MAPPING THE MUNICIPALITY OF CEGGIA TERRITORY 1.1 Recovering data and materials The data used to apply the methodology for mapping marginal areas (produced through the project PVs in BLOOM and available on the web-site: www.pvsinbloom.eu ) on the Ceggia case study have been recovered through its Municipality website. Thanks to an efficient webgis all the materials regarding the P.R.G (Municipality Urban Planning Tool) have been downloaded. Other cartographic data have been downloaded from the National Cartographic Website of the Environmental Department. As far as the specific photovoltaic data are concerned, we referred to data downloaded from the PVGIS site. 1.2 Ceggia and the sun The Joint Research Centre of Ispra created a dedicated webgis application which has been put on the PVGIS community disposal. With this application it is possible to check the entire European and African territories from a photovoltaic point of view, so obtaining technical information useful for the system and investment planning. Fig. 1: homepage of PVGIS of Ispra JRC PVGIS is a research tool but above all a support instrument for the solar resource evaluation. The JRC researchers managed to create it sharing all their different specializations in the analysis of the environmental, technical and social-economic factors. This instrument has been used to evaluate the photovoltaic performances of the Ceggia territory assuming a 1 kwp system with crystalline silicon modules (which is the most used technology) and supposing a 14% of dispersion in the electrical conversion. The example system will be free standing and both the case of a fixed plant and of a biassial solar tracker will be considered. In the first case we have considered an inclination of 35 in order to optimize the production all year long and it will receive an yearly irradiation equal to 1450kWh/ m 2, which will produce 1090kWh of electricity per year.
In the case of solar trackers instead, the yearly radiation will be 1880kWh/ m 2 which will allow an electrical production of 1420 kwh/year, with an increase of 30% as you can see in the table and in the comparative graphic. Fixed system Inclination: 35 System with solar biassal tracker Month Ed Em Hd Hm Ed Em Hd Hm Em % Jan 1.78 55.1 2,16 67 2.21 68.6 2.72 84.3 +24.50 Feb 2.27 63.5 2.81 78 2.75 77.1 3.42 95.8 +21.42 Mar 2.99 92.7 3.85 119 3,70 115 4.76 148 +24.06 Apr 3.51 105 4.62 139 4.48 134 5.85 175 +27.62 May 3.79 118 5.15 160 5.03 156 6.75 209 +32.20 Jun 4.04 121 5.61 168 5.62 169 7.70 231 +39.67 Jul 4.24 131 5.92 184 5.95. 185 8.22 255 +41.22 Ago 3.94 122 5.47 170 5.26 163 7.22 224 +33.61 Sep 3.51 105 4.75 142 4.53 136 6.08 183 +29.52 Oct 2.56 79.4 3.32 103 3.13 97.2 4.08 126 +22.42 Nov 1.90 57 2.38 71.4 2.36 70.7 2.98 89.4 +24.04 Dec 1.34 41.4 1.63 50.7 1.62 50.3 2.01 62.3 +21.50 monthly 2.99 91 3.98 121 3.89 118 5.16 157 +29.67 average Yearly 1090 1450 1420 1880 +30.28 total Tab 1: performances comparison of a fixed system and one with biassial solar tracker Ed: average daily production of electricity (kwh) Em: average monthly production of electricity (kwh) Hd: average daily radiation per m 2 of panel (kwh/ m 2 ) Hm: average monthly radiation per m 2 of panel (kwh/ m 2 ) Source: processing from PVGIS data Fig 2: performances comparison of a fixed system and one with biassial solar tracker. Average daily production per system typology. (source: processing from PVGIS data). 1.3 Marginal areas identification
The software GIS ArcMAP has been used in order to find out and identify the marginal areas of the Ceggia Municipality. The basic idea is that of removing the unavailable areas in order to leave on the map those with marginality features. The first table is that regarding the presentation of the municipality territory through the orthophotographs taken during the flights of 2006. You can see how the historical centre is compact and near a productive area of almost the same size in the south direction. The orthophoto allows distinguishing 2 landscapes on the territory; that of the emerged lands and the other one of the land which was marshy along time ago: the emerged lands are localized in the direction of Treviso and they present a system of closed fields with a thicker water network over a greater presence of buildings. The marshy lands instead are located at the south of the inhabited areas and present the typical landscape of the Veneto valley; open fields with a mesh of larger water networks. The territory analysis starts from the representation of Corine Land Cover. It is the cartography monitored by the CORINE Program, launched by the European Union in 1985, aiming to verify in a dynamic way the environmental status in order to orient common policies, control their effects and in case propose some changes. The cartography allows to underline the absence of potentially suitable grounds for PVs in Bloom as they were always in use in the years of the survey, with the exception of 2 landfills; one positioned in open country and the other inside the inhabited centre. Fig 3: placement
The first feature to evaluate in the framework of the assessment table is the permeability of the ground. In the first place all the built areas covered by residential and productive buildings have been highlighted as well as all surfaces at auction. This graphic restoration is based on the CTR, from which the occupied land has been identified. Afterwards the presence of constrains have been analysed as they actually make the areas unavailable. The protection constrains which have been considered are those of a non residential zoning, and in this specific case those ones provided for the Galasso Law and the river clear zone. Fig 4: buit up areas and areas submitted to protection constrains.
The sum of the areas submitted to constrains and the built up ones allow obtaining the unusable areas: impermeable areas, areas submitted to protection constrains and areas of environmental value such as the biotopes and the green connections. Fig 5: available areas.
The zooning of the city plan in force provides for information about the areas discipline of use. In the Ceggia case we can already select an industrial exhausted area and two military areas. We have to add also the clear areas and the green connections, which are areas of interest in the PVs in Bloom project. In this way we will have a table with all the suitable areas for the project according to the City Plan in force. Fig 6: Zooning
The areas till now identified are not yet definable as marginal areas. Thanks to the software ArcMAP we can lay upon this cartography all those areas not usable as built up or subjected to constrains. With this process we can verify the exact usability of the identified areas, so getting their potential marginality. In the following image you can see the selected and highlighted available areas on the basis of the territorial features, constrains and plan indications. Fig 7: available and unavailable areas.
Fig 8: availability according to the City Plan. The five marginal areas are: A) purifier (blue small circle), B) area belonging to the cimitery buffer zone(fuchsia); C) ex sugar refinery Eridania (violet area); D) logistic ex NATO base (brown area); E) missile ex NATO base (brown area). Then we proceed with the analysis of each single highlighted element taking into account the hydro geologic risk according to the PAI cartography of the Veneto Region. From this analysis Ceggia seems to be interested to the hydro geologic risk, even if with a medium risk. The next step is to fill the so called marginality grid in order to underline the presence of the features which characterize the marginality of an area: this grid means to be just an instrument for decision making and not one for the final choice. In fact the grid is able to compare many areas at the same time thanks to the quick view of the specific features. To get the final choice it is necessary then to compare the areas identified as potentially marginal with well defined technical functional parameters.
MARGINALITY FEATURES A B C D E Impermeability of the ground ( Modified Geo-soil horizon Mines and landfills others ( ( Pollution presence?? ( Absence of economic activities ( ( ( ( Absence of future uses expectations ( Absence of protection constrains ( ( Presence of buffer zones / anthropic restrictions ( ( Table SEQ Tabella \* ARABIC 1: marginality verification From the grid and analysis of the potentially marginal areas we can see the following results: A) Purifier According to the analysis of CORINE cartography, the area embracing the purification system s clear zone seems to be an area of permanent cultivation, so that its potential marginality is reduced. Besides it is possible to note that this area has only two marginality s features. B) Area belonging to the cemetery buffer zone. The urban growth concerning Ceggia s built up area expanded in all the area belonging to the cemetery buffer zone, which is now used as equipped urban park without any plans of changing. Consequently the area loses its potential marginality and that s also confirmed by the analysis in the grid which highlighted very few specific marginality features. C) Ex sugar refinery Eridania. The disused industrial area of the ex sugar refinery Eridania cannot be considered a marginal area as it is submitted to an Integrated Programm of Urban, Building and Environmental Requalification (PIRUEA) adopted in February 28, 2008 and then approved on June 29, 2006. These administrative steps are subsequent to the urban regulation in force for the territorial analysis. It is important to underline that the industrial park is placed in the historical-cultural Heritage, ex d.lgs. 42/2004. D) Logistic Base ex NATO. The area belonging to the ex logistic base NATO has only 2 marginality s features, which are actually not sufficient to acknowledge it as a marginal area. The canal Piavon, on a side, represents a restriction and on the other side is crossed instead from a new viability infrastructure which is not properly sufficient for the PVs in Bloom purposes.
At the end, in the preliminary document of the new urban regulation (PAT) the area shows a possible tourist use, which completely nullifies the possible marginality. E) Ex NATO base missile launching area Observing the marginality grid it is possible to note how the ex NATO area for the missile launching is lacking only 1 feature to obtain the full score: so we can definitely say that this is a marginal area. The marginality of the area is confirmed even if it is in a zone which PAI considers of moderate and medium risk. The average life of a photovoltaic system, in fact, is widely expected to fall within the interval periods of such flood phenomena. For the above mentioned area however a reclamation is necessary or a specific analysis of the chemical-physical and environmental features, as its function for the missiles launching is supposed to have used some fuels, which we don t know the chemical composition, the concentration, but overall the quality phases of their utilisation. Picture 9: Orthophoto 2006 area E (Source: www.pcn.minambiente.it)
1.3.1 Verifying the technical-functional and location criteria All the technical-functional criteria necessary for the execution of the Project PVs in Bloom are present while qualifying the area: The irradiation exposure is excellent thanks to the lack of structures that could screen with direct shadows; The cliviometry is characterized for being completely leveled except for the embankment works which are functional for the military activities and that could be used in order to support photovoltaic panels; The area presents itself as easily accessible thanks to the relevant roads and to the close medium voltage electric network. The area spreads for 186.000 square meters which, theoretically, could be enough for a system that can take advantage of 90.000 square meters of panels and, in this way, produce 9MWp right beyond the limit which the PVs in Bloom is looking for. Area exposure Full sun clivometria of the area Flat Sufficient area extension for the requested sizing Distribution network proximity: Media tensione or cabina primaria Enel lines Presence of appropriate viability for heavy vehicles 186000mq (of which 90000 coverable with panels, corresponding to about 9 MWp) Medium voltage line Relevant roads Absence of geological risk Absent Absence of hydraulic risk Moderated risk (from PAI) Table 2: Verifying of technical-functional for area "E". A further step will lead us to verify how the mentioned area reacts. These criteria are not binding but they are thought in order to increase the awareness of the area potentialities for installing photovoltaic plantations and in order to achieve the consciousness that an energy production close to industrial or commercial activities which do need that energy, could be nothing but an amazing benefit. In fact, knowing the right location according to big energy consumers or to structures and systems that definitely need a huge amount of energy, give the chance to highlight the benefits arising from the energy self-production and without any insurmountable barriers, disproving the common belief that is only reserved to the households. Following, then, the table number 4 shows the location criteria, that is the peculiar characteristics of the area, which allows to increase the potential marginality value. Closeness to public service plants Closeness to industrial zones
Closeness to commercial zones of big distribustion Table 3: Location criteria. 2.4 Final identification of the area marginality From the location criteria table, we can see as the area doesn t answer to any criteria. Nevertheless, the area is by the way suitable to the PVs in Bloom project, overall, because the difficulty of its restoration to agricultural activity. The presence of an medium voltage line guarantees however the energy carriage without the necessity of building a new distribution infrastructure. The absence of big industrial and commercial activities on the municipality territory (with the exception of the municipality industrial area south of the sugar factory area), it does not substantially limit the marginality of the selected area, as the energy which would be produced from a photovoltaic plant localized in this area could have widespread function and public benefits. For the Ceggia council, the positive effects resulting form the installation of a photovoltaic plant could be, both environmental (reduction of pollutant emissions, increase of the energy production from renewable sources, in line with the Kyoto Protocol indications) both economic (reduction of the energetic costs for the public buildings). The electricity production could contribute, also, representing a new available source for the manage of the drainage system, because of the produced energy could contribute supporting the energy requirements necessary for the operation of the pumping stations located throughout the drainage territory.