Checklist for Juvenile Justice Agency Leaders and Managers
|
|
|
- Wendy Doyle
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Checklist for Juvenile Justice Agency Leaders and Managers THE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST will help your agency conduct a detailed assessment of how current policy and practice align with what research has shown works to reduce recidivism and improve other outcomes for youth involved with the juvenile justice system. The best practices outlined in this checklist are grouped by the four core principles detailed in Core Principles for Reducing Recidivism and Improving Outcomes for Youth in the Juvenile Justice System. You can use this hard-copy checklist to assess your agency, or complete your assessment online and receive an automated scoring of your results and identification of areas for improvement. * To complete this checklist, you should compile documentation and/or have complete knowledge of your agency s policies and procedures. To the extent possible, you should also review available assessment, supervision, service, and outcome data, and collect wide-ranging input from agency staff and contract providers to accurately assess agency practice. In instances where policy exists or practices always align with the question posed, choose as your response option. In instances where practices align 50 percent of the time or more, choose. For practices that happen as described less than 50 percent of the time, choose. For questions where policies do not exist or practices never happen as described, choose. Some questions may not apply to your particular agency or to the youth under your agency s jurisdiction; in those instances, choose. Do not use the option to indicate that your agency does not have a specific policy or practice. When completing the checklist, please keep in mind that the goal of the assessment is to more fully understand agency practices and they compare to what research has shown works to reduce recidivism. Accurate identification of agency and system needs allows for the development of targeted plans for improvement. PRINCIPLE 1: Base supervision, service, and resource-allocation decisions on the results of validated risk and needs assessments. Youth dispositions and supervision are based primarily on risk of reoffending. 1. Agency policy requires that all youth receive a risk screen and/or full risk assessment prior to disposition. 2. A risk screen and/or full risk assessment is completed for all youth prior to disposition. 3. Results from the risk screen and/or full risk assessment are used as a primary factor in diversion decisions made by the agency. 4. Youth who are assessed as being at low risk of reoffending are diverted from adjudication and formal system involvement. 5. The agency uses a dispositional matrix or guideline that includes youth risk level to guide diversion decisions. *To complete this form online, please go to Supported by: In partnership with: An initiative supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
2 Youth dispositions and supervision are based primarily on risk of reoffending. 6. Agency staff use risk screen and/or full risk assessment results when making disposition recommendations. 7. The court receives a youth s full risk assessment results prior to that youth s disposition hearing. 8. Results from full risk assessments are used as a primary factor in disposition decisions made by the court. 9. The agency uses a dispositional matrix or guideline that includes youth risk level to guide disposition decisions. 10. Decisions made by the court regarding a youth s expected length of time on community supervision or in a residential facility are based primarily on a youth s risk of reoffending. 11. Supervision requirements are primarily based on the youth s risk level, with high- and moderate-risk youth receiving more contact from the supervising officer than low-risk youth. 12. Youth committed to state-run secure facilities are high risk and/or have committed a violent felony offense. 13. Upon admission, youth committed to state-run secure facilities are assessed to determine their risk of reoffending and to identify the primary needs associated with their delinquency. 14. Security level and placement location for youth committed to state custody are based on risk of reoffending and need for specific services. 15. Youth supervised in the community receive risk assessments throughout their supervision, with reassessments occurring at least every six months or after significant life events. 16. Youth in residential facilities receive risk assessments throughout their residential stay, with reassessments occurring at least every six months or after significant life events. 17. Agency policy guides the length of time a youth spends on community supervision or in a residential facility and includes consideration of the youth s risk of reoffending. 18. The agency collects information on youth in electronic data systems. 19. Data on referral, disposition, and supervision type is collected for all youth including referral, disposition, and supervision begin and end dates. 2
3 Youth dispositions and supervision are based primarily on risk of reoffending. 20. Electronic data includes information on residential and detention facility placement. 21. Risk and needs assessment data is collected in an electronic data system. Validated screens and assessments are conducted to identify youth needs, and youth are matched to services that address the needs associated with their delinquency. 22. Agency policy requires all youth to be screened for mental health and substance use prior to disposition, with full assessments ordered if warranted. 23. Youth are screened for mental health needs prior to disposition. 24. Youth who screen positive for mental health needs receive a full assessment prior to disposition. 25. Youth are screened for substance use prior to disposition. 26. Youth who screen positive for substance use receive a full assessment prior to disposition. 27. Agency policy requires that youth are matched to programs that address the primary needs associated with their delinquency as identified by assessment results. 28. The programs and services a youth receives are based on their assessment results. 29. Youth participate in programs and receive services that directly address the primary needs associated with their delinquent behavior. 30. Low-risk youth receive minimal supervision, programs, and services. 31. Low-risk youth with significant mental health or substance use needs are diverted to community behavioral health care providers for services, when appropriate. 3
4 Validated screens and assessments are conducted to identify youth needs, and youth are matched to services that address the needs associated with their delinquency. 32. Intensive programs and services serve only moderate- and high-risk youth. 33. Low-, moderate-, and high-risk youth do not participate together in the same programs and services. 34. The length of time a youth spends in a program is based on the youth s risk level and needs. 35. The agency makes supervision discharge decisions based on a youth s progress in treatment and reduction of risk while on community supervision. 36. The agency makes facility release decisions based on a youth s progress in treatment and reduction of risk while in the residential facility. 37. The agency collects information on the programs and services youth receive while under supervision, including program completion. 38. Information on the programs and services youth receive while under supervision is collected in an electronic database. Agency policy and practice emphasize the importance of using the results of screens and assessments in supervision and service decisions. 39. Agency policy guides how and when risk and other screens and assessments must be conducted. 40. Agency policy requires ongoing training on how to conduct and score risk and other screens and assessments. 41. Agency staff receive ongoing training on how to conduct and score risk and other screens and assessments. 42. Agency staff incorporate results of risk and other screens and assessments into their supervision practices. 4
5 Agency policy and practice emphasize the importance of using the results of screens and assessments in supervision and service decisions. 43. Agency staff are trained on how to develop case plans based on the information gathered through risk and other screens and assessments. 44. Service providers must specify the population their program or residential facility is intended to serve, including youth risk level and needs criteria eligibility. 45. The agency has written descriptions of all programs and services to which youth are referred and descriptions include youth risk level and needs criteria eligibility. 46. Agency policy details the process for referring youth to programs and services. 47. Agency staff follow the agency s referral policies when referring youth to programs and services. 48. The agency reviews screens and assessments for accuracy and consistency at least annually. 49. The agency provides feedback to staff on the accuracy and consistency of the screens and assessments they complete. PRINCIPLE 2: Adopt and effectively implement programs and services demonstrated to reduce recidivism and improve other youth outcomes, and use data to evaluate system performance and direct system improvements. Never (No) Youth receive services shown by research to reduce recidivism and improve other youth outcomes. 1. The agency requires that all programs and practices provided by the agency have been shown through research to reduce recidivism. 2. Agency programs and practices are focused on positive youth change and motivation. 3. Programs and practices focused on discipline, control and/or punishment are not used by the agency. 5
6 Never (No) Youth receive services shown by research to reduce recidivism and improve other youth outcomes. 4. Surveillance of youth on community supervision is used only for youth as an alternative to detention or as a graduated sanction. 5. The programs and practices used by the agency are research based. 6. Agency programs and practices stress therapeutic approaches and skill building for youth. 7. Agency contracts require service providers to provide research-based programs to the youth they serve. 8. The services youth receive while in residential facilities are research based and address the primary needs associated with their delinquent behavior. Never (No) Youth receive services that are implemented in a manner consistent with research and the intended design of the program. 9. The agency provides technical assistance to service providers to ensure that their practices are research based and tailored to the primary needs of the youth they serve. 10. The agency monitors and/or audits programs to ensure that they have been implemented and are operating as designed. 11. Program and service quality including staffing, curricula, and program delivery is reviewed at least annually. 12. The outcomes for youth participating in programs and services are measured at least annually to determine program effectiveness. 13. Service providers receive written feedback at least annually about the outcomes of youth participating in their programs and services. 14. Youth outcomes, broken down by facility, program, and/or service provider, are reported to agency management and are available to stakeholders. 6
7 Never (No) Youth receive services that are implemented in a manner consistent with research and the intended design of the program. 15. Programs that are not effective in reducing recidivism and/or improving youth outcomes do not receive continued funding from the agency and youth are no longer referred to those programs. 16. Performance expectations related to program and service delivery and youth outcomes are included in all service provider contracts and providers that do not meet expectations do not receive continued funding or referrals. 17. Service providers are required to provide written descriptions of the services they provide and the expected length of stay in programs and residential facilities. 18. The agency verifies that programs and residential facilities are serving the youth identified as the program s or facility s target population. 19. The length of time youth spend in community programs is tied to the youth s primary needs and is consistent with the expected length of stay. 20. The length of time youth spend in residential facilities is tied to the youth s primary needs and is consistent with the expected length of stay. Data on key performance measures are collected and used to drive system decisions and improvements. 21. The agency has established performance measures and reviews system performance at least annually. 22. The agency collects case-level data on all youth served. 23. Case-level data is collected in an electronic database in a manner that can be easily quantified and analyzed. 24. Case-level data is collected at all points in the system and for all services a youth receives. 25. Data on the programs and services youth receive are not primarily collected through written comments in case-planning documents and case notes. 7
8 Data on key performance measures are collected and used to drive system decisions and improvements. 26. Data on screens and assessments are collected electronically and can be quantified and analyzed. 27. The agency uses the data it collects to improve the supervision, programs, and services it provides. 28. Data to calculate recidivism is available in an electronic database and can be analyzed. 29. Youth outcome measures tied to the services youth receive are identified and the data to calculate these measures is collected in an electronic database. 30. One- and two-year recidivism rates are calculated for youth supervised by the agency. 31. Recidivism is analyzed by youth risk level, supervision type, residential facility, service provider, and program/service received. 32. The agency captures information to determine assessment, supervision, and program quality and conducts audits at least annually. 33. The agency uses information captured on quality assessment audits to improve the supervision, programs, and services it provides. 34. Agency performance and youth outcome information is provided to agency staff, service providers, policymakers, advocates, and the public. PRINCIPLE 3: Employ a coordinated approach across service systems to address youth s needs. The agency coordinates and shares information with behavioral health care (mental health and substance use) providers to meet the needs of youth. 1. The agency has a policy that requires relevant screen and assessment results be shared between the agency and behavioral health care providers. 2. The agency and behavioral health care providers share screen and assessment results. 8
9 The agency coordinates and shares information with behavioral health care (mental health and substance use) providers to meet the needs of youth. 3. Agency staff and behavioral health care providers communicate about youth participation and progress in treatment. 4. Agency staff and behavioral health care providers collaborate in case planning whenever possible. 5. Cross-system training for juvenile justice staff and behavioral health care providers is conducted at least annually. 6. MOUs or other agreements are in place that allow for data sharing between the agency and behavioral health care providers. 7. Behavioral health care providers have access to the agency data system to enter information on assessments, treatment progress, and youth outcomes. 8. The agency works with behavioral health care providers to improve the availability, accessibility, and quality of mental health and substance use services for youth under the agency s jurisdiction. 9. Youth with mental health and/or substance use needs receive treatment that matches the level and intensity of their needs. 10. The agency and behavioral health care providers develop common treatment outcome expectations for youth served in both systems. 11. The agency is able to access community-based mental health and substance use services and treatment through a state funded behavioral health care provider. The agency coordinates and shares information with the child welfare system to meet the needs of youth. 12. The agency has policies in place that promote collaboration with the child welfare system. 13. The agency is able to identify youth under its supervision who are also being served by the child welfare system. 14. Youth involved in both the juvenile justice and the child welfare systems go before the same judge for their justice and child welfare system cases. 9
10 The agency coordinates and shares information with the child welfare system to meet the needs of youth. 15. Agency and child welfare system staff perform joint case planning whenever possible. 16. Agency and child welfare systems staff have common outcomes identified for youth served in both systems. 17. MOUs or other agreements are in place that allow for data sharing between the agency and the child welfare system agency. 18. Cross-system training for juvenile justice and child welfare system staff is conducted at least annually. The agency coordinates with local school systems and vocational training providers to ensure that youth are engaged in educational and/or vocational programs. 19. MOUs or other agreements are in place that allow for data sharing between the agency and local schools, including the sharing of attendance and disciplinary information. 20. The agency has a designated liaison responsible for coordination and communication with local schools. 21. The agency requires that all residential facilities overseen by the agency adhere to the same curricular, accreditation, and accountability standards as schools in the community. 22. Community residential facility providers are required to enroll youth in the local school district or provide accredited distance learning to youth residing in the facility. 23. Educational programming that meets a wide range of education levels and needs, including credit recovery and special education, is available for all youth while in a residential facility. 24. Vocational and job-readiness training is available to all youth under the agency s jurisdiction. 25. Youth in residential facilities are required to participate in education or vocational programming. 26. Youth leaving residential facilities are re-enrolled in school or in an appropriate educational/vocational program within two weeks of release. 10
11 The agency coordinates with local school systems and vocational training providers to ensure that youth are engaged in educational and/or vocational programs. 27. Youth s school credits and records are transferred in their entirety and in a timely manner between residential facilities and schools in the community. 28. The agency collects data on a youth s education status and attendance while they are under supervision. 29. The agency collects data in an electronic database to track a youth s academic progress while they are under supervision. PRINCIPLE 4: Tailor system policies, programs, and supervision to reflect the distinct developmental needs of adolescents. Youth and families are engaged in system decisions, including case planning and service delivery. 1. The agency has policies regarding youth and family input into case plans, programming, and reentry planning. 2. Results from risk and needs screens and assessments are shared with youth and their family. 3. Youth and their families participate in regular caseplanning meetings, including at the beginning of supervision, 30 days prior to release from a residential facility, and 30 days prior to supervision discharge. 4. Support services and counseling are available to the families of youth on community supervision. 5. Support services and counseling are available to the families of youth in residential facilities. 6. The agency schedules office visits and programs at times and in locations that maximize youth and family participation/attendance. 7. Agency staff receive regular training on how to engage and communicate effectively with youth and their families. 8. The agency links youth and families to community supports and services prior to discharge from a residential facility. 11
12 Youth and families are engaged in system decisions, including case planning and service delivery. 9. Families participate in reentry planning for youth leaving residential facilities. 10. Youth and their families are surveyed about their experience with the programs and supervision the youth received from the agency. Youth supervision is focused on promoting positive behavior change. 11. The agency has policies encouraging the use of positive behavior-change strategies. 12. Youth receive supervision primarily focused on promoting positive behavior change. 13. The majority of supervision officer time is spent in a role that is supportive of the youth and focuses on the factors most closely associated with youth delinquency. 14. Staff are trained in motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral approaches, and/or other methods for engaging with youth and promoting positive behavior change. Youth are held accountable for their actions in a developmentally appropriate manner. 15. The agency has a graduated sanctions matrix that clearly outlines the appropriate sanction(s) for youth under supervision who do not follow the conditions of their supervision. 16. The agency has a graduated sanction matrix that considers the youth s risk level and seriousness of the supervision violation. 17. Staff use a graduated sanction matrix to respond to youth who have violated the terms of their supervision. 12
13 Youth are held accountable for their actions in a developmentally appropriate manner. 18. Detention, if needed, is used only as a sanction for a new offense. 19. The agency has an incentives matrix that provides for consistent incentives for youth under supervision. 20. Conditions of supervision are easily understood by youth, are realistic, and relate directly to the youth s delinquent behavior. 21. Staff have the knowledge and resources to provide youth with incentives/rewards for positive behavior. 22. A youth s ability and readiness to participate is considered prior to requiring a youth to participate in a program or service. 23. Restorative justice practices (e.g. restitution, community service, or victim mediation) are used to help youth understand and repair the harm caused to victims and communities. Youth are treated fairly and receive services tailored to their unique needs. 24. The agency offers gender-specific programs and services. 25. The agency offers culturally-specific programs and services. 26. The agency has specific programs and services designed to meet the needs of older youth transitioning to independence. 27. The agency has specific programs and services designed to meet the needs of youth 12 years old and younger. 28. Data to identify potential differences in the processing and treatment of youth, including racial and/or ethnic disparities, are collected in an electronic database at system intake, disposition, and other system decision points. 13
14 Youth are treated fairly and receive services tailored to their unique needs. 29. Data on potential differences in the processing and treatment of youth are analyzed to determine if and where disparities exist in the system. 30. If disparities have been identified, the agency takes action to promote more equitable supervision and service decisions. 31. Staff receive ongoing cultural competence and equity training. 14
REDUCING STATEWIDE RECIDIVISM: CHECKLIST FOR STATE REENTRY COORDINATORS
STATE REENTRY COORDINATORS are uniquely positioned to ensure that the policies and practices that go into a recidivism-reduction initiative are being implemented effectively, both in corrections settings
PRIMARY TREATMENT CENTERS AND DETENTION
SECTION SIX PRIMARY TREATMENT CENTERS AND DETENTION I. PRIMARY TREATMENT CENTER A. General Characteristics 1. Children referred to Primary Treatment Centers (PTC) may be children in their initial state
Reentry & Aftercare. Reentry & Aftercare. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators
Reentry & Aftercare Reentry & Aftercare Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators Reentry & Aftercare Introduction Every year, approximately 100,000 juveniles are released from juvenile detention facilities
JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OHIO. Erin Davies, Executive Director Juvenile Justice Coalition [email protected]
JUVENILE JUSTICE IN OHIO Erin Davies, Executive Director Juvenile Justice Coalition [email protected] Juvenile Court 101: Purpose of The Juvenile Court To provide rehabilitation and treatment to youth
District Attorney Guidelines
Louisiana District Attorneys Association District Attorney Guidelines by the Institute for Public Health and Justice in collaboration with the Louisiana District Attorneys Association Acknowledgements
JUVENILE DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS
JUVENILE DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA Adopted December 15, 2005 (REVISED 10/07) PREFACE * As most juvenile justice practitioners know only too well, the populations and caseloads
STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION
STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION TITLE GRADE EEO-4 CODE YOUTH PAROLE COUNSELOR III 40* B 13.265 YOUTH PAROLE COUNSELOR II 39* B 13.266
WASHINGTON STATE JUVENILE JUSITCE PROFILE (courtesy of the NCJJ web site)
WASHINGTON STATE JUVENILE JUSITCE PROFILE (courtesy of the NCJJ web site) Delinquency Services Summary Decentralized State: Delinquency services are organized at both the state and local level in Washington.
Utah Juvenile Drug Court Certification Checklist May, 2014 Draft
Utah Juvenile Drug Court Certification Checklist May, 2014 Draft Standards followed by an R are required features of a drug court, and adherence to these standards is required for certification. Standards
Associated Industries of Florida. Getting Smart on Juvenile Crime in Florida: Taking It to The Next Level
Associated Industries of Florida Getting Smart on Juvenile Crime in Florida: Taking It to The Next Level Reducing Juvenile Arrests by 40% Barney T. Bishop III Chairman Wansley Walters, Director Miami-Dade
Juvenile Diversion in North Carolina
Juvenile Diversion in North Carolina Division of Juvenile Justice July 2013 Introduction The juvenile justice system in North Carolina has made great gains in reducing the number of juveniles who go to
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE Frequently Asked Questions Lee County Juvenile Assessment Center 2107 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Ft. Myers Fl. 33901 Detention Services Q: How long do juveniles
Knowledge Brief Are Minority Youths Treated Differently in Juvenile Probation?
Knowledge Brief Are Minority Youths Treated Differently in Juvenile Probation? While many studies have examined disproportionate minority contact at the front end of the juvenile justice system, few have
Probation is a penalty ordered by the court that permits the offender to
Probation and Parole: A Primer for Law Enforcement Officers Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice At the end of 2008, there were 4.3 million adults on probation supervision and over 800,000
Community-Based Program Evaluation Series: Overview of Community-Based Juvenile Probation Programs. Part 1
Community-Based Program Evaluation Series: Overview of Community-Based Juvenile Probation Programs Part 1 June 2013 Introduction The Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) Program & Services Registry
Criminal Justice 101. The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness. April 2009
Criminal Justice 101 The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness April 2009 Acronyms DOC = Department of Corrections DYC = Division of Youth Corrections DCJ
Washington Model for Juvenile Justice
Washington Model for Juvenile Justice The juvenile justice system in Washington State is a continuum of prevention, early intervention, and intervention services operated by both the county and state government.
Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court
LOB #190: LONG-TERM RESIDENTIAL CARE Purpose The Long-Term Residential Care (LTRC) Line of Business incorporates three programs: Boys Probation House (BPH) Foundations Transitional Living Program (TLP)
Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP) Appendix B
Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP) Appendix B Appendix B Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP) Performance Domains and Job Tasks Domain I: Dynamics of Addiction and Criminal Behavior
Potential for Change: Public Attitudes and Policy Preferences for Juvenile Justice Systems Reform Executive Summary: Washington
Potential for Change: Public Attitudes and Policy Preferences for Juvenile Justice Systems Reform Executive Summary: Washington A Center for Children s Law and Policy Report Introduction New polling data
Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners
MAY 03 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Research for Practice Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for State Prisoners WEB-ONLY DOCUMENT Breaking the
Juvenile Justice Decision Point Chart
Juvenile Justice Decision Point Chart Everybody involved in the system shares with the community the concern that there are informal factors that have an effect on the outcome of all decisions. Below are
Youth and the Law. Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit
Youth and the Law Presented by The Crime Prevention Unit Objectives Explaining the juvenile justice system and the differences between it and the adult system. Discussing juveniles rights and responsibilities
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit The Victim/Witness Assistance Division of the Lake County State s Attorney s Office was formed to serve the needs of people like you. The division is meant to ensure
Georgia Accountability Court Adult Felony Drug Court. Policy and Procedure Manual
Georgia Accountability Court Adult Felony Drug Court Policy and Procedure Manual Contents Policy and Procedure Manual: Adult Felony Drug Court Overall purpose...3 Mission Statement...4 Adult Drug Court
ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL
ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION IN A NUTSHELL An alternative to incarceration is any kind of punishment other than time in prison or jail that can be given to a person who commits a crime. Frequently, punishments
Juvenile Justice Services Division
Juvenile Justice Services Division Navigating the New Mexico Juvenile Justice System Presented by: Carmela Y. Romero Juvenile Community Corrections Program Manager 1 P a g e Juvenile Justice System Division
[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. 351. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11
Session of 00 [As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No. By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure;
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PROBATION AND PAROLE DIVISION OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE. Subject: PROGRAM STRUCTURES
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PROBATION AND PAROLE DIVISION OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE Procedure No.: PPD 5.1.100 Reference: DOC 5.4.1; 53-1-203, MCA Page 1 of 6 Effective Date: 06/23/15 Revision Dates: Signature
SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK February 4, 2013 1 I. Introduction The Special Options Services (SOS) Program was established in the
Community-based Youth Services Division. Director Dennis Gober
Mission Statement The Office of Juvenile Affairs is a state agency entrusted by the people of Oklahoma to provide professional prevention, education, and treatment services as well as secure facilities
SERVICE DEFINITION: STANDARDS/LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS:
SERVICE DEFINITION: This service provides twenty-four (24) hour residential services within a structured environment for the adolescent sexual offending population. Services are designed to provide treatment
Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Washington State Institute for Public Policy EVALUATING EARLY INTERVENTION IN WASHINGTON STATE JUVENILE COURTS: A Six-Month Progress Report January 1997 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1996 Washington State Legislature
Report on the Repurposing of the Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center
Report to The Vermont Legislature Report on the Repurposing of the Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center In Accordance with Act 146 Sec. C 10: Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center Submitted to: Submitted
SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency.
SHORT TITLE: Criminal procedure; creating the Oklahoma Drug Court Act; codification; emergency. STATE OF OKLAHOMA 2nd Session of the 45th Legislature (1996) SENATE BILL NO. 1153 By: Hobson AS INTRODUCED
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM A delinquency petition is a court document alleging that a juvenile, between ages 10-16, has violated a law which would be a criminal offense if committed by an adult. Disposition
Most states juvenile justice systems have
BRIEF I Setting the Stage: Juvenile Justice History, Statistics, and Practices in the United States and North Carolina Ann Brewster Most states juvenile justice systems have two main goals: increased public
Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update. Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice
Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice Juvenile Court founded in 1899 to create a separate justice system for
Redeploy Illinois Annual Report Implementation and Impact May 2007
Redeploy Illinois Annual Report Implementation and Impact May 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Research suggests that non-violent youth offenders are less likely to be involved in subsequent delinquent behavior
COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences
COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences The Deferred Prosecution Program of the Travis County Juvenile Mental Health Court Project COPE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION An Introduction The Travis
Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.
Juvenile Justice in Wisconsin by Christina Carmichael Fiscal Analyst Wisconsin Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code. Statute 938.1 of the chapter states that it is
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
ROBERT LEVENTER COURT COMMISSIONER NORTHEAST DISTRICT- PASADENA 300 EAST WALNUT STREET, DEPARTMENT 271 PASADENA, CA 91101 TELEPHONE: (626) 356-5671 [email protected] Superior Court of California
Drug Court as Diversion for Youthful Offenders
Drug Court as Diversion for Youthful Offenders Juvenile Drug Courts in Hawaii: A Policy Brief Introduction The problem of drug abuse among the general population in the United States began to escalate
UNDER DEVELOPMENT CLASS TITLE: Social Work Support Technician (currently Youth Residential Worker 1)
OCCUPATIONAL GROUP: Social Services CLASS FAMILY: Social Work CLASS FAMILY DESCRIPTION: This family of positions includes those whose purpose is to provide social services to various populations, including
BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY
BRYCE A. FETTER ORLANDO JUVENILE CHARGES ATTORNEY People make mistakes, especially young people. Juvenile lawyer Bryce Fetter believes children should get a second chance through rehabilitation rather
NAVIGATING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM
NAVIGATING THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM A Guide for Parents of Youth with Disabilities Jessica Feierman, Esq, Emily C. Keller, Esq, Marcia Glickman, Esq. Navigating the Juvenile Justice System: A Guide
Re-connecting Disconnected Youth with Community and Careers
Re-connecting Disconnected Youth with Community and Careers NGA Policy Institute 9/20/2012 Toni Irving Deputy Chief of Staff Governor Quinn, Illinois In the beginning Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899
Austin Travis County Integral Care Jail Diversion Programs and Strategies
Jail Diversion Diversion programs serve as critical strategies in preventing people with mental illness who commit crimes from entering or unnecessarily remaining in the criminal justice system. Interception
LEECH LAKE TRIBAL COURT RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAM Bamenim Anishinaabeg Care for The People - Healing Spirit, Mind & Body -
LEECH LAKE TRIBAL COURT RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAM Bamenim Anishinaabeg Care for The People - Healing Spirit, Mind & Body - 1 THE TRIBAL COURT S MISSION: The Mission of the Leech Lake Tribal Court is
County Administrator Our mission is to deliver quality public services to the citizens in an effective, professional and efficient manner.
County Administrator Our mission is to deliver quality public services to the citizens in an effective, professional and efficient manner. PO Box 3000, 303 Minnesota Avenue, Walker, MN 56484-3000 Phone:
Education Specialist/ Field Consultant for DCS Positions throughout the State
Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor James W. Payne, Director Indiana Department of Child Services Room E306 MS47 302 W. Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2738 317-234-KIDS FAX: 317-232-4497
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Youth Services
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Department of Youth Services Jane E. Tewksbury, Commissioner Edward J. Dolan, Deputy Commissioner DYS Mission Statement The Department
A Guide to Understanding the Juvenile Justice System
A Guide to Understanding the Juvenile Justice System County of San Diego Probation Department Building a Safer Community since 1907 The Arrest When a law enforcement officer arrests a person under the
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Budget. Fiscal Year 2016. Volume II Health and Human Services. Gina M. Raimondo, Governor
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Budget Fiscal Year 2016 Volume II Health and Human Services Gina M. Raimondo, Governor Agency Agency Mission The Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth
UTAH DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES MONITORING CHECKLIST (FY 2014) GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
UTAH DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES MONITORING CHECKLIST (FY 2014) Program Name Reviewer Name Date(s) of Review GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 2014 Division
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child. A Guide for Parents and Guardians
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings and Your Child A Guide for Parents and Guardians NOTICE TO READER This brochure provides basic information about family court procedures relating to juvenile delinquency
Massachusetts Department of Correction SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT 103 DOC 446. Table of Contents. 446.01 Definitions...3. 446.02 General Policy...
Massachusetts Department of Correction SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT 103 DOC 446 Table of Contents Page 446.01 Definitions...3 446.02 General Policy...3 446.03 Orientation...3 446.04 Classification & Program
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Stanley L. Garnett, District Attorney Boulder Office: Justice Center, 1777 6th St., Boulder, Colorado 80302 303.441.3700 fax: 303.441.4703 Longmont
Statement of Policy - The Goals of Drug and Veteran Treatment Courts The Idaho Legislature established the following goals for problem solving courts:
IDAHO ADULT VETERANS TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS & GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION Idaho recognizes that veteran treatment courts promote public safety and reduce criminal activity associated
The Rights of Crime Victims in Texas
The Rights of Crime Victims in Texas 1 Housekeeping Please turn off cell phones and pagers or place in a silent mode. Questions can be answered in presentations or during break. 2 Constitutional Rights
Milwaukee County Early Intervention Program
Milwaukee County Early Intervention Program National Symposium on Pretrial Diversion Strengthening the Evidence-Based Framework Washington D.C. May 30, 2012 District Attorney John T. Chisholm First Assistant
Residential Treatment Facility Proposed Regulations. OMHSAS Children s Advisory Committee January 6, 2011
Residential Treatment Facility Proposed Regulations OMHSAS Children s Advisory Committee January 6, 2011 Agenda Review of RTF regulation development process Overview of residential treatment facilities
Nebraska s Youth Rehabilitation. and Treatment Centers. Nebraska YRTCs Issue Brief. A Publication of. www.voicesforchildren.com
Nebraska YRTCs Issue Brief Nebraska s Youth Rehabilitation and Treatment Centers Every year, Nebraska s courts send a number of serious and not-so-serious juvenile offenders to the Youth Residential Treatment
1. The youth is between the ages of 12 and 17.
Clinical MULTISYSTEMIC THERAPY (MST) Definition Multisystemic therapy (MST) is an intensive family and community-based treatment that addresses multiple aspects of serious antisocial behavior in adolescents.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD. Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Statewide Criminal Justice Recidivism and Revocation Rates LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF SUBMITTED TO THE 83RD TEXAS LEGISLATURE JANUARY 2013 STATEWIDE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECIDIVISM
Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders. Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators
Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders Juvenile Justice Guide Book for Legislators Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Offenders Introduction Children with mental
Santa Clara County Probation Department Enhanced Ranch Program: Rehabilitation Aftercare Program. Aishatu Yusuf and Angela Irvine
Santa Clara County Probation Department Enhanced Ranch Program: Rehabilitation Aftercare Program Aishatu Yusuf and Angela Irvine MAY 2014 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................
The FUNDAMENTALS Of DRUG TREATMENT COURT. Hon. Patrick C. Bowler, Ret.
The FUNDAMENTALS Of DRUG TREATMENT COURT Hon. Patrick C. Bowler, Ret. Drug Treatment Courts A New Way Partner with Treatment Transform Roles Non-adversarial/Team Shared Goal of Recovery Communication Immediate
How To Fund A Mental Health Court
Mental Health Courts: A New Tool By Stephanie Yu, Fiscal Analyst For fiscal year (FY) 2008-09, appropriations for the Judiciary and the Department of Community Health (DCH) include funding for a mental
An Overview Of The Texas Youth Commission s Specialized Treatment Programs
An Overview Of The Texas Youth Commission s Specialized Treatment Programs Criminal Justice Policy Council Prepared for the 76 th Texas Legislature Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive Director An Overview Of
Snapshot of National Organizations Policy Statements on Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System
Snapshot of National Organizations Policy Statements on Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System A n estimated 250,000 youth are prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system every year, and nearly
Allegheny County Juvenile Probation
NDTAC National Conference June 2009 Allegheny County Juvenile Probation Russell Carlino, Deputy Director Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Allegheny County Demographics Population -1.3 Million
The Alameda County Model of Probation: Juvenile Supervision
The Alameda County Model of Probation: Juvenile Supervision August 2011 Model of Probation Juvenile Supervision 1 The Alameda County Model of Probation: Juvenile Supervision August 2011 With the appointment
LEHIGH COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE
LEHIGH COUNTY JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM MISSION STATEMENT... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 QUALIFICATION... 4 GENERAL PROGRAM POLICIES... 5 CONTENT
Redirection as Effective as Residential Delinquency Programs, Achieved Substantial Cost Avoidance
March 2006 Report No. 06-34 Redirection as Effective as Residential Delinquency Programs, Achieved Substantial Cost Avoidance at a glance Although it experienced several start-up challenges, the Redirection
Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013
Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013 Panel Introductions Judge Keith Starrett Moderator Judge Robert Francis Panelist Judge Stephen Manley Panelist Charles Robinson - Panelist Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court
EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT FOR VIOLENT JUVENILE DELINQUENTS
EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT FOR VIOLENT JUVENILE DELINQUENTS THE PROBLEM Traditionally, the philosophy of juvenile courts has emphasized treatment and rehabilitation of young offenders. In recent years,
BANNOCK COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE CLASSES AND PROGRAMS SUMMARY
BANNOCK COUNTY JUVENILE JUSTICE CLASSES AND PROGRAMS SUMMARY PREVENTION/EARLY INTERVENTION YOUTH COURT Youth Court was started in Bannock County in November 1991. It is a diversion program designed to
RI Office of Management and Budget Performance Report
Annual Overtime Expenditures (in millions) Average Hourly Wage RI Office of Management and Budget Performance Report RI Department of Corrections April 11, 213 Corrections Budget Fiscal Year 213 Expenditures
