New Jersey A Special State-Focused Supplement to Education Week s Technology Counts 2007



Similar documents
State Technology Report 2008

From Cradle ToCareer Connecting American Education From Birth Through Adulthood

High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act

West Virginia. Next Steps. Life After Special Education

School to College. Alaska DIPLOMAS COUNT. Can State P-16 Councils Ease the Transition? 2008 With Support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Progress on Graduation Rate Stalls; 1.3 Million Students Fail to Earn Diplomas

High School Graduation in Texas

Called to Account New Directions in School Accountability

Texas. Preparing to Launch. Early Childhood s Academic Countdown. State Highlights 2013 State Highlights 2015

The Facts on Charter Schools and Students with Disabilities

Meeting Oregon s new high school math graduation requirements: examining student enrollment and teacher availability

Assembly Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA. credo.stanford.edu.

Computer Science State Certification Requirements CSTA Certification Committee Report

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ARIZONA. credo.stanford.edu.

Requirements for Level 2 and Level 3 Teaching Certificates in 50 States and the District of Columbia

Research Brief. Do Parents Feel More Aggravated These Days? MARCH 2014 Publication # PARENTAL AGGRAVATION IN THE U.S., 1997 TO 2012 OVERVIEW

Georgia State Highlights 2013

Center on Education Policy, Reading First: Locally appreciated, nationally troubled

State and National Grades Issued for Education Performance, Policy; U.S. Earns a C-plus, Maryland Ranks First for Fifth Straight Year

High School Graduation Rate Approaching Milestone, Reaches Highest Point in 40 Years

Iowa School District Profiles. Central City

Kentucky QUALITY COUNTS With Support from the Pew Center on the States. A Special Supplement to Education Week s

The Army s Child, Youth and School Services Strong Beginnings pre-kindergarten program, designed for 4- to 5-year-old children, prepares young

Equity in Achievement Remains a Hurdle for States Amid Progress; U.S. Earns C-minus and Massachusetts Ranks First in K-12 Achievement

Overcoming Doubts About Online Learning

CCSSO Pilot of Education Preparation Recommendations Application Information

Position Announcement Math Solutions Consultant (part- time position)

How To Teach Math And Science

Quality Counts Introduces New State Report Card; U.S. Earns C, and Massachusetts Ranks First in Nation

Graduates of UTeach STEM Teacher Preparation Programs Nationwide

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN NEW YORK CITY. credo.stanford.

Division Performance (based on data from ) Division. Performance

Proven to Increase Learning Outcomes: Results of a Third Party Study on the Impact of Digital Curriculum

Understanding Alabama Schools Accounting System. A Guide to State Allocation Calculations /4/2014. Funding Components.

School Counselors Linked to Academic Success

District of Columbia Career Guide for Early Childhood and Out of School Time Professionals

Douglas County School District Accountability Analysis

Remedial Education Program (REP) Grades School Year

Virginia s College and Career Readiness Initiative

National Program Accreditation and Quality Rating and Improvement Systems

State Defined Contribution and Hybrid Pension Plans

January Key findings

YES Prep Public Schools

Internet Survey for Art Teachers: The Results

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT

APPENDIX A. Tables. Appendix A Tables 119

2013 Association Montessori International/USA

Technology in Education: Reform Through the Implementation of Teaching and Learning Standards

What exactly are the new roles of the School Psychologist and Social Worker?

JUST THE FACTS. Memphis, Tennessee

School Systems SIS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

NCEE EVALUATION BRIEF April 2014 STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEACHER EVALUATION POLICIES PROMOTED BY RACE TO THE TOP

ACT National Curriculum Survey Policy Implications on Preparing for Higher Standards. improve yourself

AmeriCorps National Performance Measures Pilot Year 1: Output and Outcome Instrument Packet

Chapter 3: Promoting Financial Self- Sufficiency

Public Act No

Childhood Learning in Charter Schools

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools

STOP PLEASE DO NOT TURN THE PAGE UNTIL INSTRUCTED TO DO SO. Student Questionnaire. Grade 4

New Jersey Department of Education Office of Title I Program Planning and Accountability

Career and Professional Education: Preparing Florida s Students for the Knowledge Economy Florida Master Plan for K-20 Education

3.03 College Board Advanced Placement Test means the Advanced Placement test administered by the College Board and Educational Testing Service.

State Retirement System Defined Contribution Plans Ronald Snell September 2009

JUST THE FACTS. El Paso, Texas

The Effect of the Digital Divide on Social Justice. Geralyn E. Stephens and Marc H. Rosa Wayne State University Detroit, MI

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL nd Legislature st Special Session

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20554

2014 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Database

Licensed Practical Nursing Applications For the Fall 2016 Class

Arecent five-state project, the National Forum on College-

5-O-A: VIRTUAL LEARNING, DISTANCE LEARNING, & INDEPENDENT STUDY

One Hour, 10 million students, A foundation for success

Medicare Advantage Plan Landscape Data Summary

A Question and Answer Guide to Home Schooling Your Child

CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN INDIANA. credo.stanford.edu

REGIONALEDUCATIONALLABORATORY SOUTHEAST... SERVE Center

WILMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Wilmington, Massachusetts. Title I Program District Parent Involvement Plan 2014/2015

August Michigan Virtual School. Significant Features of the Michigan Virtual School (MVS) Brennan McMahon, Legislative Research Intern

Washington, DC D F F D D D F F F C F D F D F F D F F F F D F F C C D OH WI. This chapter compares district and charter

CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA. credo.stanford.edu

LESN Listserv Responses

The Official SAT Online Course Case Studies

April For Kids Sake: State-Level Trends in Children s Health Insurance. A State-by-State Analysis

Louisiana s Schoolwide Reform Guidance

Tennessee s Academic Standards in Math and English

Electronic Health Records (EHR) An Educational Session

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

Teacher Prep Student Performance Models - Six Core Principles

Besides funding basic and special education, government has provided

Intel Teach Essentials Course Instructional Practices and Classroom Use of Technology Survey Report. September Wendy Martin, Simon Shulman

Databases Can Help Teachers with Standards Implementation

Abstract Title Page Not included in page count.

K12 ONLINE LEARNING: THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND

TRIO Wolf Creek distributed the AdvancED survey link to all students and parents in a variety of ways listed below:

MAGAZINE Publisher s Statement 6 months ended June 30, 2015 Subject to Audit

The High Cost of High School Dropouts: What the Nation Pays for Inadequate High Schools

Churchill County School District Numa Elementary School 601 Discovery Drive Fallon, NV SAGE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE TITLE I - NRS 385

Middle Grades Action Kit How To Use the Survey Tools!

State Grants For Low-Income Students

Transcription:

A Special State-Focused Supplement to Education Week s Technology Counts 2007

About This Report This State Technology Report is a supplement to the 10th edition of Technology Counts, a joint project of Education Week and the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. As in previous years, the EPE Research Center has surveyed the states to assess the status of K-12 educational technology across the nation. This state report assembles key findings from that survey and other sources in a format that allows readers to examine a particular state s performance on this year s indicators. For most indicators, national results are also provided as a benchmark against which the state can be measured. Technology Counts 2007, which explores developments in educational technology over the past decade, tracks data from the 50 states and the District of Columbia in several critical areas of technology policy and practice: access, use, and capacity. The report assigns grades to the states for their performance in those three categories. State grades are not comparable with those in last year s report because of changes in two access indicators and improvements in the scoring for indicators related to teacher and administrator licensure. The full Technology Counts 2007 report can be accessed online at www.edweek.org/go/tc07. STATE TECHNOLOGY REPORT CARD 2007 How did the average state score? Access to technology C C Use of technology D+ C+ Capacity to use technology C C Overall grade C- C+ Grading the States For Technology Counts 2007, the EPE Research Center awarded grades for technology leadership to the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Grading is based on 14 individual indicators spanning three core areas of state policy and practice: access to instructional technology, use of technology, and capacity to effectively use educational technology. Information on technology use and capacity was obtained from a nationwide survey of state technology officials conducted by the EPE Research Center. Indicators related to educational technology access were derived from annual school surveys conducted by Market Data Retrieval, a research company that tracks the use of educational technology, and from background questionnaires administered as part of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress. The EPE Research Center evaluated each indicator, assigning a certain number of points to each. States received credit for the use and capacity indicators only if they could document that the respective policy or practice was in place. Points were tallied within each of the three technology categories, producing scores on a 100-point scale. To generate an overall score, the Research Center computed the average of the three category scores and then converted that total score to a letter grade. Technology Counts Grading Breakdown This table reports the detailed scoring behind the grades for the three major areas of state policy examined in Technology Counts. Access to Technology U.S. Capacity to Use Technology Does state have policy? Percent of students with State includes technology in its Number of states with policy Computer in classroom 58.5% 49.5% Teacher standards Yes 45 Computer in lab/media center 76.5% 7% Administrator standards Yes 36 Number of students per Initial teacher-license requirements No 19 Instructional computer 3.9 3.8 Initial administrator-license requirements No 9 High-speed Internet-connected computer 3.6 3.7 Teacher-recertification requirements No 9 Administrator-recertification requirements No 5 Use of Technology Does state have policy? Number of states with policy Overall Technology Score points awarded Average state points awarded Student standards include technology Yes 48 Access to technology 7 7 State tests students on technology No 4 Use of technology 69.3 78.7 State has established a virtual school No 23 Capacity to use technology 72.7 75.5 State offers computer-based assessments No 23 Total score (average of three categories) 72.3 76.7 Grading Curve A (93-100), A- (90-92), B+ (87-89), B (83-86), B- (80-82), C+ (77-79), C (73-76), C- (70-72), D+ (67-69), D (63-66), D- (60-62), F (0-59) 1

Technology Access Trends in access Note: Indicators of access to technology capture the number of students who share computers used for instructional purposes. Lower values on these measures indicate greater levels of access. This chart tracks student access to instructional computers over time. Students per computer 3.9 3.8 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 National average Students per instructional computer These charts show the average number of students sharing access to each computer available for instructional purposes for public in this state and the nation as a whole during the 2005-06 school year. U.S. Average Students per instructional computer 3.9 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.6 Students per instructional computer 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 Students per high-speed Internet computer These charts show the average number of students sharing access to each instructional computer with high-speed Internet access for public in your state and the nation as a whole during the 2005-06 school year. U.S. Average Students per high-speed Internet computer 3.6 4.3 3.4 3.3 Students per high-speed Internet computer 4.1 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.5 2

Technology Use and Capacity Policies National Perspective This map shows the number of technology use and capacity policies in place for the 2006-07 school year for each state and the District of Columbia. The EPE Research Center has examined state technology use and capacity policies. Ten key policies, listed on the first page of this state report, are summarized in this map. The states with the strongest use and capacity policies are Georgia (10 policies) and Kentucky (8 policies). At the other end of the spectrum, Montana and Nevada each have one policy, while the District of Columbia has adopted none of the policies. Number of Policies 7 to 10 policies (6) 4 to 6 policies (29) 0 to 3 policies (16) DC = 0 policies Technology Standards Past & Present This chart tracks the number of states that have technology standards for students, teachers, and administrators. Number of states 50 48 Student 45 40 35 34 Teacher 36 30 31 Administrators 20 10 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 The EPE Research Center has been tracking technology standards for students since 2001 and technology standards for teachers and administrators since 2003. The vast majority of states (48) have embraced technology standards for students for the past few years. Almost as many states (45) now have such standards for teachers, while fewer states (36) have them for administrators. Overall, 2007 shows an increase in states endorsing teacher and administrator standards in technology. Technology Standards 2001/ 2003 2007 Students Yes Yes Teachers Yes Yes Administrators No Yes 3

Extra Credit Integrating Technology Supporting Educators Nation State facilitates access to online academic content and/or instructional software (CD or Web-based) through Group-purchasing program Digital content available at lower prices because of state negotiations No 17 states Collection of online resources from different academic areas Digital content to supplement learning that can be accessed through a state Web site or portal Subscription services Electronic resources, such as e-journals, online indexes, and full-text databases, available through a commercial provider State offers teachers online opportunities Professional development online, such as courses or virtual training May include technology-related professional development or professional development in other areas Yes No Yes 26 states 29 states 39 states State offers professional or financial incentives to use technology for Teachers No 17 states Administrators No 13 states Number of policies: 2 --- Educator Technology-Integration Policies A National Perspective This map shows the number of educator technology-integration policies (listed above) for each state. Integration of digital resources in is not regular and comprehensive, according to anecdotal reports and research. For that reason, state policies to help educators such as offering access to digital content, online professional development, and incentives can help maximize the potential of educational technology. Just two states (Kentucky and West Virginia) have all six technology-integration policies discussed above. Nearly half of states have two or fewer policies. Number of Policies 5 to 6 policies (9) 3 to 4 policies (18) 0 to 2 policies (24) DC = 0 policies 4

Sources and Notes State Technology Indicators Most of the state policy indicators reported in Technology Counts are obtained through an original policy survey conducted annually by the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. The Research Center sent surveys to the chief state technology officers in all 50 states and to the superintendent of the District of Columbia public. Respondents provided information on policy indicators related to educational technology, and competencies of students and educators. Every state response was carefully verified using additional evidence provided by the state, such as documentation describing a state statute or administrative rule. For some indicators on access to technology, the EPE Research Center obtained information from Market Data Retrieval, or MDR, a research organization in Shelton, Conn., that tracks trends in educational technology, and from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics. Grading the States For Technology Counts 2007, the EPE Research Center graded state leadership in the areas of technology access, use, and capacity, based on data compiled for 14 individual indicators of state policy and practice. Each indicator was evaluated and assigned a certain number of points, with some indicators receiving greater weight than others. States were not awarded credit for an indicator unless they were able to document that the respective policy was in place. The Research Center tallied points within each of the three policy categories on a 100-point scale. These three subscores were averaged to produce an overall technology score, which was then converted to a letter grade. A detailed explanation of the grading methodology can be found in the full edition of Technology Counts 2007. Technology Access Students per instructional computer: Market Data Retrieval, "2005-06 Public School Technology Survey and unpublished tabulations from MDR s Public School Technology Surveys (2000-2005). Students per high-speed Internetconnected computer: Ibid. For the purposes of this report, highpoverty are those in which more than half of students are eligible for the federal free or reduced-price lunch program. High-minority are those in which more than half the students belong to minority racial or ethnic groups. Percent of students with computer in classroom: National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, 2005. This figure represents the percent of public school students in grades 4 and 8 whose math teachers reported that at least one computer was available to students in their classrooms. Figures for grades 4 and 8 were averaged. Percent of students with computer in lab/media center: Ibid. This figure represents the percent of public school students in grades 4 and 8 whose math teachers reported that at least one computer was available to students in a lab or media center. Figures for grades 4 and 8 were averaged. Technology Use & Capacity Editorial Projects in Education Research Center annual state technology survey, 2007. Survey respondents were asked about state policies that promote technology use and capacity. States received credit for an indicator only when they provided clear evidence that the respective policy or practice was currently in place. Extra Credit Editorial Projects in Education Research Center annual state technology survey, 2007. Survey respondents were asked about state policies that help teachers gain access to digital academic resources, and provide educators with incentives to use technology, as well as online professional-development opportunities. States received credit for an indicator only when they provided clear evidence that the respective policy or practice was currently in place. About Editorial Projects in Education Editorial Projects in Education (EPE) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization based in Bethesda, Md. Our primary mission is to help raise the level of awareness and understanding among professionals and the public of important issues in American education. We cover local, state, national, and international news and issues from preschool through the 12th grade. Editorial Projects in Education Inc. publishes Education Week, America s newspaper of record for precollegiate education, Teacher Magazine, edweek.org, and the Agent K-12 employment resource. We also produce periodic special reports on issues ranging from technology to textbooks, as well as books of special interest to educators. The EPE Research Center conducts annual policy surveys, collects data, and performs analyses that appear in the Quality Counts, Technology Counts, and Diplomas Count annual reports. The center also produces independent research reports and contributes original data and analysis to special coverage in Education Week, Teacher Magazine, and edweek.org. 5

Editorial Projects in Education Research Center 6935 Arlington Road Bethesda, MD 20814 Technology Counts 2007: A Digital Decade Technology Counts 2007 This year s full report examines the past 10 years of educational technology. Technology Counts grades the states in three critical areas of technology leadership: providing access to technology, use of technology, and capacity to use technology effectively. State Technology Reports Individualized reports featuring state-specific findings from the 2007 Technology Counts report are available for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Education Counts This online database contains hundreds of state-level indicators on K-12 education collected over the past decade for Education Week s annual Technology Counts, Diplomas Count, and Quality Counts reports. Use the Custom Table Builder feature to create graphs, tables, or maps for specific indicators. Technology Counts 2007 is available online at www.edweek.org/go/tc07