ADULT PROBATION OFFICER TRAINING STANDARDS



Similar documents
Appendix A JUDICIAL BRANCH EDUCATION STANDARDS

DUI DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

RICHLAND COUNTY DRUG COURT

SENATE BILL 698. By Stevens. WHEREAS, pursuant to language proposed to be added to Article VI, Section 3 of the

Probation and Parole Officers Social Work Qualifications and Training in Evidence-Based Practices July 2014

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Alyce Griffin Clarke Drug Court Act.

O H I O DRUG COURT EVALUATION

A Fiscal Analysis of Issue 1 The Ohio Drug Treatment Initiative

KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

Community Supervision in Texas

DATE COURSE FOR LOCATION. 5 Tue Probation Officer Training Program: Introduction to Probation Officers Dayton Assessment & Case Planning (013)

CURRICULUM VITAE. Lauren M. Block

ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2003 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 2605

64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE

SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS

YORK COUNTY TREATMENT COURTS COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

c*ttprrme Tourt OMlin

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION REPORT September 8, 2005

Lassen Community College Course Outline

Preble County Board of Developmental Disabilities. Board Approved: November 17, 2008 Revised: 02/10/2015 Section: 1.0 Page 1 of 9

STATE OF OHIO. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION RELATED ACA STANDARDS: EFFECTIVE DATE: AND CORRECTION February 19, 2011 I. AUTHORITY

CJ-310 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief David L. Perry

CRIM 200: Introduction to Criminal Justice

Myths about Criminal Justice 17 Summary 18 Key Terms 19 Review Questions 19 In the Field 20 On the Net 20 Critical Thinking Exercises 20

court. However, without your testimony the defendant might go unpunished.

Integrated Treatment Court

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

VETERANS TREATMENT COURTS BEST PRACTICE ELEMENTS

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE January 18, Opinion No.

OFFICE OF COURT MANAGEMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT

WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT

Michigan DUI Courts Outcome Evaluation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction... 1 Legislative History... 2 History of Correctional Regulations by Category:

Licking County Adult Court Services Department Annual Report. Kelly C. Miller MS Chief Probation Officer/Director

2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION

STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION

Orange County, Texas Adult Criminal Justice Data Sheet

How To Participate In A Drug Court

COURSE SCHEDULE. The Judicial College Online self-study courses are available by visiting the direct link below. DATE COURSE FOR LOCATION

JUVENILE DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

TRAVIS COUNTY DWI COURT JUDGE ELISABETH EARLE, PRESIDING

Reform of the Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Impact on Criminal Justice

Resume. Michael E. Martinez 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway Colorado Springs, Colorado University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado

Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services

Placer County Criminal Justice Policy Committee Criminal Justice Master Planning Project Objectives and Recommendations FINAL - February 10, 2015

COPE Collaborative Opportunities for Positive Experiences

Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law)

2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill:

ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS

Filing Fee $ Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record

LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT

SPECIAL OPTIONS SERVICES PROGRAM UNITED STATES PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015

MENTAL HEALTH COURTS FAD OR FUTURE?

CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM OUTCOMES FALL 2010 TO SPRING 2011

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STRATEGIC PLAN

In many jurisdictions, state and local government

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA/PI-CIR

Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals Appointment of Counsel... 4

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION I. AUTHORITY

STANDARDS FOR ATTORNEY CERTIFICATION OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. The Standards for Attorney Certification are divided into two parts.

How To Fund A Mental Health Court

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

CTAG INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE

I. Heading and Proposal Number CJUS

Campaign for Justice 403 Seymour, Suite 201 Lansing, MI

FAMILY DRUG COURT PROGRAM

Advocates Role in the Criminal Justice System ~~~~~ Presented by: Sandi Matheson

FACT SHEET. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System. Christopher Hartney

Chapter 3. Justice Process at the County Level. Brooks County Courthouse

PRE-GRADUATION JUDICIAL INTERNSHIPS

[As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole] SENATE BILL No By Joint Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice Oversight 1-11

Transcription:

ADULT PROBATION OFFICER TRAINING STANDARDS 2012/2013 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June 2011, the 129 th General Assembly of the State of Ohio passed House Bill 86 to reduce the cost of corrections while maintaining and enhancing public safety. HB 86 included provisions to develop minimum standards for the training of adult probation officers. Research indicates that standardization of training leads to greater professionalism and coordination among officers and between departments. Furthermore, states that implement training standards for probation officers demonstrate consistency in reducing recidivism and increasing public safety. The adult parole authority of the department of rehabilitation and correction shall develop minimum standards for the training of probation officers as provided by section 2301.27 of the Revised Code. The adult parole authority shall consult and collaborate with the Supreme Court (of Ohio) in developing the standards (O.R.C. 2301.217(A)). The standards are designed as minimum training standards for adult probation departments serving every municipal court, county court, and court of common pleas and all Department of Rehabilitation and Correction parole officers. The standards are intended to complement other existing standards (e.g., American Correctional Association standards) and not intended to replace local training requirements and experiential learning acquired through on the job training. The standards are divided into two distinct areas: requirements for newly hired probation officers and continuing education for probation officers. Newly hired officers are required to complete a specific catalog of training. This training catalog is rooted in three areas, Criminal Justice System and the Court, Fundamentals of the Probation Profession, and Evidence Based Practices, to provide a broad foundation of knowledge. The continuing education standard was developed because a skilled workforce with knowledge of current practices is vital to public safety. However, due to the range of duties and caseload types of probation officers throughout the state, the specific topics for continuing education/training will not be prescribed allowing each probation department to determine the required on going education for their workforce. While the specific topics are not prescribed, the minimum number of hours of continuing education for probation officers has been set to coincide with the minimum number of annual training hours for Judges. 2

ADULT PROBATION OFFICER TRAINING STANDARDS New Probation Officer Standard: Adult probation officers hired on or after January 1, 2014, shall, within 12 months of their hire date, complete all courses in the new probation officer training catalog, as developed by the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction s Adult Parole Authority in consultation with the Supreme Court of Ohio. Probation Officer Continuing Education Standard: Beginning January 1, 2013 all probation officers shall annually obtain a minimum of 20 hours of continuing education. The continuing education topics shall be relevant to the specific duties of the probation officer. The Ohio Probation Officer Training Standards were crafted from a committee composed of representatives from the Supreme Court of Ohio, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction including the Adult Parole Authority, the Ohio Chief Probation Officers Association including probation chiefs representing urban and rural common pleas, municipal and county courts. The following individuals were members of the 2011 2012 Ohio Adult Probation Officer Training Committee: Alice Barr Scott Beaver Craig Berry Holley Bossell Jo Ellen Cline David Diroll Gayle Dittmer Scott Fulton Christopher Galli Michael Jackson Dave Leitenberger Melissa Litteral Angela Mustard Milton Nuzum, III Jennifer Pealer Dan Peterca Tracy Reveal Mike Smith Kristopher Steele Juli Tice Christy Tull Libby Whitt Roger Wilson Adult Parole Authority DRC Fairfield County Municipal Probation Department Lake County Probation Department Bureau of Community Sanctions DRC Supreme Court of Ohio Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission Franklin County Probation Department Newark Municipal Probation Department Bureau of Community Sanctions DRC Adult Parole Authority DRC Richland County Probation Department Greene County Probation Department City of Mason Municipal Court Judicial College of the Supreme Court of Ohio Council of State Governments Cuyahoga County Probation Department Corrections Training Academy DRC Gallia Municipal Probation Department Judicial College of the Supreme Court of Ohio East Liverpool Municipal Probation Department Judicial College of the Supreme Court of Ohio Wilmington Municipal Probation Department Adult Parole Authority DRC 3

PROCEDURES I. Employee Training a. New Employee Training i. Adult probation officers hired on or after January 1, 2014 shall, within 12 months of hire, complete all courses in the new probation officer training catalog as developed by the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction s Adult Parole Authority in consultation with the Supreme Court of Ohio. ii. Previously hired probation officers who are rehired within 12 months of the date of separation may be given credit for topics previously completed. iii. Local probation departments shall have discretion in requiring the completion of the new probation officer training catalog for those newly hired probation officers who transfer from other probation departments and have already completed the courses. b. Continuing Education i. Beginning January 1, 2013 all probation officers shall annually obtain a minimum of 20 hours of continuing education. The continuing education topics shall be relevant to the specific duties of the probation officer. Education topics may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The criminal justice system and courts 2. Functions/operations/practices of probation officers 3. Evidence based practices for risk reduction ii. Continuing education activities may consist of but are not limited to structured programs, classroom based training/conferences, or computer based instruction, audio visual, and/or multimedia aids. c. Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) Training i. Any adult probation officer whose duties require the completion of an offender risk assessment instrument must enroll in and complete ORAS training and certification as required by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. ii. Newly hired adult probation officers whose duties require the completion of an offender risk assessment must complete the ORAS training and certification within 12 months of initial employment. II. Evaluation a. All new probation officer training courses shall have a course design that integrates a training evaluation that measures acquired knowledge related to the content. b. To successfully complete the courses within the new probation officer training catalog, each participant shall be required to pass a course examination with a score of 80 percent. 4

c. A newly hired probation officer may request to test out of certain courses of the new probation officer training catalog. To successfully test out of a course, the participant must pass the test out examination with a score of 90 percent. III. IV. Tracking of Training a. Learning Management System i. The attendance and completion of all courses within the new probation officer training catalog shall be documented within the learning management system (LMS) hosted by the Judicial College of the Supreme Court of Ohio. ii. The electronic certificate of completion for each course shall be printed and retained in each probation officer s personnel file located within the local probation department. b. Continuing Education i. Each local probation department shall be responsible for tracking the on going annual training requirements for each adult probation officer. ii. Documentation for training and professional development attended by adult probation officers shall include topic of course, dates attended and training credit hours. iii. Continuing education documentation shall be maintained within each adult probation officer s employee file. Oversight and Sustainability a. Adult Probation Officer Training Standards Committee i. The adult probation officer training standards committee shall consist of eleven members. a. Two members shall be appointed by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, one of whom shall be an employee of the Adult Parole Authority. b. Two members shall be appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, one of whom shall be a Judicial College staff member. c. One member shall be appointed by the President of the Ohio Common Pleas Judges Association. d. One member shall be appointed by the President of the Association of Municipal/County Court Judges of Ohio. e. Five members shall be appointed by the Ohio Chief Probation Officers Association as follows: 1. one representative of an urban court of common pleas; 2. one representative of an urban municipal court; 3. one representative of a rural court of common pleas; 5

4. one representative of a rural municipal court; 5. one representative of a rural county court. ii. Members of the Committee shall serve three year terms beginning on the first day of January. Members shall be eligible for reappointment. Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as original appointments. A member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which his or her predecessor was appointed shall hold office for the remainder of the term. iii. Initial appointments shall be made as follows: a. The Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections representative, the Supreme Court of Ohio representative, the judge appointed by the President of the Common Pleas Judges Association, the representative of an urban court of common pleas, the representative of the rural court of common pleas, and the representative of a rural municipal court shall be appointed to a term ending December 31, 2015. b. The employee of the Adult Parole Authority, the Judicial College of the Supreme Court of Ohio staff member, the judge appointed by the President of the Association of the Municipal/Court Judges of Ohio, the representative of the urban municipal court and the representative of the rural county court shall be appointed to an initial term ending December 31, 2016. iv. The Committee shall meet at least two times each calendar year. b. Annual Training Review i. The Adult Probation Officer Training Standards Committee shall annually review the curriculum and training standards and solicit input directly from adult probation officers to identify skill development needs and training gaps. ii. Results of the review shall be reported annually during the Ohio Chief Probation Officer Association conference. 6

New Probation Officer Training Catalog 1-2014 The Ohio Criminal Justice System & The Court Probation Officer Basic Practices Orientation to Evidence Based Practices The Ohio Court System The Ohio Criminal Justice System and Its Partners Professional Communication: Oral and Written Communication Skills The Basics of Officer Safety The Principles of Effective Interventions Risk Assessment Basics The Authority of Probation Officers and their Role within the Court Probation Officer Ethics Courtroom Presentation Basics Electronic Offender Information Systems Introduction to Assessment and Case Planning Introduction to Cognitive Behavioral Interventions Drug Identification and Testing Search and Seizure for Probation Introduction to Motivational Interviewing Introduction to Offender Skill Building Online Modules (On Demand) 12 In Person Regional Delivery 6 Special Populations Introduction to Offender Behavior Management 7