The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design



Similar documents
THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

Online Course Design Evaluation

Quality Standards for Online Learning

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

Assuring that the Online Course is Ready for Prime Time

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

Quality Matters Online Course Development and Guidelines

Community College System of New Hampshire

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

Quality Guidelines for Online Courses

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

Instructional Design Tips

Online Course Standards Rubric

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning

In this topic we discuss a number of design decisions you can make to help ensure your course is accessible to all users.

Online Learning at Duke: A Planning Guide

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Section A: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND STUDENT ASSESSMENT

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses

[CONVERTING YOUR COURSE TO A BLENDED FORMAT]

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses

Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested)

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Online Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations

Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form

INST 5500 Online Course Development. Course Syllabus. Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours

VALIDATION OF PREPAREDNESS TO TEACH ONLINE

Teaching Online at UD Best Practices Guide

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Instructor Guide. Excelsior College English as a Second Language Writing Online Workshop (ESL-WOW)

!"#$%&'()$*)"#%+,'%-"."/,&*01%% (0-%-"/*."'*01%,0/*0"%*0#$'2)$*,0% ($%$3"%40*."'#*$5%,+%6"00"##""%7%80,9.*//"%

Online Course Development Guide

PUAD 502 Administration in Public and Non-Profit Organizations Term Offered Fall, 2015 Syllabus

SLN Course Quality Rubric for Formal Course Review of New Online Faculty/Courses

EDME 532: TESOL INTERNSHIP AND SEMINAR SUMMER / 2015

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

CREATING A COURSE? Courses at SNHP

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

National Standards of Quality for Online Courses

Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses

EDU Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Faculty Bio button Contact Policy:

Strategic Use of Information Technology (CIS ) Summer /

Davis Applied Technology College Curriculum Development Policy and Procedures Training Division

Human Resources Management NURS 5304/6304/ Credit Hours

DRAFT LAMC Addendum to the Course Outline of Record Course Approval Application for Online/Distance Learning Delivery

PRST 5400/6400/7400 INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN FOR TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 3 Credit Hours

Transcription:

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design The Check was created by CEHD s Academic Technology Services Team: Treden Wagoner Sheila Hoover Thomas Nechodomu Constance Pepin Lyn DeLorme Melissa Falldin Last updated May 2013 http://z.umn.edu/cehdats CEHD ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY SERVICES

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 2 The Check is a guide to help CEHD instructors create instructionally effective and user-friendly online learning environments for students (online courses, hybrid courses, and sites that augment face-to-face courses). The Check can be used at any point in the course development process: When designing a new course to help guide good design. To evaluate an existing course (self-assessment or peer review). To begin using The Check, start by reading through the entire guide to get a sense of the different areas to consider. When creating a new course, use this guide when designing and building a course site to make sure each area is addressed. For existing courses, use this guide as a checklist to identify those items that are already included or addressed, or those areas that need improvement. Course Information Students can quickly and easily find essential course information about instructor, class sessions, course requirements, policies, etc. To effectively orient students to the course it is important that this information appears on the course site as well as in a downloadable syllabus. Course description: The course description is a concise overview that includes course goals, topics of study, and number of credit hours. Course Objectives: Specific course-level objectives are listed. Instructor information: Instructor s contact information including name, email address, phone number, office location, and office hours is provided. Course syllabus: The syllabus is easily accessible on the course home page and includes information about course structure, course schedule, requirements, and assessments. Course requirements: Requirements for successful completion of the course are clearly stated. Prerequisites: Required knowledge, skills, competencies, or courses are clearly stated. Course session details: Meeting times and locations are made explicit (e.g., for a hybrid course it is clear when sessions are in-person or online, and for an online course any synchronous meetings times are clearly listed). Course schedule: A course schedule with clear due dates for all assignments is provided. Grading policy: The grading policy for the course is clearly articulated on the course home page.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 3 Course Design The structure of the course and the course site are organized for student success. Course structure: The course content is organized into logical segments (e.g., weeks, units, modules, topics). For courses that aren t chronological, the course structure should still be logical and easy to understand. Hierarchy and sequence: There is a clear hierarchy to the site that reflects prerequisites and dependencies between learning objectives, instructional strategies, activities, and assignments. Course content is logically sequenced and learning activities build on each other. Alignment: It is clear how the content, activities, and assessments directly address or support the learning objectives and course goals. Workload: The amount of work for assignments and activities is appropriate for the number of course credit hours. Moodle Site Considerations The Moodle course site supports and reflects the course structure and encourages easy navigation and student use. Terms: Central Frame refers to the center column of a Moodle site this is the main area for course content. Topics refers to the sections within the Central Frame. Blocks are the items that appear on the left and right columns of the Moodle site (e.g., Settings, People, Navigation, Calendar). Moodle Blocks: There are no unused Moodle blocks on the site. Moodle Site Organization: The Moodle site reflects the structure of the course. Moodle Topics: There are no unused/empty topics on the site. Orientation: The following information appears in a prominent place on the course site (e.g., first Moodle block or above the topics): Instructions for getting started in the course Course Information (see above) Link to required readings and/or ereserves Link to Ask Me forum (see Communication below) Department contact information Technology requirements Navigation: It is clear to students how to access pages, course files, activities, and resources.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 4 Graphic Design The Moodle course site is clean, consistent, and clearly branded. Identity: The course site is recognizable as belonging to CEHD, or a CEHD department or program (e.g., uses the CEHD Moodle theme or a course banner). Site Layout: The course site layout is uncluttered and clear. Consistency: The graphic design of the course site is visually consistent: The same fonts and font sizes are used consistently throughout the site. There is a clear reason for variations in color, font, or other visual elements. The quality of graphics and media is consistent. Navigation aids (graphics/text) and cues (color, underline, text directives) are used consistently throughout the course site. Student Support Student support resources are prominent on the course site. Consider placing links to these support resources in a single Moodle block. Instructor support: It is clear who students should contact for questions about the course (instructor or teaching assistant). Tech support: It is clear where students should go for technical support (Moodle and other learning technologies used in the course). Accommodations: It is clear how students can request accommodations, if needed. Other resources: Resources that support student success are provided (e.g., tutoring, writing, research, library) and integrated into course activities where appropriate. Policies: UMN institutional policies relevant to student success (e.g., grade disputes, ADA Compliance) are available and easy to find. Learning objectives Learning objectives are clear, thorough, and accurate. Adequate: Learning objectives are provided for the course and each activity/unit/module. Clear: Learning objectives are stated clearly and written to the student (e.g., after completing this course or activity, you will be able to ). Consistent: Learning objectives at the course, module/unit, and activity levels hold together conceptually and support each other. Measurable: Learning objectives are observable and measurable (e.g., instructors are able to assess student mastery of the objectives). Reinforced: Learning objectives are referred to throughout the course as appropriate.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 5 Activities & Assignments Activities and assignments are appropriate for the course and course type (face-to-face, hybrid, or online); are presented to the student in a manner that clearly explains how and why they support the course; and present a clear understanding of the instructor s expectations of the students. List: A comprehensive list of activities and assignments is provided for each unit/week/module. Labels: Activities and assignments are clearly labeled (e.g., assignments, quizzes, readings). Descriptions: Each assignment or activity is clearly described, easy to understand, and includes all necessary information (e.g., relevant technology, format, due dates, level of participation, how to submit). Variety: A variety of instructional strategies are used for students to practice and master learning objectives (e.g., reflective writing, role play, lecture, demonstration, simulation, case studies). Engagement: Activities and assignments, including discussion forums, engage students on a deep level (e.g., students are encouraged to analyze, negotiate, sythesize, apply new knowledge and skills). Expectations: Expectations for synchronous and asynchronous activities are clearly defined (e.g., discussion posts by a certain time, instructor s role is clearly defined). Instructions: Assignment instructions are explicit and complete. Self-directed independent learners will be able to successfully complete the assignment without aid. Quality: Standards for quality of student work are clearly communicated (e.g., through rubrics, examples, or modeling). Feedback: Instructor's plan for providing feedback to individuals, groups, and the entire class is clearly defined. Rules: Rules for group work and roles are clearly stated. Collaboration: Activities foster interaction and collaboration among students. Participation: Expectations for individual and group participation are clearly stated. Assessment / Grading Measures of student progress are consistent with learning objectives. Multiple strategies: Multiple types of assessment strategies are used to measure student progress (e.g., quizzes, portfolio, peer review, projects). Alignment: Assessments are aligned with course-level and assignment-level learning objectives. Rubrics: Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for evaluation of student's work (e.g., rubric for each assignment). Monitoring progress: A way for students to check their progress throughout the course is provided (e.g., a grade book). Grading: The grading policy is communicated at the course-level (see Course Information). Grading method and criteria are clearly stated for each assignment.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 6 Materials & Media All materials and media are current, working properly, available in multiple formats, and accurately cited throughout the course. Current: Learning resources (e.g., texts, audio, video, images) that are used within the course are current. If a resource is not current, the reason for not using a more recent resource is provided. Multiple Formats: Instructional materials are available in multiple media formats (e.g., Moodle Pages are available as PDF, transcripts and summaries accompany videos and audio files). Copyright: Copyright permissions are noted, when appropriate. Citations: All resources and materials are properly and consistently cited in the style appropriate for the course (e.g., APA). Links: All links to external websites and online resources are working properly. Identity: Media used in the course (e.g., recorded lectures or presentations) is recognizable as belonging to the course (e.g., they have a title screen). Accessibility & Universal Design All materials are accessible and available in a format that can be printed. Moodle Site: Essential course information is placed at the top of the central frame. (Note that screen readers present all of the information in the central frame first, followed by the content from the blocks.) Course Materials: All course materials (documents, presentations, and media) reflect best practices for accessibility: http://accessibility.umn.edu/. Microsoft Word and PowerPoint materials use proper formatting styles for accessibility. Images/graphics and tables have descriptive alternative text. PDF files are designed for accessibility. Videos are captioned and/or transcripts provided. Printer-friendly: All course documents (syllabus, schedule, etc.) are available in a printerfriendly format. Course Communication Multiple communication avenues are provided to support interaction among the instructor and students, and an open and respectful learning environment is established. Netiquette: Etiquette expectations for online discussions, email, and other forms of communication (e.g., netiquette ) are clearly stated.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 7 Instructor-Student: Instructor-student communication begins prior to the start of course (e.g., through Course Announcements). The instructor introduces her/himself online using text, audio, images, and/or video. The instructor has articulated how he or she will communicate with students throughout the course (e.g., instructor will be in regular contact with class through email, discussion postings, or other communication tools). Instructor s time frame to respond to student messages is clearly stated. It is clear to students how they will receive course communications (e.g., updates, reminders, special announcements). An Ask Me Forum is used to give the instructor an opportunity to respond to student questions so that all students in the course can view the response (e.g., clarification on assignment instructions). Instructor models behaviors they are expecting of their students (e.g., in discussion forums complete sentences, grammar and punctuation, responds in a timely fashion). Student-Student: Student-to-student interactions are required as part of the course. Students are provided with a way to introduce themselves to each other. Activities to promote student interaction, communication, and community building (e.g., "get acquainted" forum, ice-breakers, requiring students to respond to discussion forum posts) are included. Learning Technologies Learning technologies are used appropriately to facilitate learning and instructions are provided to enable students to successfully use the technologies. Appropriate: The course uses a variety of technology tools to support different learning styles and to foster student learning, communication, interaction, and collaboration. Accessible: Students can readily access the technologies required in the course. Tech skills: Technical skills expected of the student are clearly stated. Tech requirements: Information about technical requirements such as hardware, software, connection speed, and browser plug-ins is provided. Installs: Links and instructions for accessing and installing necessary software are provided. Required software: Required versus optional software is clearly communicated. Costs: Costs of required or optional software are clearly communicated.

The Check: Guide to Online Course Design Page 8 Course Evaluation Students have an opportunity to provide useful feedback about the course, course site, and technologies used. Formative feedback: There is a way for students to provide formative feedback during the course. Respond: Instructors have a plan for responding to student feedback about the course while it is in progress, making changes during the course if possible. Summative feedback: There is a way for students to provide summative feedback at the end of the course. Course site: There is a way for students to provide feedback on the course site and technologies used.