NETCONN s Unanet Implementation 1
About NETCONN NETCONN Solutions mission is to be a recognized leader among Federal IT integrators by providing quality professional and technical services and solutions. NETCONN has four main areas of expertise: Network Infrastructure Information Assurance Disaster Recovery Data Center Services 2
Background Primarily Government Contractor Founded in 1997 71% average annual growth rate Woman-Owned Small Business Headquarted in Hagerstown, MD Presence in 11 States Employees travel regularly in the country and throughout the world 160 Employees; 5 Subcontractors CMMI Level 2 3
Primary Issues with Current T&E Tools (2006) Jan 2004 implemented Deltek GCS Premier Replaced paper timesheets with Deltek TimeCollection Product was new to market and users found it unreliable and frustrating, particularly with regards to version updates. Used proprietary system for expense management Maintenance costly and subject to conflicting internal priorities Manual management of JTR Per Diem rates Required manual data entry to input into GCS Managing over $1M in annual travel expenses Limited financial controls and management oversight Project reporting tools very limited Difficult to monitor revenues and project burn rates Data was three-four weeks old out of GCS No decentralized system to easily share job status report 4
Selection Process Selection Committee of End Users Evaluated Four Systems Unanet Deltek DATABASICS Gelco Unanet Chosen Ease of Use Real-Time, Accurate Time Management Accurate Cost and Revenue Forecasting Quick Burn-Rate Analysis Managerial/Team Lead Access to Information 5
Implementation Approach Phase Roll-Out with Pilot Indirect employees served as pilot Phase 1 include ½ of billed work force Phase 2 include largest contract Unanet Task Force Established Internal team with stakeholders from HR, Finance, PMO staff, and Contract Leads Focused on internal process improvement for one year after implementation Understanding the System Approval and Control Processes Residual Implementation Issues 6
Business Benefits Time Management Increased reliability of system performance Expense Management Increased voucher processing efficiency by 100% Error rate on expense reports greatly reduced Improved expense turnover by weeks Project Management Improved revenue forecasting models Same revenue data is shared across the organization Real-time revenue monitoring helps manage burn rate Driven down to team leads and tied to performance rewards 7
Hours Spent Processing Vouchers vs. # & $(K) Processed LOE required to process expense vouchers is a function of both the quantity of vouchers processed as well as the dollar amount processed. Hours spent processing same number and dollars of expense vouchers have decreased over time, freeing staff up from data entry tasks to higher-level financial management functions in support of company s strategic plan. Voucher Metrics - Hours Spent Processing vs # Processed # Processed (Unanet) # Processed (Tracker) Hours Processing Voucher Metrics - Hours Spent Processing vs $(K) Processed $(K) Processed (Unanet) $(K) Processed (Tracker) Hours Processing # Vouchers 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2006-01 2006-02 2006-03 2006-04 2006-05 2006-06 2006-07 2006-08 2006-09 2006-10 2006-11 2006-12 2007-01 2007-02 2007-03 2007-04 2007-05 2007-06 $(K) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2006-01 2006-02 2006-03 2006-04 2006-05 2006-06 2006-07 2006-08 2006-09 2006-10 2006-11 2006-12 2007-01 2007-02 2007-03 2007-04 8 2007-05 2007-06
Voucher Processing Efficiency Efficiency of expense voucher processing has increased over time, so more vouchers are now processed per hour. Efficiency of expense voucher processing has also increased as users learn more about the system as well as financial controls and less vouchers are returned to them for correction. Voucher Processing Efficiency per Hour # Processed Per Hour $(K) Processed Per Hour Efficiency in # Processed Per Hour vs. Employee Error Rate on Vouchers Submitted # Processed Per Hour Voucher Error/Return Rate 4 4 0.45 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 Hours Unanet Implementation Hours Unanet Implementation % Errors 0 0 2006-01 2006-02 2006-03 2006-04 2006-05 2006-06 2006-07 2006-08 2006-09 2006-10 2006-11 2006-12 2007-01 2007-02 2007-03 2007-04 2007-05 2007-06 2006-01 2006-02 2006-03 2006-04 2006-05 2006-06 2006-07 2006-08 2006-09 2006-10 2006-11 2006-12 2007-01 2007-02 2007-03 2007-04 2007-05 2007-06 9 0
Lessons Learned Pilot Program Ideal Approach Indirect employees took the brunt of the organizational learning curve Task Force Concept Issues bubbled up quickly and addressed by dedicated audience Financial and Managerial Controls Constantly in refinement - work closely with employees and management team to determine best mix of controls Unanet has tons of capability Webinars offer wealth of information on system functionality and how other customers are applying the tools 10
Future Goals 2007 Purchased Resource Management Now beginning to manage all our revenue projections in Unanet Need to expand on this effort and fully incorporate skills matrix Project Tracking Looking to migrate proprietary project tracking system to Unanet Issues Management Reporting Time at WBS level Document Repository PMO Dashboard Reporting Customer Reporting Open to exploring other ways Unanet can support CMMI Process Areas Unanet Partnering Continue to feed potential improvements to Unanet to help evolve the system 11
Questions? 12