Driving under the influence of alcohol or



Similar documents
LexisNexis Law Firm Billable Hours Survey Top Line Report. June 11, 2012

STATE INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING INFORMATION DOCUMENT

2016 Individual Exchange Premiums updated November 4, 2015

Hail-related claims under comprehensive coverage

VCF Program Statistics (Represents activity through the end of the day on June 30, 2015)

Notices of Cancellation / Nonrenewal and / or Other Related Forms

INTRODUCTION. Figure 1. Contributions by Source and Year: (Billions of dollars)

ANTHONY P. CARNEVALE NICOLE SMITH JEFF STROHL

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona NOTICE TO: DEBTOR ATTORNEYS, BANKRUPTCY PETITION PREPARERS AND DEBTORS

United States Bankruptcy Court District of Arizona

ENS Governmental Format Status (As of 06/16/2008)

Health Insurance Exchanges and the Medicaid Expansion After the Supreme Court Decision: State Actions and Key Implementation Issues

50-State Analysis. School Attendance Age Limits. 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, CO Fax:

Foreign Language Enrollments in K 12 Public Schools: Are Students Prepared for a Global Society?

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ASSOCIATION. Annual Asset-Based Lending and Factoring Surveys, 2008

AAIS Mobile-Homeowners 2008 Series

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

*Time is listed as approximate as an offender may be charged with other crimes which may add on to the sentence.

Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Forms

How To Regulate Rate Regulation

Table 1: Advertising, Marketing and Promotional Expense as a Percentage of Net Operating Revenue

STATE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES IN 2009 FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE

Benefits of Selling WorkLife 65

Community College/Technical Institute Mission Convergence Study

Cancellation/Nonrenewal Surplus Lines Exemptions

Health Insurance Coverage of Children Under Age 19: 2008 and 2009

How To Get A National Rac (And Mac)

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans

Cancellation of Debt (COD) R. Bruce McCommons Harford County, MD TrC 12/4/2013

Rates are valid through March 31, 2014.

The Case for Change The Case for Whopping Big Change

NEW CARRIER SIGN UP REQUEST FORM

AAIS Personal and Premises Liability Program

Alaska (AK) Arizona (AZ) Arkansas (AR) California-RN (CA-RN) Colorado (CO)

Annual Survey of Public Employment & Payroll Summary Report: 2013

TABLE 1. Didactic/Clinical/Lab SEMESTER TWO (Apply for admission to Nursing Program during Semester Two)

Health Insurance Price Index Report for Open Enrollment and Q May 2014

Alabama Commission of Higher Education P. O. Box Montgomery, AL. Alabama

APPENDIX B. STATE AGENCY ADDRESSES FOR INTERSTATE UIB CLAIMS

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

Closing the College Attainment Gap between the U.S. and Most Educated Countries, and the Contributions to be made by the States

ONLINE SERVICES FOR KEY LOW-INCOME BENEFIT PROGRAMS What States Provide Online with Respect to SNAP, TANF, Child Care Assistance, Medicaid, and CHIP

THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TEXAS

FR Y-14Q: Retail US Auto Loan Schedule Instructions

Arizona Form 2014 Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State or Country 309

Health Coverage for the Hispanic Population Today and Under the Affordable Care Act

STATE PERSONAL INCOME TAXES ON PENSIONS & RETIREMENT INCOME: TAX YEAR 2010

Resource Brief: Ombudsman Program Data Management Systems

Marketplaces (Exchanges): Information for Employers and Individuals Lisa Klinger, J.D.

Use and Characteristics of Electronic Health Record Systems Among Office-based Physician Practices: United States,

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORMATION

The Vermont Legislative Research Shop

8. Network Usage and Growth

How To Get An R22 In Massachusetts

Audio Monitoring And The Law: How to Use Audio Legally in Security Systems. Today s Learning Objectives

Radiologic Sciences Staffing and Workplace Survey 2015

NYCOM 2009 Entering Class - Matriculant Comparison Data

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

AAIS Commercial Umbrella Liability Program

Department of Banking and Finance

Pro Hac Vice Admission Rules

Cost and Benefits of Individual and Family Health Insurance. December 2013

TAX PREP FEE PHILOSOPHY. Copyright 2013 Drake Software

Approved Mortgage Insurance Forms

State Insurance Information

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

NCCI Filing Memorandum Item B-1420

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

Building Codes in Effect by State

Impact of Undocumented Populations on 2010 Congressional Reapportionment

Legislative Summary Sheet: Bills Related to Military Families Recently Introduced into State Legislatures

*** ASBESTOS/MESOTHELIOMA INJURIES, ACCIDENTS AND DEATHS ***

State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Agencies

Highway Loss Data Institute Bulletin

CPT Codes For Spirometry

How To Rate Plan On A Credit Card With A Credit Union

ASNT Conference Edition - Fall Salary Survey Your Path to the Perfect Job Starts Here.

Health Reform. Health Insurance Market Reforms: Pre-Existing Condition Exclusions

HCUP Methods Series HCUP External Cause of Injury (E Code) Evaluation Report ( HCUP Data) Report #

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

OVERPAYMENTS IN GENERAL

Drunk Driving Accident Statistics

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

FAMILY LAW DIVORCE AND DISSOLUTION ALIMONY, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER SPOUSAL SUPPORT (STATUTES) Thomson Reuters/West August 2010

Recent Trends in Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment: Analysis of CMS Performance Measure Data through August 2014

Regional Electricity Forecasting

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: Weekly Progress Report on Recovery Act Spending

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

AN INSIDE LOOK AT SOCIAL RECRUITING IN THE USA

States Served. CDFI Fund 601 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 200, South, Washington, DC (202)

Trends in Adult Female Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Reporting Primary Alcohol Abuse: 1992 to Alcohol abuse affects millions of

Transcription:

National Survey on Drug Use and Health The NSDUH Report December 9, 2010 State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving In Brief Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that 13.2 percent of persons aged 16 or older (an estimated 30.6 million persons) drove under the influence of alcohol in the past year and 4.3 percent (an estimated 10.1 million persons) drove under the influence of illicit drugs in the same time period The rates of past year drunk driving were among the highest in Wisconsin (23.7 percent) and North Dakota (22.4 percent); the rates of drugged driving were among the highest in Rhode Island (7.8 percent) and Vermont (6.6 percent) When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced statistically significant reductions in the rates of drunk driving (from 14.6 to 13.2 percent) and drugged driving (from 4.8 to 4.3 percent); 12 States saw reductions in drunk driving rates, and 7 saw reductions in drugged driving rates Driving under the influence of alcohol or illicit drugs poses a significant threat to public safety because these substances can impair perception, cognition, attention, balance, coordination, and other brain functions necessary for safe driving. Driving while impaired has been linked to reckless driving, car crashes, and fatal accidents. A review of several studies found that between 5 and 25 percent of drivers involved in motor vehicle accidents tested positive for drugs, and 18 percent of motor vehicle driver deaths involved drugs. 1 Furthermore, in 2008, 32 percent of all trafficrelated deaths nearly 12,000 deaths were the result of alcohol-related crashes. 2 Recognizing the dangers associated with driving under the influence of drugs, the 2010 National Drug Control Strategy, developed by the White House s Office of National Drug Control Policy, identified the prevention of drugged driving as a national priority. 3 In addition, a major component of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) strategic initiative to reduce underage drinking and adult problem drinking is to reduce negative consequences, such as injuries resulting from impaired driving. 4 The NSDUH Report is published periodically by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (formerly the Office of Applied Studies), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Additional copies of this report or other reports from the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality are available online: http://oas.samhsa.gov. Citation of the source is appreciated. For questions about this report, please e-mail: shortreports@samhsa.hhs.gov. NSDUH_205

NSDUH REPORT: State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving December 9, 2010 Figure 1. Percentages of Persons Aged 16 or Older Driving under the Influence of Alcohol in the Past Year, by State: 2006 to 2009 Percentages of Persons 17.0 23.7 14.7 16.9 12.6 14.5 10.5 12.5 7.4 10.4 Source: 2006 to 2009 SAMHSA National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs). The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) asks persons aged 12 or older if they had driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or under the influence of illicit drugs in the past year. NSDUH defines illicit drugs as marijuana/hashish, cocaine (including crack), inhalants, hallucinogens, heroin, or prescription-type drugs used nonmedically. 5 This issue of The NSDUH Report uses combined 2006 to 2009 data to present estimates of driving under the influence of alcohol (also referred to as drunk driving ) and driving under the influence of illicit drugs (also referred to as drugged driving ) among persons aged 16 or older by State (including the District of Columbia). 6 State estimates are rank ordered from highest to lowest and divided into quintiles (fifths), which are presented in color-coded maps shown in Figures 1 and 2. States with the highest estimates fall into the top quintile and are shown in red on the maps; States with the lowest estimates are in the bottom quintile and are shown in blue. 7 Additionally, the combined 2006 to 2009 data are compared with the combined 2002 to 2005 data to examine changes over time. Driving under the Influence of Alcohol Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that 13.2 percent of persons aged 16 or older (an estimated 30.6 million persons) drove under the influence of alcohol in the past year. The rates of drunk driving were among the highest in Wisconsin (23.7 percent) and North Dakota (22.4 percent) and among the lowest in Utah (7.4 percent) and Mississippi (8.7 percent) (Figure 1). Of the 10 States with the highest rates of drunk driving, 5 were in the Midwest (Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin), 3 were in the Northeast (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island), and 2 were in the West (Montana and Wyoming). Of the 9 States with the lowest rates of drunk driving, 4 were in the South (Alabama, Kentucky, Page 2

December 9, 2010 NSDUH REPORT: State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving Table 1. Driving under the Influence of Alcohol in the Past Year among Persons Aged 16 or Older for the Total Population and States with Significant Reductions: 2002 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2009 State Combined 2002 to 2005 Combined 2006 to 2009 Total United States 14.6 13.2 Alaska 14.8 11.1 Florida 13.7 10.9 Idaho 14.5 10.3 Illinois 16.1 14.7 Maryland 14.9 10.7 Michigan 18.7 15.9 Mississippi 11.4 8.7 Missouri 18.6 14.8 New Mexico 13.9 10.4 Pennsylvania 14.4 11.8 Texas 15.4 13.9 Washington 15.3 12.1 Source: 2002 to 2009 SAMHSA National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs). Mississippi, and West Virginia), 3 were in the West (Idaho, New Mexico, and Utah), and 2 were in the Northeast (New Jersey and New York). 8 Rates of past year drunk driving were higher among persons aged 16 to 25 than among those aged 26 or older (19.5 vs. 11.8 percent). Trends in Driving under the Influence of Alcohol When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced a statistically significant reduction in the rate of past year drunk driving (from 14.6 to 13.2 percent), as did 12 States: Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington (Table 1). No States had a statistically significant increase in the rate of drunk driving. Reductions in past year rates of drunk driving were found both among persons aged 16 to 25 (22.2 to 19.5 percent) and among persons aged 26 or older (12.9 to 11.8 percent). Driving under the Influence of Alcohol in Combination with Illicit Drugs Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that one fifth of drunk drivers aged 16 or older (21.9 percent) drove under the influence of alcohol and illicit drugs at the same time; the rate was higher for drunk drivers aged 16 to 25 than for those aged 26 or older (38.7 vs. 15.8 percent). Comparisons of combined 2002 to 2005 data with combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that similar percentages of drunk drivers in both time periods drove under the influence of illicit drugs and alcohol at the same time, overall and for both age groups. Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that 4.3 percent of persons aged 16 or older (an estimated 10.1 million persons) drove under the influence of illicit drugs in the past year. The rates of drugged driving were among the highest in Rhode Island (7.8 percent) and Vermont (6.6 Page 3

NSDUH REPORT: State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving December 9, 2010 Figure 2. Percentages of Persons Aged 16 or Older Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs in the Past Year, by State: 2006 to 2009 Percentages of Persons 5.4 7.8 4.8 5.2 4.3 4.7 3.8 4.2 2.9 3.7 Source: 2006 to 2009 SAMHSA National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs). percent) and among the lowest in Iowa (2.9 percent) and New Jersey (3.2 percent) (Figure 2). Of the 10 States with the highest rates of drugged driving, 4 were in the Northeast (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont), 3 were in the West (Colorado, Montana, and Oregon), and 3 were in the South (Arkansas, Delaware, and Oklahoma). Of the 10 States with the lowest rates of drugged driving, 4 were in the South (Alabama, Maryland, Mississippi, and Texas), 3 were in the Northeast (New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania), 2 were in the Midwest (Iowa and South Dakota), and 1 was in the West (Utah). Rates of past year drugged driving were about 4 times higher among persons aged 16 to 25 than among those aged 26 or older (11.4 vs. 2.8 percent). Trends in Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced a statistically significant reduction in the rate of past year drugged driving (from 4.8 to 4.3 percent), as did seven States: Alaska, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (Table 2). No States had a statistically significant increase in the rate of drugged driving. Reductions in past year rates of drugged driving were found both among persons aged 16 to 25 (12.9 to 11.4 percent) and among persons aged 26 or older (3.0 to 2.8 percent). Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs in Combination with Alcohol Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that two thirds of drugged drivers aged 16 or older (66.3 percent) drove under the influence of illicit drugs and alcohol at the same time; the rate was similar for drugged drivers aged 16 to 25 and those aged 26 or older (65.8 and 66.7 percent, respectively). Comparisons of combined 2002 to 2005 data with combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate Page 4

December 9, 2010 NSDUH REPORT: State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving Table 2. Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs in the Past Year among Persons Aged 16 or Older for the Total Population and States with Significant Reductions: 2002 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2009 State Combined 2002 to 2005 Combined 2006 to 2009 Total United States 4.8 4.3 Alaska 6.8 4.3 California 5.1 4.4 Florida 4.9 4.2 Hawaii 6.3 3.9 Iowa 4.9 2.9 Michigan 6.0 5.1 Pennsylvania 4.5 3.5 Source: 2002 to 2009 SAMHSA National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs). that similar percentages of drugged drivers drove under the influence of illicit drugs and alcohol at the same time, overall and for both age groups. Discussion The Nation as a whole has seen reductions in the rates of drunk driving and drugged driving in recent years; however, each of these behaviors remains a serious problem in the United States. Although there is wide variation in the rates of impaired driving among States, no State is immune from this problem. The prevalence of impaired driving, particularly among persons aged 16 to 25, points to the need for continued prevention efforts, such as media campaigns, responsible alcohol sales and service training, sobriety checkpoints, and substance abuse assessment and treatment for those convicted of impaired driving, 9 to reduce the incidence of impaired driving and the harm it poses. End Notes 1 Kelly, E., Darke, S., & Ross, J. (2004). A review of drug use and driving: Epidemiology, impairment, risk factors and risk perceptions. Drug and Alcohol Review, 23, 319-344. 2 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2009). Traffic safety facts, 2008 data: Alcohol-impaired driving (DOT HS 811 155). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. [Available as a PDF at http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pubs/811155.pdf] 3 Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2010). National drug control strategy. Washington, DC: The White House. [Available as a PDF at http://www. whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/policy/ndcs10/ndcs2010.pdf] 4 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010, October 1). Leading change: A plan for SAMHSA s roles and actions 2011-2014. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Available as a PDF at http://www.samhsa.gov/about/sidocs/samhsa_si_paper.pdf] 5 NSDUH defines nonmedical use of prescription-type drugs as use not prescribed for the respondent by a physician or used only for the experience or feeling the drug(s) caused. Nonmedical use of any prescription-type pain reliever, sedative, stimulant, or tranquilizer does not include over-the-counter drugs; nonmedical use of stimulants includes methamphetamines. 6 This report uses State estimates based solely on the weighted sample for each State and the District of Columbia (e.g., direct State estimates) and does not use the small area estimation (SAE) methodology. Therefore, this report s estimates should not be compared with the estimates in any previous NSDUH reports that use the SAE methodology. 7 Estimates were divided into quintiles for ease of presentation and discussion, but differences between States and quintiles were not tested for statistical significance. In some instances, more than 10 or fewer than 10 States were assigned to each quintile because of ties in the estimated prevalence rates. 8 The West has 13 States: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, and WY. The South has 16 States plus the District of Columbia: AL, AR, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, and WV. The Northeast has 9 States: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT. The Midwest has 12 States: IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, and WI. 9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2010, July 30). Impaired driving. Retrieved November 10, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/ impaired-drv_factsheet.html Suggested Citation Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (December 9, 2010). The NSDUH Report: State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving. Rockville, MD. Page 5

Presorted First Class U.S. Postage Paid Capitol Heights, MD Permit #4416 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 For change of address, corrections, or to be removed from this list, please e-mail: shortreports@samhsa.hhs.gov. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1044 Rockville, MD 20857 For change of address, corrections, or to be removed from this list, please e-mail: shortreports@samhsa.hhs.gov. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Findings from the SAMHSA 2002 to 2009 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUHs) State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving Combined 2006 to 2009 data indicate that 13.2 percent of persons aged 16 or older (an estimated 30.6 million persons) drove under the influence of alcohol in the past year and 4.3 percent (an estimated 10.1 million persons) drove under the influence of illicit drugs in the same time period The rates of past year drunk driving were among the highest in Wisconsin (23.7 percent) and North Dakota (22.4 percent); the rates of drugged driving were among the highest in Rhode Island (7.8 percent) and Vermont (6.6 percent) When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced statistically significant reductions in the rates of drunk driving (from 14.6 to 13.2 percent) and drugged driving (from 4.8 to 4.3 percent); 12 States saw reductions in drunk driving rates, and 7 saw reductions in drugged driving rates The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) is an annual survey sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The combined 2002 to 2005 data used in this report are based on information obtained from 210,286 persons aged 16 or older, and the combined 2006 to 2009 data are based on information obtained from 213,350 persons aged 16 or older. The survey collects data by administering questionnaires to a representative sample of the population through face-toface interviews at their place of residence. The NSDUH Report is prepared by the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (CBHSQ), SAMHSA, and by RTI International in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. (RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.) Information on the most recent NSDUH is available in the following two-volume publication: Office of Applied Studies. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of national findings (HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4586Findings, NSDUH Series H-38A). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied Studies. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume II. Technical appendices and selected prevalence tables (HHS Publication No. SMA 10-4586Appendices, NSDUH Series H-38B). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Also available online: http://oas.samhsa.gov. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality www.samhsa.gov