DEEP AZIMUTHAL SEISMIC ANISOTROPY IN THE WESTERNANATOLIA AND AEGEAN SUBDUCTION ZONE



Similar documents
DYNAMIC CRUST: Unit 4 Exam Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes

Mapping the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Mohos across the northern and central Apennine chain through teleseismic receiver functions

Plate Tectonics. Plate Tectonics The unifying concept of the Earth sciences. Continental Drift

Plate tectonics states that the Earth's crust and upper mantle are broken into sections, called plates.

ES Chapter 10 Review. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Plate Tectonics: Big Ideas. Plate Tectonics. Plate Tectonics. The unifying concept of the Earth sciences.

Tectonic plates push together at convergent boundaries.

Interactive Plate Tectonics

TECTONICS ASSESSMENT

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

Earthquake Focal Parameters and Lithospheric Structure of the Anatolian Plateau from Complete Regional Waveform Modeling

The Dynamic Crust 2) EVIDENCE FOR CRUSTAL MOVEMENT

II. Earth Science (Geology) Section (9/18/2013)

Plate Tectonics. Introduction. Boundaries between crustal plates

Geodynamics Lecture 2 Kinematics of plate tectonics

Investigation 6: What happens when plates collide?

Continental Drift, Sea Floor Spreading and Plate Tectonics

Study Guide Questions Earth Structure and Plate Tectonics

4. Plate Tectonics II (p )

Plate Tectonics Practice Questions and Answers Revised August 2007

Plate Tectonics Chapter 2

FOURTH GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Name: Period: # Plate Tectonics. Journey to the center of the Earth

Georgia Performance Standards Framework for Science Grade 6. Unit Organizer: Geology: Inside the Earth (Approximate Time: 7 Weeks)

Regents Questions: Plate Tectonics

Plate Tectonics Web-Quest

Name Score /225. (Make sure you identify each key concept by identifying the section [1.1, 1.2, etc.].]

Geol 101: Physical Geology PAST EXAM QUESTIONS LECTURE 4: PLATE TECTONICS II

Unit 4 Lesson 2 Plate Tectonics. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

Rocks and Plate Tectonics

Plate Tectonics. Earth, 9 th edition Chapter 2

Transform Boundaries

Chapter 8: Plate Tectonics -- Multi-format Test

Brief Review of Global Earth Velocity Structures and Seismology

1. The diagram below shows a cross section of sedimentary rock layers.

1. You are about to begin a unit on geology. Can anyone tell me what geology is? The study of the physical earth I.

Chapter 2. Plate Tectonics. Plate Tectonics: Learning Goals

Glossary. continental crust: the sections of crust, the outermost layer of the earth, that include the continents

Hot Spots & Plate Tectonics

Plate Tectonics Short Study Guide

Earthquakes. Earthquakes: Big Ideas. Earthquakes

1 Introduction. External Grant Award Number: 04HQGR0038. Title: Retrieval of high-resolution kinematic source parameters for large earthquakes

Seismic Waves Practice

The interior of the Earth is divided into layers based on chemical and physical properties.

Plate Tectonics: Ridges, Transform Faults and Subduction Zones

6.E.2.2 Plate Tectonics, Earthquakes and Volcanoes

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

Plate waves in phononic crystals slabs

SECOND GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Earthquakes and Plate Boundaries Deborah Jordan and Samuel Spiegel

Magnitude 7.2 GUERRERO, MEXICO

The seismic activity in the area of Greece between 1966 and 1969

Student Exploration: Plate Tectonics

Step 2: Learn where the nearest divergent boundaries are located.

Continental Drift. Alfred Wegener ( ) Proposed that all of the continents were once part of a large supercontinent - Pangaea Based on:

Unit 4 Lesson 6 Measuring Earthquake Waves. Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

The Aegean: plate tectonic evolution in Mediterranean

Magnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE

ELEMENTS OF PLATE TECTONICS

Continents join together and split apart.

Using Google Earth to Explore Plate Tectonics

GENERAL SCIENCE LABORATORY 1110L Lab Experiment 9B: Tracking the Hawaiian Islands: How Fast Does the Pacific Plate Move?

THE 2004 SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE AND INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI: WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY

Earthquake Hazards and Risks

FIFTH GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Chapter 5: Earthquakes

3D Visualization of Seismic Activity Associated with the Nazca and South American Plate Subduction Zone (Along Southwestern Chile) Using RockWorks

TECTONICS OF AEGEAN/ANATOLIAN REGION 1. Tectonics of the Aegean/Anatolian region Glenn Simonelli Indiana University G554

Sedimentary Basins. Revision Material. Introduction. CE3A8 SMJ Geology for Engineers 1

Georgia Performance Standards Framework for Shaky Ground 6 th Grade

PLATE TECTONICS EXERCISE (Modified from North Seattle Community College online exercise)

Engaging Students Through Interactive Activities In General Education Classes

Earthquake Magnitude

Earthquakes.

Plate Tectonics. Learning Guide. Pacific Plate. Pacific Ocean. Divergent boundaries

Geology 112 Earthquakes. Activity 1 Worksheet Introduction to the Course. What is a Fault? What is an Earthquake?

Earthquakes. Seismograph stations operated by the British Geological Survey

SIXTH GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

Lesson 13: Plate Tectonics I

Building 1D reference velocity model of the Irpinia region (Southern Apennines): microearthquakes locations and focal mechanism

Layers of the Earth s Interior

Sonic Logging in Deviated Boreholes of an Anisotropic Formation: Laboratory Study

Tectonic plates have different boundaries.

Plate Tectonics Lab. Continental Drift. The Birth of Plate Tectonics

FIRST GRADE PLATE TECTONICS 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Plate Tectonics PuzzleMap User Guide

Volcanoes Erupt Grade 6

Plate Tectonics. Hi, I am Zed and I am going to take you on a trip learning about Plate Tectonics. And I am Buddy Zed s mascot

Data Analysis and Seismogram Interpretation

Chapter 16: Plate Tectonics

Tsunami Practice Questions and Answers Revised November 2008

New constraints on the active tectonic deformation of the Aegean

Transcription:

DEEP AZIMUTHAL SEISMIC ANISOTROPY IN THE WESTERNANATOLIA AND AEGEAN SUBDUCTION ZONE G. Polat -1 and M.N. Ozel -1 Adress: 1- Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institution, Cengelköy/ İstanbul E-mail: gulten.polat@boun.edu.tr, ozeln@boun.edu.tr Keywords: Anisotropy, shear wave splitting, Aegean region and subduction zone ABSTRACT Shear wave splitting due to source-side mantle anisotropy is estimated from broadband teleseismic and local S waves using a suite of Aegean subduction zone events. The data have been recorded by Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI) stations, at the depth of more than 30 km, from 2000 to 2007. We assume that there are at most two anisotropic regions along the ray path: one on the source-side and the other one on the receiver-side. It has been known that receiver-side splitting is found from analysis of SKS waves. Aim of this study is to investigate the kinematics of subduction; its influence on mantle convection and related deformation by using seismic anisotropy. From the combined analysis of SKS, local S, and teleseismic S waves, we have concluded that there must be azimuthal seismic anisotropy in the deep part of the mantle around the consuming slab. The splittings of the waves recorded at the stations in the western Anatolia have allowed us to constrain the orientation and depth distribution of the anisotropy both below and above the slab. In the lithospheric mantle beneath the western part of the Anatolia, S- wave fast propagation direction is parallel to the direction of the extension of the Aegean region. Our results at Balıkesir (BALB), Antalya (ANTB) and Dalyan (DALT) stations show that fast split shear wave direction is about NE and delay time greater than 1 sec. These findings give information about the nature of the deformation and the coupling between the subducted lithosphere and surrounding asthenosphere. These results are consistent with the presence of azimuthal seismic anisotropy in the asthenosphere below the slab. Local S phases recorded at Southern Aegean Region (SAR) stations, yield fast directions that are not similar to the pattern of the SKS results at the depth of 133 km. We have found high delay times among the S phases in this region (SAR). This situation can be explained with the important coupling between cold slab and the intense mantle convection. INTRODUCTION In the combination with the westward motion along the North Anatolian Fault Zone, the southwestern motion of the Hellenic arc results from the continental collision between Arabia and Eurasia plates (Fig.1). The extension in the Aegean region focused on the role of the westward push of Turkey versus that of the slab pull-related forces acting in the Hellenic trench region [Taymaz et al.,1991]. The complex structure of Aegean region can be understood not only the seismicity but also the analysis of seismic anisotropy. Mapping azimuthal seismic anisotropy is very crucial to determine the location and extent of seismic anisotropy in complex structures of the earth and to investigate in dynamic structure of the mantle by using shear wave splitting parameters. 141

Figure-1. Tectonic structure of Turkey and surrounding areas Many researchers investigate the details of seismic anisotropy in the mantle wedge and asthenosphere under subducted slabs by using teleseismic S and SKS splitting parameters combining with local S waves above subduction zones [e.g., Fouch and Fisher, 1996; Sandvol and Ni, 1997]. In this study we use both local and teleseismic data recorded by Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI) stations (Fig.2). Figure-2. Broadband stations used in this study DATA AND METHOD In this study events are selected in terms of some criteria include the depth of greater than 30 km and distance range is smaller than 10 deg for local events and greater than 10 degre for teleseismic events. Broadband data are used to determine the depth extent of seismic anisotropy. Furthermore, we use the high quality data with S wave incidence angles of 35 o or less in terms of signal to noise ratio. Local S waves have angles of incidence much larger than the critical angle in which case the shear waves get distorted because of the effect of the free surface [Nuttli,1961; Kennett, 1991]. Assuming that the azimuthal anisotropy is distributed in terms of depth, it is expected that upgoing S waves originating from deeper hypocenters have larger lag times than S waves originating from more shallow earthquakes. In subduction zone, the SKS lag time minus the local S wave 142

lag time causes the lag time stemming from the azimuthal anisotropy beneath the hypocenter. The method of Silver and Chan (1991) and the bootstrap technique [Sandvol and Hearn 1994] are used to measure the shear wave splitting parameters for SKS and SKKS waves. We minimize the smaller of the two eigenvalues in horizontal covariance matrix to determine the splitting parameters for both local and teleseismic S waves [Silver and Chan, 1991]. The horizontal covariance matrix is defined as: Where k is the digital time index, n is the sampling rate, and N is the total number of data points for the given time series. As applying the method to our data, once the C ij N K = 1 ( k n * t) * u ( k) = u δ i j receiver-side splitting is removed to get source-side splitting. The spitting parameters of the receiver-side corrected S waveforms can be determined by the same methods applied for SKS, SKKS and local S waves. Also, each of the source-side fast directions about the back azimuth to correct for the difference in geometry between a downgoing and an upgoing ray path [Russo and Silver, 1994]. RESULTS Local split S waves at BALB station (Fig.3) show that fast directions are parallel to the Hellenic Arc. Event 2 is located near to Kythira. Its fast direction is perpendicular to E-W extension of the Hellenic Arc but Event 3 is parallel to the Hellenic Trench. The result of ISP station shows that fast polarization directions do not have an uniform pattern. It could be related to intersection between the E-W extension of the Hellenic arc and N-S extension of the western Anatolia. Fast polarization directions at the event 2 and the event 3 are consistent with the ISP and other stations that are used in the study. Changes in the amount of delay time might not be consistent with the increase in focal depths of the used eartquakes in the study. However, amount of delay time obtained from most of the stations except ISP and ANTB at Cyprus Arc are very reasonable and consistent with the focal depth of the earthquakes that occured in this region. The amount of delay time at ISP is different from HDMB, DALT, FETY and BODT stations, but their fast polarization directions are all in NW-SE. Their fast polarization directions except ANTB are parallel to the Cyprus Arc. Figure-3. Source-side splitting parameters for BALB station 143

CONCLUSION Almost all local splitting values along the Subduction boundary zone are parallel to the consuming direction and the slab retreating direction because azimuthal anistropy could be resulting from slab movements and related deformation in it. The observed shear wave splitting directions get complex at the edge of the Hellenic subduction near to the south-west of the Anatolian plate in terms of our results. All earthquakes have moderate depths at Cyprus Arc. Splitting directions along the Cpyrus arc observed parallel to it but it is contrast to the Hellenic Arc. This may be related to continent continent collision along the Cyprus Arc. In another words, the collision in the south of the Cyprus island causes parallel deformations especially in northwest southeast directions along the arc. The young age of the collision may explain the small delay time in this region. Although seismic anisotropy in Cyprus arc is only related to the present deformation, the existence of anisotropy in Hellenic arc may be related with the metastable and higly anisotropic olivine. The consistency between the directions of fast polarized SKS waves and local S waves suggests that the presence of anisotropy in the North-West part of the Aegean subduction zone is linked to coherent mantle flow. REFERENCES Benetatos, C., Kiratzi, A., Papazachos, C. and G. Karakaisis, 2004. Focal mechanisms of shallow and intermediate depth earthquakes along the Hellenic Trench. Journal of Geodynamics, 37, 253-296. Faccenna, C., O Bellier, J. Martioned, C. Piromella and V. Regard, 2006. Slab detachment beneath Eastern Anatolia: A possible cause for the formation Of the North Anatolia Fault, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 242, 85-97. Fischer, K. M., and D. A. Wiens, 1996. The depth distribution of mantle anisotropy beneath the Tonga subduction zone, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 142,253-260. Fouch, M., and K. M. Fischer, 1996. Seismic anisotropy beneath the northwest Pasific subduction zones,. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 15,987-16,002. Hatzfeld, D. et al., 2001. Shear wave anisotropy in the upper mantle beneath the Aegean related internal deformation,. J. Geophys. Res.,106, 30 737-30 754. Karato, S. C., 1998. Seismic Anisotropy in the Deep Mantle, Boundary Layers and the Geometry of Mantle Convection, Pure and Applied Geophysics. Kenet, B. L. N., 1991. The removal of free surface interactions from three component seismograms, Geophys. J. Int., 104, 153-163. Nuttli, O.,1961. The effects of the Earth s surface on the S wave particle motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 51,237-246. 144

Russo, R. M., and P. G. Silver, 1994. Trench paralel seismic anisotropy, Science, 263, 1105-1111. flow beneath the Nazca plate from Sandvol, E. And J. Ni, 1997. Deep azimuthal seismic anistropy in the southern Kurile and Japon subduction zones, J. G.R. Vol. 102, No. B5, Pages 9911-9922 T. Taymaz, J. Jackson, D. McKenzie,1991, Active tectonics of the north and central Aegean Sea Geophys. J. Int. 106, 433. Vinnik, L.P., and R. Kind, 1993, Ellipticity of teleseismic S-particle motion, Geophys. J. Int., 113, 165-174. 145