EFFICACY OF RACTOPAMINE AND PST



Similar documents
FEEDING MANUAL Feed manual TOPIGS Finishers

Consequences of 100% organic diets for pigs and poultry

AN EVALUATION OF DEXTROSE, LACTOSE, AND WHEY SOURCES IN PHASE 2 STARTER DIETS FOR WEANLING PIGS 1

Spray-dried porcine plasma, a healthy feed ingredient for resilient weaner pigs

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

Improves pig performance in a wide range of health and growing conditions

Copper and zinc in diets of growing pigs

PROCESSING OF WHEAT FOR GROWING-FINISHING SWINE

Most limiting amino acid concept...

Fishmeal for PIGS. Fishmeal for pigs a feed with a very healthy future

The Production and Use of High-Valued Canola Protein Concentrates

A diet fit for a pig: seven basic rules

Methionine Supplementation of Low-Protein Broiler Diets: Influence upon Growth Performance and Efficiency of Protein Utilization

Lohmann Brown Management Guide May 2007

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

14/11/2014. Copper supply affects growth performance and health in growing pigs. Outline. Copper as essential trace elements

L-VALINE: Release the potential of your feed!

Diet formulation: making use of non-linear functions

Section C. Diet, Food Production, and Public Health

Report of the Veal Calf Vaccination Study with Rispoval IntraNasal (Zoetis)

Land O Lakes Feed DDGS. Nutrients Concentrate: United States Ethanol Outlook. A Growing Opportunity

UTI CAT FOOD COMPARISON CHART

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand

Nutrition Guide For Bobwhite Quail Production

CODEX STANDARD FOR FOLLOW-UP FORMULA CODEX STAN This standard applies to the composition and labelling of follow-up formula.

Response of Dairy Cows to Supplements of Energy and Protein in Early and Mid Lactation

H.A. DePra, J.D. Duggin, D.R. Gill, C.R. Krehbiel, J.B. Morgan, D.C. Bietz, A.H. Trenkle, R.L. Horst, F.N. Owens. Story in Brief

Broiler Nutrition Supplement

The Effect of Citric Acid, Phytase, and Their Interaction on Gastric ph, and Ca, P, and Dry Matter Digestibilities

Project Pig Production Planner

NUTRITION OF THE BODY

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Effects of Diet Particle Size on Pig Growth Performance, Diet Flow Ability, and Mixing Characteristics

Grow Taller 4 Idiots 2

Valine and Isoleucine: The next limiting amino acids in broiler diets

Feeding weaned piglets and growing-finishing pigs with diets based on mainly home-grown organic feedstuffs

Nutrition Support Service

Introduction to Feed Amino Acids. Bank of America Merrill Lynch Chemicals Conference

EFFECT OF AGRADO ON THE HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE OF TRANSPORT-STRESSED HEIFER CALVES. Authors:

Effects of Supplemental Vitamin E with Different Oil Sources on Growth, Health, and Carcass Parameters of Preconditioned Beef Calves 1

Effect of Flaxseed Inclusion on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestion and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Growing and Finishing Diets for Beef Cattle

Feedlot Lamb Nutrition

ROLLED VERSUS WHOLE CORN: EFFECTS ON RUMINAL FERMENTATION OF FEEDLOT STEERS

Feeding Game Birds: Pheasant, Quail, and Partridge Limited information is

Level 3. Applying the Principles of Nutrition to a Physical Activity Programme Level 3

National Food Safety Standard Standard for nutrition labelling of prepackaged foods

Nutrition Requirements

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

Let s Talk Oils and Fats!

Eat like a pig for better health?

Swine EPD Terminology

BURNETT CENTER INTERNET PROGRESS REPORT. No. 12 April, Summary of the 2000 Texas Tech University Consulting Nutritionist Survey

FARMERS INFORMATION SERIES DAIRY BEEF. Scheme. blade-farming.com

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

CORN BY-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY COW RATIONS

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES FOR THE CONTROL OF COMPLIANCE WITH EU LEGISLATION ON:

Hill s Evidence-Based Clinical Nutrition for Dermatology Specialists

THE EVALUATION OF DISTILLERS CO-PRODUCTS IN DAIRY BEEF PRODUCTION

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

Dietary Fat Supplements and Body Condition: Does Fatty Acid Profile Matter? James K. Drackley, Professor of Animal Sciences

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Online Supporting Materials. Supplemental Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets, expressed as g/kg diet.

Sheep Nutrition. Sheep Nutrition. Nutrient Needs. Sheep Nutrition Water. Products Produced. Use of Pasture\Range and Forages.

Summary. Keywords: methanol, glycerin, intake, beef cattle. Introduction

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Dr Erhard Briendenhann

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Understanding CNCPS and CPM: Biology, Modeling, and Best Cost Applications for Balancing the Nutrient Requirements in Dairy Diets

BASIC SHOW PIG FEEDING and CARE

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

Egg performance, egg quality, and nutrient utilization in laying hens fed diets with different levels of rapeseed expeller cake

Selecting 4-H pigs. By: Ryan Harrell

CAT FOOD PREMIUM PREVENTION BY NUTRITION. krmivo-brit.cz

PIG NUTRITION AND FEEDING

Hemp as organic protein source for pigs and poultry. Focus on Industrial Hemp. November 4, 2010

FEEDING ORGANIC PIGS A HANDBOOK OF RAW MATERIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEEDING PRACTICE

Fish In - Fish Out (FIFO) Ratios explained

FEED MANUFACTURING TO LOWER FEED COST. Presented at the Leman Conference 2007

These calculations are on a hectare basis or for a given size of an experimental plot.

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

THE EFFECTS OF PALATABILITY ON FEED CONSUMPTION IN GROWING SWINE

REGULAR CAT FOOD COMPARISON CHART

Animal Science Research Centre - Beef Unit Trial Results 2005 (a) Evaluation of head-cut whole crop wheat and barley for beef cattle

CORPORATE HEALTH LOWERING YOUR CHOLESTEROL & BLOOD PRESSURE

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

Effect of Energy Source Prior to Parturitian and During Lactation on Piglet Survival and Growth and on Milk Lipids

Human Tubal Fluid (HTF) Media & Modifi ed Human Tubal Fluid (mhtf) Medium with Gentamicin

Disruptive Dairy innovation: Why has it become a necessity for the food industry?

ANIMAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE

Nutrients: Carbohydrates, Proteins, and Fats. Chapter 5 Lesson 2

Protein Sources and its Benefits

Level II Agricultural Business Operations - Assessment Booklet

What is Geriatric? Geriatric Nutrition of Companion Animals. Age Chart. Diseases Associated with Older Pets

Optimizing Broiler Feed Conversion Ratio

Insulin s Effects on Testosterone, Growth Hormone and IGF I Following Resistance Training

Product Information: PediaSure

Transcription:

EFFICACY OF RACTOPAMINE AND PST COMBINATIONS ON FINISHER PIG PERFORMANCE Report prepared for the Co-operative Research Centre for an Internationally Competitive Pork Industry By Dr Robert van Barneveld Consultant Research Scientist (Nutrition) Barneveld Nutrition Pty Ltd/BECAN Consulting Group Springwood QLD 4127 September 2008 Established and supported under the Australian Government s Cooperative

Introduction FEEDLOGIC Experiment 3 Ractopamine is an approved feed ingredient for pigs that repartitions nutrients toward increased lean deposition and has been shown to improve growth performance and carcass characteristics. Porcine somatotropin (pst) is a protein naturally produced by the pig and is a major factor controlling growth and metabolism, administering exogenous sources of pst during the finishing phase enables the animal to continue to deposit muscle tissue and reduce the amount of fat in the carcass. Recent experimental work has shown that combining ractopamine and pst in the last two weeks of production improved feed efficiency by about 40% and resulted in overall feed:gain for females between 65 and 100kg of only 2.31. If we can achieve these levels within commercial operations, production will be at world best level. Hypothesis The use of ractopamine and pst in combination results in increased feed efficiency in finisher gilts. Methods Treatments To test the efficacy of ractopamine and pst under commercial conditions five treatments were investigated (table 1). Table 1 Treatments Treatment Diet Ractopamine pst 1 Standard finisher - - 2 Hi-spec finisher - - 3 Hi-spec finisher 5 ppm - 4 Hi-spec finisher 5 ppm 5 mg daily 5 Hi-spec finisher 5 ppm 20 mg twice weekly Treatment 1 was a control diet using the current specifications of the finisher diet (13.4 MJ/kg; 0.55 g available lysine/mj DE; normally containing 5ppm of ractopamine) used in this facility. Treatment 2 was a positive control utilizing the high specification finisher with elevated levels of energy, available lysine, calcium and essential amino acids relative to lysine to allow pst to fully express its benefits. Treatments 3, 4 and 5 all contained ractopamine at an inclusion rate of 5ppm, but differing in pst treatment. Treatment 3 pigs did not receive any pst, nor a placebo solution. Treatment 4 pigs received 5mg of pst administered daily, as a 1ml solution. Treatment 5 pigs received 20mg or 15 mg of pst administered as an oil emulsion delivered as a 1ml solution twice weekly. All pigs on treatment five received the same daily pst equivalent as those on the daily treatment. Diets Three diets were formulated to meet the treatment requirements (Table 2). The hi-specification finisher diets had both higher energy and available lysine contents compared to the standard diet and in accordance with specifications for pst use the ratios of threonine and methionine plus cystine to lysine were lifted. 2

Table 2 Specifications of treatment diets Di et Name MJ DE/kg Total Avail Lys g/kg Thr:Lys Met+Cys:Lys 1 Standard finisher 13.4 7.4 0.67 0.63 2 Hi-spec finisher 14.0 9.8 0.70 0.67 3 Hi-spec finisher + ractopamine 14.0 9.8 0.70 0.67 Pigs and feeding The experiment utilised 20 pens of pigs blocked on shed side (the two sides of the shed were filled a week apart, with a one week age difference between sides) and average pen weight. Sides were run as experimental blocks, with events on the younger side occurring one week after the older side. The FEEDLOGIC delivery system was used for feeding. Feeders were filled to capacity on the first day of the experiment with the allocated dietary treatment and an attempt was made to maintain the feeders at full capacity for the duration of the trial so that daily feed consumption could be recorded. At the completion of the trial (28 days after its commencement) the pens were reweighed. Any residual feed left in feeders on the final day of the trial was removed and weighed. Responses measured included average daily gain, feed intake and feed: gain ratio. pst treatment The administration of pst was conducted by an experienced operator using a gas-powered autoinjector. Statistical analyses As there was no significant effect of shed side (block), differences between treatments were assessed using a simple one-way ANOVA. All analyses were conducted using Genstat 10 th Edition. Results There was no significant difference in average daily gain (p=0.212), average daily feed intake (p=0.292) or feed: gain ratio (p=0.567) between each side of the shed (table 3), nor any difference in starting weight (Weight in) of each treatment (p=1.000). Whilst there were no significant differences in weight out at the end of the trial (Weight out, p=0.504), there was a difference in weight gain, with ractopamine treated pigs gaining significantly more than non-ractopamine treated pigs (p<0.001). Pigs treated with pst grew, on average, 41 to 50g per day faster than those receiving only Paylean and up to 180g per day faster than pigs on the standard diet (table 3 and figure 1). When pst was administered on a daily basis (treatment 4) pigs consumed significantly less than their non-pst treated counterparts, although when administered twice per week this effect became non-significant. As a result of this improved rate of average daily gain and decreased feed intake, pigs treated with pst had a significantly better feed: gain ratio than other treatments (p<0.001). Pigs that received only ractopamine had a significantly better feed: gain ratio than the two control treatments (1 & 2). 3

Daily Feed Intake/F:G Ratio 4.00 3.80 3.60 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 2.60 2.40 2.20 1.000 0.950 0.900 0.850 0.800 0.750 0.700 0.650 0.600 0.550 Average daily gain (kg/d) 2.00 Standard Hi-Spec Hi-Spec Ractopamine Hi-Spec Ractopamine Hi-Spec Ractopamine Daily pst 2x Weekly pst Treatment ADFI (kg/d) F:G Ratio ADG (kg/d) 0.500 Figure 1. Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed: gain ratio (F: G Ratio) for each treatment group (mean ± SE) measured over the entire 28 days of the study. There was no significant difference in average daily feed intake (ADFI) between treatments during the first two weeks of the trial (table 3 and figure 2). However, when pst was administered for the final two weeks, it resulted in a significant reduction in the ADFI during this period (p<0.001). The ADFI of pigs that were not treated with pst increased by 80 to 200g per day from the first to the second period, whereas those treated with pst reduced their intake by 110 to 200g per day. 3.00 2.90 2.80 Average Daily Feed Intake 2.70 2.60 2.50 2.40 2.30 2.20 2.10 2.00 Standard Hi-Spec Hi-Spec Ractopamine Hi-Spec Ractopamine Daily pst Treatment ADFI Week 1-2 (kg/d) ADFI Week 3-4 (kg/d) Hi-Spec Ractopamine 2x Weekly pst Figure 2. Average daily feed intake during the first two weeks (ADFI Week 1-2) and second two weeks (ADFI Week 3-4), showing the response to pst (mean ± SE). 4

Table 3. Parameter values showing treatment means and p-values for treatment and block factors and their interaction. Treatment p-value Parameter Standard Hi-Spec Hi-Spec Paylean Hi-Spec Paylean Daily pst Hi-Spec Paylean 2x Weekly pst SED Treatment Block Treatment x Block N. (Pens) 4 4 4 4 4 N. (Pigs) 177 181 182 181 180 Days on trial 28 28 28 28 28 Weight in (kg) 75.7 75.5 75.5 75.2 75.4 2.64 1.000 0.210 0.995 Weight out (kg) 96.3 97.4 99.7 100.8 100.8 3.10 0.504 0.093 0.995 Weight gain (kg) 20.6a 21.9a 24.2b 25.6b 25.4b 0.99 <0.001 0.212 0.383 ADG (kg/d) 0.735a 0.783a 0.865b 0.915b 0.906b 0.04 <0.001 0.212 0.383 ADFI (kg/d) 2.57b 2.59b 2.58b 2.39a 2.42ab 0.08 0.069 0.087 0.321 F:G Ratio 3.50c 3.31c 2.99b 2.61a 2.68a 0.13 <0.001 0.738 0.162 ADFI Week 1-2 (kg/d) 2.46 2.55 2.48 2.49 2.48 0.11 0.937 0.010 0.425 ADFI Week 3-4 (kg/d) 2.68b 2.63b 2.67b 2.29a 2.37a 0.09 <0.001 0.558 0.118 N. (Pigs) 128 131 132 126 89 Adj. P2 (mm) 9.7a 10.4c 9.8b 9.1a 9.4ab 0.32 <0.001 0.890 0.381 5

Backfat depth (P2) was captured at slaughter, unfortunately due to an outbreak of Erysipelas four days post-trial pigs over 107kg in live weight were not sold until after they had been treated, consequently the data for backfat depth contains only pigs in the 84-107kg live weight range. Differences in carcase weights (HSCW) were not significant between treatments, so backfat depths were linearly adjusted to a common carcase weight (75.1kg HSCW). There were significant differences between treatments (table 3 & figure 3, p<0.001). The treatment group that only received the hi-spec diet was significantly fatter than all other groups, and whilst the administration of pst did show a response it was not significant when compared with the standard treatment and only marginally significant compared to the ractopamine only treatment group. 11.0 10.5 P2 backfat depth (mm) 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 Standard Hi-Spec Hi-Spec Ractopamine Hi-Spec Ractopamine Daily pst Treatment Hi-Spec Ractopamine 2x Weekly pst Figure 3. Adjusted backfat depths showing treatment effects (mean ± SE). Backfat depths were adjusted to a common slaughter weight of 75.1kg. Discussion The use of ractopamine and pst in combination results in markedly increased feed efficiency in finisher gilts. Whilst the use of ractopamine on its own significantly improved the growth rate of finisher pigs during the last four weeks of growth it had little effect on daily feed intake. However, when pst was administered either daily or twice a week in combination with ractopamine in the last two weeks of production a significant reduction in daily feed intake occurred, which resulted in further improvements in feed efficiency. Despite the extra costs involved in preparing a higher specification diet (~$40/t) and the administration of pst ( less than $3/treatment period), the increased slaughter weight or reduced time to slaughter and the improvements in feed efficiency can result in a benefit to the producer of at least $3/pig. Modelling of the outcomes by the Pork CRC predicted an improvement in profitability of some $7/pig for animals offered the diet containing 5 ppm Paylean and treated with pst during the final two weeks of production. The improvement in profitability predicted for pigs treated with Paylean only was lower however; these pigs would not likely require the higher specification and more costly diet to elicit the improvements in growth performance reported here. 6

Overall the results demonstrate the levels of improvement in growth performance able to be achieved in late finishing using Paylean and Paylean and pst in combination. The improvement in feed efficiency elicited by the combination treatments was in the order of 30% which would improve overall herd feed conversion 9%-10% and reduce the latter from 4.05 to only 3.65.These results confirm the importance of understanding what pigs are doing in late finishing and offer practical means for enhancing performance during this critical and relatively costly period of pork production. Acknowledgements Thanks to Mr Mark Mingay, OzBioPharm for the supply of pst and its administration. 7

APPENDIX 1 DIET FORMULATIONS ================================================================================================================================= : : : Single-Mix Tools (FM) MCLEAN FARMS {16} JUNE 2008 FULL PRINT 10:51 27/06/08 0001 : : 27-October-2006/643.5r ( 29) Plant=0088 Rob : ================================================================================================================================= Formula basic data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code : 20500 Name : DIET 1 STANDARD FINISHER Sell price: 0.0 Batch [Kg]: 1500.0 Group code: Cost : 340.919 Created : 26/06/08 Version : Margin : -340.586 Updated : 27/06/08 FM origin : KPE 60 Tonnes : 0.0 User name : Rob VM key : KPE 60 External reference: Script file name : Raw material % [Kg] Tonnes --------------------------------------------------- 13240 SORGHUM 11.0 65.606667 984.1 0.0 16020 MILLRUN 16.0 15.933333 239.0 0.0 33170 CANOLA MEAL 38.0 [EXP] 10.0 150.0 0.0 40100 BLOOD MEAL 90.0 1.266667 19.0 0.0 40660 MEAT MEAL 50.0 5.466667 82.0 0.0 47000 LIMESTONE (FINE) 0.733333 11.0 0.0 49005 SALT (FINE) 0.2 3.0 0.0 52810 CHOLINE CHLORIDE 60% 0.033333 0.5 0.0 53000 DL METHIONINE 0.006667 0.1 0.0 53150 L-LYSINE SULPHATE (51% LYSINE) 0.4 6.0 0.0 53810 ZNP 3801 PHYTASE (SORGHUM) - 60G/KG 0.1 1.5 0.0 PCP4005 CHM PIG GROWER PMX (McLEAN) - 2.5 KG/T 0.253333 3.8 0.0 100.0 1500.0 0.0 Analysis --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- [VOLUME] % : 100.0 THREONINE % : 0.624938 CHOLINE MG/KG : 1000.04 DRYMATTER % : 87.9911 TRYPTOPHAN % : 0.179495 FAT/EE % : 3.960987 MOISTURE % : 11.655567 M+C % : 0.593436 W3_FA % : 0.147005 PROTEIN % : 17.743273 AILYSPIG % : 0.738944 W6_FA % : 1.13706 NITROGEN % : 2.790304 CALCIUM % : 1.092261 W3+W6_FA % : 1.284065 C_FIBRE % : 4.24074 PHOSPHORUS % : 0.720959 #AILYS/DEP : 0.055132 DE_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 13.403213 AV_PHOS % : 0.420304 #MET/LYS : 0.30044 ME_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 0.066 #CAL/PHO : 1.515011 #M+C/LYS : 0.633941 ISOLEUCINE % : 0.616509 #CAL/AVPHO : 2.598741 #TRY/LYS : 0.191746 LYSINE % : 0.936106 SODIUM % : 0.154809 #THR/LYS : 0.667593 METHION % : 0.281244 SALT % : 0.394408 #ISO/LYS : 0.658588 8

================================================================================================================================= : : : Single-Mix Tools (FM) MCLEAN FARMS {16} JUNE 2008 FULL PRINT 10:51 27/06/08 0002 : : 27-October-2006/643.5r ( 29) Plant=0088 Rob : ================================================================================================================================= Formula basic data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code : 21500 Name : DIET 2 HI-SPEC FINISHER Sell price: 0.0 Batch [Kg]: 1500.0 Group code: Cost : 382.79 Created : 26/06/08 Version : Margin : -382.793 Updated : 27/06/08 FM origin : KPE 60 Tonnes : 0.0 User name : Rob VM key : KPE 60 External reference: Script file name : Raw material % [Kg] Tonnes --------------------------------------------------- 13240 SORGHUM 11.0 67.173333 1007.6 0.0 16020 MILLRUN 16.0 5.0 75.0 0.0 33170 CANOLA MEAL 38.0 [EXP] 7.533333 113.0 0.0 34580 SOYBEAN MEAL 45.0 7.533333 113.0 0.0 40100 BLOOD MEAL 90.0 3.0 45.0 0.0 40660 MEAT MEAL 50.0 7.0 105.0 0.0 45100 TALLOW 1.266667 19.0 0.0 47000 LIMESTONE (FINE) 0.266667 4.0 0.0 49005 SALT (FINE) 0.2 3.0 0.0 52810 CHOLINE CHLORIDE 60% 0.033333 0.5 0.0 53000 DL METHIONINE 0.16 2.4 0.0 53150 L-LYSINE SULPHATE (51% LYSINE) 0.4 6.0 0.0 53200 L-THREONINE 0.08 1.2 0.0 53810 ZNP 3801 PHYTASE (SORGHUM) - 60G/KG 0.1 1.5 0.0 PCP4005 CHM PIG GROWER PMX (McLEAN) - 2.5 KG/T 0.253333 3.8 0.0 100.0 1500.0 0.0 Analysis --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- [VOLUME] % : 100.0 THREONINE % : 0.841077 CHOLINE MG/KG : 1095.34 DRYMATTER % : 88.352933 TRYPTOPHAN % : 0.219336 FAT/EE % : 4.890853 MOISTURE % : 11.293733 M+C % : 0.806887 W3_FA % : 0.124088 PROTEIN % : 21.092293 AILYSPIG % : 0.980424 W6_FA % : 1.02904 NITROGEN % : 3.302677 CALCIUM % : 1.099848 W3+W6_FA % : 1.153128 C_FIBRE % : 3.44664 PHOSPHORUS % : 0.727676 #AILYS/DEP : 0.070057 DE_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 13.994747 AV_PHOS % : 0.448857 #MET/LYS : 0.38995 ME_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 0.066 #CAL/PHO : 1.511453 #M+C/LYS : 0.671596 ISOLEUCINE % : 0.727307 #CAL/AVPHO : 2.450329 #TRY/LYS : 0.18256 LYSINE % : 1.201447 SODIUM % : 0.167256 #THR/LYS : 0.700054 METHION % : 0.468504 SALT % : 0.421188 #ISO/LYS : 0.605359 9

================================================================================================================================= : : : Single-Mix Tools (FM) MCLEAN FARMS {16} JUNE 2008 FULL PRINT 10:51 27/06/08 0003 : : 27-October-2006/643.5r ( 29) Plant=0088 Rob : ================================================================================================================================= Formula basic data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code : 22500 Name : DIET 3 HI-SPEC FINISHER + PAYLEAN Sell price: 0.0 Batch [Kg]: 1500.0 Group code: Cost : 403.974 Created : 27/06/08 Version : Margin : -403.974 Updated : 27/06/08 FM origin : KPE 60 Tonnes : 0.0 User name : Rob VM key : KPE 60 External reference: Script file name : Raw material % [Kg] Tonnes --------------------------------------------------- 13240 SORGHUM 11.0 67.148333 1007.225 0.0 16020 MILLRUN 16.0 5.0 75.0 0.0 33170 CANOLA MEAL 38.0 [EXP] 7.533333 113.0 0.0 34580 SOYBEAN MEAL 45.0 7.533333 113.0 0.0 40100 BLOOD MEAL 90.0 3.0 45.0 0.0 40660 MEAT MEAL 50.0 7.0 105.0 0.0 45100 TALLOW 1.266667 19.0 0.0 47000 LIMESTONE (FINE) 0.266667 4.0 0.0 49005 SALT (FINE) 0.2 3.0 0.0 52810 CHOLINE CHLORIDE 60% 0.033333 0.5 0.0 52960 PAYLEAN (RACTOPAMINE) ELANCO 0.025 0.375 0.0 53000 DL METHIONINE 0.16 2.4 0.0 53150 L-LYSINE SULPHATE (51% LYSINE) 0.4 6.0 0.0 53200 L-THREONINE 0.08 1.2 0.0 53810 ZNP 3801 PHYTASE (SORGHUM) - 60G/KG 0.1 1.5 0.0 PCP4005 CHM PIG GROWER PMX (McLEAN) - 2.5 KG/T 0.253333 3.8 0.0 100.0 1500.0 0.0 Analysis --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- [VOLUME] % : 100.0 THREONINE % : 0.840986 CHOLINE MG/KG : 1095.19 DRYMATTER % : 88.355558 TRYPTOPHAN % : 0.21931 FAT/EE % : 4.890153 MOISTURE % : 11.291108 M+C % : 0.806793 W3_FA % : 0.124071 PROTEIN % : 21.089543 AILYSPIG % : 0.980382 W6_FA % : 1.028765 NITROGEN % : 3.302237 CALCIUM % : 1.099843 W3+W6_FA % : 1.152836 C_FIBRE % : 3.446115 PHOSPHORUS % : 0.727604 #AILYS/DEP : 0.070071 DE_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 13.991197 AV_PHOS % : 0.448842 #MET/LYS : 0.389935 ME_PIG_MJ MJ/KG : 0.066 #CAL/PHO : 1.511597 #M+C/LYS : 0.671552 ISOLEUCINE % : 0.727197 #CAL/AVPHO : 2.450399 #TRY/LYS : 0.182547 LYSINE % : 1.201386 SODIUM % : 0.167246 #THR/LYS : 0.700013 METHION % : 0.468463 SALT % : 0.421158 #ISO/LYS : 0.605298 10