Table 1: Prescriptive Envelope Requirements: Residential WOOD FRAME WALL R-VALUE MASS WALL R-VALUE CEILING R-VALUE



Similar documents
2009 IECC Update. Scope. Content. International Energy Conservation Code

Building Energy Codes 101 October 23, Matthew Giudice Building Policy Associate Midwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

IECC Compliance Guide for Homes in Virginia

2011 Energy Efficiency Expo!

Mississippi. Energy and Cost Savings. for New Single and Multifamily Homes: 2009 and 2012 IECC as Compared to the 2006 IECC

Tennessee. Energy and Cost Savings. for New Single and Multifamily Homes: 2009 and 2012 IECC as Compared to the 2006 IECC

Introduction to Energy Codes & Green Building Programs

Colorado Energy and Cost Savings

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF INTERNATIONAL. (1) The Department of Labor and Industry adopts and incorporates by

Georgia Energy and Cost Savings

Energy and Cost Savings

Indiana Energy and Cost Savings

Idaho Energy and Cost Savings

Energy Code Compliance With SIPs. Frank Baker, PFB Corporation Don Ferrier, Ferrier Custom Homes

Analysis of 2009 International Energy Conservation Code Requirements for Residential Buildings in Kansas City, Missouri

) SIGNIFICANT CHANGES INCLUDING CODE COMMENTARY

BUILDING SAFETY UNIT

CITY PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION. Lisa Fleming Brown, CPM

North Carolina State Buildings

Jesse Krivolavek Nebraska Native American Energy Auditors Veterans Dr Ste. 600, Omaha, NE 68022

1/9/2013. Terminology Calculating Heat Transfer Code Requirements Design Examples and Sustainability

Impacts of the 2009 IECC for Residential Buildings at State Level

Course # Resubmitted for On-line Use

Clark County Department of Building & Fire Prevention 4701 West Russell Road, Las Vegas, NV ~ (702)

ENERGY STAR Certified Homes, Version 3 Cost & Savings Estimates

Table of Contents. Page ii

LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS IN EXISTING LOW-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Residential Provisions of the Utah 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

Energy Analysis for Internal and External Window Film Applications for Existing Homes in Florida

Residential Provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code July 2011

INDIANA COMMERCAL ENERGY CODE BASELINE STUDY

The Potential for Energy Retrofits within the City of Sacramento s Rental Housing Inspection Program

2012 Ontario Building Code Requirements for New Construction. Bradford West Gwillimbury Building Division March 5, 2012

ASHRAE Key Changes You Should Know About and A Few Interesting Trends Impacting the Built Environment 4/12/2014

Raising the Bar- Houston

Town/City: State: Zip: Town/City: State: Zip: Phone: Cell: Phone: Cell: Signature Print Name Date

APPENDIX C FORMS 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION C.1

NOTICE OF INCORPORATION United States Legal Document

Residential Weatherization Plus Program

Energy Analysis for Window Films Applications in New and Existing Homes and Offices

2014 British Columbia Building Code Changes

PERFORMANCE OF SIDE-BY-SIDE SOUTH TEXAS HOMES Isolating the Contribution of Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation

Energy-Efficient. Home. Tips for Purchasing an. Revised Use this brochure to answer these questions:

BPC Green Builders. Green building for new and existing homes. Health Comfort Energy

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Category Measure Minimum Efficiency / Certification Requirements

Chapter 2: Foundations

National Energy and Cost Savings

RULING OF THE MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING

2009 Seattle Energy Code Impacts: See below for a recap of Changes in Envelope performance from 2006 to 2009

First Time Home Buyers Energy Efficiency Workshop Guide

Residential Buildings Energy Code Summary

2013 BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

Non-Residential Energy Code Comparison

Stretch Appendix to the Building Energy Code in Massachusetts. Question and Answer (Q&A) February 2011

HVAC INSTALLATION. Success with 2015 IECC Northeast & Mid-Atlantic. Checklist for Builders & Trades

HVAC INSTALLATION SUCCESS WITH 2012 IECC DELAWARE. for Builders & Trades. Recommended Practices for Optimized Energy Savings

Beyond Code Programs: Design Strategies and Best Practices. Eric Makela, Britt/Makela Group

Chapter Seven RESNET Standards

Affordable Zero Energy

Uncovering Myths and Opportunities of Advanced Building Envelope Technologies: BIPV, Roofing and Windows

RELEASE NOTES EG USA 3.0.0

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Georgia

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in Arizona

Georgia State Supplements and Amendments to the International Energy Conservation Code

2012 NC Residential Energy Code

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES to the 2015 Minnesota Residential Codes (MR 1303, 1309 and 1322)

Residential HVAC Load Sizing Training October 14, David Kaiser Green Code Plan Reviewer

research highlight Highly Energy Efficient Building Envelope Retrofits for Houses

Below are detailed instructions for using the EMS load calculator.

Potential of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Savings To Impact Florida s Projected Energy Use in 2014

Energy Savings with Window Retrofits

Selecting Energy Efficient Replacement Windows in Nevada

Differentiating Energy Modeling Software!

COMPLETING THE GREEN APPRAISAL ADDENDUM FOR AN NGBS GREEN CERTIFIED HOME

ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPARISON

Energy Efficiency for the Homeowner

Red River College MECB 101 School of Construction and Engineering Technologies Manitoba Energy Code for Buildings 101 (MECB 101)

COMcheck Software User's Guide for and Building Energy Codes Program

1 RCNY CHAPTER New York City Energy Conservation Code

How To Design An Hvac Design For A Stick Built Home

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

energy-saving checklist a guide for rental property owners

Q&A on Tax Credits for Sections 25C and 25D. Notice SECTION 1. PURPOSE

Residential Duct Systems for New and Retrofit Homes

Building Permit Application Packet. BUILDING CODES Adopted by La Plata County For Enforcement In The Unincorporated Areas Of La Plata County

New Homes EPS Modeling Frequently Asked Questions. Developed by Energy Trust of Oregon

APPENDIX C - Florida Energy Code Standard Reference Design Auto-Generation Tests

ENERGY STAR Qualified New Homes Thermal Enclosure Checklist. Water Management Checklist. Eli Caudill

Selecting Energy Efficient New Windows in California

THE NATIONAL BUILDING REGULATIONS PART XA: ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Presentation by Peter Henshall-Howard: HEAD: BUILDING DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT.

BUILDING PERMIT SPECIFICATIONS

2013 Residential Roof Measures

Building Permit Application

ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY

Requirements to Obtain a Building Permit for a NEW HOME. 1. Completed application form. (Boxes A, B, C, D & E if applicable F and I)

Residential Windows, 3 rd edition Corrected index 1

CITY OF BERKELEY BUILDING PERMIT DETAILED CHECKLIST

Heating Load Calculation

Preparation for 2015 Residential Code Changes Discussion with Local Builders and Designers

Transcription:

June 24, 2011 North Carolina Has a New Energy Conservation Code! By R. Christopher Mathis Executive Summary On Friday, June 24, 2011, Governor Beverly Perdue signed SB 708 into law and, with it, approved a new Energy Conservation Code for the residential and commercial buildings in North Carolina. This new code, the fruit of over two years of work, will save home and business owners money on their monthly energy bills and help retain and create jobs in every region of our state. It delivers significant improvements in insulation levels, window performance and building envelope air leakage reduction. The new code also includes the High Efficiency Residential Option (HERO) Appendix which delivers a 30% improvement in minimum energy efficiency over the state s current energy code. The new NC Energy Conservation Code has an effective date of January 1, 2012. Report After over two years of effort, numerous setbacks and delays, and the hard work of a vast group of supporters and advocates, North Carolina has a new energy conservation code which will go into effect January 1 st, 2012 less than six months away. The action to get the code approved by the legislature and governor has been a long and arduous process, but the fruits of that effort are significant for everyone in the building industry and all North Carolinians. Residential Energy Efficiency Improvements The provisions of the 2012 North Carolina Energy Conservation Code (NCECC) will result in improved homes across the state of North Carolina. Significant improvement was made in the areas of envelope leakage reduction, duct tightness, window performance, wall insulation and lighting efficiency. Table 1 shows the residential prescriptive values adopted for the 2012 NCECC. CLIMATE ZONE FENES- U-FACTOR Table 1: Prescriptive Envelope Requirements: Residential SKYLIGHT U-FACTOR GLAZED FENES- SHGC CEILING WOOD FRAME MASS FLOOR BASEMENT SLAB & DEPTH CRAWL SPACE 3 0.35 0.65 0.30 30 13 5/10 19 0 5/13 4 0.35 0.60 0.30 5 0.35 0.60 NR 38 or 30 cont. 38 or 30 cont. 15, 13+2.5 19, 13+5, 5/10 19 10 13/17 30 10 One important improvement is a reduction in fenestration solar heat gain coefficient to 0.30 (from 0.40). This 25% improvement prioritizes reductions in solar gain as a necessary tool to help address North Carolina s growing peak power problem. These improvements in solar heat gain coefficients MC 2 Mathis Consulting Company P.O. Box 18055 Asheville, NC 28814 Telephone: 828 678 3500 E mail: Chris@MathisConsulting.com

cover over 90% of the state defined by climate zones 3 and 4 (Wilmington to Asheville). The 0.30 SHGC level is consistent with values for southern climates in the 2009 IECC. A more aggressive 0.25 SHGC is contained in the 2012 IECC and in the HERO alternative. Similarly, fenestration U factors were lowered across the state from 0.40 to 0.35, a welcome improvement in heating season performance especially on the heels of North Carolina s worst winter on record. Another item of note is the required improvement in wall R values in climate zone 4 (Raleigh to Asheville, as well as St. Louis to Washington D.C.). This change demonstrates the clear recognition that improving the energy performance of walls is a priority and that continuous insulation is a proven method for achieving these goals. As in the IECC, air leakage control in the 2012 NCECC has become a significantly higher priority. Building envelope air tightness must be demonstrated either through compliance with an air sealing checklist or, alternatively, a blower door test that demonstrates delivered air tightness at less than 5 ACH50. When the air leakage test option is elected, the resultant value must be displayed on the building certificate along with all other construction attributes required. Additional residential improvements include: A requirement for a programmable thermostat Heat pump strip heating controls A larger percentage (75%) of energy efficient lighting installed Improved duct tightness and mandatory duct testing. Duct testing has been a requirement in the North Carolina Code for at least one code cycle, and now all HVAC ducts must be tested, demonstrating leakage no greater than 6 CFM per 100 square feet of conditioned floor area. Like building envelope testing, tested duct leakage performance values must be shown on the compliance certificate. Efficiency gains are also delivered through the requirement that at least 75% of the lamps in permanently installed fixtures be high efficiency lamps. Probably one of the most important, yet unsung, benefits of the 2012 NCECC is the jobs it will create right here in North Carolina. North Carolina s manufacturing base includes glass and window companies, a variety of insulation manufacturers and installers, caulk, sealant and spray foam manufacturers, as well as manufacturers of energy efficient lighting. North Carolina s new energy code will put North Carolinians to work. The new energy code also will support the continued growth of North Carolina s clean energy job sector, by employing the growing number of home energy raters and building diagnosticians across our state from duct testing to envelope testing to building modeling, to determine code compliance the energy code will create jobs in the service sector as well. Another important inclusions in the 2012 NCECC is a voluntary appendix that defines a High Efficiency Residential Option (HERO) for those builders and contractors that are seeking to deliver a home that is 30% more energy efficient than North Carolina s current code. This 30% HERO alternative offers prescriptive paths that require slightly better insulation, fenestration, air sealing, equipment, and lighting packages to deliver even greater savings. Table 2 shows some of the aspects and typical values MC 2 Mathis Consulting Company P.O. Box 18055 Asheville, NC 28814 Telephone: 828 678 3500 E mail: Chris@MathisConsulting.com

in this higher efficiency option. For example, the window provisions in the HERO option have a lower SHGC, delivering even greater peak power and air conditioning savings. It is anticipated that this HERO option could be tied to green building programs, tax credits, utility incentives, greater appraisal evaluations, mortgage incentives and other market pull forces for those seeking to build better than the minimum code. Table 2: Prescriptive HERO Appendix Values CLIMATE ZONE FENES U FACTOR SKYLIGHT U FACTOR GLAZED FENES SHGC CEILING 3 0.32 0.65 0.25 38 4 0.32 0.60 0.25 38 5 0.32 0.60 (NR) 38 WOOD FRAME MASS FLOOR BASEMENT SLAB CRAWL SPACE 5/10 19 5 5/10 19 10 13/17 30 10 15/19 Again, energy efficient windows, improved insulation and other building provisions define the HERO options for beyond minimum code performance. Commercial Building Performance The provisions of the 2012 NCECC that address commercial building energy performance are similarly innovative, delivering improved efficiency and enabling a wide array of design options to achieve the minimum performance requirements. In addition to the mandatory provisions that have long existed in the code, compliance in North Carolina now also requires designers to selection at least one of six additional energy efficiency options for every building. These include: An option for more efficient mechanical equipment An option for energy efficient lighting An option for energy efficient ventilation systems An option for higher efficiency service water heating systems An option to take credit for onsite supply of renewable energy, and An option on automatic daylighting control systems. As in the residential section of the code, the commercial provisions prioritize building envelope performance. The new minimum requirements show improved energy efficiency levels through slightly higher R values for ceilings, walls, floors and slabs, slightly better window performance with lower U factors and SHGCs required, increased reliance on energy efficient lighting and other improvements. These efficiency improvements in the commercial provisions cross all climate zones and all building types covered under the commercial code. In many cases, these improvements to North Carolina s energy code for commercial buildings deliver levels of energy efficiency greater than the prescriptive provisions of ASHRAE Standard 90.1, the alternative compliance path included in the code. Table 3 shows the specific improvements to the commercial opaque envelope provisions in the code for each of North Carolina s 3 climate zones. The improved code prioritizes improved insulation, continuous over the building envelope, improved insulation levels for metal buildings, mass walls, metal and wood framed walls, and slab on grade floors. MC 2 Mathis Consulting Company P.O. Box 18055 Asheville, NC 28814 Telephone: 828 678 3500 E mail: Chris@MathisConsulting.com

Table 3: Commercial Opaque Prescriptive Provisions of the NCECC 2012 (partial listing) Climate Zone 3 4 5 All Other Group R All Other Group R All Other Group R Insulation entirely above deck Attic and other wood framing Attic and other steel framing Roofs R 25 ci R 25 ci R 30 ci R 30 ci R 30 ci R 30 ci R 38 R 38 R 42 R 42 R 42 R 42 R 38 R 38 R 49 R 49 R 49 R 49 Walls, Above Grade Mass R 7.6 ci R 9.5 ci R 9.5 ci R 11.4 ci R 11.4 ci R 15 ci Metal framed Wood framed and other R 13 + 7.5 ci R 13 + R 3.8 ci R 13 + R 7.5 ci R 13 + R 10 ci R 13 + R 7.5 ci Walls, Below Grade R 13 + R 12.5 ci R 13 + R 12.5 ci R 13 + R 10 ci R 13 + R 15 ci Below grade wall c R 7.5 ci R 7.5 ci R 7.5 ci R 10 ci R 7.5 ci R 10 ci Floors Mass R 12.5 ci R 12.5 ci R 14.6 ci R 16.7 ci R 14.6 ci R 16.7 ci Joist / Framing R 30 e R 30 e R 38 R 38 R 38 R 38 Slab on Grade Floors Unheated slabs NR R 10 for 24 in. R 15 for 24 in. R 15 for 24 in. R 15 for 24 in. R 20 for 24 in. The commercial provisions of the code also reflect North Carolina s energy and peak load concerns by dramatically improving the minimum requirements for windows. Table 4 shows the commercial window performance provisions in the 2012 NCECC. Table 4: Commercial Fenestration Provisions of the 2012 NCECC (Partial Listing) CLIMATE ZONE 3 4 5 Vertical Fenestration (30% maximum of above grade wall) Framing materials other than metal with or without metal reinforcement or cladding U Factor 0.32 0.32 0.30 Metal framing with or without thermal break Curtain Wall/Storefront U Factor 0.45 0.45 0.38 Entrance Door U Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 All Other U Factor 0.45 0.45 0.45 SHGC All Frame Types SHGC: PF < 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.40 SHGC: 0.25 PF < 0.5 0.33 0.33 NR SHGC: PF 0.5 0.40 0.40 NR Skylights (3% maximum, 5% if using automatic daylighting controls) U Factor 0.60 0.60 0.60 SHGC 0.35 0.35 0.40 Non metal window U factors have been lowered to 0.32 in climate zones 3 and 4 (90% of the state) and 0.30 in climate zone 5. Peak savings are delivered with lower solar heat gain coefficients in each climate zone 0.25 in climate zones 3 and 4 and 0.40 in climate zone 5. While there remain some of the material specific biases in this table, these values will help push other states in the region, as well as the national model code, to continue to address improved window performance. The commercial code also requires HVAC systems to be properly sized, the systems be appropriately tested and balanced, and system performance specifications be listed on the compliance certificate. Again, energy efficient lighting, and lighting controls figures prominently in the delivering of the MC 2 Mathis Consulting Company P.O. Box 18055 Asheville, NC 28814 Telephone: 828 678 3500 E mail: Chris@MathisConsulting.com

improved levels of energy efficiency in the 2012 NCECC. Maximum lighting power densities have been reduced across the board for all occupancy classes and uses. Conclusions The 2012 North Carolina Energy Conservation Code represents the essential starting point toward securing and protecting North Carolina s energy future. North Carolina s buildings are its single largest energy consumer and therefore represent the single largest opportunity for protecting our state against an uncertain energy future. The new code is a key part of our state s interest in creating durable clean energy jobs and revitalizing our beleaguered manufacturing and construction industries. January 1, 2012 launches a new day and a new path for North Carolina s energy future. R. Christopher Mathis is President of Mathis Consulting Company, a building science and consulting firm headquartered in Asheville, NC. He is one of the co principal investigators on the project to deliver a 30% improved energy code for North Carolina. www.mathisconsulting.com. MC 2 Mathis Consulting Company P.O. Box 18055 Asheville, NC 28814 Telephone: 828 678 3500 E mail: Chris@MathisConsulting.com