Health IT Policy Committee Meeting. Data Update. March 10, 2015



Similar documents
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet

Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016

Critical Access Hospitals Electronic Health Record Incentive Payment Calculations

Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS (CAHS)

MEDICARE AND MEDICAID ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR) INCENTIVE PROGRAM: OVERVIEW

Eligible Hospitals Meaningful Use Stage 1

Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015

CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015

Agenda. Overview of Stage 2 Final Rule Impact to Program

Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Update

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE STAGE 2 SUMMARY

EHR Incentive Program for Medicare Hospitals: Calculating Payments Last Updated: May 2013

Meaningful Use Stage 2. Meeting Meaningful Use Stage 2 with InstantPHR TM.

Preview of the Attestation System for the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program

Eligible Professional Menu Measure Frequently Asked Questions

To: From: Date: Subject: Proposed Rule on Meaningful Use Requirements Stage 2 Measures, Payment Penalties, Hardship Exceptions and Appeals

Meaningful Use Modification Rules for Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support

Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society

HHS Issues Final Rule on Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. Amy M. Joseph, Esq. Paul T. Smith, Esq.

Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012

Proposed Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria

EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor

June 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: May 2013

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2

EHR/Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements

Meaningful Use Timeline

EMR Use in the Age of Healthcare Reform. C. Martin Harris, M.D. Chief Information Officer, Cleveland Clinic Executive Director, ecleveland Clinic

MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015

Meaningful Use Madness: Stage 3 Overview APRIL 08, 2015

Georgia Medicaid Electronic Health Records Incentives Program. General Overview. Presented by Jacqueline Koffi, Program Director

Eligible Professional s Checklist 2015 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Eligible Hospitals Reporting Meaningful Use for the Wisconsin Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program and Other Program Information

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

CMS Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs 2015 Final Rule Overview Meaningful Use

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

EHR Incentive Programs

Modified Stage 2 Final Rule

CMS EHR Incentive Programs:

1 13 ESSENTIAL STEPS TO BECOMING ICD-10 COMPLIANT With Practice Management Software. The Beginner s Guide to EHR Meaningful Use

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

Meaningful Use Objectives

CMS Meaningful Use Proposed Rule

NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EHR MEDICAID INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS

TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES

Meaningful Use Stage 2: What s Next?

Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Re: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017; Proposed Rule

Medicare EHR Incentive Program - Tip Sheet for Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Payments Last Updated: September, Overview.

Meaningful Use Stage 3 Proposed Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers

LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley

Overview and Analysis of Proposed Changes to Meaningful Use in

Meaningful Use Stages 1 and 2 and How to Survive a Meaningful Use Audit. Charles Jarvis, Senior Manager

EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program

How To Improve Health Care Quality

The Future of Meaningful Use

Achieving Meaningful Use

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs

Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Eligible Hospitals. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services Office of Medicaid Business and Policy

Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) and the NC Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program

It s where we drive Quality Improvement and Get Money to aid in our ability to provide quality patient care

MEDICARE ACCESS AND CHIP REAUTHORIZATION ACT (MACRA) MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) ADVANCING CARE INFORMATION PERFORMANCE CATEGORY

Meaningful Use 2015: Modified Stage 2 Objectives and Measures

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Requirements Primer

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

2013 E-Prescribing Incentive Requirements

Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Overview of the EHR Incentive Programs and Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

Electronic Prescribing Guide. Establishing a Computer-to-Computer Connection Between Your Practice, Payers and Pharmacies

Achieving Meaningful Use in Presented by the SFREC

The Wisconsin Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Program for Eligible Hospitals

February 24, 2012 (202) CMS PROPOSES DEFINITION OF STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OF CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS (EHR) TECHNOLOGY

Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

Florida Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Overview for Eligible Hospitals

Critical Access Hospitals Receipt of Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Payments

hospital s or CAH s inpatient or professional guidelines

Meaningful Use Stage 2

RPMS DIRECT Secure Messaging

EHR Incentive Program FAQs posted on the CMS website as of 10/15/2013

Enabling Meaningful Use of EHR

Transcription:

Health IT Policy Committee Meeting Data Update March 10, 2015

Agenda Examine characteristics associated with meaningful use performance among eligible hospitals Care transitions Patient engagement Patient safety Public health 1

Providers must complete 2 years of stage 1 before progressing to stage 2 Based on CMS EHR Incentive data through January, 2015. 2

Distribution of characteristics among stage 2-scheduled hospitals Distribution of stage 2-scheduled hospitals by characteristics and stage of attestation Based on CMS EHR Incentive data through January, 2015. 3

Care Transitions

Critical Access Hospitals reported sending an electronic summary of care to a higher proportion of transitions than other hospital types Average proportion of hospital transitions that included an electronic summary of care document, FY2014 Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through January 31, 2015. The electronic summary of care measure applies only to stage 2 hospitals, and requires that more than 10% of care transitions have a summary of care record provided electronically using certified technology.

Summary On average, stage 2 hospitals are sending electronic summaries of care for 36% of all transitions Critical Access Hospitals reported the highest summary of care rates On average, 44% of transitions from CAHs received an electronic summary of care Large hospitals (400+ beds) reported the lowest provision rate of electronic summaries of care On average, 32% of transitions from large hospitals received an electronic summary of care 6

Patient Engagement

Hospitals that have been in the Incentive Program longer reported higher rates of patients who viewed, downloaded, or transmitted their electronic health information Average proportion of patients who have viewed, downloaded, or transmitted their electronic health information at least once, FY2014 18 Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through January 31, 2015. This measure applies only to stage 2 hospitals, and requires that more than 5% of patients view, download, or transmit their electronic health information at least once. 8

Hospitals that attested in November reported the highest rates of patients viewing, downloading, or transmitting their electronic health information at least once Average reported score by eligible hospitals for VDT measure 2 by attestation month Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through January 31, 2015. For VDT measure 2, hospitals must attest that more than 5% of all their patients viewed, downloaded, or transmitted their electronic health information at least once. 9

Summary On average, 15% of stage 2 hospitals patients viewed, downloaded, or transmitted their electronic health information at least once Hospitals that have been meaningful users since 2011 have the highest average rates (18%) of VDT With an average of 17%, hospitals that attested in November had the highest rates of patients viewing, downloading, or transmitting their electronic health information at least once 10

Patient Safety

Medium-sized hospitals reported higher electronic medication administration record (emar) tracking rates for their inpatient or ED medication orders Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through January 31, 2015. The stage 2 emar measure requires that more than 10% of the hospitals inpatient or emergency department (ED) medication orders have all doses tracked through an electronic medication administration record (emar). 6% of hospitals took an exclusion on this measure. Average hospital rate of tracking all doses of medication orders through an electronic medication administration record (emar), FY2014

Among hospitals that selected the erx menu measure, smaller hospitals reported the highest e-prescribing rates Average hospital performance on the e-prescribing menu measure, FY2014 Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through January 31, 2015. The stage 2 e-prescribing (erx) measure is optional. For this measure, hospitals must query for a drug formulary and transmit electronically more than 10% of their permissible hospital discharge medications.

Summary On average, 70% of medications administered in stage 2 hospitals had all doses tracked through an electronic medication administration record (emar) Medium-size hospitals and hospitals that first attested to meaningful use in 2011 reported the highest average emar tracking rates The e-prescribing measure is an optional measure in stage 2. On average, hospitals that selected this measure used e- prescribing for 56% of all permissible discharge medications Of the hospitals that selected the measure, Critical Access Hospitals and other small hospitals reported the highest average discharge erx rates at 64% Of the hospitals that selected the measure, medium-size hospitals had the lowest average discharge erx rates at 48% 14

Public Health Reporting

More stage 2 hospitals reported on all public health measures without exclusion than did stage 1 hospitals Percent of Medicare eligible hospitals that reported on all applicable public health measures in 2014. Based on CMS EHR Incentive Program data through December, 2014. Includes eligible hospitals reporting to the Medicare EHR Incentive Program for Fiscal Year 2014. (n~4,000) For more information on public health reporting, see the data brief posted here: http://dashboard.healthit.gov 16

Summary Three public health measures are required reporting for stage 2; these were optional for stage 1. Seven in 10 stage 2 hospitals reported, without exclusion, on all three public health measures. 5% of stage 1 hospitals reported, without exclusion, on all three public health measures. 17

Questions?

Methodology Denominator data for hospitals was obtained based on the CMS list of certified hospitals through September, 2014 and CMS EHR Incentive Program participants through January, 2014. Hospital size was based on the number of certified beds as reported in the CMS Provider of Service files through September, 2014 (http://www.cms.gov/research- Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Downloadable-Public-Use-Files/Provider-of- Services/index.html). CAHs were separated prior to classification by size and geography. Bed size was unavailable for less than 1% of hospitals. Size categories were: Large: 400 or more beds Medium: 100-399 beds Small: 1-99 beds Geographic location was based on the county in which the hospital was located based on the zip code provided through the CMS EHR Incentive Program data file. Hospitals in metropolitan counties were classified as urban. Hospitals in micropolitan and areas that were not in a combined statistical area were classified as rural. Combined Statistical Area designations were based on HRSA s 2012/2013 Area Resources File. Hospitals were assigned to an attestation cohort based on the first year they attested to, or were paid for, meaningful use with either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. 19