University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review



Similar documents
HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

Community College System of New Hampshire

!"#$%&'()$*)"#%+,'%-"."/,&*01%% (0-%-"/*."'*01%,0/*0"%*0#$'2)$*,0% ($%$3"%40*."'#*$5%,+%6"00"##""%7%80,9.*//"%

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses.

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS

Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy

Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

THE CHECK. academic. A Guide to Online Course Design. What aspects of course design does The Check address? How can The Check be used?

Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines

Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template

Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

Teaching and Learning Standards and Principles

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Checklist for Evaluating Online Courses

Del Mar College, Corpus Christi, TX Department of Mathematics. Course: ID: Instructor:

Online Course Design Evaluation

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching

VALIDATION OF PREPAREDNESS TO TEACH ONLINE

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

Online Course Standards Rubric

UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA. Online Course Design Guidelines for Faculty

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses

SLN Course Quality Rubric for Formal Course Review of New Online Faculty/Courses

Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form

Online Student Orientation

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Best Practices in Online Course Design and Delivery

Instructional Design Tips

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested)

STEP ONE Work with instructor to develop/redesign course and fill out sections I VII. COURSE DEVELOPMENT or REVISION Course Information

ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Course Development Resource Guide. Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support

South Georgia State College Distance Learning Policy

Middlesex Community College Spring 2015

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Best Practices for Online Courses. 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design

NURS 5001 Healthcare Policy 3 Credit Hours

Getting Started Guide For Students

Human Resources Management NURS 5304/6304/ Credit Hours

English 2950: Scientific and Technical Report Writing Common Syllabus

Quality Standards for Online Learning

In this topic we discuss a number of design decisions you can make to help ensure your course is accessible to all users.

Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning

Section A: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND STUDENT ASSESSMENT

ASU College of Education Department of Curriculum and Instruction EDG 6361 American Higher Education Course Syllabus

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

City Tech Instructional Technology & Media Services. Blackboard Tutorial for Students

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

Maryland Online SYLLABUS

Main Author: Contributing Authors:

inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses

CREATING A COURSE? Courses at SNHP

Template for the Design and Development of Online Courses

Course Standards. Support Standards. Institutional and Administrative Standards

CISS 492 DEA Senior Seminar in Management Information Systems

Online Course Syllabus EDFD 641 Children's and Adolescent Literature

Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction. Recommended Best Practices for Online Instruction

Course Evaluation: A Tool for Faculty

Online Course Proposal Form Form 1

EDU Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Faculty Bio button Contact Policy:

Equal Access: Universal Design of Instruction

Transcription:

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review Three copies must be completed: one by instructor, one by peer, and one by DDEC. All three must reach satisfy scoring requirements (at bottom) for course to be deemed exemplary. All standards with possible points MUST be.. Course Introduction and Information. The instructor provides a biography, photograph, and an appropriate self-introduction which presents the instructor as approachable and engaged.. Students are encouraged to introduce themselves to the class.. The course provides initial exercises to enable the student to become accustomed to the course management tool (ex: send instructor an email, reply to a discussion posting). 4. Minimum technology requirements and prerequisite technology skills are clearly stated. 5. The course syllabus is easily located, and provides complete and clear information pertaining to ALL of the following: course objectives, grading, instructor contact information, required materials, the nature of distance learning, and honesty policies ensuring the integrity of student work. 6. The course calendar is available with assignments, test and other due dates. 7. Instructions on how and where to receive technical assistance are readily visible and easy to understand. 8. Information regarding other academic resources (library, tutoring, testing services, etc.) are clearly visible (syllabus and/or

linked from main course page).. Learning Materials/Content. The course is complete (not under construction).. Each course module includes clear learning objectives.. Course content and materials are of sufficient breadth and depth. 4. All external links are functional. 5. Supplementary resources and links are available to students and are labeled as required or optional.. Assessment and Evaluation. The course includes a formative evaluation, soliciting student feedback regarding course quality, at or prior to the mid-point of the course.. The grading policy is clear.. Performance standards, rubrics, or examples of quality assignments are provided. 4. Self-check or practice tests/assignments (games, quizzes, written work) are provided to enable students to measure their own progress. 5. The types of assessments are appropriate for the online learning environment and encourage academic honesty. 6. Course materials and assessments are clearly related to the course

learning objectives. 7. Each activity and assignment is well-written, providing students with a clear understanding of what is expected and how they should submit their work. 8. Activities and assignments are achievable, and minimize unnecessary or redundant busy work. 4. Instructional Design & Interaction. The course is well-organized and easy to navigate.. Course pages and materials are consistent in appearance and organization.. Course materials and modules are presented in a logical progression. 4. Course materials are divided into appropriate sections or chunks, with all or most sections containing assignments/exercises involving recall or application. 5. Course materials appeal to multiple learning styles through the use of print, visuals, and reallife applications (when appropriate). 6. Graphic elements load quickly and are legible. 7. Course activities and assignments promote student-instructor interaction and student-content interaction. Student-to-student interaction is fostered when appropriate to the academic discipline. 8. The instructor clearly states how often students are required to interact with one another and the instructor, the expected quality of such interactions, and how these

interactions affect student grades. 9. Course guidelines provide information as to the amount of time a student can expect a response from specific inquiries to the instructor. 0. Course guidelines provide information as to when and how (email, discussion board, etc.) students will receive feedback on assignments, grades, and participation. 5. Course Technology, Innovation and Accessibility Standard Possible Points. Course technologies are readily and easily accessible. Check if. The course makes broad use of technology available within the course management system (WebCT).. The course provides links to tools required for viewing course content (Acrobat Reader, QuickTime, etc.), and includes instructions for using such tools. 4. Course content is enhanced as appropriate through audio and visual materials. 5. Audio/video clips are short. 6. The courses uses appropriate formatting (font, color, etc.) to maximize readability. 7. The course can adapt learning materials and activities to meet the needs of students with disabilities. 8. The course provides a statement telling students how to access ADA services on their campus.

Total possible points: 8 For exemplary status: All standards with points must be achieved. Total score must equal 68 or greater (85%).