Subject Description Form

Subject Description Form Subject Code Subject Title APSS5760 Evolution in Family Therapy: Structural & Systemic Approaches Credit Value 3 Level 5 Pre-requisite / Co-requisite/ Exclusion Nil Assessment Methods 100% Continuous Assessment Individual Assessment Group Assessment 1. Reading & Quiz 20% 0% 2. Case Report / Portfolio 50% 0% 3. Group presentation & Case Powerpoint Report 0% 30% Objectives Intended Learning Outcomes The main purpose of this course is to facilitate students to develop a system perspective in understanding marriage and family therapy. Students are expected to critically examine the role of the changing epistemological paradigms in the evolution of marriage and family therapy approaches. Students will be introduced to the major concepts of general system theory that shape the development of various family therapy approaches. Students will be guided to compare and contrast the differences in the philosophical, theoretical and practice assumptions underlying the three major family therapy approaches: Bowen family systems therapy, Structural family therapy and Milan systemic approaches. The emphasis of the learning is on developing a systemic orientation to family practice instead of mastering exclusively on therapeutic techniques of these family therapy approaches. Upon completion of the subject, students will be able to: a. Examine the influences of modern and post-modern perspectives in marriage and family therapy. b. Understand the historical evolution and development of systems theory, including first and second-order cybernetics, and their impact on the emergence of various family therapy approaches. c. Understand the philosophical premises, theoretical assumptions, practice principles, and ethical principles underlying the three o major family therapy approaches, Structural, Bowen family systems, and Milan systemic family therapy approaches. d. Examine the research basis for supporting their practice of these three family therapy approaches. e. Creatively integrate the three family therapy approaches with different family problems and issues in the context of Hong Kong; f. Begin to develop their own personal style of family therapy in light of the family therapy approaches studied. Last updated in July 2014-1 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15

Subject Synopsis/ Indicative Syllabus Teaching/Learning Methodology 1. Overview the difference between individual and family therapy 2. Historical development for family therapy 3. General system theory 4. Family life cycle 5. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Bowen family systems therapy 6. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Structural family therapy 7. The application of systemic epistemological paradigm in Milan systemic family therapy 8. Family system assessment and family system interventions The main pedagogical approach for this subject is based on the action learning approach. Through attending the lectures and reading of the relevant materials, students will develop a conceptual understanding on the subject. They will be expected to actively experiment the newly learned concepts with actual cases. Their experimentation will be presented to the whole class so as to get feedback from other fellow students and teacher. Based on the feedback, they will make further experimentation with the newly acquired knowledge for family therapy practice. The subject will also incorporate a variety of experientially-based pedagogical methods to facilitate the students learning, including case studies, role-play, videos of real-life cases, and individual and group presentation and reflection. Assessment Methods in Alignment with Intended Learning Outcomes Specific assessment methods/tasks % weighting Intended subject learning outcomes to be assessed (Please tick as appropriate) a b c d e f 1. Reading & Quiz 20% 1. Case Portfolio 50% 2. Group presentation & Case Powerpoint Report 30% Total 100 % Explanation of the appropriateness of the assessment methods in assessing the intended learning outcomes: Course requirement: 1. Reading and Quiz (20%) 2. Case Portfolio (50%) Students are expected to read the assigned readings for the quizzes. Students will submit a case portfolio consisting of three case reports on three different family cases. Each case report will not exceed 10 double-spaced pages. Students are expected to analyze the family from the perspectives of the Structural, Bowen family systems, and Milan systemic family approaches. Each report should include a genogram or a family map of the family, and the analysis of the problems facing the family and treatment direction.. Last updated in July 2014-2 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15

3. Group presentation & Case Powerpoint Report (30%) The class will be divided into small groups. Each group will present one family case. Students will have to analyze the family case according to one of the three family therapy approaches. The presentations emphasize on a systemic analysis on the problem and design of appropriate treatment plans to be administrated to the family. Students will submit a brief powerpoint report of the presentation. Student Study Effort Expected Class contact: Lecture 27 Hrs. Seminar 12 Hrs. Other student study effort: Preparation for case presentation 15 Hrs. Reading on required books & articles 30 Hrs. Assignment 30 Hrs. Total student study effort 114 Hrs. Medium of Instruction Medium of Assessment Reading List and References English supplemented with Chinese English Textbook Nichols, M. P. (2012). Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (10 th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. References Essential Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., Hoffman, L., & Penn, P. (1987). Milan systemic family therapy: Conversations in theory and practice. New York, NY: Basic Books. Hoffman, L. (1981). Foundations of family therapy: A conceptual framework for systems change. New York, NY: Basis Books. Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York, NY: Norton. McGoldrick, M., & Gerson, R. (1985). Genograms in family assessment. New York, NY: Norton. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Last updated in July 2014-3 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15

Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. H.. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Family Systems Perspective Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2012). Family therapy: A systemic integration. (8 th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Dallos, R., & Draper, R. (2010). An introduction to family therapy: Systemic theory and practice. (2 nd ed.). Maidenhead; NY: Open University Press. Gladding, S. T. (2014). Family therapy: History, theory and practice. (6 th ed.). Boston MA: Pearson. Hanna, S. M. (2007). The practice of family therapy: Key elements across models. Belmont, CA : Thomson Nichols, M. P. (2010). The Essentials of family therapy. (5 th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Wynne, L. C., McDaniel, S. H., & Weber, T. T. (Eds.). (1986). Systems consultation: A new perspective for family therapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press Structural Family Therapy Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. H. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Minuchin, S., Nichols, M. P., & Lee, W. Y. (2007). A four-step model for assessing families and couples: From symptom to psyche. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Bowen Family Systems Therapy Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson. Brown, F. H. (Ed.). (1991). Reweaving the family tapestry: A multigenerational approach to families. New York, NY: Norton & Company. Framo, J. L. (1992). Family-of-origin therapy: An intergenerational approach. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel. Kramer, J. R. (1985). Family interfaces: Transgenerational Patterns, New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel. Kerr, M. E. & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York, NY: Norton. McGoldrick, M. & Gerson, R. (1985). Genograms in family Assessment. New York, Last updated in July 2014-4 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15

NY: Norton. Roberto, L. G. (1992). Transgenerational family therapies. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Titelman, P. (ed.). (1998). Clinical applications of Bowen family systems theory. New York, NY: Haworth Press. 屈 偉 豪 (2007) 家 庭 成 長 歷 程,2nd ed. 飛 躍 國 際 網 絡 屈 偉 豪 (1999) 情 牽 兩 代 心 ( 錄 音 帶 ), 卓 越 出 版 社 Milan Systemic Family Therapy Bennun, I. (1986). Evaluating family therapy: A comparison of the Milan and problem solving approaches, Journal of Family Therapy, 8(3), 225-242. Boscolo, L., & Bertrando, P. (1996). Systemic therapy with individuals. London, England: Karnac Books. Burbatti, G. L., Castoldi, I., & Maggi, L. (1993). Systemic psychotherapy with families, couples, and individuals. London, England: Jason Aronson. Campbell, D., Draper, R., Huffington, C. (1991). Second thoughts on the theory and practice of the milan approach to family therapy. London, England: Karnac Books. [On line book: http://www.questia.com/pm.qst?a=o&d=14477407] Campbell, D. (1999). Family Therapy and Beyond: Where is the Milan Systemic Approach Today? Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 4(2), 76-84. Campbell, D. (2003). The mutiny and the bounty: The place of Milan ideas today. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 24(1), 15-25. Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26(4), 405-413. Haley, J. (1984). Ordeal therapy. Sanfrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Palazzoli, M. S., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1994). Paradox and counterparadox. London, England: Jason Aronson. Penn, P. (1982). Circular questioning. Family Process, 21(2), 267-280. Lawson, D. M., & Prevatt, F. F. (1999). Casebook in family therapy. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. Selvinii, M. P., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing circularity Neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19(1), 3-12. Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part I. Strategizing as a fourth guideline for the therapist, Family Process, 26(1), 3-13. Tomm, K. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing, Family Process, 26(2), 167-183. Last updated in July 2014-5 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15

Suggested Reading Carter, B. & McGoldrick, M.. (Ed.). (1989). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy (2 nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (2008). Family therapy: An overview. (8th ed.). Brooks/Cole. Piercy, F. P., Sprenkle, D. H. & Associates. (1986). Family therapy sourcebook. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Brock, G. W., & Barnard, C. P. (2008). Procedures in marriage and family therapy. (4 th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Last updated in July 2014-6 - APSS5760 for the academic year of 2014-15