Access to Mental Health Services. Record. For Youth in Pennsylvania s. by National Center for Juvenile Justice, Center for Children s Law and Policy



Similar documents
Intake-Based Diversion

Law Enforcement-Based Diversion

Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

District Attorney Guidelines

MODELS FOR CHANGE BUILDING MOMENTUM FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE REFORM

I KNOW MY RIGHTS. I WANT A LAWYER.

ISSUE BRIEF. While only 18-20% of all children in the United. Mental Health Screening in Juvenile Detention Facilities. O c t o b e r

Written statement of the American Psychological Association. Hearing before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Research and Program Brief

Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders

Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health

Potential for Change: Public Attitudes and Policy Preferences for Juvenile Justice Systems Reform Executive Summary: Washington

tools are referenced for more in-depth exploration of this model juvenile drug court treatment.

Research and Program Brief

Reentry & Aftercare. Reentry & Aftercare. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

Models for Change: Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice

Beyond Anecdote: New Resources in Washington State for Data-Informed Policy Reform

Knowledge Brief Are Minority Youths Treated Differently in Juvenile Probation?

Alternatives to Arrest for Young People

A Survey of Mental Health Care Delivery to Youth in the California Juvenile Justice System: Summary of Findings

Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts and Co-occurring Mental Disorders

Associated Industries of Florida. Getting Smart on Juvenile Crime in Florida: Taking It to The Next Level

Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail

II. Children, Youth and Families

Most states juvenile justice systems have

Juvenile Diversion in North Carolina

Working with States to Help Teens in Trouble with Drugs, Alcohol and Crime. April 2008

Checklist for Juvenile Justice Agency Leaders and Managers

Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

Re-connecting Disconnected Youth with Community and Careers

Nebraska s Youth Rehabilitation. and Treatment Centers. Nebraska YRTCs Issue Brief. A Publication of.

executive summary method findings actions

Rehabilitation Versus Incarceration of Juvenile Offenders: Public Preferences in Four Models for Change States Executive Summary

Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child. A Guide for Parents and Guardians

I KNOW MY RIGHTS. I WANT A LAWYER.

Reducing Recidivism for Youth in the Juvenile Services Division of the Kansas Department of Corrections

Washington Model for Juvenile Justice

Best Practices in Juvenile Justice Reform

Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services

Improving Diversion Policies and Programs for Justice-Involved Youth with Co-occurring Mental and Substance Use Disorders

CORRELATES AND COSTS

LEECH LAKE TRIBAL COURT RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAM Bamenim Anishinaabeg Care for The People - Healing Spirit, Mind & Body -

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Juvenile Justice Programs

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

Oversight Pre- and Post- Release Mental Health Services for Detained and Placed Youth

STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION

Mental Health Courts: Solving Criminal Justice Problems or Perpetuating Criminal Justice Involvement?

National Conference of State Legislatures Law and Criminal Justice Committee Models for Change Luncheon Chicago, IL August 7, 2012

Miami-Dade Civil Citation Program

Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009

Communicating the Struggle Between Due Process and Public Safety. National Association of Counties, July 2012

IMPROVING YOUTH OUTCOMES

TESTIMONY Regarding Oversight: Pre- and Post-Release Mental Health Services for Detained and Placed Youth

Illinois. An Assessment of Access to Counsel & Quality of Representation in Delinquency Proceedings

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.

A Better Model: Ensuring Equal Justice for Persons With Mental Illness & Mental Retardation

Probation is a penalty ordered by the court that permits the offender to

Residential Treatment Facility Proposed Regulations. OMHSAS Children s Advisory Committee January 6, 2011

Redeploy Illinois Annual Report Implementation and Impact May 2007

SFY 2015 STATE JUVENILE DIVERSION AWARDS Project Period: July 1, 2014 June 30, 2015

NAVIGATING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN PENNSYLVANIA. A Guide for Parents and Guardians

CORE PRINCIPLES FOR REDUCING RECIDIVISM AND IMPROVING OTHER OUTCOMES FOR YOUTH IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

NAVIGATING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

Drug Court as Diversion for Youthful Offenders

Special Treatment/Recovery Programs -- Participant Demographics

Probation Semi-Annual Report January-June, 2015

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OHIO. Erin Davies, Executive Director Juvenile Justice Coalition

City of Philadelphia Department of Human Services

Department of Health Services. Alcohol and Other Drug Services Division

How To Stop Youth From Being In Adult Jail And Prison

Better Results, Lower Costs

National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD)

Professional Development for Key Decision Makers in Juvenile Court:

Chapter 28 Justice Community Rehabilitation of Adult Offenders Follow Up 1.0 MAIN POINTS

The Alameda County Model of Probation: Juvenile Supervision

Effects of Child Poverty

State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families

EDISON COURT, INC. Organizational Strategic Plan

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

BANNOCK COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE CLASSES AND PROGRAMS SUMMARY

JUSTICE INVOLVED YOUTH-IN-TRANSITION. April Graham CSW DJJS Salt Lake Case Management October 2014

Measuring Success: A Guide to Becoming an Evidence-Based Practice

PRIMARY TREATMENT CENTERS AND DETENTION

Juvenile Justice in the U.S. Facts for Policymakers

Disproportionate Minority Contact. Disproportionate Minority Contact. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators

Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc. Utilization Management Considerations for Care Management Entities

Issue Brief. State and County Collaboration: Mental Health and the Criminal Justice System

LONG-RANGE GOALS FOR IOWA S CRIMINAL & JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS

INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE

State and County Data Resources

How To Run A Diversion Program In Connecticut

Providing Treatment for Youth with Co-occurring Disorders. Advancing Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts: Policy and Program Briefs

Results First Adult Criminal and Juvenile Justice Evidence-Based Program Inventory

Best Practice Assessment and Treatment for Juvenile Drug Courts

Collection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:-

Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs

Contra Costa County System of Care Planning and Policy Council Memorandum of Understanding

CONNECTICUT S BIFURCATED JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM

Transcription:

Improving HowandtoCoordinating Collect and Access to Mental Health Services Record For Youth in Pennsylvania s by National Center for Juvenile Justice, Juvenile Justice System Center for Children s Law and Policy

www.modelsforchange.net

Models for Change Models for Change is an effort to create successful and replicable models of juvenile justice reform through targeted investments in key states, with core support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Models for Change seeks to accelerate progress toward a more effective, fair, and developmentally sound juvenile justice system that holds young people accountable for their actions, provides for their rehabilitation, protects them from harm, increases their life chances, and manages the risk they pose to themselves and to the public. The initiative is underway in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Louisiana and Washington.

Understanding the Problem: The Unmet Mental Health Needs of Youth in the Juvenile Justice System Our country s juvenile justice system was designed to hold young people accountable for their behavior and provide individualized treatment, supervision, and rehabilitation to prevent future delinquency. Increasingly, however, it is filled with youth whose troubled behavior stems from untreated mental health problems, most of whom have fallen through the cracks of other public systems, including education, child welfare, mental health, and other social services. Unfortunately, many youth are arrested and referred to the juvenile justice system merely to increase the likelihood that they receive mental health services. Recent research shows that 70 percent of youth in the juvenile justice system meet the criteria for at least one mental health disorder such as major depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety conditions (National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice, Prevalence Study). Of those, about half have co-occurring substance abuse disorders. Many of these youth land in the juvenile justice system because their conditions are unrecognized, community services aren t available, or systems aren t coordinating effectively to put the right support in place. The juvenile justice system can be the last stop after a long journey during which a young person bounces from one system to another, with no effective support. Unfortunately, young people with mental health problems often get worse, not better, when they are inappropriately treated or confined without support. In fact, many of these youth would do better in community-based settings that provide appropriate treatment without sacrificing community safety in any way. Such an approach can produce better outcomes for these youth while at the same time reducing future offending.

Juvenile justice systems are struggling to meet the mental health needs of children. Although juvenile justice systems are not designed to be mental health service providers, when youth are committed to their care, they must keep the youth and their communities safe while providing access to appropriate treatment. They are overburdened with large numbers of youth with mental health needs who would be more adequately served elsewhere. New approaches introduced in the past five years represent an opportunity for the juvenile justice and mental health systems to better respond to the needs of these youth. These advancements include improved screening and We are committed to creating a juvenile justice system that not only holds young people accountable for their actions, but also provides effective rehabilitation while recognizing the important developmental differences between young people and adults. Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell assessment to identify youth with mental health disorders, policies and services that support family involvement, programs that divert appropriate youth from the juvenile justice system to services, increased access to effective programs in communities, and enhanced coordination between juvenile justice and other youth-serving systems (Skowyra & Cocozza, 2007). Juvenile justice systems can be strengthened while meeting the needs of the young people they serve. Pennsylvania: Building a Stronger System and Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Youth Pennsylvania has long been recognized as a national leader in juvenile justice innovations and reforms. Through the leadership of the Juvenile Detention Centers Association of Pennsylvania, in 2000 Pennsylvania became the first state in the nation to adopt the standardized and scientifically sound Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version (MAYSI-2) in most detention centers (Keystones for Reform, 2005). The MAYSI-2 allows detention centers to determine which youth may be in need of mental health assessments and to collect important information about the mental health problems of admitted youth. County-specific data have allowed detention administrators to get additional staff and coordinate with local mental health departments to better serve the mental health needs of youth and to keep them safe. Improving and Coordinating Access to Mental Health Services For Youth in Pennsylvania s Juvenile Justice System

Our goal is to support every Pennsylvania county in developing, through a collaborative effort among all child-serving systems and families, a comprehensive system that features the key components of identification, diversion, short term interventions and crisis management, evidence-based treatment and continuity of care/aftercare planning for youth with mental health needs and co-occurring substance abuse issues. Mental Health/Juvenile Justice Joint Policy Statement, September 2006 With support from Models for Change, Pennsylvania is coming closer to a system in which all youth referred to juvenile justice systems and probation departments receive appropriate screening and assessment to divert youth from the juvenile justice system and have access to the mental health services they need. When youth are in the juvenile justice system, these services are provided within the context of the principles of balanced and restorative justice, which addresses protection of the community, accountability for offenses committed, and development of competencies to enable youth to become responsible and productive members of the community. Core goals of the Pennsylvania initiative Timely screening and identification of youth with mental health challenges to juvenile probation departments; Diverting appropriate youth out of the juvenile justice system and into other programs that are better able to address the needs of youth with behavioral and mental health challenges; Protecting youth from having their statements used against them in court when they in good faith share information during court-ordered mental health screenings, assessments, or treatment; Providing adequate and effective mental health services to youth in the juvenile justice system; and Involving families in the mental health care of their children.

On a statewide level, a working group has created a joint policy statement to inspire commitment to change. The Mental Health/Juvenile Justice Joint Policy Statement was signed by administrators of state entities working in juvenile justice in Pennsylvania, including the departments of Public Welfare and Education, the Juvenile Court Judges Commission, the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, the Pennsylvania Council of Chief Juvenile Probation Officers, the Mental Health/Mental Retardation Program Administrators Association, and the Mental Health Association in Pennsylvania. The statement serves as a blueprint for juvenile justice policy and programs in the state and commits to the goal of achieving, by 2010, a model system that would: identify youth with mental health needs; provide timely access to treatment in the least restrictive environment; prevent unnecessary involvement of youth with mental health needs with the juvenile justice system; engage families in the care and treatment of young people; and coordinate services with multiple agencies. At the county level, Models for Change is working to improve mental health services by supporting three model counties that participated in the Comprehensive Systems Change Initiative (CSCI), a strategic-planning model developed by the National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice in a joint effort with the National Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators and Policy Research Inc. CSCI brings together juvenile justice and mental health systems to develop a comprehensive and coordinated service delivery system so that all youth, and especially the growing numbers in the juvenile justice system, have access to effective mental health services. Improving and Coordinating Access to Mental Health Services For Youth in Pennsylvania s Juvenile Justice System

Models for Change mental health activities are concentrated in three model counties Allegheny County is working to identify youth in the juvenile justice system who have a mental health disorder; ensure that the probation department has the information needed to communicate with mental health service providers; and make the mental health system the main place where young people are assessed and treated. Chester County is working to improve its ability to identify youth with mental health problems early in the process; expand community-based treatment and evidence-based practices; and engage family in young people s mental health treatment. Erie County is working to implement screening and treatment for the unique needs of youth receiving probation supervision; expand the ability of the juvenile court and the probation department to identify the mental health needs of young people; expand community-based treatment and evidenced-based practices; and increase the funding and resources available to meet these goals.

Learn More To learn more about the organizations mentioned in this document, visit: Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators: www.cjca.net Juvenile Court Judges Commission: www.jcjc.state.pa.us Juvenile Detention Centers Association of Pennsylvania: www.jdcap.org/jdcap Juvenile Law Center: www.jlc.org Mental Health Association in Pennsylvania (MHAPA): www.pachildrensnews.org Models for Change: www.modelsforchange.net National Center for Juvenile Justice: www.ncjj.org National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice: www.ncmhjj.com National Youth Screening Assistance Project (MASYI-2 Info): www.umassmed.edu/nysap Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency: www.pccd.state.pa.us 10 Improving and Coordinating Access to Mental Health Services For Youth in Pennsylvania s Juvenile Justice System

An initiative supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation www.macfound.org www.modelsforchange.net