Section 1: Wind Turbines Section 2: Crookwell Aerodrome

Similar documents
OPERATING MINIMA FOR AEROPLANES AND HELICOPTER OPERATIONS PURPOSE REFERENCE 4.0 DEFINITION

Supporting document to NORSOK Standard C-004, Edition 2, May 2013, Section 5.4 Hot air flow

Potential Effects of Wind Turbine Generators on Pre-Existing RF Communication Networks SEAN YUN. June Software Solutions in Radiocommunications

Wind Energy at Earth Sciences

Computational Modeling of Wind Turbines in OpenFOAM

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

13.0. Safety Management and Airspace Protection

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

Wind Turbine Power Calculations

Air Coverage Test with SCANTER 4002 at Horns Rev Wind Farm I and II

A Dynamic Programming Approach for 4D Flight Route Optimization

Cessna 172SP & NAV III Maneuvers Checklist

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

Learning Objectives - 06 OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc nd Place SE Newcastle, Washington

Current Challenges in UAS Research Intelligent Navigation and Sense & Avoid

UCCS PES/ENSC 2500: Renewable Energy Spring 2014 Test 3 name:

WHICH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TO CONTACT

2. Parallel pump system Q(pump) = 300 gpm, h p = 270 ft for each of the two pumps

Open-Source-based Visualization of Flight Waypoint Tracking Using Flight Manipulation System

H is for HELP! He was employed as an EMS pilot in Buffalo New York for about 2 years, than transferred to work as a relief pilot through out WI.

CAAP 89W-1(0) Guidelines on provision of obstacle information for take-off flight planning purposes

LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE

The CREDOS Project. Human Machine Interface Design

Using Big Data and GIS to Model Aviation Fuel Burn

Propeller Efficiency. Rule of Thumb. David F. Rogers, PhD, ATP

Annex to Decision 2015/007/R AMC and GM to Part-CAT Issue 2, Amendment 2

BEFORE YOU GET STARTED

Background on Airspace

Low Level Windshear Alert System (LLWAS) An integral part of the U.S. FAA Wind-shear safety program

AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF BLADE 1.5 KW OF DUAL ROTOR HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE

EXHIBIT/P Company Operations Manual Edition II Chapter 1. Chapter 1. Operating Certificate and Operations Specifications

FLUID FLOW STREAMLINE LAMINAR FLOW TURBULENT FLOW REYNOLDS NUMBER

Application of CFD Simulation in the Design of a Parabolic Winglet on NACA 2412

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas: A Comparison of Flight Measurement versus Simulation Techniques

European Aviation Safety Agency. Engine Type Certificate Data Sheet EASA.IM.E.002

12.0 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Results of wake simulations at the Horns Rev I and Lillgrund wind farms using the modified Park model

Outline. Introduction to Wind Energy. US Wind Energy Installations. ME 483 Alternative Energy Engineering II 1

Aeroelastic models for wind turbines

Wind Generator. NEMO400 Instruction Manual. Suzhou Shoot Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Serial number:

Minimum Safety Requirements for temporary Helicopter Landing Areas.

O.F.Wind Wind Site Assessment Simulation in complex terrain based on OpenFOAM. Darmstadt,

G1000 Search Patterns. National Emergency Services Academy Mission Aircrew School (June 2013 Rev D)

Databases. by David Cerda Salzmann

Wind Energy Math Calculations Calculating the Tip Speed Ratio of Your Wind Turbine

and Implementing Rules for Air Operations of Community Operators F. Cross Reference Tables

AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE Pressure Altitude And Density Altitude

Cloud seeding. Frequently Asked Questions. What are clouds and how are they formed? How do we know cloud seeding works in Tasmania?

High-Lift Systems. High Lift Systems -- Introduction. Flap Geometry. Outline of this Chapter

CTAF PROCEDURES GUIDE

Evaluating Computer Graphics Animations of Aircraft Accidents and Incidents

Power output of offshore wind farms in relation to atmospheric stability Laurens Alblas BSc

Aircraft Radio Operator Certificate of Proficiency

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY REGULATION (C.A.S.R)

Lab 1a Wind Tunnel Testing Principles & Lift and Drag Coefficients on an Airfoil

DAN-AERO MW: Detailed aerodynamic measurements on a full scale MW wind turbine

Unit 1 - Radian and Degree Measure Classwork

Flight Training Program Outline Single-Engine Instrument Rating

Light Sport West Standard Flight Training Procedures for N110GX (Remos GX, 100 H.P.)

VISITING PILOT S BRIEF

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SPREAD PATTERN FROM SALT SPREADERS

FLOWSTAR-Energy Validation NoordZee Wind Farm

European Aviation Safety Agency

Melbourne city area noise information pack

Wind shear - poses challenges and dangers at the most critical stages of flight

Training program for S2 (TWR) rating

Coupled CFD and Vortex Methods for Modelling Hydro- and Aerodynamics of Tidal Current Turbines and On- and Offshore Wind Turbines

Comparison between OpenFOAM CFD & BEM theory for variable speed variable pitch HAWT

ENERCON WIND TURBINES

Wind resources and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms. Professor R.J. Barthelmie Atmospheric Science and Sustainability

Beechcraft 1900D: Fuel, Emissions & Cost Savings Operational Analysis

Sound Power measurements according to IEC

The Map Grid of Australia 1994 A Simplified Computational Manual

How To Discuss Unmanned Aircraft System (Uas)

CFD Lab Department of Engineering The University of Liverpool

Mathematically Modeling Aircraft Fuel Consumption

Pricing Framework July 2012

3. FLYING TECHNIQUES. 3.1 Speed Management. 3.2 Attitude Management. 3.3 Height Management. 3.4 Transit Flying

AVIATION TRAINING ACADEMY

CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE SYLLABUS FOR AIRP 1307 AVIATION METEOROLOGY Semester Hours Credit: 3

INTERIM STATEMENT. Accident occurred to AW609 registration marks N609AG, on 30 th October 2015, in Tronzano Vercellese (VC), Italy.

11 Distress and Urgency

This file contains the full script of the corresponding video, published on YouTube. November 2014:

TP 308 IMPACT STUDY TORONTO BILLY BISHOP/TORONTO CITY AIRPORT. for

2014 NIFA CRM Contestant Briefing Guide San Diego, California

13 Aviation. Introduction. Consultation and scoping. Table 13.1 Summary of Key Concerns in relation to Aviation

Assessment Specifications for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems, Class 1 AS-RPAS1

Official Journal of the European Union L 296/69

The Influence of Aerodynamics on the Design of High-Performance Road Vehicles

Data Review and Analysis Program (DRAP) Flight Data Visualization Program for Enhancement of FOQA

In-flight Evaluation of Avionic Systems

Research and Education in the Field of Wind Energy at the Technical University of Denmark

ACRP Report 108: Guidebook for Energy Facilities Compatibility with Airports and Airspace. Stephen B. Barrett, LEED AP HMMH

Relevance of Modern Optimization Methods in Turbo Machinery Applications

Eco Pelmet Modelling and Assessment. CFD Based Study. Report Number R1D1. 13 January 2015

MULTI-ENGINE TURBO-PROP AEROPLANE ENDORSEMENT

Transcription:

Section 1: Wind Turbines Section 2: Crookwell Aerodrome By Ralph Holland, B Sc., Dip Ed., Dip. Com. Sc., ACT Australia. Nov 2009 (c) Copyright 2009 1/12/2009 version 2.1 1

Section I Covers Turbine Wake pressure changes velocity deficit turbulence and visual evidence 1/12/2009 version 2.1 2

Parameters and assumptions wind Blade max tip Max tip tip wind speed at max tip speed at max tip 16 * Diameter Total Max speed speed speed speed speed blade m height m RPM kph knots ratio Knots m/s diam. m 93 126.5 17 298.0 160.9 6.0 26.8 13.8 1488 120 195 17 384.5 207.6 6.0 34.6 17.8 1920 1/12/2009 version 2.1 3

Turbine Wake Free stream velocity 8 m/s From M Pawlka and F Richert ref. 1 1/12/2009 version 2.1 4

Pressure Differential Severe pressure differential crossing the blade/disk pressure differential represents a bio hazard to air-borne mammals crossing the disk. blade tip velocities of the order of 160 Kts (298 kph) for 93 m diameter turbines. Gary L Johnson Ref 3 5 1/12/2009 version 2.1

Velocity deficit airspeed reduced to 2/3 of free flow velocity in front airspeed reduced to 1/3 of free flow velocity behind airspeed deficit 37% at 16 blade/disk diameters downstream how far downstream does it return to normal? Gary L Johnson Ref 3 1/12/2009 version 2.1 6

Profile of Velocity Deficit Hand M et al Ref 4. A plume, almost contained within the diameter of the blades, extends downstream behind the turbine velocity is 0.33 times free stream velocity at 6 blade diameters (558/600 m) downstream velocity is 0.55 times free stream velocity at 10 blade diameters (930/1200 m) downstream velocity is 0.63 times free stream velocity at 16 blade diameters (1488/1920 m) downstream 1/12/2009 version 2.1 7

How far does the deficit extend? Velocity change versus axial distance from wind tunnel measurements 1.2 1 0.8 (U / Uo) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 measured U/U0 Linear Extrapolation asymptotic extrapolation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (X / D) Blue line obtained from data on the Profile graph Red and green lines are extrapolations 1/12/2009 version 2.1 8

Hornes Rev Wind Farm Denmark Measurements made via Dromader Aircraft equipped with Synthetic Aperture Radar, Christiansen and Hasager Ref 16 1/12/2009 version 2.1 9

Satellite Data wind farm ship plumes Hornes Rev Wind Farm data from E-SAR track L1, Christiansen and Hasager - ref 16. 1/12/2009 version 2.1 10

ERS-2 SAR and ENVISAT ASAR satellite data Start of farm End of farm Velocity deficit as a percentage versus distance, Christiansen and Hasager - ref 16 1/12/2009 version 2.1 11

Tip Vortices and Turbulence Alfredson P-H, Dahlberg J-A. - Ref 2 1/12/2009 version 2.1 12

Turbulence The wake turbulence is generated as a side-effect of the rotation and power. The wake turbulence at 10 blade diameters downstream is 12% of the velocity at that point (variation of 12% in wind speed @ 930/1200 m) Hand M et al. Ref 4 1/12/2009 version 2.1 13

Power Assumptions: 3.3MW generated with turbine operating at Betz limit with blade tip speed of 6 17 rpm with wind velocity of 13.8 m/s blade disk diameter 93 metres P = T 2π rpm / 60 T = P * 60 / ( 2π rpm) = 3300000 * 60 / (6.283 * 17) = 1853686.9 Kg m F = T / d = 39,864 kg force at blade tips (approx 39.9 metric tonnes) (Ref. 5) 1/12/2009 version 2.1 14

Vortices from the tips Vortex Circulation = 4L/(πρbV) (Ref. 6) where L = lift (kg) ρ = air density (kg / m^3) b = wingspan (m) V = speed (m/s) Examples Vortex Circulation Cessna 172R 3.1 93m Turbine 5.4 Boeing 737 26.0 Boeing 747-400 (156Kts) 83.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 Vortex Circulation Cessna 172R 93m Turbine Boeing 737 Boeing 747-400 (156Kts) 1/12/2009 version 2.1 15

Windmills in the Mist Please view the video at this point to see: the danger of the blade-tips hidden by cloud, the downstream void in the cloud, and the turbulence effects in that cloud, around Cullerin Wind Farm situated 33.4 km SSW of Crookwell Aerodrome. Windmills in the Mist 1/12/2009 version 2.1 16

Summary By direct wind tunnel measurements the velocity deficit in the wake is 37% at 16 blade diameters (1,488 /1920) metres. The wake extends more than 16 blade/disk diameters downstream (1488/1920 m), and by asymptotic extrapolation the wake could extend 50 blade diameters (4,650/11,112m) or more. Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar measurements of offshore wind farms show the velocity deficit extending more than 15 km (>100D), from turbine clusters with a total height of only 110 m. The velocity deficit is coupled with turbulence being 12% of the free stream velocity at 10D 930 (1200) metres downstream, and by accounts extends further than the velocity deficit. The wake interacts with terrain and airflow as it flows downstream. The wake represents wind-sheer, which is dangerous to passing aircraft. Light aircraft taking off and landing are at substantial risk. Ultra-light aircraft with little momentum are more at risk. In aviation terms, the volume behind a turbine is a no-go zone for an aircraft (ref 1/12/2009 15). version 2.1 17

Section II Covers: Turbine locations Simulated vista from Crookwell Aerodrome Flight path after take off from R27 Standards Operational airspace extent and buffer zones 1/12/2009 version 2.1 18

Turbine locations Turbine Name Easting Northing Lat Lon KIA_05 722477 6178958-34 30 ' 25.27282 149 25 ' 24.07198 " KIA_04 722293 6178775-34 30 ' 31.3517 " 149 25 ' 17.03418 " KIA_06 722744 6178681-34 30 ' 34.04990 " 149 25 ' 34.79421 " KIA_03 722267 6178510-34 30 ' 39.96754 " 149 25 ' 16.26416 " KIA_02 722171 6178251-34 30 ' 48.44313 " 149 25 ' 12.74549 " KIA_01 722125 6177964-34 30 ' 57.78809 " 149 25 ' 11.21224 " KIA_14 723709 6177613-34 31 ' 7.93843 " 149 26 ' 13.61523 " KIA_07 723379 6177555-34 31 ' 10.07770 '' 149 26 ' 0.73806 '' KIA_08 723227 6177336-34 31 ' 17.29988 '' 149 25 ' 54.98805 '' KIA_10 723918 6177304-34 31 ' 17.79753 '' 149 26 ' 22.09777 '' KIA_11 723623 6177203-34 31 ' 21.30443 '' 149 26 ' 10.63250 '' KIA_09 723200 6177054-34 31 ' 26.46792 '' 149 25 ' 54.19592 '' BAN_01 722828 6177027-34 31 ' 27.63386 '' 149 25 ' 39.64260 '' KIA_12 723560 6176950-34 31 ' 29.55998 '' 149 26 ' 8.40260 '' Turbine locations supplied by Epuron (Ref. 9) as GDA zone 55 Northing and Eastings. The position data were sorted by Northings and converted to WGS84 Latitude and Longitude for entry into Google Earth. A 93 metre height turbine tower model was chosen from the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse and used to place turbines at each way-point for visualisation, note the proposed Crookwell turbines will be taller. 1/12/2009 version 2.1 19

Vista looking southwest near aerodrome 1/12/2009 version 2.1 20

Take-off from R27, then heading south 1/12/2009 version 2.1 21

Instructions to Pilots MOS Part 139 - Cat 1 aerodrome 2.5 km arc. MOS Part 139 - Cat 2 aerodrome 3.0 km arc. AIP ENR 1.5 Cat A aircraft 3.111 km arc,... Cat B aircraft 2.66 nm (4.926 km) arc. Old ICAO rules 3 nm (5.556 km) from aerodrome reference point (i.e. a circle). 1/12/2009 version 2.1 22

CAT B Aircraft circling area 1/12/2009 version 2.1 23

15 km Buffer Zone & CAT B aircraft circling area 72 GUR_07-34 40 ' 27.28176 '' 149 29 ' 13.90608 '' 73 GUR_06-34 40' 34.92435" 149 28 ' 50.83822 " 1/12/2009 version 2.1 24

Summary Wind Turbines are dynamic obstructions that generate a plume in their wake, by measurements extends more than 16 blade diameters (1488/1920 m) down stream, and by extrapolation we can expect the plume to extend to 30 blade diameters (2790/3600m) or more downstream, airborne SAR evidence shows it extending > 15 kms downstream for offshore wind farm clusters. The wake plume contains turbulence energy. This wake and turbulence plume cannot be seen directly, and is a void to flight. Pilots should avoid flying behind the turbine blades, because the velocity deficit extends downstream in the plume like a tube for a few kilometres. Note there is also an upstream velocity deficit close in front of the turbine. A suitable buffer zone is required around any aerodrome to permit safe operations of aircraft. To ensure pilots can avoid the wake, the turbines should be set-back so it is not possible for the wake plume to affect expected aerodrome traffic and operational areas. 1/12/2009 Version 2.1 25

Safety Considerations 1. The NSW Rural fire services requires the aerodrome to support Category B Aircraft (ref-14), namely the twins: Cessna 310, Piper Cheiftain, Beechcraft Baron, and the Partenavia P86. 2. That Category-B circling requirements and areas be used because they match the category of aircraft operating into the aerodrome. 3. That consideration be given to the extent of the turbine wake plumes when determining set-back of turbines to ensure that the wake does not infringe on the operational areas of any aircraft using the aerodrome and associated operational areas. 1/12/2009 version 2.1 26

References and Credits 1. 2. New Model for Calculating the Intensities of Turbulence in the Wake of Wind-Turbines. M Pawlka, F Richert. A preliminary wind tunnel study of windmill wake dispersion in various flow conditions. Technical Note AI-1499, Part 7, FFA, Stockholm, Sweden, September 1979. Alfredson P-H, Dahlberg J-A. 3. Wind Energy Systems. Gary L Johnson. 4. 5. Unsteady aerodynamics experiments phase VI: Wind tunnel test configuration and available data campaigns. Technical report BREL/TP-500-29955, NREL, December 2001. Hand M, Simms D, Finger L, Jager D, Coteril J, Schreck S, Larwood S. Torque and Power equations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/torque. 6. Departure Exclusion Zone: Monitoring System Concept. Carmine Primeggia FAA, Washington DC. 7. Manual of Standards Part 139 Aerodromes, CASA www.casa.gov.au/rules/1998casr/139/139m04.pdf 8. AIP ENR 1.5 http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/pending/aip/enr/1_5_1-5.pdf 9. Turbine locations supplied by Epuron www.epuron.com.au and converted from GDA84 to WGS84. 10. GDA84 to WGS84 conversions via calculator from GeoSciences website http://www.ga.gov.au/geodesy/datums/redfearn_grid_to_geo.jsp. 11. Google Sketchup tool http://sketchup.google.com/ and turbine model from the Sketchup Warehouse. 12. Google Keyhole markup file containing Turbine waypoints etc supplied by Ralph Holland. 13. Google Earth and Maps (c) copyright by Google and Google providers, used under fair use for academic and for environmental report reasons as per the terms on www.earthgoogle.com. All the maps views in this presentation can be reproduced entirely from the CrookwellAerodrome.kmz data file by importing into the Google Earth application. Letter from Alan Lawrance, the Director of Works and Operations, Upper Lachlan Shire Council, regarding NSW Fire Service aircraft. Tabled Thursday 15 October 2009. Email from Richard Thompson, regarding Wind Turbine affect on the flight of an Aero Commander 680E aeroplane. Wake Studies around a large offshore wind farm using Satellite and Airborne SAR, Christiansen and Hasager http://www.isprs.org/publications/related/isrse/html/papers/272.pdf 14. 15. 16. 1/12/2009 version 2.1 27

Revision History 2.1 01 Dec 09 Airborne SAR data shows 29% deficit at 15 km so included that as buffer zone with Cat B aircraft circling area, removed unnecessary slides. 2.0 24 Nov 09 reduced summary to > 10 km for SAR data. 1.9 22 Nov 09 Included 3 slides and reference 16 on SAR measurements of the velocity deficit plumes for the Hornes Rev 80 turbine offshore wind farm, Denmark. 1.8 21 Nov 09 Page 5 understated the length of the blade., though the tip velocity was correct. 1.7 12 Nov 09 Twin aircraft included in Category B due to 1.3 times stall speed. 1.6 09 Nov 09 Updated Section I and Section II Summary. Included safety considerations in Section II and the references 14 and 15. 1.5 08 Nov 09 corrected the placement of KIA_14. 1.4 05 Nov 09 corrected turbulence statement to 12% of free stream velocity at 10D. 1.3 05 Nov 09 Included Google Map with distance arc for ICAO Cat B aircraft, which operate into Crookwell for fire-fighting. 1.2 04 Nov 09 - Corrected GDM to GDA and included statement on Google Maps use. Included statement on aerodrome arcs instead of the simple circles employed in the Google Sketchup models, included additional references and mark-up to that effect, and some minor typographical edits. Corrected placement of several turbines and updated Google Map diagrams. 1.1 04 Nov 09 - Included extrapolation of wake plume distance. 1.0 03 Nov 09 - Initial writing. 1/12/2009 version 2.1 28