Instructional Design Tips



Similar documents
Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

Quality Guidelines for Online Courses

Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form

Online Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

!"#$%&'()$*)"#%+,'%-"."/,&*01%% (0-%-"/*."'*01%,0/*0"%*0#$'2)$*,0% ($%$3"%40*."'#*$5%,+%6"00"##""%7%80,9.*//"%

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Course Standards. Support Standards. Institutional and Administrative Standards

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses

Best Practices in Online Course Design and Delivery

Online Learning at Duke: A Planning Guide

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested)

VALIDATION OF PREPAREDNESS TO TEACH ONLINE

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Community College System of New Hampshire

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

Online Course Standards Rubric

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Main Author: Contributing Authors:

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY ONLINE for MASTERING HEALTHCARE TERMINOLOGY, Third Edition Module 7: Male Reproductive System

Online Student Orientation

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

South Georgia State College Distance Learning Policy

Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching. Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College. Revised November 2012

Online Course Development: A Guide for Instructors

HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals DEANSHIP OF ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT KFUPM ONLINE COURSES:

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

CREATING A COURSE? Courses at SNHP

How To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction

The Art & Science of Teaching Online Syllabus

How To Evaluate An Online Course

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

INST 5500 Online Course Development. Course Syllabus. Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours

Course Title: ARE Curriculum in Teaching Art (Web) Term: Fall 2014 Credits: 3

MGMT 338 A International Business

Centenary College. Guidelines for Alternative Instructional Equivalencies

EDU Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Faculty Bio button Contact Policy:

Penn State Quality Assurance e-learning Design Standards

WEST JEFFERSON HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT THOMAS JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL DIGITAL DESIGN GRADES

COMM 286S: Business & Professional Communication

PHOENIX COLLEGE ONLINE. SBS220 Internet Marketing for Small Business

Quality Standards for Online Learning

It provides the performance indicators to evaluate the level of knowledge and competence of teacher to apply ICT in the educational setting.

Online Course Design Evaluation

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

Expectations for Classroom Setup and Online Teaching

Online Basic Statistics

Statistical Methods Online Course Syllabus

Best Practices in Online Teaching 2012

CN-ONLINE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STUDENT MANUAL

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Ten Simple Steps Toward Universal Design of Online Courses

SUNGARD SUMMIT 2007 sungardsummit.com 1

Quality Matters Online Course Development and Guidelines

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

Transcription:

Instructional Design Tips Category 1 Learner Support and Resources Information about being an online/hybrid learner Tips for being an online/hybrid student Quiz to self-assess readiness to be an online/hybrid student Link to Kennedy Library Instructions for how to conduct online research (if applicable) Instructions on how to write a research paper (if applicable) Link to the Disability Resource Center (DRC) Information/tutorials on how to use software required by class assignments How to forward campus email to another account Contact information for technical support from the Service Desk Minimum computer hardware and software requirements Tips for avoiding and dealing with computer viruses Sources for any required plug-ins Guidelines for forming groups (if applicable) Pointing to tutorials on Blackboard Netiquette guidelines Course specific resources Contact information for academic department or advisor Contact information for the instructor(s) of the course Pre-requisites of course Link to El Corral Bookstore to order textbooks or other instructional materials FAQ site for course information Estimated amount of time needed for completing course requirements Resources supporting course content Link(s) to web sites with supporting information relevant to course content Link(s) to web sites of organizations or associations related to course content Glossary of terms or links to definitions of new vocabulary Link(s) to learning objects external to course (e.g., MERLOT)

2 Category 2 Online Organization and Design Course navigability and organization Syllabus is easily located Links to other parts of the course or external sources are up-to-date Required instructional materials are easily located Organization and sequencing of the course content is logical and clear Topics are clearly identified and subtopics are related to topics Course schedule is available in a printer-friendly format for convenience Resources are separated into required and optional categories Syllabus includes Course objectives Course completion requirements Course schedule is summarized in one place Expectations of students participation, honesty, etc. Timeline for student participation is clear Faculty member(s) introductory information Expectations of availability and turnaround time for contact with instructor Assessment and evaluation guidelines Aesthetic design Typeface is easy to read Sufficient contrast between text & background for readability Appropriate images supporting course content add visual interest Design of course pages has sufficient white space for better readability. Consistency in course Layout of course is visually and functionally consistent Navigability is clear, simple and user friendly Spelling and grammar are consistent and accurate Sentences and paragraphs are brief Written material is concise Language of written material is friendly and supportive Clear instructions are given for each task or assignment Universal accessibility Universal accessibility concerns are addressed throughout the course including transcripts of any non-text objects Images are optimized for speedy display and include alternative text Alternative formats of materials provided when possible (e.g., optional print packet of extensive reading materials, CD of audio clips used in course, etc.) Use of color adds interest but does not disadvantage color-blind students Longer videos or audio clips (i.e., over 3 minutes in length) are streamed

Category 3 Instructional Design and Delivery 3 Promote interaction in the learning community Instructor introduces himself/herself to model interaction Students introduce themselves to the class Students are encouraged to respond to classmate introductions Ice-breaker activity included to allow class to get acquainted Students input is not evaluated as right or wrong Netiquette is described and enforced Student participation is tracked and wallflowers drawn in to discussions Students are prompted by facilitator to expand on relevant points Facilitator may play devil s advocate Reading & writing requirements consistent with student abilities & unit load Goals and alignment to learning objectives Pace of delivery of course content is managed Course content is chunked for more manageable learning Instructional design is made clear (e.g., is it self-paced, or group-paced?) Expectations for synchronous vs asynchronous activities are clear Learning objectives and activities are integrated Reading assignments match learning objectives Activities lead to learning desired concepts Tasks and activities are designated as synchronous or asynchronous, sequential or non-sequential, and are clarified as such Instructional material may be reviewed repeatedly (built-in redundancy) Summary provided frequently (often at end of a topic) to reinforce learning Activities to enhance student learning (multiple learning styles) Video clips of interviews, performances, news, documentaries, etc. Historical audio clips of famous speeches Screen animations for instructional exercises using software Personal interview reports Crossword or word search puzzles Matching and game-show-style trivia games Online scavenger hunts / WebQuests Annotated bibliography PowerPoint or video presentations as assignments Flash simulations Activities to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills Discussions center on questions without a single correct answer Compare and contrast exercises Case studies Critique classmates assignments Collaborative exercises

4 Category 4 Assessment & Evaluation of Learning Assess student readiness for learning Pre-requisites are defined and enforced Acceptable methods for completing assignments are identified (group work, open book, etc.) Consequences of cheating or plagiarism are clear Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are aligned Criteria used to evaluate participation in online discussion groups Study questions or practice online assessments with evaluation are provided Quantity and scope of graded assignments is reasonable Authentic assessments Multiple assessment strategies Students bibliography or reference list includes a variety of materials such as URLs, books and journals, videos, etc. When possible, options among assignments are provided to allow for different interests, backgrounds, and personal learning styles Students are not assessed solely on tests/quizzes but are provided ample opportunity to demonstrate proficiency in different ways Regular feedback Instructor models assignment Rich and rapid feedback self-grading assignments released immediately Frequent and substantial feedback from the instructor Samples of assignments illustrate instructor s expectations Detailed instructions and tips for completing assignments Due dates for all assignments Rubrics for all assignments identify assessment guidelines Grading scale Self-assessments and peer feedback Self-tests similar to the final evaluation instruments Students pose discussion questions, respond to others discussion topics, later post answers to their own questions and respond to others comments on their discussion topic Peer review opportunities Students apply rubric to their own work and describe/defend their score Clear guidelines for peer review, if applicable

5 Category 5 Appropriate/Effective Use of Technology Appropriate tools to facilitate communication Discussion boards Synchronous chats PowerPoint presentations Email Listserv Teleconferencing Group discussion areas, when appropriate for group activities Instant messaging New teaching methods Instructor is open to trying new methods of delivery of instruction Instructor is open to new methods of students preferred learning styles Multimedia elements Flash illustrations Animated Viewlets or SnapzPro movies for screen captures of software programs Audio clips Video clips PowerPoint presentations CD-Rom or DVD supplemental materials Engaging students throughout the course Students off-campus with modems are provided with low-bandwidth alternatives for downloading media Technology is used to engage students in learning -- not just for viewing but for interacting with other students or with the course content

6 Category 6 Faculty Use of Student Feedback Course content Evaluation survey at midterm and at the end of the course Student input sought at regular intervals Open-ended questions Students falling behind are prompted to determine what might be delaying their progress Students prompted to find web-based resources supporting the topic to share with classmates; the highest quality resources incorporated into the course Online technology Instructor has an open door to students to point out flaws of delivery of instruction using technology Instructor solicits feedback on how delivery can be more effective for student learning (e.g., a discussion topic for student feedback) Instruction and assessment Instructor is willing to modify course (live) as needed to improve or fix inadequacies Instructor is able to modify elements (e.g., fix bad quiz questions, extend deadlines, review methods of achieving course objectives) A BIG Thank You to Laura Sederberg - CSU Chico, for sharing the CSU Chico Rubric Instructional Design Tips that served as the basis for this document