Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender



Similar documents
Minneapolis Resident Survey April 2011

The National Citizen Survey

Sandy City Citizen Survey Report. December Prepared for. Sandy City. Lighthouse Research & Development, Inc

Neighborhood Checkup

BELLEAIR BEACH CITIZEN OPINION SURVEY

Gunnison County, CO Community Livability Report

Healthy Homes: Community Perspectives of a Healthy, Happy & Safe Home. Report to Stakeholders March 2013

How Walkable is Your Neighborhood? A project of Health by Design

Tips for Reporting Timely and Accurate CDBG Data in IDIS

Appendix A CDBG MATRIX CODES


This chapter highlights the Citywide Analytics Team s work, recent accomplishments, and plans for the upcoming year. CREATING A CULTURE OF DATA

SCILC Statewide Needs Assessment

Community Development Block Grant Program Year Application Instruction Booklet

Priority: Alcohol Use/Binge Drinking (B)

West River Community Master Planning Howard W. Blake High School / Tampa, Florida July 18, 2013

The City will be holding a series of public planning meetings and a community survey for the Consolidated Plan.

City of Philadelphia - Need and Social Services. Susan Kretsge, Deputy Mayor

Vicken municipality - $1.2 Billion Dollar Tax Rebate

Statewide Survey on Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities

2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey Subway

BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BOARD 14 FLATBUSH MIDWOOD COMMUNITY DISTRICT 810 East 16 th Street Brooklyn, New York 11230

CITY OF MILWAUKEE POLICE SATISFACTION SURVEY

City of Winnipeg Budget Consultations Final Report

Improving Edmonton s. Sociability Award Winner. Sociable City Edmonton tops 9 American cities, named Most Sociable City in North America

SAMPLE SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INTAKE/ASSESSMENT FORM

One State One Solution: Policy Services & Research Data Center DIANE HAYNES FLORIDA MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA

NO TICKETING CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS BYLAW A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF VICTORIA

Sample 311 Report

Walking Route the assigned or authorized route a pupil walks to arrive at school or at the designated bus stop.

Descriptions of NTEE Major Groups

Care Team. Ministry Module

Appendix D: 2015 Program & Service Budget

Survey Instrument Date Responses

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

AN ILLUSTRATION OF COMPARATIVE QUANTITATIVE RESULTS USING ALTERNATIVE ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

To take this survey online, visit:

Individualized Education Plans

Keep Federal Hill Clean and Green Campaign Strategy Plan

Produced in 2009 by the Seattle Neighborhood Group in collaboration with the Drug Free Communities Program. MARKET SEATTLE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP

SECTION 6. MENTAL HEALTH

Selected Parking Regulations from the New Orleans City Code (The quotation marks have been omitted in the cited material).

Building Tennessee s Tomorrow: Anticipating the State s Infrastructure Needs July 2011 through June 2016

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES CHILD WELFARE MANUAL. Chapter 5: General Case Management Effective Date: March 1, 2007

Oklahoma county. Community Health Status Assessment

Smith County Forum Sponsored and Facilitated by: Smith County Office Texas Cooperative Extension The Texas A&M University System

Performance Management. Government Finance Officers Association

2012 Customer Satisfaction KPI Research External Customers

Counting for Dollars: Denver County, Colorado

Safety and Security Plan

AGENCY DESCRIPTION The London Family Center (LFC) mission is to provide individual and family support to the London community.

Personal Security and Safe Routes to School

Surveying for Dollars: Oregon

2016 Performance Measures

City of Elkhart Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Plan

EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM

APPROVED Consolidated Community Funding Pool (CCFP) Priority Areas for Fiscal Years Approved by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

chapter 3 Community Outreach

Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat Students Family values influence community

Lions Young Leaders in Service Awards CHALLENGE YOUTH TO SERVE

Key outcome data analyses

RESPITE BED PROGRAM CONCEPT PAPER S

TRANSPORTATION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

FAIR SHARED CITY: GENDER MAINSTREAMING PLANNING STRATEGY IN VIENNA: AUSTRIA.

Ordinances Governing OCCUPATION TAXES AND LICENSES. in the CITY OF ARLINGTON TEXAS. Amended by Ordinance No (January 21, 2014)

Community Needs Assessment Survey Guide

Agenda & Purpose of Presentation

Education. Chapter 3. Education Encouragement Enforcement Engineering & Facilities Evaluation & Planning. Education Chapter 3

VANDERBILT COMPARISON

YOUTH CENTER MENTORING PROGRAM Making a Difference through Adults in Action

HOUSING SERVICES. Policy Anti Social Behaviour Policy Version 2. Issue Date Lead Officer Neil Turton Review Date

Consumer Perception of Care Survey 2013 DETAILED REPORT

Services outsourced in 2013 to a third-party firm (not including parts, equipment purchased). Type of Service

NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY. An Examination of Resident Perceptions in the Eastside Promise Neighborhood

The Teen Challenge After-School Learning and Children s Prevention Programs

REPORT OVERVIEW FY ST QUARTER PERFORMANCE REPORT

METRO MENTORING. Mentor Application

Resources for the Homebound in the New York City Metropolitan Area

The Effect of Family Background on the Risk of Homelessness in a Cohort of Danish Adolescents

Mental Health and Social Services District Questionnaire

APPENDIX D GLOSSARY OF COMMON LONG-TERM CARE TERMINOLOGY

I. General Information

City of Clayton Event Guidelines

Health Atlas and the Community Health and Equity Index:

City of Ottawa Older Adult Plan. Feedback from Chinese Seniors (Kanata Chinese Seniors Support Centre, KCSSC) November 25, 2011

Draft Milton Keynes Drug and Alcohol Strategy. Consultation Paper. What is a strategy?

Tickets and ticket inspections preliminary results

ICMA Insights TM Key Performance Indicators

ASHLAND COUNTY SALES TAX INITIATIVE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FY 2011 Total County. FY 2011 Health County Dollars - $29,869,193. Medical Examiner 1%

Easy Does It, Inc. Transitional Housing Application

Denver Police Department Law Enforcement Advocate Program. Scanning: When a developmentally delayed youth was involved in a police shooting in 2003,

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Gaston County Community Resources

Flood Mitigation Strategy for the Milwaukee 30 th Street Corridor Redevelopment Program

2010 Client Satisfaction Survey Results

Illinois Differential Response Survey Investigation Supervisor (Baseline)

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL

DRAFT 2016 Budget and Financial Plan

ELIGIBILITY APPLICATION

Transcription:

Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender

Page 2

Citywide Customer Survey Results Tables Table 1: Index Scores by Gender of Respondent...2 Table 2: Quality of Life by Gender of Respondent...2 Table 3: Perceptions of Safety by Gender of Respondent...2 Table 4: Ratings of Neighborhood Services by Gender of Respondent...3 Table 5: Ratings of City Services in the Neighborhood by Gender of Respondent...3 Table 6: Ratings of City Services in the City Overall by Gender of Respondent...4 Table 7: Ratings of City Services by Gender of Respondent...4 Table 8: Public Trust by Gender of Respondent...4 Table 9: Overall Quality of City Services by Gender of Respondent...5 Table 10: Frequency of Use of City Resources by Gender of Respondent...5 Table 11: Use of City Services by Gender of Respondent...5 Table 12: User Ratings of City Services by Gender of Respondent...6 Table 13: Contact with the City by Gender of Respondent...6 Table 14: Ratings of Customer Service by Gender of Respondent...6 Table 15: Most Important Issues Facing the City by Gender of Respondent...7 Table 16: Emergency Preparedness by Gender of Respondent...7 Page i

Page ii This page intentionally left blank.

Citywide Customer Survey Results Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender Introduction This appendix provides the results of select survey responses by respondent gender. Below are the percent of respondents who reported being male or female. Percent of respondents 46% 54% Total 100% Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender Page 1

Results by Gender Table 1: Index Scores by Gender of Respondent Customer Service Index 88 89 Health Services Clients Index 82 83 Social Support Services Index 60 56 Human Services Clients Index 91 92 Public Education Index 75 75 Public School Users Index 85 85 Cleaning and Maintenance Index 83 83 Streets and Sidewalks Index 79 79 Community Amenities Index 85 84 Mass Transit Index 87 85 Citywide Public Safety Index 86 84 Neighborhood Public Safety Index 89 88 Average percent of respondents reporting "excellent," "good" or "fair" for each item in the index. Table 2: Quality of Life by Gender of Respondent Quality of Life How would you rate the quality of life in NYC overall? 89% 88% How would you rate your neighborhood as a place to live? 88% 88% Table 3: Perceptions of Safety by Gender of Respondent Please rate how safe you feel in each of the following locations or situations: Feelings of safety walking alone on a street in your neighborhood at night 72% 67% Feelings of safety in a park or playground during the day 88% 85% Feelings of safety riding a subway during the day 89% 84% Feelings of safety riding a subway at night 50% 41% Percent of respondents reporting "very" or "somewhat" safe Page 2 Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender

Citywide Customer Survey Results Table 4: Ratings of Neighborhood Services by Gender of Respondent Please rate each of the following in your neighborhood. Cleanliness of your neighborhood 81% 81% Control of street noise in your neighborhood 66% 67% Household garbage pick-up in your neighborhood 93% 92% Recycling services in your neighborhood 90% 89% Rat control in your neighborhood 73% 72% Graffiti control in your neighborhood 79% 81% Pedestrian safety (crossing intersections) in your neighborhood 86% 85% Maintenance of streets and roads in your neighborhood 74% 76% Maintenance of sidewalks in your neighborhood 80% 80% Removal of snow from city streets in your neighborhood 85% 82% Parking enforcement in your neighborhood 85% 87% Condition of street trees in your neighborhood 86% 87% Storm water drainage and sewer maintenance in your neighborhood 80% 78% Availability of health care services in your neighborhood 86% 87% Availability of cultural activities in your neighborhood 76% 73% Neighborhood parks 88% 88% Neighborhood playgrounds 87% 86% Table 5: Ratings of City Services in the Neighborhood by Gender of Respondent Please rate each of the following in your neighborhood... Fire protection services in your neighborhood 98% 98% Emergency medical services in your neighborhood 96% 95% Police-Community relations in your neighborhood 79% 81% Crime control in your neighborhood 84% 82% Bus services in your neighborhood 87% 84% Subway services in your neighborhood 85% 85% Public libraries in your neighborhood 90% 90% Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender Page 3

Table 6: Ratings of City Services in the City Overall by Gender of Respondent Please rate each of the following in the City overall... Fire protection services in the City overall 97% 97% Emergency medical services in the City overall 95% 94% Police-Community relations in the City overall 78% 79% Crime control in the City overall 84% 81% Bus services in the City overall 89% 86% Subway services in the City overall 86% 84% Public libraries in the City overall 95% 95% Table 7: Ratings of City Services by Gender of Respondent Please rate each of the following in New York City... NYC.gov, the City website 96% 97% 3-1-1, New York City's information telephone number 93% 94% Public education (kindergarten 12th grade) 79% 78% Public after-school programs 71% 71% Air quality in the City overall 70% 66% Restaurant cleanliness in the City overall 86% 84% Overall ease of travel within the city 85% 86% Public housing in the City overall 58% 54% Public assistance (such as Medicaid, food stamps, etc.) 74% 71% Services addressing homelessness 55% 50% Availability of youth employment programs 57% 52% Services protecting children at risk of abuse and neglect 60% 52% Table 8: Public Trust by Gender of Respondent Please rate how well you think New York City government does the following: Promotes the economic growth of New York City 82% 80% Prepares the city for an emergency 81% 78% Spends tax dollars wisely 61% 57% Page 4 Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender

Citywide Customer Survey Results Table 9: Overall Quality of City Services by Gender of Respondent Overall Quality of Services Rate the overall quality of New York City government services 87% 85% Table 10: Frequency of Use of City Resources by Gender of Respondent In the last 12 months, about how many times, if ever, have you or any member of your household done any of the following? Used the public libraries 71% 75% Visited a website called NYC.gov 69% 68% Used one of the City's public parks or recreation facilities 82% 79% Used City services for the mobility impaired 8% 10% Used a City child daycare program 6% 9% Used a City youth program 10% 12% Percent of respondents reporting they or a member of their household participated at least once in the last 12 months. Table 11: Use of City Services by Gender of Respondent Done by you or any household member? Called 3-1-1 67% 70% Called 9-1-1 33% 32% Attended a New York City Public School (K - 12) 28% 32% Attended a New York City Public School after-school program 13% 15% Received consumer assistance 10% 12% Visited a public community center 18% 20% Participated in an employment training program 7% 9% Used public hospital services 39% 41% Used public health clinic services 23% 27% Used public mental health services 5% 6% Used public substance abuse services 2% 2% Used a public senior center 7% 10% Used other public senior services (e.g., respite care, transportation, etc.) 7% 10% Received Medicaid 21% 25% Paid a fine or ticket to the City 51% 42% Contacted the City with a tax question 14% 15% Note: Percent of respondents reporting they or a member of their household used a service at least once in the last 12 months. Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender Page 5

Table 12: User Ratings of City Services by Gender of Respondent Rate the services received 3-1-1 services 90% 92% 9-1-1 services 86% 89% New York City Public Schools 88% 87% Student safety at public schools 81% 82% Public School after-school programs 88% 88% Consumer assistance 67% 72% Public community center 92% 93% Employment training program 79% 85% Public hospital services 79% 82% Public health clinic services 84% 86% Public mental health services 74% 84% Public substance abuse services 73% 82% Public senior center 89% 94% Other public senior services 90% 89% Medicaid services 89% 92% Paying a fine or ticket to the City 67% 72% Contacting the City with a tax question 73% 81% Note: Responses are only from those who reported they or a member of their household used this service at least once in the last 12 months. Table 13: Contact with the City by Gender of Respondent Contact with City Office or Agency Phone or in-person contact w City office/agency last 12 months? 39% 38% Percent of respondents who reported they had contacted a City office or agency in the last 12 months. Table 14: Ratings of Customer Service by Gender of Respondent How would you rate the response of the office or agency with which you most recently had contact? Timeliness of response 75% 76% Employee's courtesy 85% 85% Employee's willingness to help or understand 78% 80% Overall customer service 78% 81% Overall satisfaction with response 69% 71% Note: Responses are only from those who reported they or a member of their household had been in contact with a City office or agency in the last 12 months. Page 6 Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender

Citywide Customer Survey Results Table 15: Most Important Issues Facing the City by Gender of Respondent Most Important Issues Facing New York City Housing Issues 27% 31% Cost of living 15% 16% Crime 21% 21% Education 20% 24% Mass Transit Issues 23% 21% Responses may total more than 100% as respondents could write in more than one issue. Table 16: Emergency Preparedness by Gender of Respondent Emergency Preparedness How prepared your household would be if there were an emergency? 60% 55% Percent of respondents who reported "very" or "somewhat" prepared Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender Page 7

This page intentionally left blank. Page 8 Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender