U. S. Department of Energy. National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544



Similar documents
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

FWS Cultural Resource Management Planning

Advisory Council On Historic Preservation

State and Territory Coastal Management Program Managers

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Pacific Gas and Electric Company;

36 CFR PART PROTECTION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES (incorporating amendments effective August 5, 2004)

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

CHAPTER 8. FEDERALLY-LISTED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

Exhibit SHN-029. Commission Mandatory Hearing SHINE Construction Permit Application Environmental Overview December 15, 2015

FirstNet Historic Preservation Requirements

The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as Amended (NHPA)

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy

Welcome! To the. Public Open House

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Disaster Recovery Debris Management Planning

Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest;

RECORD OF PLAN CONFORMANCE AND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CX) DETERMINATION

FINAL FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

Experience Summary. KINA MURPHY, M.S. Ecologist / Community Planner 9 Stone Ridge Road, Santa Fe, NM Cell: Education / Training

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY COMBINED HEAT AND POWER AT POST AVENUE IN DOWNTOWN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON

Department of the Interior. Departmental Manual

NNSA s Risk-Based Nuclear Security Enterprise-wide Facility Disposition Program 14108

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

Deconstruction Requirements Code Language

Categorical Exclusion Determination Bonneville Power Administration Department of Energy

PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

United States Depmiment of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Western Colorado Area Office Grand Junction, Colorado

ARTICLE 11. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

SECTION 9 SUMMARY OF COORDINATION, PUBLIC VIEWS AND COMMENTS

J. Template Environmental Checklist for FEMA/HUD Using the Template Environmental Checklist for FEMA and HUD Responsible Entities EHP Reviews

PART I. NOMINATOR PART II. SHORT ANSWERS

8. The City received a $100,000 grant from the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District to conduct initial planning and engineering analyses.

Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for Disaster Response, Recovery, and Mitigation Projects

Water Security in New Mexico: Vision for the Middle Rio Grande and Forested Watersheds. Anne Bradley Forest Conservation Program Manager

WYOMING STATE PROTOCOL APPENDIX I GLOSSARY

WHEREAS, the underground garage is being jointly funded by the DCC and the USCAAF; and

APPENDIX B PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

National Environmental Policy Act and Permitting Services for the Mining Industry

FOR HOUSINIG AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT-FUNDED PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION THE VIRGINIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

MD-DC Utilities Association 2014 Environmental Conference. Working with the Maryland Historical Trust MD SHPO

/;L/rl 7!dolO DatE! J

Department of Defense MANUAL

Save Our Heritage Organisation v. San Diego Unified Port District

REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT (DOE O 430.1B) REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

Chapter 3 Planning Issues, Opportunities, and Constraints

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURES OF THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (LANDMARKS BOARD)

Land Protection Planning for the National Wildlife Refuge System

U.S. Deportment OfTranrportatian!iis

Environmental Impact Statement for the Washington Union Station Expansion Project

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

Audit Report. The Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility Replacement Project at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. CONSTRUCTION or DEMOLITION SITE WASTE RECYCLING RULES AND REGULATIONS

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Drought Response Program: Draft Funding Criteria for Review and Comment

FINAL REPORT ON DOT WORKSHOP, Integrating Stream Restoration Principles & Transportation Maintenance

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

5090 PEO(Ships) Ser/ Dec 04. From: Program Executive Officer, Ships (PEO(SHIPS)) To: DD(X) Program Manager (PMS 500)

Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (FASTC) U.S. General Services Administration U.S. Department of State

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

North Face. South Face. Figure Science Park Station Exteriors. Pg 1-3 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Proposed Project For Exide Technologies Bristol, Tennessee - New NEPA Analysis

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Environmental Issues & Public Affairs

ODOT NEPA Assignment Training Plan Prepared by Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Environmental Services Last Updated: 12/17/15

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

San Francisco Water Powe Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

~ Joanna M. Livengood Manager

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVILS TOWER NATIONAL MONUMENT

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN FAIRFIELD HILLS BROWNFIELD CLEANUP (EPA/DEP) TOWN OF NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUT

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis I.2. Cultural Resources Archaeological Resources

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

How To Write An Environmental Assessment For The Texas A&M Combined Heat And Power Project

Engaging Communities in Post-Fire Restoration: Forest Treatments and Community-Agency Relations after the Cerro Grande Fire

1816, Independence Hall 1850, Washington s Headquarters

DRAFT RESTORATION PLAN FOR MCGIRTS CREEK PARK FOR

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT GRANTS PASS FIELD OFFICE 2164 NE Spalding Ave Grants Pass, OR 97526

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS

Millennium Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is a Residence Hall/Dormitory building of approximately 102,680 ft². The client is Drexel University.

BEAR DEN PHASE 2 PROJECT. Plan of Development. APPENDIX I Plan for Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources or Human Remains During Construction

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

Environmental Protection Information Center

Environmental Management Floodplain Management Desk Guide

FAIR Act Inventory Functions and Service Contract Inventory Product Service Codes Crosswalk Attachment I

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Northern Middlesex Council of Governments

Transcription:

Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Finding of No Significant Impact for the Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures within TA-3 at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico U. S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Los Alamos Area Office 528 35th Street Los Alamos, NM 87544

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECUIRTY ADMINISTRATION FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT INIPACT withinta-3 at Los Alarnos National Laboratory, Los Alamos. New Mexico FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Environmental Assessment (EA) for within TA-3 at L os Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico (DOE/EA- 7 375) (attached) provides sufficient evidence and analysis to determine that a Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate for the Proposed Action. The EA documents the evidence and analysis in the following chapters: 1. Purpose and Need for Agency Action; 2. Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives; and 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences. Analyses performed in the EA conclude that potential adverse effects of the Proposed Action, under normal conditions, would be minimal. No short-term or long-term adverse effects are expected to occur to air quality, visual resources, water quality, soil erosion, waste management, human health, socioeconomics, or utilities and infrastructure. Only cultural resources would be affected long-term through the demolition of the existing Administration Building (Building 3-43), which has been identified as a historical building eligible for listing on the National Register of ~istoric Places. Mitigations to resolve this adverse effect would be negotiated with the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and a treatment plan would be established. Mitigations could include a variety of elements, including archival of large format photographs, architectural blueprints, preparation of a set of "as-built" drawings, preparation of a detailed report on the building's history and interviews with past and present workers. Additional elements may be added during the negotiations with the SHPO and from comments provided by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (such as virtual tours of the structure posted on the internet system or construction and display of a scale model of the structure at another site such as the proposed new office building or its related lecture hall). A Memorandum of Agreement for the resolution of adverse effects would be executed for the implementation of the treatment plan for the property. Constructio'n and Operation of a New Office Building and Related Structures 1

Beneficial effects to a variety of resources including visual resources, human health, socioeconomics, and parking space availability within TA-3 are expected. ~n~ineerin~ and administrative controls or considerations that serve to lessen any potential for adverse environmental effects have been incorporated as integral features of the Proposed Action. Examples of these types of features include: the recycling and reuse of materials (such as cooper wiring and pipe, glass, concrete and asphalt) resulting from the demolition of Building 3-43 at LANL or off-site so that no disposal of these materials as wastes is required; the use of building materials produced from reclaimed and recycled materials (such as finish materials and carpeting), the use of low-flow lavatory fixtures and energy-efficient lighting fixtures and equipment to reduce water and electricity consumption; and the use of reused and recycled materials in landscaping, along with captured precipitation and the planting of native species. The Environmental Assessment (EA) has analyzed the potential environmental consequences of one additional alternative besides the Proposed Action, namely, the No Action alternative. The No Action alternative would result in slow deterioration of the existing Administration Building (Building 3-43) through benign neglect. The building would be vacated and funding would not be available at the current level to provide for continued upkeep and support. While the building would not be demolished outright, it would result in an adverse effect on a historic structure and the eventual loss of the structure. No waste would be generated under the No Action alternative in the short term, and no additional parking would become available at TA-3 in the long term. The EA considered the cumulative effects of the Proposed Action with past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions, regardless of what agency or person undertakes them. Several new office and laboratory structures are being built at TA-3 at LANL. Parking space availability will change beneficially as a result of the Proposed Action and the completion of the other construction activities by nearly 800 additional parking spaces. Other cumulative effects include beneficial effects to the overall visual quality within TA-3, to worker health; adverse effects include noise generation heard primarily by the involved and nearby workers for a long period of time as construction projects phase in and out; and the increase in risk of construction worker injuries with additional construction and demolition activities. Other activities at or nearby to TA-3 over the next 10 years include: potential construction actions taken by the Incorporated County of Los Alamos on tracts of land conveyed to them by the DOE; reconstruction of housing units lost Construction and Operation of a New Office Building and elated Structures 2

during the May 2000 Cerro Grande Fire within Los Alamos townsite on privately held lands; the implementation of wildfire hazard reduction activities, including forest thinning actions, on LANL and neighboring properties; some minor construction and demolition actions scattered over LANL; the generation of large amounts of waste by LANL through decontamination and demolition of buildings and environmental restoration efforts; and the gradual demolition of structures and buildings of the Cold War period at LANL and nearby. PREDECISIONAL DRAFT REVIEW & CONINIENT: On June 29, 2001, the Department of Energy invited review and comment on-the predecisional draft EA from.the State of New Mexico; four nearby American Indian Tribes: Cochiti, Jemez, Santa Clara and San lldefonso (sometimes referred to as the four accord pueblos because each tribe has entered into an accord with the Department of Energy); the Acoma Pueblo and the Mescalero Apache Tribe. In addition, the Department of Energy made the predecisional draft EA available to the general public at the same time it was provided to the State and Tribes. The availability of the EA to the public was accomplished by placing it in the Department of Energy Public Reading Rooms located within the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Community Outreach Center and Reading Room, and in the University of New Mexico's Zimmerman Library in Albuquerque. A notice was placed in three local newspapers announcing the availability of the draft EA for review. The predecisional draft EA was also placed on the World Wide Web Computer Internet System. Additionally, over 50 local stakeholder groups and individuals that have identified themselves as interested parties with regards to LANL activities, were notified by letter of the availability of the predecisional draft EA. Copies of the EA were provided to all interested parties for their review upon their requests. The review and comment period was 21 days long and ended on July 19, 2000. No comments have been received on the predecisional draft EA. AGENCY CONSULTATIONS: No effects to Federally-listed threatened and endangered species or their habitat are anticipated during the implementation of the Proposed Action and, therefore, DOE is not required to engage in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service according to section 7 requirements under the Endangered Species Act. DOE implemented a Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Management Plan (HMP) for LANL in March 1999; all project portions implemented under the Proposed Action would comply with the HMP. Adverse 3

effect to a historic property by demolition of that property requires the NNSA to take mitigative actions of a kind and sort agreed upon through consultation with the New Mexico SHPO. NNSA has started consultative discussion with the SHPO and expects to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement to implement agreed an upon treatment plan. FINDING: The United States Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration finds that there would be no significant impact from proceeding with its proposal to implement the project to construct and operate a new office building, lecture hall and parking garage, together with the demolition of two buildings, at Los Alamos National Laboratory as described in the Proposed Action alternative. This finding is based on the EA, which analyzes the consequences of the relevant issues of environmental concern. The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration makes this Finding of No Significant Impact pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.], the Council on Environmental Quality (CEO) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act [40 CFR 15001 and the Department of Energy National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures [I0 CFR 102 1 I. Therefore, no environmental impact statement is required for this proposal. Signed in Los Alamos, New Mexico this 26 2001. day of u David A. Gurule, P.E. Area Manager Los Alamos Area Office 4

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information on this proposal, this Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI), or the Department of Energy's llational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review program concerning proposals at Los Alamos National Laboratory, please contact: Elizabeth Withers, NEPA Compliance Officer Los Alamos Area Office U.S. Department of Energy 528 35th Street Los Alamos NM 87544 Copies of this FONSI (with the Environmental Assessment attached) will be made available for public review at the DOE Public Reading Room within the Los Alamos National Laboratory Community Relations Office, 1619 Central Avenue, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87544 at (505) 665-4400 or (800) 508-4400. Copies will also be made available within the DOE Public Reading Room at the Zimmerman Library, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131 at (505) 277-5441. 5