Tickets and ticket inspections preliminary results



Similar documents
Bjørn Kjos (CEO) Oslo, 27. April 2006 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

Norwegian Air Shuttle Corporate Fact Sheet

Public Transport in the Oslo Region

Federal Transit Administration Activity Line Item Codes

Barcelona case study. Successfully managing the transition from one ticketing system to another. Albert Tortajada, FGC Infrastructure Director

Ticketing Scheme for Public Transport in Greater Manchester

Financing Public Transport

TITLE A CTS FOR THE NEW ROME EXHIBITION

Network Revenue Protection Plan

Oyster Database Marketing April 2009

City of Joburg experience Results of internal review and considerations Commentary on Transport Functional Study views

Warsaw City Card. Warsaw,

Restructuring the public transport network in times of financial crisis: Solutions from Thessaloniki

Green Mobility - an action plan for the way forward

Appendix K: Responses to Selected Survey Results by Gender

Service Quality Performance Report 2013

PERCEPTION OF SENIOR CITIZEN RESPONDENTS AS TO REVERSE MORTGAGE SCHEME

2011 Boulder Valley Employee Survey for Transportation Report of Results

National Passenger Survey Autumn 2012 Main Report

General Travel Conditions of Helsinki Region Transport

NSB AS Service Quality Performance Report for 2012 Passenger Rights regulation 1371/2007

27.ity of Johannesburg 27.2 Council

Multimodal Services in Vienna. Dr. Michael Lichtenegger, Neue Urbane Mobilität Wien GmbH

Development of a Concept for the Public Transport Interconnectivity for Savaria International Airport. Report

A-CDM from an airport perspective Oslo Airport

An integrated approach to develop the transport system of Metropolitan Helsinki

AN ILLUSTRATION OF COMPARATIVE QUANTITATIVE RESULTS USING ALTERNATIVE ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Can shared mobility offer an answer to the problems with regard to transport poverty?

Public Transport Integration

Norwegian. - Becoming a global brand. Stine Steffensen Børke SVP Marketing

Fleet management system as actuator for public transport priority

Travel Expenses. June Guidelines. Definitions

Seamless Multimodal Integration for Smart City Public Transportation Network

Pre tax Commuter Benefits

Helsinki region public transport. Ticket prices

Fare and Ticketing Systems in Europe

Non-Staff Travel, Subsistence and General Expenses Policy and Procedures

car2go Seattle Parking Rules and FAQs

Electronic ticketing the key to linking different means of transportation

Guidelines for travel expenses related to medical and hospital services, medical reviews and return to work case conferencing.

WEST YORKSHIRE BUS STRATEGY

INTEGRATED TICKETING SYSTEM OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN JAKARTA VS VÄRMLAND, SWEDEN

Travel and subsistence policy

Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan

Metro Rail Gating Study

HLJ Transport policy in Nordic urban regions - POLISE

Improving public transport decision making, planning and operations by using Big Data

Integrated Public Transport Control Systems Information Day

< Travelling with the ] [ OV-chipkaart >

SAS Q3 2014/2015 TELECONFERENCE

in Switzerland. 1 The total values reported in the tables and

Ticketing and user information systems in Public Transport in Thessaloniki area

STIB Cambio A partnership for a better mobility

The Oslo Pass - Oslo (Norway)

Expenses Policy and Procedures

Supplier conference. Passenger counting solutions. Oslo, 14th January 2016

How to Develop a Sporting Habit for Life

Development of a Regional (short distance) Transport Model System in Norway

Dear Mainstream Applicant:

Calgary Transit Funding and Fare Strategy Review February

Farshad Jalali. Hojat Behrooz

2. WHAT IS MARKETING? 2.1 Definition

Innovations in London s transport: Big Data for a better customer experience

Double digit revenue growth in Q4

Transport Scotland Strategic Transport Projects Review Report 3 Generation, Sifting and Appraisal of Interventions Annex 2

Welcome to Bremen. Michael Glotz-Richter, Senior Project Manager Sustainable Mobility, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen

Use of GPS systems with people count sensors for transport planning studies

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS (2004)

Eliminating Gridlock Through Effective Travel Demand Management and Urban Mobility Strategies

How To Understand The Relationship Between A Line And A Passenger Car

Transport demands in suburbanized locations

SunGO Fare Payment General Information

Transcription:

BEST 2011 2014 BEST Special survey topic Tickets and ticket inspections preliminary results Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager Helsinki, 13 th of November 2014

Previous special topics 2008: Use of PT information channels 2009: How to finance PT service improvements 2010: Transfers 2011: Walking distance vs. frequency 2012: Comfort vs. travel time 2013: Ticket media & use of PT information channels 2014: Tickets & ticket inspections, and use of ticket media BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 2

Content 1. Key figures: Reported fare evasion rates 2. How common is it to be fined by the PTA for not paying? 3. Perception of the ticketing system (ease of use) 4. Perception of the PTA s effort to reduce fare evasion 5. Perception of how the inspections are conducted 6. Citizens attitude towards fare evasion 7. Preliminary findings BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 3

Key figures: Fare evasion rates 2013 Metro 2,9 % n.a. 3,0 % Tram 2,9 % 2,9 % 5,2 % Train* 0,9 % 4,0 % n.a. n.a Boat 1,4 % 0,0 % Share of passengers inspected Mode Copenhageholm Stock- Helsinki Geneva Oslo Total 0,87 % 1,22 % 0,90 % 1,5 % Bus 0,24 % 0,27 % 0,85 % 0,55 % Metro 1,75 % n.a. 1,54 % Tram 1,05 % 0,85 % 0,90 % Train* 8,32 % 1,67 % 8,00 % Boat 1,95 % 100,00 % Share without a valid ticket Mode Copenhagen Helsinki Geneva Oslo Bus 3,5 % 0,5 % 2,9 % 7,1 % Stockholm Average 2,7 % 3,1 % 4,4 % 3,0 % Comments: *Train includes Movias train and not DSB BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 4

Around 20% of the population has been fined by their PTA (except Bergen and Stockholm) Have you ever had to pay a fine because you didn't have a valid ticket? 100% 90% 80% 25% 2% 8% 8% 8% 16% 70% 60% 50% 40% 73% 74% 65% 77% 73% 78% 30% 20% 10% 0% 24% 26% 15% 19% 3% 5% BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO Yes No Never experienced ticket inspection BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 5

Ticketing systems not perceived as user friendly Helsinki is best in class Ticketing system - easy to use 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 16% 44% 11% 40% 41% 22% 36% 68% 20% 49% BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO 9% 26% Ticketing system easy to use (fully agree) Ticketing system easy to use (partially or fully) BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 6

100% 90% 80% A reduction in fare evasion not perceived as top-priority for PTA s 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 57% 45% 59% 50% 52% 65% 39% 32% 25% 19% 24% 12% BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO PTA actively working to reduce number of nonpaying passengers (agree) PTA actively working to reduce number of nonpaying passengers (neutral or disagree) BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 7

Negative trend observed in Oslo Ruter is actively working to reduce number of nonpaying passengers (partially or fully agree, excl. do not know) BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 8

It s not socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket except perhaps in Copenhagen Socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket (fully agree) 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2% 16% 6% 2% 5% 4% BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 9

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% How ticket inspections are conducted is perceived quite well except in Stockholm 47% 32% 63% 70% 71% 53% 10% 9% 7% 27% 16% 17% BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO Ticket inspections performed efficient/professional (partially/fully agree) Ticket inspections performed efficient/professional (do not know) BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 10

People in Oslo and Stockholm seems more likely to travel without a valid ticket Attitudes towards fare evasion BGO CPH GVA HEL OSL STO I have no trouble traveling without a valid ticket I occasionally travel without a valid ticket, but I try to avoid it I will always, if possible, travel with a valid ticket I will never travel without a valid ticket 1 % 0 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4 % 3 % 9 % 5 % 7 % 14 % 27 % 26 % 28 % 24 % 44 % 41 % 69 % 70 % 61 % 70 % 48 % 44 % Total 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 11

Preliminary summary 1. The ticketing systems are not perceived as userfriendly 2. It s socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket in Copenhagen 3. Around 5 to 15 % of citizens might have a tendency to travel without a valid ticket 4. 2 out of 10 has paid a fine 5. Ticket inspections are performed in a way citizens are quite satisfied with (taking into account that it is an inspection), except in Stockholm BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 12

Possible special survey topic 2015 Optimal fine level Would a benchmark study of optimal fine level be of interest? Could be a part of the BEST Survey 2015 Draft questions (for illustration purposes only): a) How low could the fine be, and still prevent people (you?) from travelling without a valid ticket? b) How high must the fine be, for you to consider is at out of proportion? The response is the fine in local currency. Based on an analysis of a) and b) where the lines intersect the optimal fine level is supposed to be BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 13

BEST 2011 2014 Appendix

Tickets & ticket inspections Questions added in the survey What kind of ticket did you use last time you travelled with public transport? Single ticket Multiple ride ticket 24-hours / 7-days passes 30-days or 365 day passes (season cards) I did not have a valid ticket Other type of ticket Which of the following statements best fit for you? I have no trouble traveling without a valid ticket, and will continue to do so in the future I occasionally travel without a valid ticket, but I try to avoid it I will always, if possible, travel with a valid ticket I will never travel without a valid ticket To which degree to you agree with the following statements It is socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket PTA is actively working to reduce the number of non paying passengers PTA ticketing system is easy to use (read- ticket, check the expiration date, check balance, determine the number of zones, rules when changing lines etc) Ticket controls are performed in an efficient and professional manner In which public transport mode did you last experience a ticket inspection? Bus/trolleybus Tramway Train/RER Boat I have never experienced a ticket inspection Have you ever had to pay a fine because you didn t have a valid ticket? Yes No BEST Special topic 2014 - fare evasion Page 15