3. Observed Damage in Railway Viaducts



Similar documents
(1) Minami Nagamachi and Naka Nagamachi viaducts between Shiraishi Zao and Sendai Stations on the Tohoku Shinkansen line

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

Seismic Retrofitting for School Buildings in Japan Nonstructual Seismic Retrofitting

SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1

REHABILITATION OF THE FIGUEIRA DA FOZ BRIDGE

ASSESSMENT AND PROPOSED STRUCTURAL REPAIR STRATEGIES FOR BRIDGE PIERS IN TAIWAN DAMAGED BY THE JI-JI EARTHQUAKE ABSTRACT

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Damage to Sewage Treatment Systems caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Government s Response

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

SEISMIC RETROFITTING TECHNIQUE USING CARBON FIBERS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

What is Seismic Retrofitting?

SEISMIC CAPACITY OF EXISTING RC SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN OTA CITY, TOKYO, JAPAN

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

SECTION 7 Engineered Buildings Field Investigation

REVISION OF GUIDELINE FOR POST- EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EVALUATION OF RC BUILDINGS IN JAPAN

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC EVALUATION AND RETROFITTING OF UNSYMMETRICAL MEDIUM RISE BUILDINGS- A CASE STUDY

DAMAGE TO WOOD BUILDINGS DURING THE GREAT TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE PART2- DAMAGE DUE TO GROUND MOTION

Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND RETROFITTING OF R.C.C STRUCTURE

PCI Reconnaissance Team Report. Preview of PCI s Japan Earthquake Reconnaissance Team Report

Seismic Isolation Retrofitting of Japanese Wooden Buildings

EGYPTIAN CODES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES PART V SEISMIC DESIGN

Project Report. Structural Investigations Hotel del Sol Yuma, Arizona

fib Bulletin 39, Seismic bridge design and retrofit structural solutions: Colour figures

Bridge Seismic Design, Retrofitting and Loss Assessment

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Structural Audit of Buildings

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

REFOR-tec REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF STRUCTURES WITH U.H.P.F.R.C.C. Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites

Seismic Retrofitting Quick Reference School Facilities that Withstand Earthquakes Examples of Seismic Retrofitting

Methods for Seismic Retrofitting of Structures

The Current Situation and Circumstances Regarding the Great Earthquake Damage

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

The Original Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer System

DISASTER RESISTANCE EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES

SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

Chapter. Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories

Seismic retrofitting on structures in urban areas

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

Retrofitting of Existing RCC Buildings by Method of Jacketing

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF EARTHQUAKE-DAMAGED CONCRETE COLUMNS BY LATERAL PRE-TENSIONING OF FRP BELTS. K. Nasrollahzadeh Nesheli 1 and K.

Seismic Retrofit of Bridges - A Short Course

WASHINGTON STATE s BRIDGE SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAM

UrEDAS, URGENT EARTHQUAKE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM, NOW AND FUTURE

REPAIR, RESTORATION AND STRENGTHENING OF BUILDINGS

REPAIR AND SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN PERU

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

Cover page. Introduction to the Earthquake Resistance Capacity Assessment and Reinforcement of Taipei Water Department Office Building.

Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas

Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Beam- Column T-Joints in Bridge Piers with FRP Composite Jackets

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

Unit 4 Lesson 6 Measuring Earthquake Waves. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR AND FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT OF MULTI-STORY CONFINED MASONRY WALLS UNDER CYCLIC LOADS

bi directional loading). Prototype ten story

Structural Failures Cost Lives and Time

Current Status of Hokkaido Shinkansen

Bridge Structural Rehabilitation Using FRP Laminates

The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

How To Repair A House After An Earthquake

SEISMIC RETROFIT DESIGN CRITERIA

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF STRUCTURES

Guidelines for Promotion of Earthquake-resistance School Building July 2003

REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE BEAM BRIDGES IN CROATIAN STATE ROAD NETWORK

beams columns blast walls slabs pipes protective coatings polymer concrete Solutions Looking for Problems...

Comparison of Seismic Retrofitting Methods for Existing Foundations in Seismological Active Regions

Maintenance and Management of JR East Civil Engineering Structures

Rehabilitation of Existing Foundation Building to Resist Lateral and Vertical Loads

VERIFICATION OF THE METHOD FOR IMPROVING ACCURACY OF SIMPLIFIED SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF STEEL RIGID FRAME VIADUCTS

Retrofitting By Means Of Post Tensioning. Khaled Nahlawi 1

BEHAVIOR OF SHORT CONCRETE COLUMNS REINFORCED BY CFRP BARS AND SUBJECTED TO ECCENTRIC LOAD

Control of Seismic Drift Demand for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Weak First Stories

2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

Seismic Risk Evaluation of a Building Stock and Retrofit Prioritization

Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction of a Curved Continuous Box Girder Bridge with Variable Width

Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings: Innovative Alternatives

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Building Condition Assessment: West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland

Seismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey

Requirements for the Use of PRESSS Moment-Resisting Frame Systems

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

STRUCTURAL CONCEPT FOR LIGHT GAUGE STEEL FRAME SYSTEM

PROJECT SUMMARY. Scope of work details: (If phased construction, please see plan submittal guidelines.)

Structural Integrity Analysis

Outline of Guidelines for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Dams During Large Earthquakes (Draft)

Incorporating Innovative Materials for Seismic Resilient Bridge Columns

SECTION 8 Industrial Facilities Field Investigation

Transcription:

Structural Damage of Tohoku Shinkansen Viaducts by the Off the Pacific Tohoku Earthquake First Report on March 16, 2011 Dr. Yoshikazu Takahashi, Associate Professor Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University (Translated by S. Otani, University of Tokyo) 1. Overview The author investigated the structural damage of the Tohoku Shinkansen viaducts from Kitakami station to Inohana No. 5 Viaducts on March 15; this portion of viaducts was severely damaged by the 2003 South Sanriku Earthquake. 2. Design of Viaducts The Shinkansen railway viaduct was constructed in 1977 and 1978 in accordance with Shinkansen Network Structural Design Standards (specifically for the Tohoku, Joetsu and Narita Lines) and Structural Design Standards for Reinforced Concrete Structures, Unreinforced Concrete Structures and Prestressed Concrete Structures, 1979. Compared to the present standards, the level of design earthquake force, the verification procedure of earthquake resistance (static seismic coefficient method used) and the required amount of lateral reinforcement are different. The Tohoku Shinkansen line was severely damaged by the 2003 South Sanriku Earthquake. Ministry of Infrastructure, Land and Transport (MLIT) ordered JR companies to study the retrofit methods of existing railway viaducts. Out of 51,000 columns of the Tohoku Shinkansen Line between Tokyo and Hachinohe, 12,500 columns were found necessary for strengthening work; the retrofit work for shear failure type columns was completed by 2007. Finally, JR-East completed the strengthening of 31,100 railway viaduct columns and 2,880 piers by April 2009. The second stage retrofit program for flexural failure type RC columns was announced to start for additional 6,700 railway viaducts from 2009 fiscal year using 5 year period. 3. Observed Damage in Railway Viaducts 3.1 Waga No. 1 Viaducts (447 km from Tokyo, 309 m long) Rigid frame viaducts with mid-height beams (Photo 1). Columns above the mid-height beams were strengthened by steel plates. No damage was observed.

Photo 1: Waga No. 1 Viaducts 3.2 Okajima No. 3 Viaducts (452 km from Tokyo, 279 m long) Single story rigid frame viaducts. No retrofit work was carried out, but no damage was observed in the structure. Elevated electricity poles were tilted toward the rail (Photo 2). Separation was observed at the base of piers and surrounding soil (Photo 3), which possibly indicates the vibration in the direction perpendicular to the direction of the viaduct. Photo 2: Tilting of electricity poles Photo 3: Gaps at the base of a pier and soil 3.3 Torigui No. 5 Viaducts (453 km from Tokyo, 489 m long) (Photo 4) Near the top of Pier R9 (end pier toward Tokyo), shear cracks were observed normal to the direction of the viaduct (Photo 5). Corner concrete of an RC simple girder fell, indicating the deformation in the direction normal to the viaduct. Some piers show separation at the base and soil; and also boil out sands due to liquefaction was observed (Photo 6).

Photo 4: Torigui No. 5 Viaducts Photo 5: Shear cracks normal to the viaduct Photo 6: Trace of boil sands at pier base 3.4 Nakasone No. 1 Viaducts (456 km from Tokyo, 103 m long) In two successive viaducts, serious damage was observed near the top of piers; near and further ends of the viaducts, concrete was separated along the placing joint; core concrete was also broken, and the column lost capability to support the weight of the structure. Intermediate columns between the ends also developed shear cracks; inclined cracks were observed in the direction normal and parallel to the viaduct, these cracks may be associated with torsion. In columns at the end of a viaduct, cracks were observed along the cover concrete from the base to the top. Repair work was started even three days after the earthquake; soil was removed to the top of the foundation girder, but no damage was observed in the foundation.

Photo 7: Damage in Nakasone No. 1 Viaducts Some viaducts suffered serious shear failure at the upper part of piers near the ends of each viaduct; in one viaduct near Tokyo end, and in another viaduct further end. These shear cracks were observed in the viaduct direction. Photo 8: Shear failure observed at the top of columns in Nakasone No. 1 Viaducts 3.5 Ohki No. 1 Viaducts (456 km from Tokyo, 717 m long) Single story rigid frame viaducts. Retrofit work by steel plate jacketing was completed; no damage was observed. Further end columns were not strengthened, but damage was not observed by external

observation at a distance Photo 9: Ohki No. 1 Viaducts 3.6 Inohana No. 5 Viaducts (469 km from Tokyo, 301 m long) R15-1. This viaduct was severely damage by the 2003 South Sanriku Earthquake with spalling of concrete at the end columns and shear cracking in the intermediate columns without concrete spalling. In the repair work, cracks were injected with plastic resin and spalled cover concrete was replaced, followed by strengthening with steel plate jacketing. In some severely damaged columns, aramid fiber sheet was used for strengthening. Separation at the base of piers and surrounding ground was observed in the direction normal to the viaduct, but no structural damage was found. The effective strengthening work was noted. The water level is relative high in this area, and corrosion of strengthening steel plates is observed due to high humidity.

Photo 10: Inohana No. 5 Viaducts