Delegated Credentialing: Achieving Success for your Organization



Similar documents
NCQA Standards Update & Delegated Credentialing Tips NYSAMSS Annual Meeting May 4, 2012

Policy No.: CR006_07. Title: Delegated Credentialing and Recredentialing Policy QM CR 04 02, CR 07 08

Subject: Overview of Credentialing (Page 1 of 8)

Subject: Overview of Credentialing of Practitioners Pg 1 of 11

UnitedHealthcare. Credentialing Plan

Guidelines for a Successful OC Survey

GENESEE COUNTY Date Issued: COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH Date Revised: PIHP POLICY MANUAL SUBJECT:

Arizona Department of Health Services Division of Behavioral Health Services PROVIDER MANUAL

HOSPITAL SERVICES CORPORATION CREDENTIALS VERIFICATION SERVICES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Greensboro, NC October 4-5, North Carolina Health Insurance Institute

IX. Network Management

WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE Policy & Procedure

MAGELLAN HEALTH SERVICES ORGANIZATION SITE - SITE REVIEW PACKET Behavioral Health Intervention Services (BHIS) ONLY

Licensed Counselors (LPCC)

Credentialing and Privileging. Mary Coffey, MBA, RN Executive Director, Kenosha Community Health Center

Credentialing Requirements for Physicians & Facilities

The Journal of the Healthcare Billing and Management Association. Earn 0.5 CEUs toward your CHBME accreditation, right from this issue! p.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/04. SUBJECT: Primary Care Nurse Practitioners SECTION: CREDENTIALING POLICY NUMBER: CR-31

Ambulatory Care Program: The Who, What, When, and Where s of Credentialing and Privileging. The Who, What, When, and Where s

Why is doctor credentialing important to Aetna members? What does the Aetna doctor credentialing process involve?

MEDICAL RESOURCE CENTER FOR RANDOLPH COUNTY, INC. POLICY & PROCEDURES

Pages: 9 Date: 03/13/2012 Subject: Credentialing and Recredentialing. Prepared By: MVBCN Clinical Director

Credentialing/Recredentialing

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CREDENTIALING POLICY

PIAA Corporate Counsel Workshop October 22 23, 2015

CAQH ProView. Practice Manager Module User Guide

CREDENTIALING PLAN SECTION ONE INDIVIDUAL PROVIDERS

ATTACHMENT I. CAMHD Credentialing and Recredentialing

Policy No.: CR001_011. Title: Credentialing and Recredentialing Policy. applicable): QM CR 04 01, CR Policy Review Frequency: Annual

CHAPTER 59A-23 WORKERS COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE ARRANGEMENTS 59A Scope. 59A Definitions. 59A Authorization Procedures.

Confidentiality Statement

LIBERTY DENTAL PLAN Provider Credentialing Application

Lakeshore RE AFP POLICY # 4.4. APPROVED BY: Board of Directors

PARTNERSHIP HEALTHPLAN OF CALIFORNIA POLICY / PROCEDURE:

STATEMENT BY ALAN RAPAPORT, M.D., M.B.A. PHYSICIAN SURVEYOR THE JOINT COMMISSION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE

GUIDELINES FOR MARKETING AND ADVERTISING

PRACTITIONER CREDENTIALING APPLICATION Advanced Practice Nurse Prescriber, Certified Nurse Midwife, Physician Assistant

Riverside Physician Network Utilization Management

2014 Quality Improvement and Utilization Management Evaluation Summary

Coventry Health Care of Florida, Inc. Coventry Health Plan of Florida, Inc. Summit Health Plan of Florida

1) ELIGIBLE DISCIPLINES

The Ideal Credentialing Standards: Best Practice Criteria and Protocol for Hospitals

Functions: The UM Program consists of the following components:

Kathy Matzka, CPMSM, CPCS

Anthem Credentialing Programs Standards

Behavioral Healthcare, Inc. 155 Inverness Drive West Suite 201 Englewood, CO 80112

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. AHS16-1. ADDENDUM No. 1 ANSWERS TO WRITTEN QUESTIONS RECEIVED FROM INTERESTED VENDORS FOR

Applied Behavior Analysts (ABA) Provider Orientation

CHAPTER 6: CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES

How to select a practice management system

Sagamore Health Network, Inc Provider Reference Manual. Physicians, Hospitals, Ancillaries, & Other Healthcare Professionals

DOCUMENT TITLE: Clarification of Bureau of Primary Health Care Credentialing and Privileging Policy Outlined in Policy Information Notice

The Seven Elements of a Vendor Oversight Program

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE LETTER

Guidelines for Updating Medical Staff Bylaws: Credentialing and Privileging Physician Assistants (Adopted 2012)

PROVIDER CREDENTIALING POLICIES & PROCEDURES FOR CHIROPRACTIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC (CMS)

Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid Integrity Program

POLICY AND PROCEDURE RELATING TO HEALTH UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

Special Needs Plans Structure & Process Measures. Policy Clarifications and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Credentialing. Recruitment & Retention Best Practices Model, 2005 Credentialing 1

Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for health service organisation boards

LOCUM TENENS APPLICATION Page 1 of 4

HealthCare Administrative Solutions, Inc. Credentialing Manual

Regal Medical Group & QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (QI) PROGRAM 2015

Data Bank Education Forum October 10-11, 2012 Denver, CO

Credentialing Program Description. Policy Update 7/8/2015

Colorado Association Medical Staff Services. What Does the Future Hold for Medical Staff and Credentialing Professionals?

Table of Contents. 2 P a g e

Cenpatico Integrated Care Credentialing Program Description

The University of Utah Health Plans offers the following plans and networks. Please specify the networks you are interested in participating with:

Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) Free Clinics Program Overview

BoardroomBasics. Medical Staff Credentialing INSIDE. KNOWLEDGEPoints. Knowledge Resources for Health Care Governance Effectiveness

Arizona Medicaid School Based Claiming

211 CMR: DIVISION OF INSURANCE 211 CMR 52.00: MANAGED CARE CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AND ACCREDITATION OF CARRIERS

UPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs

State Level Registration for Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. - Professionals -

A. IEHP Quality Management Program Description

NCQA Health Plan Accreditation. Rigorous. Flexible. Superior.

Transcription:

Delegated Credentialing: Achieving Success for your Organization Amy M. Niehaus, CPMSM, CPCS, MBA October 7, 2014 Objectives Name the key components of a delegated credentialing program under NCQA standards Outline the various elements of a delegated credentialing agreement Summarize the required steps of the delegation audit process Identify the benefits of delegated credentialing to both parties Sources NCQA 2014 Health Plan (HP) Standards and Guidelines - Effective for Surveys Beginning On or After July 1, 2014 (CR 9: Delegation of CR) NCQA Frequently Asked Questions NCQA Corrections, Clarifications and Policy Changes ncqa.org 1

What is Delegation? Merriam Webster Dictionary: to give (control, responsibility, authority, etc.) to someone: to trust someone with (a job, duty, etc.) NCQA: delegation occurs when an organization gives another entity the authority to carry out a function that it would otherwise perform Why Delegate from Organization s Perspective? Reduces turnaround time for network participation Helps manage significant volume of providers Reduces resources (staff, budget, time) Accommodates network growth Supports contracting efforts Increases practitioner satisfaction Why Become Delegated from Entity s Perspective? Reduces turnaround time for network participation Timelier reimbursement from payers Reduces resources for provider enrollment Depends on terms of agreement May still have other non-delegated payers, i.e. CMS Further reduction if integrated with MSSD May provide contracting leverage Increases practitioner and patient satisfaction 2

What Entities Can Be Delegated To? The organization can delegate credentialing activities to a variety of entities, including IPAs PHOs CVOs Medical societies Other health plans Hospitals What Can Be Delegated? Portion of the credentialing process, such as primary source verification (PSV) Multiple credentialing processes, such as collection and review of the application and PSV All credentialing activities Organizations vary in the amount of delegated activities that occur, if any Organizations may not delegate overall responsibility for credentialing What is Subdelegation? Subdelegation occurs when a delegated entity contracts with a third party to perform a delegated function Examples Payer to PHO to Hospital PHO to Hospital to CVO Payer to IPA to CVO Organization must receive results of delegate s oversight assessment or perform the oversight assessment directly 3

Pre-Delegation Assessment Evaluation of the potential delegate s ability to perform required PRIOR to signing an agreement Written review of delegate s understanding of standards and delegated tasks Policies & procedures, file review Staffing levels Performance records NCQA Accreditation or Certification a plus! Onsite visit not required Discussion Point Is there value in performing a site visit during the pre-delegation assessment, even though it is not required by NCQA? Verification Timeframes under Delegation Timeliness determined based on date of credentialing decision Full Credentialing Process - timeframes for each credentialing element mirror those required of the organization under NCQA Example: provider organization (PHO, IPA) License (180 days) Partial Credentialing Process timeframes are 60 days less Example: CVO License (120 days) 4

Delegation Agreement Must include the following elements: mutually agreed upon responsibilities of each party/activities being delegated reporting frequency, at least semiannually performance evaluation process use of Protected Health Information (PHI) remedies for non-compliance right of the plan to make the final decision NCQA will review up to 4 delegated agreements during survey Annual Assessment Annual reviews are performed to ensure that standards continue to be met Similar to pre-delegation review process Policies and procedures NCQA standards and Plan s own requirements File Review; NCQA audit process required 5% or 50, minimum of 10 each, OR 8/30 methodology Semiannual review of reports NCQA Accreditation or Certification a plus! Discussion Point What is the NCQA 8/30 Rule and how does it impact the file audit? 5

Annual Assessment Onsite visit not required Performance improvement opportunities identified and followed up on, if applicable Corrective actions required if issues identified Education Corrective Action Plan Terminate agreement if non-compliant Files processed by a delegated entity are viewed by NCQA in the same manner as if they were processed by the organization Termination of Delegation Recredentialing must still occur at least every 3 years Organization may obtain files from the delegate and continue with established timeframes; OR Perform initial credentialing within 6 months of termination Credentials Verification Organization (CVO) An organization that conducts verification of practitioner credentials and other related activities on behalf of its clients Must comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, including any requirements for licensure or registration Maintain the necessary credentials information, policies and procedures 6

CVO Certification NCQA offers CVO Certification program Evaluates: Policies & Procedures Quality Improvement Customer Satisfaction Confidentiality/Security Scope of Services CVO cannot delegate NCQA standards to other organizations NCQA Certified CVOs As of 5/31/2014, NCQA has certified 70 CVOs 2 year certification Standards address Policies & Procedures, Quality Improvement and Confidentiality 10 verification elements available for certification www.ncqa.org NCQA CVO Certification Elements Application and Attestation Content Practitioner Application Processing DEA or CDS Certification Education and Training License to Practice Malpractice Claims History Medicare/Medicaid Sanctions Medical Board Sanctions Ongoing Monitoring of Sanctions Work History 7

Discussion Point How does CVO certification impact delegation oversight audits? DELEGATION ACTIVITY Case Scenario #1 An NCQA-accredited health plan has signed a contract with a large physician group that includes delegated credentialing. As the manager of the plans credentialing department, you received a copy of the contract today but notice that the agreement was effective on October 1, 2014. What do you do? 8

Case Scenario #2 During the course of an annual review for an existing delegated entity, you identify a trend in the file review results. A particular staff member is using the ABMS Certified Doctor Verification Program, a non NCQA-approved source, for verifying board certification. What do you do? Case Scenario #3 Your organization has enjoyed a successful, long-term delegation agreement with a large IPA. Recently, there was a change in leadership at the IPA, staffing reductions, and rumors of financial difficulties. What do you do? Case Scenario #4 Your physician group has grown significantly and you are looking to streamline the provider on-boarding and payer enrollment processes. You are considering delegation with your 14 commercial payers. What are your first steps to determine if you are eligible and ready for this type of arrangement? 9

Disadvantages of Delegation Organization Loss of control Potential impact to accreditation survey results Resources to perform oversight audits Delegate Additional responsibilities based on health plan s requirements Resources to support oversight audits Does not fully eliminate provider enrollment activities Achieving Success the Organization Delegation Agreement: Contracting should involve Credentialing early on in the process Be as inclusive as possible of all activities and expectations Education: Ensure both parties understand what is required per the agreement Know the standards and share updates with delegates Inform delegates of any policy changes Achieving Success the Organization Assessments: Perform desktop review of P&P and minutes in advance of onsite audit Consider electronic file reviews, if available Give 30-day notice of audit; be flexible with date Review only necessary file elements Send audit results in a timely manner Surveys: Involve delegates in upcoming survey activities Recognize delegate s role and contributions 10

Achieving Success the Delegate Keep detailed list of requirements for each agreement, highlighting differences to ensure compliance Create process for issue files (red flags) Inform organization of any adverse issues with practitioners Audit every file and database Prepare/tab files to facilitate audits Build and maintain credibility Be accessible and flexible Delegation Collaboration Opportunities to create synergies and efficiencies by collaborating within the industry Examples: ICE MUCH CAQH WCSG Delegation Collaboration ICE (Industry Collaborative Effort, Inc) - CA http://www.iceforhealth.org/home.asp Credentialing Shared Audit Policy Team Standardized audit tool and training Completion of oversight audits is divided among organization and results shared 11

Delegation Collaboration MUCH (Michigan United Credentialing Healthcare Forum) Original goal to create a common delegated credentialing process Expanded to include other mutual topics of interest, such as NPI, CAQH, legislative activities Share responsibility for oversight audits using standard tools and processes Delegation Collaboration CAQH Universal Provider DataSource www.caqh.org v2.0 to be released Q1 2015 Delegation Workgroup representing health plans, hospitals and delegated groups Developing standard list of data elements requested by payers that delegate credentialing Eliminate duplicative and organization specific reporting requirements Streamline data reporting between payers and delegated entities Delegation Collaboration WCSG (Washington Credentialing Standardization Group) www.wamss.org State-wide representation from multiple health care entities Created Washington Practitioner Application Developed Shared Delegation Audit (SDA) Team Completes collaborative annual credentialing assessments of 25 medical groups 12

Keys to Success TEAMWORK TEAMWORK TEAMWORK Questions? 13