Carolyn P. Hartley, MLA President, CEO Physicians EHR, Inc



Similar documents
EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

Who are we? *Founded in 2005 by Purdue University, the Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, and the Indiana Hospital Association.

Proposed Rule Standards & Certification Criteria 2014 Edition. Steve Posnack, MHS, MS, CISSP Director, Federal Policy Division

Stage 2 Medical Billing and reconciliation of Patients

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Changes with MU Stage 2. Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management

CMS EHR Incentive Programs:

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

How To Improve Health Care Quality

The Future of Meaningful Use

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Are you ready? Meaningful Use Stage 2 HIT Summit July 26, 2014

Eligible Professionals (EPs) Purdue Research Foundation

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Meaningful Use Stage 2:

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY

Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 Summary of Proposed Rule (EP)

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Administrator Training

Qualifying for Medicare Incentive Payments with Crystal Practice Management. Version

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

Modified Stage 2 Final Rule

Meaningful Use Stage 2

The now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014.

Meaningful Use Stage 2: Summary of Proposed Rule for Eligible Professionals (EPs) Wyatt Packer HIT Regional Extension Center (REC) HealthInsight

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

Meaningful Use Stage 2: What s Next?

Meaningful Use and PCC EHR

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF

EHR Incentive Programs

LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Creating the Foundation for Population Health

Modified Stage 2, and Stage 3 Proposals: To the Future, and Beyond

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs

Completing Your MPIP Attestation: Supporting Documentation

Three Proposed Rules on EHRs:

2015 Meaningful Use CMS EHR Incentive Program. DeeAnne McCallin, REC Program Director 11/12/2015 update

Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use - The Basics

TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage One Meaningful Use. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator October 16, 2014

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

A Deep Dive Into MU Stage 2

Michigan Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Update Jason Werner - MDCH

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

Targeting Next Stages of Meaningful Use

Attesting for Meaningful Use Stage 2 in 2014 Customer Help Guide

Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use

HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 Final Recommendations

6/26/2013. Continuing Medical Education Disclaimer

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Regulations Overview

How to Play by the (Final) Rules:

MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 USERS GUIDE

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

MicroMD EMR version 7.6

Achieving Meaningful Use in Presented by the SFREC

Stage Two Meaningful Use Measures for Eligible Professionals

Navigating Meaningful Use Stage 2

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

InteliChart. Putting the Meaningful in Meaningful Use. Meeting current criteria while preparing for the future

EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)

An Update in Electronic Health Records

4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers

MEDICARE EHR: PREPARING FOR Community Counts Practice Effectiveness Web Series ION June 26, 2014 Risë Marie Cleland Oplinc, Inc.

10/19/2015. Meaningful Use: Current and Future Environment. Agenda. MGMA Annual Conference Nashville, TN October 13, 2015

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations

Meaningful Use Qualification Plan

Financial Incentives for EHR Use and The Washington- Idaho Regional Extension Center Program: WIREC

2 Final Rule for EPs. Meaningful Use Stage 2. October 18, 2012

Navigating Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Summary of Key Provisions: CMS EHR Incentive Program Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Final Rule)

Transcription:

Carolyn P. Hartley, MLA President, CEO Physicians EHR, Inc

Health Information Management Professional SME to Regional Extension Centers President, CEO: Physicians EHR, Inc 140+ complex to risky EHR installations Workflow, process redesign, compliance, change management Lead, Co Author 20 books published by AMA, ADA, ASCO, AGA. Editor in Chief, Physicians ehealth Report

1. Patient Portals 2. Clinical quality measures 3. HIPAA Risk Assessment / 2014 risks 4. Computerized Provider Order Entry 5. Clinical Decision Support 6. Clinical Lab Results 7. Medication Reconciliation

Clarity of regulations Programs competing for your attention ICD 10, HIPAA Omnibus, ACA, ACOs, MU Stage 2 Volume of information vs. Areas of focus Emerging technology: what to trust, what not to trust Process of information sharing Slowly emerging consumers

What is required for MU Stage 2? (D2) What does CEHRT have to demonstrate? What must a modular certified patient portal demonstrate? What do physicians want in a portal? What the EHR vendor provides What patients need What RECs can do to help physicians

Objective Measure Exclusion? Patient Ability to Electronically View, Download & Transmit Health Information >50% provided timely online access >5% view, download, or transmit to a 3 rd party Yes Clinical Summaries >50% within one business day Yes Patient Specific Education Resources Use Secure Electronic Messaging >10% all unique patients receive patient specific education resources through logic built into the system. >5% unique patients sent a secure electronic message Yes Yes

ONC requires EHRTs to support Direct protocol for Transition of Care (TOC) and Portal Transmit. Very complex and challenging. ONC Certification does NOT address Patient Consent or Provider Look up Just Secure Transmission. Setting up Direct environment will take time. PROVIDER POINT: Discuss with EHR vendor how is your EHR supporting electronic exchange (HISP, no HISP, etc.) and how does that impact your community (e.g. state HIE)? Source: Kyle Meadors, Drummond Group

The portal piece of 2014 Edition (View, Download, Transmit) is significantly more complex. Patients now have the ability to transmit summary records via Direct. What is not tested is policy and IT setup decisions on how to enable patient to exchanges data with other providers/organizations. PROVIDER POINT: While Direct utilizes email, setup is not nearly as simple as emailing someone in Outlook. PROVIDER POINT: Other portals besides the one packaged with your EHR can be used in MU (e.g. community hospital) but must ensure other portal is certified and not breaking possession rule (see ONC FAQ #21 Question [12 10 021 2]). Source: Kyle Meadors, Drummond Group

Test Procedure for 170.304 (i) Exchange Clinical Information and Patient Summary Record 1) Receive and display in human readable format a patient s summary record from other providers Diagnostic tests results, problem list, medication list, medication allergy list 2) Generate and transmit from the EHR in HL7 CCD or ASTM CCR format (at least) Diagnostic test results, problem list, medication list, medication allergy list.

1) Patient Portal must be ONC HIT certified 2) If EP goes this route, EP is responsible for any set up/configuration. 3) EP also must ensure the EHR vendor will play nice with the 3 rd party portal. 4) EHR may be tightly coupled with their portal, may not be practical to have a 2 nd portal option. EHR Vendors want to keep customers and likely to find a way to leverage new portal in sales. Source: Kyle Meadors, Jim Tate

Will the patient portal offered by my EHR vendor meet clinical needs of my patient population? Yes use the portal No select another portal (specialty) Maybe ask for advice Will my EHR become irrelevant? Data outside the EHR; not important to PT/MD Phone calls, texts, emails, MD to MD, MD to PT

STAGE 1: CORE Minimum 6: maybe 9 or 10 2014 All providers, regardless of stage of CQMs report in the same way: EP: 9 out of 64 EH / CAH: 16 out of 29 PLUS: 3 of 6 key health care domains: Patient & family engagement Patient safety Care Coordination Population & Public Health Efficient Use of Healthcare Resources Clinical Processes

Roll out of 2014 MU CEHRT ICD 10 10/1/2014 End to End Testing ICD 10; Vendor updates Changes to clinical documentation, templates

ICD 9: 3 5 characters ICD 10: Seven characters (x indicates blank) Disease Category Etiology (cause) Anatomic Site Manifestation Extension for More Specificity

How are EHR software companies supporting clinical documentation? Standards (SNOMED, LOINC) More space (alpha numeric) Additional drop down menus Customization issues: Speed texts Templates Clinical decision support How are your clients updating their clinical documentation?

SNOMED embedded in CEHRT 2014. Vendors must demonstrate SNOMED in: Smoking Status Family Health History Cancer Registry Clinical Summary SNOMED & LOINC in: Lab Orders, Results Posting Biggest changes: Obstetrics Cardiology Orthopedics

Natural Language Processing (NLP) M*Modal Nuance Communications (Dragon) Wired Informatics (Invenio ) 3M Precyse

HIPAA Risk Assessments Updated Privacy Risks due to specificity in ICD 10 codes Updated Notice of Privacy Practices, made available effective date. Business Associate Agreements / Amendments Updated risk assessments with updated patient rights

Marketing requirements Refill reminder is an exception Restrict disclosure of PHI to health plan if paid for in full. School immunization records w/o authorization Families of deceased can exercise right to protect identity for 50 years after death. GINA Encrypt data at rest, including mobile devices Possible compensation to patients for breach

STAGE 1 CORE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed HC professional (per state, local and professional guidelines). >30% with at least one medication in list; seen by the EP STAGE 2 CORE Use CPOE for medication, lab and radiology orders directly entered by any licensed HC professional. Increased percentages >60% meds >30% lab orders > 30% radiology orders Denominators change in 2014 If seen more than once in reporting period, PT is counted just once. Diagnostic codes must accompany the lab / imaging order ICD 10; ICD 9 codes

STAGE 1 CORE Implement one clinical decision support rule relevant to specialty or high clinical priority; track compliance with that rule. STAGE 2 CORE Implement 5 clinical decision support interventions related to 4 or more clinical quality measures. Drug drug and drug allergy intervention enabled Attestation: Yes/No

Problem List Medication List Medication Allergy List Demographics Lab tests and values Vital Signs Problem List Medication List Medication Allergy List Demographics Lab tests and values Vital signs

Select and Activate Trigger Identify Problem List Medication list Medication allergy list Demographics Lab tests and values/results Vital signs Electronically trigger interventions Identify a user diagnostic and therapeutic reference Diagnostic and therapeutic reference information Configure EHR brings up patient s record with interventions Review Evidence Based CDS Attributes Bibliographic citation, developer, funding source, release Review attributes of at least one drug drug, drug allergy interaction

STAGE 1 MENU Reconcile medications for >50% patients transitioned into the EP s care STAGE 2 CORE Reconcile medications for >50% patients transitioned into the EP s care. Relevant encounter left relevant if EP determines it to be so. Medications reported by PT AND hospital s ATD (in patient)

Include patient in medication reconciliation Workflow redesign Patient Portal Kiosks: Phreesia connects with RxHub/Surescripts for patients to identify on check in. Also connects patient with eligibility. Currently selected by Allscripts, emds, Greenway, Nextgen

STAGE 1 MENU Incorporate clinical lab test results into CEHRT as structured data. > 40% all clinical lab test results are incorporated into CEHRT as structured data. STAGE 2 CORE Incorporate clinical lab test results into CEHRT as structured data. > 55% of all clinical lab tests ordered are incorporated in CERHT as structured data Hot button: ICD 10 will change this significantly, depending on payer contracts

Critical in specialties dependent on lab results to make clinical decisions Urology Oncology Hematology Nephrology Neurology

Update hardware, software 2014 CEHRT Product Rollout ACA: new pts. ICD 10 testing ICD 10 Training Update interfaces for ICD 10 Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2014 Unknown: Vendor readiness for ICD 10 and updates Significant payment delays

1. Patient Portals 2. Clinical quality measures 3. HIPAA Risk Assessment / 2014 risks 4. Computerized Provider Order Entry 5. Clinical Decision Support 6. Clinical Lab Results 7. Medication Reconciliation

Thanks a bunch! Carolyn Hartley Physicians EHR, Inc Carolyn@physiciansehr.com 919 637 0220 www.physiciansehr.com #PhysiciansEHR