Top-Quark Studies at CMS

Similar documents
Top rediscovery at ATLAS and CMS

ATLAS NOTE ATLAS-CONF July 21, Search for top pair candidate events in ATLAS at s = 7 TeV. The ATLAS Collaboration.

Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in the l+ Jets Channel Using the Matrix Element Method

Single-Top Production at the Tevatron and the LHC: Results and Prospects

CMS Physics Analysis Summary

Measurement of Neutralino Mass Differences with CMS in Dilepton Final States at the Benchmark Point LM9

Highlights of Recent CMS Results. Dmytro Kovalskyi (UCSB)

PHYSICS WITH LHC EARLY DATA

Jet Reconstruction in CMS using Charged Tracks only

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Real Time Tracking with ATLAS Silicon Detectors and its Applications to Beauty Hadron Physics

How To Teach Physics At The Lhc

THE TOP QUARK Updated September 2013 by T.M. Liss (Univ. Illinois), F. Maltoni (Univ. Catholique de Louvain), and A. Quadt (Univ. Göttingen).

Open access to data and analysis tools from the CMS experiment at the LHC

variables to investigate Monte Carlo methods of t t production

Search for Dark Matter at the LHC

Single Top Production at the Tevatron

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. CMS Note. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. D. J. Mangeol, U.

ATLAS NOTE ATLAS-CONF November 28, Evidence for Higgs Boson Decays to theτ + τ Final State with the ATLAS Detector

How To Find The Higgs Boson

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 4 Oct 2003

Tracking/Vertexing/BeamSpot/b-tag Results from First Collisions (TRK )

Measurements of single-top-quark production at the LHC

Study of the B D* ℓ ν with the Partial Reconstruction Technique

Constraints on the top quark s charge with the CMS experiment

Data analysis in Par,cle Physics

Risultati recenti dell'esperimento CMS ad LHC e prospettive per il run a 14 TeV

Implications of CMS searches for the Constrained MSSM A Bayesian approach

Validation of the MadAnalysis 5 implementation of ATLAS-SUSY-13-05

Physik des Higgs Bosons. Higgs decays V( ) Re( ) Im( ) Figures and calculations from A. Djouadi, Phys.Rept. 457 (2008) 1-216

Cross section, Flux, Luminosity, Scattering Rates

A Guide to Detectors Particle Physics Masterclass. M. van Dijk

PoS(Kruger 2010)013. Setting of the ATLAS Jet Energy Scale. Michele Petteni Simon Fraser University

FTK the online Fast Tracker for the ATLAS upgrade

Status of ALICE activities within FKPPL LIA

The TOTEM experiment at the LHC: results and perspective

A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 31 Aug 2015

t th signal: theory status

Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC

PoS(LHCPP2013)033. Rare B meson decays at LHC. Francesco Dettori Nikhef and Vrij Universiteit, Amsterdam fdettori@nikhef.nl.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Faculteit Wetenschappen Departement Natuurkunde

Track Trigger and Modules For the HLT

Searching for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at GlueX

FCC JGU WBS_v0034.xlsm

Progress in understanding quarkonium polarization measurements

High Energy Physics. Lecture 4 More kinematics and a picture show of particle collisions

Jets energy calibration in ATLAS

D. Rainwater and D. Zeppenfeld. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI K. Hagiwara

From Jet Scaling to Jet Vetos

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. CMS Note. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Theory versus Experiment. Prof. Jorgen D Hondt Vrije Universiteit Brussel jodhondt@vub.ac.be

Dirigido por: Susana Cabrera Urbán. Tesis Doctoral Junio Facultat de Física Departament de Física Atòmica Molecular i Nuclear

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Los Angeles. in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at 1.96 TeV. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the

Measurement of the t -Channel Single Top-Quark Production Cross-Section with the ATLAS Detector at s = 7 TeV

ADVANCEMENTS IN BIG DATA PROCESSING IN THE ATLAS AND CMS EXPERIMENTS 1. A.V. Vaniachine on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations

H & II in Inclusive Jet Production

Calorimeter Upgrades for the High Luminosity LHC

Vertex and track reconstruction with the ALICE Inner Tracking System

!"#$%&'(%))*#+$',$*--+$.'/*,0'0*-01 23")*,4',$"(5*&-'",'6+$4'0*-0'+6+&,' $",+.#

Real-time data analysis at the LHC: present and future

Theoretical Particle Physics FYTN04: Oral Exam Questions, version ht15

Physics Letters B 716 (2012) Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Physics Letters B.

Science+ Large Hadron Cancer & Frank Wurthwein Virus Hunting

Precise measurements of the proton structure towards the new physics discoveries at the LHC

Vector-like quarks t and partners

Middle East Technical University. Studying Selected Tools for HEP: CalcHEP

CMS Tracking Performance Results from early LHC Running

PrHEP JHW2002. Experiments on high energy reactions in the diffractive regime at LHC. 1. Introduction. Twenty-sixth Johns Hopkins Workshop

Delphes, a framework for fast simulation of a general purpose LHC detector

CMS Computing Model: Notes for a discussion with Super-B

Medida de la sección eficaz y masa del quark top en las desintegraciones dileptónicas de pares top-antitop en el experimento CMS del LHC

Search for SUSY in Same-Sign Di-Lepton Events with the CMS Detector

Operation and Performance of the CMS Silicon Tracker

1 Experiments (Brahms, PHENIX, and STAR)

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 4 Feb 2014

Measurement of the Beauty Cross Section using the Semileptonic Decay into Electrons at HERA

Hadro-Production Experiments: Impact on T2K and LBNE

π 0 γγ calibration Savrina Daria, ITEP, Moscow SINP MSU, Moscow Victor Egorychev, ITEP, Moscow Ivan Belyaev

Calibration of the muon momentum resolution in view of the W mass measurement with the CMS experiment

Online CMS Web-Based Monitoring. Zongru Wan Kansas State University & Fermilab (On behalf of the CMS Collaboration)

Jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions at LHC with CMS detector. Yetkin Yilmaz

STUDY OF SINGLE TOP QUARK PRODUCTION USING BAYESIAN NEURAL NETWORKS WITH DØ DETECTOR AT THE TEVATRON

Which calorimeter for FCC detector

Dissertation. Studies for a Top Quark Mass Measurement and Development of a Jet Energy Calibration with the ATLAS Detector. von.

Electron Muon Ranger (EMR) Software Development

Extensions of the Standard Model (part 2)

Testing the In-Memory Column Store for in-database physics analysis. Dr. Maaike Limper

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Readout Electronics Upgrade Program for the High Luminosity LHC

Kísérleti eszközök fejlesztése a nagyenergiájú fizika számára. Development of experimental methods for the high-energy physics.

Selected Topics in Elementary Particle Physics ( Haupt-Seminar )

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 27 Jul 2010 The CMS Collaboration

Big Data Processing Experience in the ATLAS Experiment

MICE detectors and first results. M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 28 Jun 2010

Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Entwicklung von Analyse-Software und Bestimmung von Parametern des W -Bosons am LHC durch Vergleich mit Z-Bosonen

The CMS Pixel Luminosity Telescope Browser Interface

Neural networks in data analysis

The accurate calibration of all detectors is crucial for the subsequent data

Betriebssystem-Virtualisierung auf einem Rechencluster am SCC mit heterogenem Anwendungsprofil

Transcription:

Top-Quark Studies at CMS Tim Christiansen (CERN) on behalf of the CMS Collaboration ICHEP 2010, Paris 35th International Conference on High-Energy Physics tt 2 km 22 28 July 2010 Single-top 4 km New Physics

Outline Introduction Examining the top-quark selection on first 78 nb -1 of pp collision data at s = 7 TeV In the dilepton and lepton+jets channels (l=e,µ) Aimed (eventually) at first cross-section measurements Not enough data to see any top-quark signal, but a good test of CMS s tools event reconstruction in first data, comparison with simulation testing of data-driven methods for background estimation Latest news from the most recent data What we see in 0.25 pb -1 Summary The Truth (Quark) is rarely pure and never simple. (Oscar Wilde) 2

Introduction Why top-quark physics? Test of not-so-well explored area of the standard model, couplings, rare decays, prod. properties The most exotic of all known elem. particles Important background to many searches, etc [mb] s = 2 7 14 TeV T. Han Tev4LHC Contains/tests ~all major features of the reconstruction leptons of all kinds, light and heavy jets (b-tagging), missing transverse energy (MET), + an on-shell W boson in its decay Excellent tool for the calibration of the experiment jet-energy scale for light & heavy quarks, b-tagging efficiency, MET 3

Dilepton+X Selection Dilepton channels: ee, µµ, eµ Triggers: µ+x (p T > 9 GeV/c) or e/ +X (E T > 15 GeV) 2 isolated, prompt, oppositely charged leptons (l = e,µ) of good quality p T (l) > 20 GeV/c < 2.5, e < 2.4 Rel.isol. = Relative isolation: Detected energy around lepton R 0.3 p T track < 15 % R 0.3 p T ECAL p T (lepton ) R 0.3 p T HCAL Missing transverse energy (MET) using calorimeter tracking MET > 30 (20) GeV (in eµ+x) p b W + l - Z-boson veto: W - b b-jet b-jet 76 < M ee,µµ < 106 GeV/c 2 Count additional jets: anti-k T jets, R = 0.5 using calorimeter < 2.4, p T > 30 GeV/c 2 jets typical for ttbar t t l + p tracking info 4

Dilepton Channel in 78 nb -1 Insufficient data for signal just yet background studies in relaxed selection & test of data-driven methods for background estimation Z-veto, N jet 1, no MET cut Relaxed selection: w/o Z-veto, no MET cut ee+x µµ+x Z/ ll W ttbar 5

Z-veto Background Estimation in Dileptons ee+x Estimate Drell-Yan background outside Z-veto region from events inside: ratio outside/inside from DY simulation Excellent agreement on loosened selection! correction for non-dy contribution in Z-veto region from e sample Also: QCD multijet & W+X contributions with additional fake prompt and isolated lepton(s) is estimated my measuring fake rates in data 6

Bottom-Jet Identification Relaxed selection: Simulation describes the data very well! Jets from b-quarks are a telling feature of top-quark decays Not (yet) applied in the selection, but we start to observe the heavy-quark content of the event sample Example: Loose b-tagger using the impact parameter significance (IPsig) of the tracks associated with the jet (loose cut ~10% fake rate/jet) Simple and robust tagger: IPsig of track with 2 nd -highest IPsig in the jet > loose threshold Chosen here, as it allows to see any tagged jets in the selected sample already To be tightened as luminosity increases to improve purity of b-tagged jets Relaxed selection here: without Z-veto, no MET requirement 7

Lepton+Jets Selection (simplified) Channels: e+jets, µ+jets Ask for exactly 1 prompt, isolated electron (muon) of good quality Very similar selection of e,µ as before, but tightened ID requirements and isolation: Rel.isol. < 10%(e), 5%(µ) due to larger backgrounds p T (e) > 30 GeV/c p T (µ) > 20 GeV/c, < 2.1 Do not apply (yet) any requirement of significant missing transverse energy (MET) p b W + t l - W - b b-jet b-jet jet t q Count additional jets q p anti-k T jets, R = 0.5 using calorimeter info < 2.4, p T > 30 GeV/c 4 jets is typical for ttbar jet 8

L+Jets Channel in 78 nb -1 78 ± 9 nb -1 No signal in 78 nb -1 yet BG studies in low jet multiplicity bins W+X e+jets QCD multi-jets ttbar µ+jets Test datadriven estimation of BG contribution 9

µ impact parameter Background Estimation in L+Jets Estimate of backgrounds with fake isolated and prompt leptons from data: ABCD method with 2 ~ uncorrel. variables µ + jets N jet 0 simulation Fit & extrapolation to signal region: µ + jets N jet 0 signal region A µ + jets N jet 0 N jet 1 ABCD 57 29 30 15 Rel. isol. fit 7 4 6 3 Simulation 21 2 7 2 e + jets N jet 0 N jet 1 Rel. isol. fit 70 35 44 22 Simulation 63 7 42 6 disagreement currently u.i. with more data... Now, we assign 100% uncert. on N QCD in µ+jets (100% is OK, as BG small in N j 4) e + jets N jet 1 10

L+Jets Channel in 78 nb -1 Missing transverse energy: µ+jets N jet 0 hard to get right, but important ingredient of any top-quark analysis in the future! Currently dominated by W+X without jet requirement Transverse mass M T (W): sensitive to the W-boson mass in the event calculated from lepton p T & missing transverse energy e+jets N jet 0 (In the figures: QCD BG is taken from simulation, with 50 /100 % uncertainty assigned for /e+jets) 11

Telling L+Jets Distributions M3: M jjj of the three-jet system that maximizes p T ( jet ) Jets with displaced vertices and/or soft muons inside will be a hint for bottomjets in the event typical for ttbar! jjj (here: same b-tagger as for dileptons) Events with 1 loosely tagged jet: e+jets & µ+jets combined Events with 1 muon in jet e+jets µ+jets µ+jets 12

So do we see the Top-Quark? Not in the 78 nb -1 of data presented so far (in agreement with the expectation/predictions) However there a few interesting events that pass our selection in the more recent data: Some of the first top-quark candidates observed outside Fermilab! 13

µ+jets Candidate Event (from July 14!) Event passes all cuts of full selection 1 high-momentum muon significant MET > 100 m T (W) = 104 GeV/c 2 4 high-p T jets, one of which with good b-tag µ reconst. top mass around 210 GeV/c 2 masses of 2 untagged jets (3 possible comb.): 104, 105, 151 GeV/c 2 µ 14

e+jets Candidate Event (from July 18) Event passes all cuts: 1 high-momentum electron significant MET 44 GeV 4 high-p T jets, two of which with good/clear b-tags (with reconstructed 2 nd ary vertices) m T (W) 77 GeV/c 2 Mass of 2 untagged jets 102 GeV/c 2 m(jjj) 208, 232 GeV/c 2 (for the two 3-jet combinations) 15

y [cm] µµ +Jets Candidate Event (from July 18) Event passes all cuts of full selection: 2 muons with opposite charge 2 jets, both w/ good/clear b-tags (and secondary vertices!) significant MET (>50 GeV) 2 nd ary- vertex 6 ellipse m( ) = 26 GeV/c 2 Preliminarily reconstr. mass is in the range 160 220 GeV/c 2 (consistent with m top ) x [cm] 16

y [cm] µµ +Jets Candidate cont d Very clean candidate with little expected background! Multiple primary vertices multiple pp collisions ( pile-up ) Jets & muons originate from same primary vertex Side view: ttbar out of the box, i.e. no syst., no datadriven BG estimation, yields from sim. z [cm] 17

Summary 78 ± 9 nb -1 of pp collisions at 7 TeV fully analyzed Fast turn-around time (data is only 2 weeks old) No signal, as expected Tools are ready for first measurements: Simulation describes the data very well Successfully tested background estimations Currently establishing first top-quark signals Exciting top candidates in the most recent data in 3 channels in 0.25 pb -1! Very, very exciting times are ahead! we ve been saying this for years, but it s nothing but the Truth (quark) This is the top The signal is starting to rise from the background 18

Thanks! To you for the attention, to the organizing committees of ICHEP, and to the LHC, the CMS collaboration and all the analysts for their dedicated work to make first top-quark physics in pp collisions possible! Reference: Selection of Top-Like Events in the Dilepton & Lepton+Jets Channels in Early 7 TeV Data, CMS Physics Analysis Summary, CMS-PAS-TOP-10-004 (2010) 19

Backup Slides 20

Compact Muon Solenoid 21

Dilepton Channel: Fake Rate & Yields Z-veto, N jet 1, but no MET cut fake rate measurements with jet-triggered data 22

Dilepton Channel Dilepton invariant mass Relaxed selection: no Z-veto, N jet 0, no MET cut 23

Dilepton Channel Missing transverse energy Relaxed selection: no Z-veto, N jet 0, no MET cut 24

Dilepton Channel Sum (p T ) of the 2 lepton transverse momenta Relaxed selection: no Z-veto, N jet 0, no MET cut 25

e+jets: Fits in H T,lep & MET for QCD template for QCD template 26

e+jets: Fits in H T,lep & MET, Results Fit templates in background region extract N(QCD) 2 complementary templates for QCD: electron candidates that nearly pass e-id criteria and jets with large electro-magnetic fraction (W template from simulation) (>25) (>60) (>25) (>60) Simulation describes the data as well as the BG estimate very well! 27

e+jets Kinematical Distributions 28

µ+jets Kinematical Distributions 29