQUENCY RATE Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 6.0% -3.3% 18,912 10.3% Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 0.9% -0.9% 18,339 4.2% Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 4.8% -3.6% 13,944 9.2% Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights, IL 2.7% -1.7% 11,859 6.5% Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 0.4% - 9,409 1.9% Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX 0.7% -0.4% 9,061 3.0% St. Louis, MO-IL 0.7% -0.4% 7,400 3.3% Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1.0% -0.6% 7,276 3.3% Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 1.1% -1.0% 7,050 3.7% Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX 0.7% - 6,683 3.1% Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI - 5,630 2.3% Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, MI -0.4% 5,477 2.5% Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA 1.3% -0.6% 5,357 3.1% Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA 0.7% - 5,354 2.5% Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA- MD-WV 1.3% - 4,805 3.7% Source: CoreLogic June 2014 10

CoreLogic National Foreclosure Report Methodology The data in this report represents foreclosure activity reported through June 2014. This report separates state data into judicial versus non-judicial foreclosure state categories. In judicial foreclosure states, lenders must provide evidence to the courts of delinquency in order to move a borrower into foreclosure. In non-judicial foreclosure states, lenders can issue notices of default directly to the borrower without court intervention. This is an important distinction since judicial states, as a rule, have longer foreclosure timelines, thus affecting foreclosure statistics. A completed foreclosure occurs when a property is auctioned and results in the purchase of the home at auction by either a third party, such as an investor, or by the lender. If the home is purchased by the lender, it is moved into the lender s real estate owned (REO) inventory. In foreclosure by advertisement states, a redemption period begins after the auction and runs for a statutory period, e.g., six months. During that period, the borrower may regain the foreclosed home by paying all amounts due as calculated under the statute. For purposes of this Foreclosure Report, because so few homes are actually redeemed following an auction, it is assumed that the foreclosure process ends in foreclosure by advertisement states at the completion of the auction. The foreclosure inventory represents the number and share of mortgaged homes that have been placed into the process of foreclosure by the mortgage servicer. Mortgage servicers start the foreclosure process when the mortgage reaches a specific level of serious delinquency as dictated by the investor for the mortgage loan. Once a foreclosure is started, and absent the borrower paying all amounts necessary to halt the foreclosure, the home remains in foreclosure until the completed foreclosure results in the sale to a third party at auction or the home enters the lender s REO inventory. The data in this report accounts for only first liens against a property and does not include secondary liens. The foreclosure inventory is measured only against homes that have an outstanding mortgage. Homes with no mortgage liens can never be in foreclosure and are, therefore, excluded from the analysis. Approximately one-third of homes nationally are owned outright and do not have a mortgage. CoreLogic has approximately 85 percent coverage of U.S. foreclosure data. SOURCE: CORELOGIC The data provided is for use only by the primary recipient or the primary recipient s publication or broadcast. This data may not be re-sold, republished or licensed to any other source, including publications and sources owned by the primary recipient s parent company without prior written permission from CoreLogic. Any CoreLogic data used for publication or broadcast, in whole or in part, must be sourced as coming from CoreLogic, a data and analytics company. For use with broadcast or web content, the citation must directly accompany first reference of the data. If the data is illustrated with maps, charts, graphs or other visual elements, the CoreLogic logo must be included on screen or website. Data provided may not be modified without the prior written permission of CoreLogic. Do not use the data in any unlawful manner. This data is compiled from public records, contributory databases and proprietary analytics, and its accuracy is dependent upon these sources. ABOUT CORELOGIC CoreLogic (NYSE: CLGX) is a leading global property information, analytics and data-enabled services provider. The company s combined data from public, contributory and proprietary sources includes over 3.5 billion records spanning more than 40 years, providing detailed coverage of property, mortgages and other encumbrances, consumer credit, tenancy, location, hazard risk and related performance information. The markets CoreLogic serves include real estate and mortgage finance, insurance, capital markets, and the public sector. CoreLogic delivers value to clients through unique data, analytics, workflow technology, advisory and managed services. Clients rely on CoreLogic to help identify and manage growth opportunities, improve performance and mitigate risk. Headquartered in Irvine, Calif., CoreLogic operates in North America, Western Europe and Asia Pacific. For more information, please visit www.corelogic.com. CORELOGIC, the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. CONTACT For more information, please email bvisini@corelogic.com. 2014 CoreLogic Proprietary and confidential. This material may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission. JUNE 2014 11

For an expanded perspective on housing economies and property markets, visit the CoreLogic Insights Blog and follow us on: CoreLogic CoreLogic Econ corelogic.com 2014 CoreLogic, Inc. All rights reserved. CORELOGIC and the CoreLogic logo are trademarks of CoreLogic, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders. 17-NFR-JUN14-0714-01