Community College Survey of Student Engagement



Similar documents
Community College Survey of Student Engagement

Suggested Strategies for Student Engagement

Office of Institutional Research. Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice.

Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice -Full-time and Part-time Student Comparisons-

A Matter. of Degrees. Promising Practices for Community College Student Success A FIRST LOOK

Community College Survey of Student Engagement Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Spring 2009

ABET - Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Mapped to NSSE Survey Questions

Required for Review: Ask and answer an assessment-focused question

The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction? are less committed to academic pursuits compared with their counterparts who go away to

Cognition, Instruction, & Learning. University of Connecticut. Technology Graduate Program. Department of Educational Psychology.

Student Engagement and Student Outcomes: Key Findings from CCSSE Validation Research

PSYCHOLOGY Program Equivalency Criteria

Testimony for the National Commission on Accountability in Higher Education Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. Pre-Collegiate Initiatives

MAKING CONNECTIONS. Dimensions of Student Engagement Findings

College of Education. Bachelor of Science Psychology Major and Comprehensive Psychology Program

Implementing Guided Pathways at Miami Dade College: A Case Study

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR ACADEMIC QUALITY OF POST-SECONDARY AND HIGHER DEGREE PROGRAMS IN NURSING

SREB State College and Career Readiness Initiative

Strategic Plan

Louisiana Special Education Guidance

GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE COURSES OFFERED FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PERSONNEL

OFFICE OF QUALITY PROFESSIONALS AND SPECIAL SCHOOLS Summary of State Board of Education Items February 16-17, 2012

The College Student Expectations Survey (CSXQ) Results of an Administration to Entering Freshmen at California State University, Fresno Fall 2004

Running Head: Promoting Student Success: Evaluation of a Freshman Orientation Course

CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA. credo.stanford.edu

How To Get A Wgu Degree

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Closing the Gap 2020: A Master Plan for Arkansas Higher Education Executive Summary

Learning Communities at Lamar University

Assessments in Alabama

The Historic Opportunity to Get College Readiness Right: The Race to the Top Fund and Postsecondary Education

The Reality of College Readiness Georgia

First-Generation College Students: How Co-Curricular Involvement Can Assist with Success. Valerie Garcia

Assessment. Show US The Learning. An Institution-Wide Process to Improve and Support Student Learning. College of DuPage

What Student Engagement Data Tell Us about College Readiness

Annual Assessment Summary B.S. in Psychology

Virginia s College and Career Readiness Initiative

Effective Programming for Adult Learners: Pre-College Programs at LaGuardia Community College

Maine High School Graduates: Trends in College-Going, Persistence, and Completion August 2015

The University of Tennessee Diversity Plan College/Dept. Nursing. Goal One: Create and sustain a welcoming, supportive and inclusive campus climate.

[Weighted] 4a. Asked questions in class or contributed to class discussions [ACTCOLL] CLQUEST

Colorado Professional Teaching Standards

Master of Education, Learning and Technology

California State University, Stanislaus Doctor of Education (Ed.D.), Educational Leadership Assessment Plan

ACEN 2013 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA MASTER S and POST-MASTER S CERTIFICATE

Student Success Courses and Educational Outcomes at Virginia Community Colleges

How To Plan For A Community College

Higher Performing High Schools

USG Incubator RFP: Coastal Connection Initiative

S. Dallas Dance, Ph.D.

The Influence of a Summer Bridge Program on College Adjustment and Success: The Importance of Early Intervention and Creating a Sense of Community

Traditional College Retention Strategies & New Initiatives

Strategic Plan

Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University

Educational Leadership. Doctor of Education Program Application Guidelines

Coastal Carolina University Catalog 2004/2005 ADMISSIONS

Are high achieving college students slackers? Brent J. Evans

Howard University Clinical Psychology PhD Program Frequently Asked Questions

The Bronx Achievement Pact

2015 Employee Engagement and Satisfaction Survey

An Analysis of IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction in Traditional Versus Online Courses Data

School of Advanced Studies Doctor Of Education In Educational Leadership With A Specialization In Educational Technology. EDD/ET 003 Requirements

UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA SOUTHEAST BACHELOR S OF SCIENCE IN GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES

ACEN 2013 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA CLINICAL DOCTORATE

Arizona GEAR UP Research in Practice Series I, No. 2 Spring 2013

Response to ACCJC Accreditation Recommendation #4 On Distance Education Prepared by: The Institutional Committee on Distance Education

Transcription:

Community College Survey of Student Engagement Northwest Indian College 2011 Key Findings Table of Contents Key Findings: A Starting Point 2 Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice 3 Aspects of Highest Student Engagement 4 Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement 5 2011 CCSSE Special-Focus Items 6 CCFSSE 8 1

Key Findings: A Starting Point The Key Findings report provides an entry point for reviewing results from Northwest Indian College s administration of the 2011 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). The report provides college-specific data in an easy-to-share format including benchmark comparisons between the college, top-performing colleges, and the CCSSE cohort. It also highlights aspects of highest and lowest student engagement at the college, as well as results from five of the CCSSE special-focus items on promising educational practices. Select faculty survey (CCFSSE) data are also highlighted (cohort data are provided for colleges that did not administer CCFSSE). Promising Practices for Student Success In each annual administration, CCSSE has included special-focus items to allow participating colleges and national researchers to delve more deeply into areas of student experience and institutional performance of great interest to the field. The 2011 special-focus items are part of a special national study focused on community college students participation in a defined collection of promising practices for which there is emerging evidence of effectiveness in strengthening student learning, persistence, and attainment. This study will link data from the 2011 CCSSE special-focus items; related items on the 2011 faculty survey (CCFSSE), which explore the extent of faculty members use of the identified promising practices in their teaching; and institutional data collected from the new Community College Institutional Survey (CCIS) that address questions about how these promising practices are implemented across varied institutions. Additionally, a corresponding special-focus module will be included in the 2011 SENSE survey administration. This data collection will provide empirical confirmation of promising educational practices in community colleges; quantification of the extent to which those practices are part of the current experience of our students; and information about whether participation in these types of practices varies across subgroups of students. Ongoing data analysis will provide new evidence of how student participation in these practices is related to overall student engagement, academic progress, and college completion. Benchmark Overview by Enrollment Status Figure 1 below represents Northwest Indian College s CCSSE benchmark scores by students enrollment status. Figure 1 2

Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice The CCSSE benchmarks are groups of conceptually related survey items that address key areas of student engagement. The six benchmarks denote areas that educational research has shown to be important to students college experiences and educational outcomes. Therefore, they provide colleges with a useful starting point for looking at institutional results and allow colleges to gauge and monitor their performance in areas that are central to their work. In addition, participating colleges have the opportunity to make appropriate and useful comparisons between their performance and that of other groups of similar colleges. Performing as well as the national average or a peer-group average may be a reasonable initial aspiration, but it is important to recognize that these averages are sometimes unacceptably low. Aspiring to match and then exceed highperformance targets is the stronger strategy. Community colleges can differ dramatically on such factors as size, location, resources, enrollment patterns, and student characteristics. It is important to take these differences into account when interpreting benchmark scores especially when making institutional comparisons. Furthermore, the Center for Community College Student Engagement has adopted a policy on Responsible Uses of CCSSE Data, available at www.ccsse.org. CCSSE uses a three-year cohort of participating colleges in all core survey analyses. The current cohort is referred to as the 2011 CCSSE Cohort (2009-2011) throughout all reports. CCSSE Benchmarks Active and Collaborative Learning. Students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and have opportunities to think about and apply what they are learning in different settings. Through collaborating with others to solve problems or master challenging content, students develop valuable skills that prepare them to deal with real-life situations and problems. Student Effort. Students own behaviors contribute significantly to their learning and the likelihood that they will successfully attain their educational goals. Academic Challenge. Challenging intellectual and creative work is central to student learning and collegiate quality. These survey items address the nature and amount of assigned academic work, the complexity of cognitive tasks presented to students, and the rigor of examinations used to evaluate student performance. Student-Faculty Interaction. In general, the more contact students have with their teachers, the more likely they are to learn effectively and to persist toward achievement of their educational goals. Through such interactions, faculty members become role models, mentors, and guides for continuous, lifelong learning. Support for Learners. Students perform better and are more satisfied at colleges that provide important support services, cultivate positive relationships among groups on campus, and demonstrate commitment to their success. Figure 2 *Top-performing colleges are those that scored in the top 10 percent by benchmark. Notes: Benchmark scores are standardized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 25 across all respondents. For further information about how benchmark scores are computed, please visit www.ccsse.org. 3

Aspects of Highest Student Engagement Benchmark scores provide a manageable starting point for reviewing and understanding CCSSE data. One way to dig more deeply into the benchmark scores is to analyze those items that contribute to the overall benchmark score. This section features the five items across all benchmarks (excluding those for which means are not calculated) on which the college scored highest and the five items on which the college scored lowest in comparison to the 2011 CCSSE Cohort. The items highlighted on pages 4 and 5 reflect the largest differences in mean scores between the institution and the 2011 CCSSE Cohort. While examining these data, keep in mind that the selected items may not be those that are most closely aligned with the college s goals; thus, it is important to review the full Institutional Report on the CCSSE online reporting system. Figure 3 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed most favorably compared with the 2011 CCSSE Cohort. For instance, 14.6% of Northwest Indian College students, compared with 6.8% of other students in the cohort, responded 'Often' or 'Very often' on item 4i. Figure 3 Table 1 Benchmark Item Number Item Active and Collaborative Learning 4i Participated in a community-based project as a part of a regular course Academic Challenge 6c Number of written papers or reports of any length Support for Learners 9d Helping you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Support for Learners 13a1 Frequency: Academic advising/planning Student Effort 13e1 Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.) Notes: For Item(s) 4, 'Often' and 'Very Often' responses are combined. For Item(s) 6, '5 to 10,' '11 to 20,' and 'More than 20' responses are combined. For Item(s) 9, 'Quite a bit' and 'Very much' are combined. For Item(s) 13, 'Sometimes' and 'Often' are combined. 4

Aspects of Lowest Student Engagement Figure 4 displays the aggregated frequencies for the items on which the college performed least favorably compared with the 2011 CCSSE Cohort. For instance, 53.0% of Northwest Indian College students, compared with 61.0% of other students in the cohort, responded 'Quite a bit' or 'Very much' on item 5c. Figure 4 Table 2 Benchmark Item Number Item Academic Challenge 5c Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or experiences in new ways Academic Challenge 5d Making judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods Academic Challenge 5e Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations Academic Challenge 7 Mark the box that best represents the extent to which your examinations during the current school year have challenged you to do your best work at this college Support for Learners 9c Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds Notes: For Item(s) 5, 'Quite a bit' and 'Very Much' responses are combined. For Item(s) 7, '5' to '7' on the 1-7 challenge scale are combined. For Item(s) 9, 'Quite a bit' and 'Very much' are combined. 5

2011 CCSSE Special-Focus Items The Center adds special-focus items to CCSSE each year to augment the core survey, helping participating colleges and the field at large to further explore fundamental areas of student engagement. The 2011 specialfocus items elicited new information about students experiences associated with promising educational practices such as early registration, orientation, freshman seminars, organized learning communities, and student success courses. Frequency results from the first five promising practices items for Northwest Indian College (n=211) and the 2011 CCSSE Cohort are displayed across pages 6 and 7. Figure 5: During the current semester/quarter at this college, I completed registration before the first class session(s). Figure 6: The ONE response that best describes my experience with orientation when I first came to this college is... 6

Figure 7: During my first semester/quarter at this college, I participated in a structured experience for new students (sometimes called a "freshman seminar" or "first-year experience"). Figure 8: During my first semester/quarter at this college, I enrolled in an organized "learning community" (two or more courses that a group of students take together). Figure 9: During my first semester/quarter at this college, I enrolled in a student success course (such as a student development, extended orientation, study skills, student life skills, or college success course). 7

CCFSSE The Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE), designed as a companion survey to CCSSE, elicits information from faculty about their teaching practices; the ways they spend their professional time, both in and out of class; and their perceptions regarding students educational experiences. CCFSSE data not only help participating colleges identify areas of strength, but also enable them to recognize challenges or gaps that may require further consideration. The CCFSSE results displayed below reveal full- and part-time faculty members perceptions of three inclass student experiences. Faculty Perceptions of Student Experiences by Employment Status Figure 10 4a. Ask questions in class or contributed to class discussions 4b. Make a class presentation 4f. Work with other students on projects during class Response Full-time Part-time Full-time Part-time Full-time Part-time Very Often 62.5% 44.4% 4.2% 11.1% 13.0% 33.3% Often 29.2% 33.3% 20.8% 22.2% 39.1% 33.3% Sometimes 8.3% 22.2% 58.3% 33.3% 30.4% 33.3% Never 0 0 16.7% 33.3% 17.4% 0 8